O. Ait Mokhtar , M. Baouni , A. Azzouz , A. Azaza , M. Kara , M. Salem , N. Dahimene , M. Saidane , A. Sik , S. Ouabdesselam , S. Benkhedda
{"title":"Délais d'attente d'implantation de valve aortique transcutanée (TAVI) et mortalité durant la période d'attente en Algérie","authors":"O. Ait Mokhtar , M. Baouni , A. Azzouz , A. Azaza , M. Kara , M. Salem , N. Dahimene , M. Saidane , A. Sik , S. Ouabdesselam , S. Benkhedda","doi":"10.1016/j.ancard.2024.101765","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Trans Aortic Valve Implantation (TAVI) has become the primary treatment for aortic stenosis in patients over 75 years old. Despite its clinical efficacy, it's adoption in emerging countries remains low due to the high cost of prostheses and limited healthcare funding resources. This leads to prolonged waiting times for the TAVI procedure, which may lead to complications; these data are missing particularly in emerging countries.</p></div><div><h3>Aims</h3><p>To describe waiting time for TAVI and mortality rate in this waiting period.</p></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><p>This was prospective registry, patients referred for TAVI were prospectively followed; waiting time was calculated from the first visit after referral to TAVI implantation, clinical and, call fellow up was performed every 3 months. We divided patients into two groups: Group 1 (G1) patients still awaiting TAVI (105 patients), and those who underwent TAVI (36 patients). Group 2 (G2) patients who died while awaiting TAVI (16 patients, 10,2 %).</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Demographic characteristics were similar, with a tendency for older age in G2 (79.5 ± 5.7 years vs. 82.5 ± 7.4 years, <em>p</em>=0,06). G2 exhibited more left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) impairment (8.5% vs. 25%, <em>p</em>=0,03) and a higher rate of severe heart failure with dyspnea stages III or IV (2.8% vs. 12.5%, <em>p</em><0,001). The mean follow-up in G1 was 242.9 ± 137.4 days; the waiting time for TAVI was 231.7 ± 134.1 days, and the average time between the first consultation and death while awaiting TAVI (G2) was 335.1 ± 167.4 days.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>in our series, waiting time is high due to limited Trans aortic heart valve availability, mortality during this wait exceeds 10%. Adverse prognostic factors include impaired LVEF and severe dyspnea stages III or IV.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":7899,"journal":{"name":"Annales de cardiologie et d'angeiologie","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annales de cardiologie et d'angeiologie","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0003392824000441","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background
Trans Aortic Valve Implantation (TAVI) has become the primary treatment for aortic stenosis in patients over 75 years old. Despite its clinical efficacy, it's adoption in emerging countries remains low due to the high cost of prostheses and limited healthcare funding resources. This leads to prolonged waiting times for the TAVI procedure, which may lead to complications; these data are missing particularly in emerging countries.
Aims
To describe waiting time for TAVI and mortality rate in this waiting period.
Materials and methods
This was prospective registry, patients referred for TAVI were prospectively followed; waiting time was calculated from the first visit after referral to TAVI implantation, clinical and, call fellow up was performed every 3 months. We divided patients into two groups: Group 1 (G1) patients still awaiting TAVI (105 patients), and those who underwent TAVI (36 patients). Group 2 (G2) patients who died while awaiting TAVI (16 patients, 10,2 %).
Results
Demographic characteristics were similar, with a tendency for older age in G2 (79.5 ± 5.7 years vs. 82.5 ± 7.4 years, p=0,06). G2 exhibited more left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) impairment (8.5% vs. 25%, p=0,03) and a higher rate of severe heart failure with dyspnea stages III or IV (2.8% vs. 12.5%, p<0,001). The mean follow-up in G1 was 242.9 ± 137.4 days; the waiting time for TAVI was 231.7 ± 134.1 days, and the average time between the first consultation and death while awaiting TAVI (G2) was 335.1 ± 167.4 days.
Conclusion
in our series, waiting time is high due to limited Trans aortic heart valve availability, mortality during this wait exceeds 10%. Adverse prognostic factors include impaired LVEF and severe dyspnea stages III or IV.
期刊介绍:
Organe scientifique de référence fondé en 1951, les Annales de cardiologie et d''angéiologie abordent tous les domaines qui intéressent quotidiennement les cardiologues et les angéiologues praticiens : neurologie et radiologie vasculaires, hémostase, diabétologie, médecine interne, épidémiologie et prévention.
Les Annales de cardiologie et d''angéiologie sont indexées aux grandes bases de données et publient rapidement, et en conformité avec les normes internationales de publication scientifique, des articles en français sur la pathologie cardiaque.