{"title":"Perceptions of psychological safety in healthcare professionals’ online learner-learner interactions","authors":"Janna Knickerbocker, Andrew A. Tawfik","doi":"10.1007/s12528-024-09401-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Research in computer-supported collaborative learning has explored various ways to support learner-learner interaction as healthcare professionals engage in online formats. While studies have explored various socio-emotional learning outcomes, learners’ psychological safety has yet to be explored as healthcare professionals engage in collaborative problem-solving. To address this gap, the qualitative study employed semi-structured interviews to understand occupational therapy students’ (<i>N</i> = 10) perceptions of psychological safety as they engaged in an online learning class. The resulting themes of this study described the feelings associated with different forms of interactions requiring psychological safety: (a) being vulnerable, (b) fear of being misunderstood, (c) need to protect/protection, and (d) group cohesion. The findings have implications for online learner-learner interactions and computer-supported collaborative learning. For example, learners discussed how the perceived permanence of online learning lead to a sense of self-preservation and reticence to discuss the ill-structured and potentially controversial nature of complex problems. Additional aspects of psychological safety in online learning highlighted the importance of shared experiences, learning from failure, and community building.</p>","PeriodicalId":15404,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Computing in Higher Education","volume":"2013 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Computing in Higher Education","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12528-024-09401-9","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Research in computer-supported collaborative learning has explored various ways to support learner-learner interaction as healthcare professionals engage in online formats. While studies have explored various socio-emotional learning outcomes, learners’ psychological safety has yet to be explored as healthcare professionals engage in collaborative problem-solving. To address this gap, the qualitative study employed semi-structured interviews to understand occupational therapy students’ (N = 10) perceptions of psychological safety as they engaged in an online learning class. The resulting themes of this study described the feelings associated with different forms of interactions requiring psychological safety: (a) being vulnerable, (b) fear of being misunderstood, (c) need to protect/protection, and (d) group cohesion. The findings have implications for online learner-learner interactions and computer-supported collaborative learning. For example, learners discussed how the perceived permanence of online learning lead to a sense of self-preservation and reticence to discuss the ill-structured and potentially controversial nature of complex problems. Additional aspects of psychological safety in online learning highlighted the importance of shared experiences, learning from failure, and community building.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Computing in Higher Education (JCHE) contributes to our understanding of the design, development, and implementation of instructional processes and technologies in higher education. JCHE publishes original research, literature reviews, implementation and evaluation studies, and theoretical, conceptual, and policy papers that provide perspectives on instructional technology’s role in improving access, affordability, and outcomes of postsecondary education. Priority is given to well-documented original papers that demonstrate a strong grounding in learning theory and/or rigorous educational research design.