Early detection of phlebitis among hematology-oncology patients: a best practice implementation project.

IF 2.7 4区 医学 Q2 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Jbi Evidence Implementation Pub Date : 2024-05-10 DOI:10.1097/XEB.0000000000000429
Shao Wei Toh, Ramil Marty Alicabo Tamarra, Ying Xuan Goh, Ya Qi Chang, Valerie Tantiana Hollen, Iris Xin Qi Ng, Noor Melati Ahmad, Poh Chi Tho, Yee Mei Lee
{"title":"Early detection of phlebitis among hematology-oncology patients: a best practice implementation project.","authors":"Shao Wei Toh, Ramil Marty Alicabo Tamarra, Ying Xuan Goh, Ya Qi Chang, Valerie Tantiana Hollen, Iris Xin Qi Ng, Noor Melati Ahmad, Poh Chi Tho, Yee Mei Lee","doi":"10.1097/XEB.0000000000000429","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Peripherally-inserted venous catheters (PIVC) are essential for cancer patients to receive treatment. Phlebitis is a major complication of PIVC. Currently, nurses' assessment of phlebitis mainly involves visual inspection. However, the latest literature suggests palpation for tenderness to promote the early detection of phlebitis.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This project evaluated the effectiveness of a bundle approach to increase nurses' compliance with PIVC site assessment to promote early detection of phlebitis (grade 2 and above).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The JBI Evidence Implementation Framework was used to conduct this project in a 28-bed hematology-oncology ward in a Singapore hospital. The bundle approach used in this project consisted of a training presentation, medical mannequin, and phlebitis scale card. The rate of nurses' compliance with best practice for PIVC site assessment was measured at 1 month and 6 months post-implementation. The incidence of phlebitis was monitored up until 12 months post-implementation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Baseline data indicated that only 18.75% (3 out of 16) nurses palpated for tenderness when assessing for phlebitis. Data at 1 month and 6 months post-implementation reported sustained high compliance rates of 85.71% (24 out of 28) and 89.29% (25 out of 28), respectively. Late detection of phlebitis was reduced by 66% (from three cases to one case) at 6 months post-implementation, and no patients required invasive interventions.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The bundle approach used in this project facilitated early detection of phlebitis following the inclusion of palpation into nurses' assessment for phlebitis.</p><p><strong>Spanish abstract: </strong>http://links.lww.com/IJEBH/A204.</p>","PeriodicalId":48473,"journal":{"name":"Jbi Evidence Implementation","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jbi Evidence Implementation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/XEB.0000000000000429","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Peripherally-inserted venous catheters (PIVC) are essential for cancer patients to receive treatment. Phlebitis is a major complication of PIVC. Currently, nurses' assessment of phlebitis mainly involves visual inspection. However, the latest literature suggests palpation for tenderness to promote the early detection of phlebitis.

Objectives: This project evaluated the effectiveness of a bundle approach to increase nurses' compliance with PIVC site assessment to promote early detection of phlebitis (grade 2 and above).

Methods: The JBI Evidence Implementation Framework was used to conduct this project in a 28-bed hematology-oncology ward in a Singapore hospital. The bundle approach used in this project consisted of a training presentation, medical mannequin, and phlebitis scale card. The rate of nurses' compliance with best practice for PIVC site assessment was measured at 1 month and 6 months post-implementation. The incidence of phlebitis was monitored up until 12 months post-implementation.

Results: Baseline data indicated that only 18.75% (3 out of 16) nurses palpated for tenderness when assessing for phlebitis. Data at 1 month and 6 months post-implementation reported sustained high compliance rates of 85.71% (24 out of 28) and 89.29% (25 out of 28), respectively. Late detection of phlebitis was reduced by 66% (from three cases to one case) at 6 months post-implementation, and no patients required invasive interventions.

Conclusions: The bundle approach used in this project facilitated early detection of phlebitis following the inclusion of palpation into nurses' assessment for phlebitis.

Spanish abstract: http://links.lww.com/IJEBH/A204.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
血液肿瘤科患者静脉炎的早期检测:最佳实践实施项目。
简介外周置入静脉导管(PIVC)是癌症患者接受治疗的必备工具。静脉炎是 PIVC 的主要并发症。目前,护士对静脉炎的评估主要是目测。然而,最新的文献建议通过触诊触痛来促进静脉炎的早期发现:本项目评估了采用捆绑方法提高护士对 PIVC 现场评估的依从性以促进早期发现静脉炎(2 级及以上)的有效性:方法:采用 JBI 证据实施框架在新加坡一家医院的 28 张床位血液肿瘤科病房开展该项目。该项目采用的捆绑方法包括培训演示、医疗模型和静脉炎量表卡。在实施 1 个月和 6 个月后,对护士遵守 PIVC 现场评估最佳实践的比率进行了测量。对静脉炎的发生率进行了监测,直至实施后 12 个月:结果:基线数据显示,只有 18.75% 的护士(16 人中有 3 人)在评估静脉炎时触诊到触痛。实施后 1 个月和 6 个月的数据显示,依从率一直很高,分别为 85.71%(28 人中有 24 人)和 89.29%(28 人中有 25 人)。实施 6 个月后,静脉炎的晚期发现率降低了 66%(从 3 例降至 1 例),没有患者需要进行侵入性干预:西班牙文摘要:http://links.lww.com/IJEBH/A204。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
13.00%
发文量
23
期刊最新文献
Nutrition as therapy - the role of dietitian counseling: a best practice implementation project. Pain assessment and management in patients with dementia in Taiwan: a best practice implementation project. Comparison of two audit and feedback approaches: descriptive analysis of personal and contextual dynamics. Collaborative implementation science: a Can-SOLVE CKD case example. Improving communication among nursing staff at a children's hospital in the southern United States: a best practice implementation project.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1