Objectives: The ValveClamp system (Hanyu Medical Technology) is a novel transcatheter edge-to-edge repair (TEER) system designed for ease of operation; however, there is a lack of data on its application in secondary mitral regurgitation (SMR). The authors report the mid-term outcomes of TEER using the ValveClamp system in SMR.
Methods: The study prospectively analyzed consecutive severe SMR patients who underwent transapical ValveClamp implantation at 10 Chinese centers. The enrolled patients were categorized into atrial SMR (aSMR) and ventricular SMR (vSMR) groups. Clinical and echocardiographic outcomes were evaluated at baseline and at follow-up.
Results: A total of 19 aSMR and 24 vSMR patients were enrolled. Technical success was achieved in 100% of the patients and the overall 30-day device success rate was 88.37%. At 1 year, sustained MR reduction to less than or equal to 1+ was achieved in 76.47% of aSMR cases and 77.27% of vSMR cases, and positive reverse left cardiac remodeling was observed. The estimated overall 1-year survival and HF rehospitalization rates for aSMR and vSMR were 83.33% and 83.59%, respectively (log rank P = .98), and improvement of New York Heart Association functional class and Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire score were observed in both groups. In multivariable logistic analysis, a lower leaflet-to-annulus index (LAI) (odds ratio [OR], 0.021; 95% CI, 0.001-0.042; P = .02) and a narrow MR jet type (OR, 12.029; 95% CI, 1.530-94.592-0.990; P = .02) were independently associated with a higher incidence of a residual MR of at least 2+ at 3 months after TEER.
Conclusions: TEER using the ValveClamp system is a safe and feasible therapeutic option for patients with SMR regardless of MR etiology. A lower LAI and a narrow MR jet type were independent predictors of residual MR at follow-up.
{"title":"Outcomes of a transapical edge-to-edge repair system in secondary mitral regurgitation.","authors":"Qinchun Jin, Wei Li, Jianing Fan, Dawei Lin, Zilong Wen, Yuan Zhang, Wei Lai, Wenzhi Pan, Daxin Zhou, Junbo Ge","doi":"10.25270/jic/24.00234","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.25270/jic/24.00234","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The ValveClamp system (Hanyu Medical Technology) is a novel transcatheter edge-to-edge repair (TEER) system designed for ease of operation; however, there is a lack of data on its application in secondary mitral regurgitation (SMR). The authors report the mid-term outcomes of TEER using the ValveClamp system in SMR.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The study prospectively analyzed consecutive severe SMR patients who underwent transapical ValveClamp implantation at 10 Chinese centers. The enrolled patients were categorized into atrial SMR (aSMR) and ventricular SMR (vSMR) groups. Clinical and echocardiographic outcomes were evaluated at baseline and at follow-up.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 19 aSMR and 24 vSMR patients were enrolled. Technical success was achieved in 100% of the patients and the overall 30-day device success rate was 88.37%. At 1 year, sustained MR reduction to less than or equal to 1+ was achieved in 76.47% of aSMR cases and 77.27% of vSMR cases, and positive reverse left cardiac remodeling was observed. The estimated overall 1-year survival and HF rehospitalization rates for aSMR and vSMR were 83.33% and 83.59%, respectively (log rank P = .98), and improvement of New York Heart Association functional class and Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire score were observed in both groups. In multivariable logistic analysis, a lower leaflet-to-annulus index (LAI) (odds ratio [OR], 0.021; 95% CI, 0.001-0.042; P = .02) and a narrow MR jet type (OR, 12.029; 95% CI, 1.530-94.592-0.990; P = .02) were independently associated with a higher incidence of a residual MR of at least 2+ at 3 months after TEER.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>TEER using the ValveClamp system is a safe and feasible therapeutic option for patients with SMR regardless of MR etiology. A lower LAI and a narrow MR jet type were independent predictors of residual MR at follow-up.</p>","PeriodicalId":49261,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Invasive Cardiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2025-01-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143014943","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
The authors propose a modified transcatheter aortic valve replacement technique wherein the removal of the guidewire and delivery catheter immediately after the valve implantation helps to not only shorten the procedure but also decrease complications induced by the guidewire and delivery catheter.
{"title":"Modified transcatheter aortic valve replacement: the pros and cons of removing the guidewire immediately after valve deployment.","authors":"Brig Navreet Singh, Guilherme F Attizzani","doi":"10.25270/jic/24.00224","DOIUrl":"10.25270/jic/24.00224","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The authors propose a modified transcatheter aortic valve replacement technique wherein the removal of the guidewire and delivery catheter immediately after the valve implantation helps to not only shorten the procedure but also decrease complications induced by the guidewire and delivery catheter.</p>","PeriodicalId":49261,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Invasive Cardiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2025-01-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143014942","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Deniz Mutlu, Dimitrios Strepkos, Pedro Ep Carvalho, Michaella Alexandrou, Ahmed Al-Ogaili, Sandeep Jalli, Khaldoon Alaswad, Farouc A Jaffer, Rhian Davies, Paul Poommipanit, Jarrod Frizzel, Basem Elbarouni, Jaikirshan J Khatri, Sevket Gorgulu, Omer Goktekin, Ramazan Ozdemir, Mahmut Uluganyan, Ahmed ElGuindy, Yasser Sadek, Yousif Ahmad, Mir B Basir, Leah Raj, Luiz Ybarra, Bilal Murad, Bavana V Rangan, Olga C Mastrodemos, Lorenzo Azzalini, Yader Sandoval, M Nicholas Burke, Emmanouil S Brilakis
Background: The use of the Ostial Flash balloon (Ostial Corporation) has received limited study in aorto-ostial chronic total occlusion (CTO) percutaneous coronary artery intervention (PCI).
Methods: The authors evaluated the outcomes of Ostial Flash balloon use in a large CTO-PCI registry (PROGRESS-CTO, NCT02061436).
Results: The Ostial Flash balloon was used in 54 of 907 aorto-ostial CTO PCIs in 905 patients (6.0%). The mean patient age was 65.1 ± 10.7 and 80.6% were men, with a high prevalence of diabetes mellitus, hypertension, prior PCI, and prior myocardial infarction. The mean occlusion length was 40.5 ± 25.1 mm, 52.2% had moderate to severe calcification, and the mean Japanese-CTO score was 2.8 ± 1.1. Lesions treated with the Ostial Flash balloon were more frequently located in the right aorto-ostium (79.6% vs 66.0%, P = .002). In the Ostial Flash group, the most common successful CTO crossing technique was antegrade wiring (46.3%), followed by the retrograde approach (40.7%); intravascular imaging was used in 61.1% of cases. Technical success (92.6% vs 87.9%, P = .300) and the incidence of major adverse cardiac events (MACE) (5.6% vs 3.6%, P = .450) was similar in the Ostial Flash vs non-Ostial Flash patients, respectively. In multivariable analysis, PCI of proximal right coronary artery CTOs was independently associated with use of the Ostial Flash balloon (odds ratio 2.2; 95% CI, 1.1-4.8; P = .036).
Conclusions: The Ostial Flash balloon is infrequently used in aorto-ostial CTO PCI. Although there were no differences in MACE with use of the balloon, randomized controlled trials are needed to determine its effectiveness.
背景:在主动脉-口慢性全闭塞(CTO)经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)中使用口闪光球囊(Ostial Corporation)的研究有限。方法:作者评估了在大型CTO-PCI注册表(PROGRESS-CTO, NCT02061436)中使用鼻腔闪光球囊的结果。结果:905例患者907例主动脉-主动脉CTO pci中,有54例(6.0%)使用了oral Flash球囊。患者平均年龄为65.1±10.7岁,男性占80.6%,糖尿病、高血压、既往PCI、既往心肌梗死发生率高。平均咬合长度为40.5±25.1 mm, 52.2%为中至重度钙化,平均Japanese-CTO评分为2.8±1.1。经口闪光球囊治疗的病变多位于右主动脉口(79.6% vs 66.0%, P = 0.002)。在开口闪光组中,最常见的成功的CTO交叉技术是顺行布线(46.3%),其次是逆行入路(40.7%);61.1%的病例采用血管内显像。技术成功率(92.6% vs 87.9%, P = 0.300)和主要心脏不良事件(MACE)发生率(5.6% vs 3.6%, P = 0.450)在口闪患者和非口闪患者中分别相似。在多变量分析中,右冠状动脉近端cto的PCI与使用开口闪光球囊独立相关(优势比2.2;95% ci, 1.1-4.8;P = .036)。结论:经口闪光球囊在主动脉-经口CTO PCI中应用较少。虽然使用球囊在MACE方面没有差异,但需要随机对照试验来确定其有效性。
{"title":"Use of the Ostial Flash balloon in aorto-ostial chronic total occlusion percutaneous coronary intervention.","authors":"Deniz Mutlu, Dimitrios Strepkos, Pedro Ep Carvalho, Michaella Alexandrou, Ahmed Al-Ogaili, Sandeep Jalli, Khaldoon Alaswad, Farouc A Jaffer, Rhian Davies, Paul Poommipanit, Jarrod Frizzel, Basem Elbarouni, Jaikirshan J Khatri, Sevket Gorgulu, Omer Goktekin, Ramazan Ozdemir, Mahmut Uluganyan, Ahmed ElGuindy, Yasser Sadek, Yousif Ahmad, Mir B Basir, Leah Raj, Luiz Ybarra, Bilal Murad, Bavana V Rangan, Olga C Mastrodemos, Lorenzo Azzalini, Yader Sandoval, M Nicholas Burke, Emmanouil S Brilakis","doi":"10.25270/jic/24.00263","DOIUrl":"10.25270/jic/24.00263","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The use of the Ostial Flash balloon (Ostial Corporation) has received limited study in aorto-ostial chronic total occlusion (CTO) percutaneous coronary artery intervention (PCI).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The authors evaluated the outcomes of Ostial Flash balloon use in a large CTO-PCI registry (PROGRESS-CTO, NCT02061436).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The Ostial Flash balloon was used in 54 of 907 aorto-ostial CTO PCIs in 905 patients (6.0%). The mean patient age was 65.1 ± 10.7 and 80.6% were men, with a high prevalence of diabetes mellitus, hypertension, prior PCI, and prior myocardial infarction. The mean occlusion length was 40.5 ± 25.1 mm, 52.2% had moderate to severe calcification, and the mean Japanese-CTO score was 2.8 ± 1.1. Lesions treated with the Ostial Flash balloon were more frequently located in the right aorto-ostium (79.6% vs 66.0%, P = .002). In the Ostial Flash group, the most common successful CTO crossing technique was antegrade wiring (46.3%), followed by the retrograde approach (40.7%); intravascular imaging was used in 61.1% of cases. Technical success (92.6% vs 87.9%, P = .300) and the incidence of major adverse cardiac events (MACE) (5.6% vs 3.6%, P = .450) was similar in the Ostial Flash vs non-Ostial Flash patients, respectively. In multivariable analysis, PCI of proximal right coronary artery CTOs was independently associated with use of the Ostial Flash balloon (odds ratio 2.2; 95% CI, 1.1-4.8; P = .036).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The Ostial Flash balloon is infrequently used in aorto-ostial CTO PCI. Although there were no differences in MACE with use of the balloon, randomized controlled trials are needed to determine its effectiveness.</p>","PeriodicalId":49261,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Invasive Cardiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2025-01-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142980443","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Francesco Ciotola, Harald Rittger, Stylianos A Pyxaras
{"title":"Kounis syndrome manifesting with myocardial infarction due to bi-coronary late stent thrombosis following anaphylaxis.","authors":"Francesco Ciotola, Harald Rittger, Stylianos A Pyxaras","doi":"10.25270/jic/24.00366","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.25270/jic/24.00366","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":49261,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Invasive Cardiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2025-01-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142980382","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Marco A Alcántara-Meléndez, Antonio Vargas-Cruz, César L González-Aguilar, Faustino J Silva-Centeno, Jesus González-Jasso, Leonel Avendaño-Perez, Rafael Esparza-Corona, Heberto Aquino-Bruno
{"title":"Parallel wire technique as a bailout for chronic total occlusion recanalization due to microcatheter over-torquing and entrapment.","authors":"Marco A Alcántara-Meléndez, Antonio Vargas-Cruz, César L González-Aguilar, Faustino J Silva-Centeno, Jesus González-Jasso, Leonel Avendaño-Perez, Rafael Esparza-Corona, Heberto Aquino-Bruno","doi":"10.25270/jic/24.00362","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.25270/jic/24.00362","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":49261,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Invasive Cardiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2025-01-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142980435","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Deniz Mutlu, Dimitrios Strepkos, Pedro E Carvalho, Michaella Alexandrou, Ozgur Selim Ser, Barkin Kultursay, Ali Karagoz, Oleg Krestyaninov, Dmitrii Khelimskii, Mahmut Uluganyan, Korhan Soylu, Ufuk Yildirim, Seda Tanyeri Uzel, Olga Mastrodemos, Bavana V Rangan, Sandeep Jalli, Konstantinos Voudris, Yader Sandoval, M Nicholas Burke, Emmanouil S Brilakis
Background: Upfront 2-stent techniques are often used in bifurcation percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI), but there is controversy about optimal strategy selection.
Methods: The authors examined the clinical and angiographic characteristics and long-term outcomes of 232 bifurcation PCIs that were performed using the double kissing (DK) crush or culotte technique in 216 patients between 2014 and 2023 using data from the Prospective Global Registry for the Study of Bifurcation Lesion Interventions (NCT05100992). The inverse probability of treatment weighted (IPTW) Cox proportional hazards model was used to assess long-term outcomes.
Results: DK crush was more commonly used (69.0%). Patients in the DK-crush group had similar baseline characteristics to those in the culotte group. Lesions treated with DK crush were more likely to be in the left main coronary artery (42.9% vs 15.5%, P less than .001), had larger proximal (3.50 [3.50-4.00] vs 3.50 [3.21-3.79] mm, P = .027) and distal (3.00 [3.00-3.50] vs 3.00 [2.75-3.25] mm, P = .047) main vessel diameter, and were more likely to have severe calcification (29.8% vs 5.6%, P less than .001). Technical (98.8% vs 97.2%, P = .588), procedural success (96.5% vs 95.1%, P = .698), and in-hospital major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) (6.1% vs 3.0%, P = .509) were similar in both groups. During a median follow-up of 43 months, 60 (33.9%) patients experienced MACE. On IPTW adjusted Cox analysis, DK crush was associated with lower follow-up MACE (hazard ratio 0.28; 95% CI, 0.13-0.60; P = .001) compared with culotte driven by lower target vessel revascularization (TVR) (14.3% vs 29.3%, P = .029).
Conclusions: Compared with culotte, DK crush is associated with similar periprocedural outcomes but lower TVR and MACE during follow-up.
背景:前置2支架技术常用于分叉经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI),但在最佳策略选择上存在争议。方法:作者研究了2014年至2023年间使用双吻(DK)挤压或culotte技术对216例患者进行的232例分叉pci的临床和血管造影特征和长期结果,使用的数据来自分叉病变干预研究的前瞻性全球注册表(NCT05100992)。采用治疗加权逆概率(IPTW) Cox比例风险模型评估长期预后。结果:DK压伤发生率较高(69.0%)。DK-crush组患者的基线特征与套索组相似。以DK粉碎治疗的病变多位于左冠状动脉主干(42.9% vs 15.5%, P < 0.001),近端(3.50 [3.50-4.00]vs 3.50 [3.21-3.79] mm, P = 0.027)和远端(3.00 [3.00-3.50]vs 3.00 [2.75-3.25] mm, P = 0.047)主血管直径较大,严重钙化的可能性更大(29.8% vs 5.6%, P < 0.001)。两组的技术(98.8% vs 97.2%, P = .588)、手术成功率(96.5% vs 95.1%, P = .698)和院内主要心血管不良事件(MACE) (6.1% vs . 3.0%, P = .509)相似。在中位随访43个月期间,60例(33.9%)患者经历了MACE。在IPTW校正的Cox分析中,DK挤压与较低的随访MACE相关(风险比0.28;95% ci, 0.13-0.60;P = .001)与低靶血管重建术(TVR)驱动的血栓(14.3% vs 29.3%, P = .029)相比。结论:与血栓相比,DK压碎术的围手术期预后相似,但随访期间TVR和MACE较低。
{"title":"Double kissing crush versus culotte for bifurcation percutaneous coronary interventions: insights from the PROGRESS-BIFURCATION registry.","authors":"Deniz Mutlu, Dimitrios Strepkos, Pedro E Carvalho, Michaella Alexandrou, Ozgur Selim Ser, Barkin Kultursay, Ali Karagoz, Oleg Krestyaninov, Dmitrii Khelimskii, Mahmut Uluganyan, Korhan Soylu, Ufuk Yildirim, Seda Tanyeri Uzel, Olga Mastrodemos, Bavana V Rangan, Sandeep Jalli, Konstantinos Voudris, Yader Sandoval, M Nicholas Burke, Emmanouil S Brilakis","doi":"10.25270/jic/24.00350","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.25270/jic/24.00350","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Upfront 2-stent techniques are often used in bifurcation percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI), but there is controversy about optimal strategy selection.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The authors examined the clinical and angiographic characteristics and long-term outcomes of 232 bifurcation PCIs that were performed using the double kissing (DK) crush or culotte technique in 216 patients between 2014 and 2023 using data from the Prospective Global Registry for the Study of Bifurcation Lesion Interventions (NCT05100992). The inverse probability of treatment weighted (IPTW) Cox proportional hazards model was used to assess long-term outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>DK crush was more commonly used (69.0%). Patients in the DK-crush group had similar baseline characteristics to those in the culotte group. Lesions treated with DK crush were more likely to be in the left main coronary artery (42.9% vs 15.5%, P less than .001), had larger proximal (3.50 [3.50-4.00] vs 3.50 [3.21-3.79] mm, P = .027) and distal (3.00 [3.00-3.50] vs 3.00 [2.75-3.25] mm, P = .047) main vessel diameter, and were more likely to have severe calcification (29.8% vs 5.6%, P less than .001). Technical (98.8% vs 97.2%, P = .588), procedural success (96.5% vs 95.1%, P = .698), and in-hospital major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) (6.1% vs 3.0%, P = .509) were similar in both groups. During a median follow-up of 43 months, 60 (33.9%) patients experienced MACE. On IPTW adjusted Cox analysis, DK crush was associated with lower follow-up MACE (hazard ratio 0.28; 95% CI, 0.13-0.60; P = .001) compared with culotte driven by lower target vessel revascularization (TVR) (14.3% vs 29.3%, P = .029).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Compared with culotte, DK crush is associated with similar periprocedural outcomes but lower TVR and MACE during follow-up.</p>","PeriodicalId":49261,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Invasive Cardiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2025-01-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142980355","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Giulia Passaniti, Parasuram M Krishnamoorthy, Rajeev R Samtani, Supawat Ratanapo, Annapoorna S Kini, Gilbert H L Tang, Lucy M Safi
{"title":"Mitral transcatheter-edge-to-edge-repair after failed Alfieri stitch: an effective alternative to re-do surgery.","authors":"Giulia Passaniti, Parasuram M Krishnamoorthy, Rajeev R Samtani, Supawat Ratanapo, Annapoorna S Kini, Gilbert H L Tang, Lucy M Safi","doi":"10.25270/jic/24.00235","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.25270/jic/24.00235","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":49261,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Invasive Cardiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2025-01-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142980432","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Charles Gallen, Amine Boussofara, Quentin Landolff
{"title":"How to avoid a myocardial infarction with radial wall strain?","authors":"Charles Gallen, Amine Boussofara, Quentin Landolff","doi":"10.25270/jic/24.00369","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.25270/jic/24.00369","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":49261,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Invasive Cardiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6,"publicationDate":"2025-01-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"142980359","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}