Analgesic benefits of regional anesthesia in the perioperative management of transition-related surgery: a systematic review

Glen Katsnelson, Connor T A Brenna, Laura Girón-Arango, Yasmeen M Abdallah, Richard Brull
{"title":"Analgesic benefits of regional anesthesia in the perioperative management of transition-related surgery: a systematic review","authors":"Glen Katsnelson, Connor T A Brenna, Laura Girón-Arango, Yasmeen M Abdallah, Richard Brull","doi":"10.1136/rapm-2024-105479","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction Transition-related surgery is an effective treatment for gender dysphoria, but the perioperative analgesic management of transgender patients is nuanced and potentially complicated by higher rates of mood and substance use disorders. Regional anesthetic techniques are known to reduce pain severity and opioid requirements; however, little is known regarding the relative analgesic effectiveness of regional anesthesia for transgender patients undergoing transition-related surgery. Methods We performed a systematic review of the literature to evaluate original reports characterizing the analgesic effectiveness of regional anesthetic techniques for patients undergoing chest and/or genital transition-related surgery. Our primary outcomes were pain severity and opioid requirements on the first postoperative day. Results Of the 1863 records identified, 10 met criteria for inclusion and narrative synthesis. These included two randomized controlled trials, three cohort studies, and five case reports/series, comprising 293 patients. Four reports described 243 patients undergoing chest surgery, of whom 86% were transgender men undergoing mastectomy with pectoralis nerve blocks or local anesthetic instillation devices. The remaining six reports comprised 50 patients undergoing genital surgery, of whom 56% were transgender women undergoing vaginoplasty with erector spinae plane blocks or epidural anesthesia. Three studies directly compared regional techniques to parenteral analgesia alone. Two of these studies reported lower pain scores and opioid requirements on the first postoperative day with nerve blocks compared with none while the third study reported no difference between groups. Complications related to regional anesthetic techniques were rare among patients undergoing transition-related surgery. Discussion Despite the ever-growing demand for transition-related surgery, the relative analgesic effectiveness of regional anesthesia for transgender patients undergoing transition-related surgery is very understudied and insufficient to guide clinical practice. Our systematic review of the literature serves to underscore regional anesthesia for transition-related surgery as a priority area for future research.","PeriodicalId":21046,"journal":{"name":"Regional Anesthesia & Pain Medicine","volume":"16 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Regional Anesthesia & Pain Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/rapm-2024-105479","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction Transition-related surgery is an effective treatment for gender dysphoria, but the perioperative analgesic management of transgender patients is nuanced and potentially complicated by higher rates of mood and substance use disorders. Regional anesthetic techniques are known to reduce pain severity and opioid requirements; however, little is known regarding the relative analgesic effectiveness of regional anesthesia for transgender patients undergoing transition-related surgery. Methods We performed a systematic review of the literature to evaluate original reports characterizing the analgesic effectiveness of regional anesthetic techniques for patients undergoing chest and/or genital transition-related surgery. Our primary outcomes were pain severity and opioid requirements on the first postoperative day. Results Of the 1863 records identified, 10 met criteria for inclusion and narrative synthesis. These included two randomized controlled trials, three cohort studies, and five case reports/series, comprising 293 patients. Four reports described 243 patients undergoing chest surgery, of whom 86% were transgender men undergoing mastectomy with pectoralis nerve blocks or local anesthetic instillation devices. The remaining six reports comprised 50 patients undergoing genital surgery, of whom 56% were transgender women undergoing vaginoplasty with erector spinae plane blocks or epidural anesthesia. Three studies directly compared regional techniques to parenteral analgesia alone. Two of these studies reported lower pain scores and opioid requirements on the first postoperative day with nerve blocks compared with none while the third study reported no difference between groups. Complications related to regional anesthetic techniques were rare among patients undergoing transition-related surgery. Discussion Despite the ever-growing demand for transition-related surgery, the relative analgesic effectiveness of regional anesthesia for transgender patients undergoing transition-related surgery is very understudied and insufficient to guide clinical practice. Our systematic review of the literature serves to underscore regional anesthesia for transition-related surgery as a priority area for future research.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
区域麻醉在过渡相关手术围手术期管理中的镇痛优势:系统性综述
导言:变性相关手术是治疗性别焦虑症的有效方法,但变性患者的围手术期镇痛管理存在细微差别,并可能因较高的情绪障碍和药物使用障碍而变得复杂。众所周知,区域麻醉技术可降低疼痛的严重程度和阿片类药物的需求量;然而,对于接受变性相关手术的变性患者而言,区域麻醉的相对镇痛效果却鲜为人知。方法 我们对文献进行了系统性回顾,评估了有关对接受胸部和/或生殖器变性相关手术的患者采用区域麻醉技术的镇痛效果的原始报告。我们的主要结果是术后第一天的疼痛严重程度和阿片类药物需求量。结果 在确定的 1863 条记录中,有 10 条符合纳入和叙述性综合的标准。其中包括两项随机对照试验、三项队列研究和五项病例报告/系列研究,共涉及 293 名患者。四份报告描述了 243 名接受胸部手术的患者,其中 86% 是接受乳房切除术的变性男性,并使用了胸肌神经阻滞或局部麻醉灌注装置。其余六份报告包括 50 名接受生殖器手术的患者,其中 56% 是接受阴道成形术的变性女性,她们接受了竖脊平面阻滞或硬膜外麻醉。有三项研究直接比较了区域技术和单纯肠外镇痛。其中两项研究报告称,术后第一天使用神经阻滞与不使用神经阻滞相比,疼痛评分和阿片类药物的需求量更低,而第三项研究报告称两组之间没有差异。在接受过渡相关手术的患者中,很少出现与区域麻醉技术相关的并发症。讨论 尽管变性相关手术的需求与日俱增,但对变性患者接受变性相关手术时区域麻醉的相对镇痛效果研究却非常不足,不足以指导临床实践。我们对文献的系统性回顾有助于强调变性相关手术的区域麻醉是未来研究的优先领域。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Optimal techniques of ultrasound-guided superficial and deep parasternal intercostal plane blocks—a cadaveric study Multimodal analgesia and the erector spinae plane block in a rapid recovery pathway after posterior spinal fusion in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a randomized controlled study of practicality In reply: evaluating the efficacy of PENG and SIFICB in hip fracture analgesia – a critical analysis Invited reply letter: optimal techniques of ultrasound-guided superficial and deep parasternal intercostal plane blocks – a cadaveric study Postoperative epidural analgesia and outcomes following pediatric bilateral lung and heart-lung transplantation: a retrospective observational study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1