Balloon venoplasty for right heart catheterization from the arm in patients with subclavian vein stenosis.

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Journal of Invasive Cardiology Pub Date : 2024-09-01 DOI:10.25270/jic/24.00016
Kishor Khanal, Juan A Pastor-Cervantes, Sunay Shah, Jianli Niu, Jonathan Roberts
{"title":"Balloon venoplasty for right heart catheterization from the arm in patients with subclavian vein stenosis.","authors":"Kishor Khanal, Juan A Pastor-Cervantes, Sunay Shah, Jianli Niu, Jonathan Roberts","doi":"10.25270/jic/24.00016","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>In the trans-radial era, arm venous access for right heart catheterization (RHC) is rising. Procedural success is affected by many factors, including subclavian/innominate vein stenosis (SVS) and pre-existing wires or catheters. In a study published previously by the same authors, 2% of cases had unsuccessful RHC through the arm, predominantly due to SVS. Since that study, techniques to improve RHC success rates have been developed, including crossing the stenosis with a coronary guidewire, followed by balloon dilatation. We aimed to determine whether subclavian/innominate venoplasty allows successful RHC in patients with SVS.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Our retrospective study included patients who had RHC from the arm between November 1, 2019, and December 31, 2022 that was unsuccessful due to the inability to pass a catheter through the SVS, and then underwent balloon venoplasty. The success rate of completed RHC was then assessed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Out of 2506 RHCs via arm access, 2488 were successful with a catheter alone or over a guidewire. In 18 patients, venoplasty was needed for catheter passage over a guidewire. Post-dilatation, all 18 cases (100%) had successful RHC with a mean procedural time of 35.2 (SD = 15.5) minutes. The most common stenosis site was the subclavian vein in 13 patients (72.2%), and 12 patients (66.7%) had pacemaker/ implantable cardioverter defibrillator wires present.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Balloon dilatation of SVS is an efficacious method to improve the success rate of RHC from the arm. It is a safe technique that may prevent cross-over to a different access site, thereby improving patient satisfaction and reducing the possibility of alternate site complications.</p>","PeriodicalId":49261,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Invasive Cardiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Invasive Cardiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25270/jic/24.00016","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: In the trans-radial era, arm venous access for right heart catheterization (RHC) is rising. Procedural success is affected by many factors, including subclavian/innominate vein stenosis (SVS) and pre-existing wires or catheters. In a study published previously by the same authors, 2% of cases had unsuccessful RHC through the arm, predominantly due to SVS. Since that study, techniques to improve RHC success rates have been developed, including crossing the stenosis with a coronary guidewire, followed by balloon dilatation. We aimed to determine whether subclavian/innominate venoplasty allows successful RHC in patients with SVS.

Methods: Our retrospective study included patients who had RHC from the arm between November 1, 2019, and December 31, 2022 that was unsuccessful due to the inability to pass a catheter through the SVS, and then underwent balloon venoplasty. The success rate of completed RHC was then assessed.

Results: Out of 2506 RHCs via arm access, 2488 were successful with a catheter alone or over a guidewire. In 18 patients, venoplasty was needed for catheter passage over a guidewire. Post-dilatation, all 18 cases (100%) had successful RHC with a mean procedural time of 35.2 (SD = 15.5) minutes. The most common stenosis site was the subclavian vein in 13 patients (72.2%), and 12 patients (66.7%) had pacemaker/ implantable cardioverter defibrillator wires present.

Conclusions: Balloon dilatation of SVS is an efficacious method to improve the success rate of RHC from the arm. It is a safe technique that may prevent cross-over to a different access site, thereby improving patient satisfaction and reducing the possibility of alternate site complications.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
锁骨下静脉狭窄患者从手臂进行右心导管检查的球囊静脉成形术。
目的:在经桡动脉时代,右心导管检查(RHC)的手臂静脉入路正在增加。手术成功与否受多种因素影响,包括锁骨下静脉/腹股沟静脉狭窄(SVS)和预先存在的导线或导管。在同一作者之前发表的一项研究中,2% 的病例经手臂 RHC 不成功,主要原因是 SVS。自该研究以来,提高 RHC 成功率的技术不断发展,包括用冠状动脉导丝穿过狭窄处,然后进行球囊扩张。我们的目的是确定锁骨下/腹股沟静脉成形术是否能让 SVS 患者成功进行 RHC:我们的回顾性研究纳入了在 2019 年 11 月 1 日至 2022 年 12 月 31 日期间从手臂进行 RHC 的患者,这些患者因导管无法通过 SVS 而未能成功,随后接受了球囊静脉成形术。然后评估完成 RHC 的成功率:结果:在通过手臂入路进行的 2506 例 RHC 中,有 2488 例仅使用导管或通过导丝成功完成。在 18 名患者中,导管通过导丝时需要进行静脉成形术。扩张后,所有 18 例患者(100%)都成功进行了 RHC,平均手术时间为 35.2 分钟(标度 = 15.5)。13例患者(72.2%)最常见的狭窄部位是锁骨下静脉,12例患者(66.7%)存在心脏起搏器/植入式心脏除颤器导线:结论:球囊扩张 SVS 是提高手臂 RHC 成功率的有效方法。它是一种安全的技术,可防止患者跨入不同的入路部位,从而提高患者满意度并减少发生其他部位并发症的可能性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Invasive Cardiology
Journal of Invasive Cardiology CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
6.70%
发文量
214
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Invasive Cardiology will consider for publication suitable articles on topics pertaining to the invasive treatment of patients with cardiovascular disease.
期刊最新文献
Ranolazine in chronic total occlusion percutaneous coronary intervention. IntraCardiac echocardiography-guided leaflet modification for coronary protection prior to transcatheter valve-in-valve replacement. Early LAAO device migration after combined atrial fibrillation ablation and left atrial appendage occlusion. Transcatheter aortic valve replacement in a patient with pre-existing left ventricular pseudoaneurysm: the importance of pre- and intra-procedural imaging Right coronary artery obstruction following transcatheter aortic valve replacement by aortic valve mass.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1