AAC Business as Usual: Clinical Practice of School-Based Speech-Language Pathologists

IF 0.7 4区 医学 Q4 REHABILITATION Communication Disorders Quarterly Pub Date : 2024-05-06 DOI:10.1177/15257401241248605
Kris L. Brock, Erica LaBranch, Alycia Cummings, Diane Ogiela, Cathy Binger
{"title":"AAC Business as Usual: Clinical Practice of School-Based Speech-Language Pathologists","authors":"Kris L. Brock, Erica LaBranch, Alycia Cummings, Diane Ogiela, Cathy Binger","doi":"10.1177/15257401241248605","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"School speech-language pathologists (SLPs; n = 233), via survey, provided the following business-as-usual (BAU) augmentative and alternative communication (AAC) practices: (a) service delivery models, (b) treatment intensity, (c) the number of aided models provided, and (d) caseload size and knowledge. In addition to descriptive analyses, logistic regressions determined if caseload predicted the most frequently used BAU practices. Group pull-out with two, 30-minute sessions per week was used most frequently. Most SLPs provided fewer than 20 aided models per 15-minute period. Logistic regressions revealed that SLPs with larger caseloads did not utilize the group pull-out model as frequently as SLPs with smaller caseloads. As caseload size increased, SLPs were more likely to use classroom-based services. Finally, only SLPs with large caseloads were considered high-frequency modelers. Overall, this survey provides clinicians with a starting point to enhance clinical decisions until additional BAU quantitative research is conducted with children who use AAC systems.","PeriodicalId":46403,"journal":{"name":"Communication Disorders Quarterly","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Communication Disorders Quarterly","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15257401241248605","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

School speech-language pathologists (SLPs; n = 233), via survey, provided the following business-as-usual (BAU) augmentative and alternative communication (AAC) practices: (a) service delivery models, (b) treatment intensity, (c) the number of aided models provided, and (d) caseload size and knowledge. In addition to descriptive analyses, logistic regressions determined if caseload predicted the most frequently used BAU practices. Group pull-out with two, 30-minute sessions per week was used most frequently. Most SLPs provided fewer than 20 aided models per 15-minute period. Logistic regressions revealed that SLPs with larger caseloads did not utilize the group pull-out model as frequently as SLPs with smaller caseloads. As caseload size increased, SLPs were more likely to use classroom-based services. Finally, only SLPs with large caseloads were considered high-frequency modelers. Overall, this survey provides clinicians with a starting point to enhance clinical decisions until additional BAU quantitative research is conducted with children who use AAC systems.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
AAC 一切照旧:校本言语治疗师的临床实践
学校言语病理学家(SLPs;n = 233)通过调查提供了以下 "一切照旧"(BAU)的辅助和替代性交流(AAC)实践:(a)服务提供模式,(b)治疗强度,(c)提供的辅助模式数量,以及(d)案例数量和知识。除描述性分析外,逻辑回归还确定了案例数量是否能预测最常用的 BAU 实践。使用最频繁的是每周两次、每次 30 分钟的小组抽离式治疗。大多数 SLP 每 15 分钟提供的辅助模型少于 20 个。逻辑回归结果表明,工作量较大的辅助语言治疗师使用小组拉动模式的频率不如工作量较小的辅助语言治疗师。随着工作量的增加,SLPs 更倾向于使用基于课堂的服务。最后,只有工作量大的 SLPs 才被认为是高频模式使用者。总之,这项调查为临床医生提供了一个起点,在对使用 AAC 系统的儿童进行更多 BAU 定量研究之前,可以帮助他们做出更好的临床决策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
27
期刊介绍: Articles for Communication Disorders Quarterly (CDQ) are accepted for review on a continual basis. The editor of CDQ welcomes submissions of previously unpublished applied and clinical research relating to typical and atypical communication across the lifespan. This includes assessment of and interventions for communicative disorders in infants, toddlers, young children, school-age children, youth, and adults. The readers of CDQ represent a breadth of viewpoints and professional interests, which is also reflected in the diversity of interests and expertise of the editorial board members. The journal is particularly of interest to speech–language pathologists and teachers of the deaf and hard of hearing. CDQ uses a masked peer review process for submissions.
期刊最新文献
Strategies Used by University Students With Dyslexia: A Narrative Review Speech Rate of Children With Developmental Language Disorder in a Narrative Context Effect of ‘Be Clear’ Treatment on Intelligibility in Adults with Post-Stroke Dysarthria: Acoustic-Perceptual Consequences Plasma Levels of Thiamine and Histamine in Childhood-Onset Stuttering AAC Business as Usual: Clinical Practice of School-Based Speech-Language Pathologists
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1