Pharmaceutical innovation and its crisis: drug markets, screening, and the dialectics of value

IF 1.3 4区 医学 Q4 SOCIAL SCIENCES, BIOMEDICAL Biosocieties Pub Date : 2021-06-12 DOI:10.1057/s41292-021-00235-7
Jean-Paul Gaudilliere
{"title":"Pharmaceutical innovation and its crisis: drug markets, screening, and the dialectics of value","authors":"Jean-Paul Gaudilliere","doi":"10.1057/s41292-021-00235-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This article explores recent debates on innovation in the drug sector, focusing on the ways in which the articulation of use value and exchange value operates in the hegemonic—Northern—form of pharmaceutical capitalism. Taking the category ‘crisis of innovation’ as an entry point and engaging with the economics literature in which it has been discussed for nearly twenty years, this paper uses the vast historiography of post-WWII pharmacy to propose a critical historical understanding of the crisis. It argues that the features to which the crisis discourses point originate in the long-term contradictions between use value and exchange that affect the dominant regime of pharmaceutical innovation, i.e., <i>the screening regime</i> of research and development. These tensions have accumulated over the past two decades and become more visible, leading to a new reading of the present turn toward bio-capital, i.e., toward biotechnology and a more speculative (financial) economy of pharmacy. The last section of the paper discusses the theoretical implications of this hypothesis.</p>","PeriodicalId":46976,"journal":{"name":"Biosocieties","volume":"21 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biosocieties","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1057/s41292-021-00235-7","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SOCIAL SCIENCES, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article explores recent debates on innovation in the drug sector, focusing on the ways in which the articulation of use value and exchange value operates in the hegemonic—Northern—form of pharmaceutical capitalism. Taking the category ‘crisis of innovation’ as an entry point and engaging with the economics literature in which it has been discussed for nearly twenty years, this paper uses the vast historiography of post-WWII pharmacy to propose a critical historical understanding of the crisis. It argues that the features to which the crisis discourses point originate in the long-term contradictions between use value and exchange that affect the dominant regime of pharmaceutical innovation, i.e., the screening regime of research and development. These tensions have accumulated over the past two decades and become more visible, leading to a new reading of the present turn toward bio-capital, i.e., toward biotechnology and a more speculative (financial) economy of pharmacy. The last section of the paper discusses the theoretical implications of this hypothesis.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
医药创新及其危机:药品市场、筛选和价值辩证法
本文探讨了近期有关药品行业创新的争论,重点关注使用价值和交换价值在北方霸权形式的医药资本主义中的运作方式。本文以 "创新危机 "这一范畴为切入点,结合近二十年来对其进行讨论的经济学文献,利用二战后庞大的药学史料,提出了对这一危机的批判性历史理解。本文认为,危机论述所指向的特征源于使用价值与交换之间的长期矛盾,这种矛盾影响了医药创新的主导制度,即研究与开发的筛选制度。这些矛盾在过去二十年中不断累积,并变得更加明显,从而导致了对当前转向生物资本(即转向生物技术和更具投机性的(金融)制药经济)的新解读。本文最后一部分讨论了这一假设的理论意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Biosocieties
Biosocieties SOCIAL SCIENCES, BIOMEDICAL-
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
6.20%
发文量
23
期刊介绍: BioSocieties is committed to the scholarly exploration of the crucial social, ethical and policy implications of developments in the life sciences and biomedicine. These developments are increasing our ability to control our own biology; enabling us to create novel life forms; changing our ideas of ‘normality’ and ‘abnormality’; transforming our understanding of personal identity, family relations, ancestry and ‘race’; altering our social and personal expectations and responsibilities; reshaping global economic opportunities and inequalities; creating new global security challenges; and generating new social, ethical, legal and regulatory dilemmas. To address these dilemmas requires us to break out from narrow disciplinary boundaries within the social sciences and humanities, and between these disciplines and the natural sciences, and to develop new ways of thinking about the relations between biology and sociality and between the life sciences and society. BioSocieties provides a crucial forum where the most rigorous social research and critical analysis of these issues can intersect with the work of leading scientists, social researchers, clinicians, regulators and other stakeholders. BioSocieties defines the key intellectual issues at the science-society interface, and offers pathways to the resolution of the critical local, national and global socio-political challenges that arise from scientific and biomedical advances. As the first journal of its kind, BioSocieties publishes scholarship across the social science disciplines, and represents a lively and balanced array of perspectives on controversial issues. In its inaugural year BioSocieties demonstrated the constructive potential of interdisciplinary dialogue and debate across the social and natural sciences. We are becoming the journal of choice not only for social scientists, but also for life scientists interested in the larger social, ethical and policy implications of their work. The journal is international in scope, spanning research and developments in all corners of the globe. BioSocieties is published quarterly, with occasional themed issues that highlight some of the critical questions and problematics of modern biotechnologies. Articles, response pieces, review essays, and self-standing editorial pieces by social and life scientists form a regular part of the journal.
期刊最新文献
‘Our biology is listening’: biomarkers as molecular vestiges of early life and the production of positive childhood experiences in behavioral epigenetics Anticipating and suspending: the chronopolitics of cryopreservation From brain “scar” to “bat shit crazy”: negotiating the madness of sexual violence discourse What is the cure for absolute infertility? Biomedicalisation and routinisation of surrogacy and uterus transplantation in Nordic medical journals The politics of suspension suspended: the curious case of a cryopreserved cell product
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1