The effects of data aggregation on long-term projections of forest stands development

IF 3.8 1区 农林科学 Q1 FORESTRY Forest Ecosystems Pub Date : 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1016/j.fecs.2024.100199
Kobra Maleki, Rasmus Astrup, Nicolas Cattaneo, Wilson Lara Henao, Clara Antón-Fernández
{"title":"The effects of data aggregation on long-term projections of forest stands development","authors":"Kobra Maleki,&nbsp;Rasmus Astrup,&nbsp;Nicolas Cattaneo,&nbsp;Wilson Lara Henao,&nbsp;Clara Antón-Fernández","doi":"10.1016/j.fecs.2024.100199","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Forest management planning often relies on Airborne Laser Scanning (ALS)-based Forest Management Inventories (FMIs) for sustainable and efficient decision-making. Employing the area-based (ABA) approach, these inventories estimate forest characteristics for grid cell areas (pixels), which are then usually summarized at the stand level. Using the ALS-based high-resolution Norwegian Forest Resource Maps (16 ​m ​× ​16 ​m pixel resolution) alongside with <em>stand-level</em> growth and yield models, this study explores the impact of three levels of pixel aggregation (<em>stand-level</em>, <em>stand-level with species strata</em>, and <em>pixel-level</em>) on projected stand development. The results indicate significant differences in the projected outputs based on the aggregation level. Notably, the most substantial difference in estimated volume occurred between <em>stand-level</em> and <em>pixel-level</em> aggregation, ranging from −301 to +253 ​m<sup>3</sup>⋅ha<sup>−1</sup> for single stands. The differences were, on average, higher for broadleaves than for spruce and pine dominated stands, and for mixed stands and stands with higher variability than for pure and homogenous stands. In conclusion, this research underscores the critical role of input data resolution in forest planning and management, emphasizing the need for improved data collection practices to ensure sustainable forest management.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":54270,"journal":{"name":"Forest Ecosystems","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2197562024000356/pdfft?md5=2ff5a56f6ac79dfa104a9e9e412358b2&pid=1-s2.0-S2197562024000356-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Forest Ecosystems","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2197562024000356","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FORESTRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Forest management planning often relies on Airborne Laser Scanning (ALS)-based Forest Management Inventories (FMIs) for sustainable and efficient decision-making. Employing the area-based (ABA) approach, these inventories estimate forest characteristics for grid cell areas (pixels), which are then usually summarized at the stand level. Using the ALS-based high-resolution Norwegian Forest Resource Maps (16 ​m ​× ​16 ​m pixel resolution) alongside with stand-level growth and yield models, this study explores the impact of three levels of pixel aggregation (stand-level, stand-level with species strata, and pixel-level) on projected stand development. The results indicate significant differences in the projected outputs based on the aggregation level. Notably, the most substantial difference in estimated volume occurred between stand-level and pixel-level aggregation, ranging from −301 to +253 ​m3⋅ha−1 for single stands. The differences were, on average, higher for broadleaves than for spruce and pine dominated stands, and for mixed stands and stands with higher variability than for pure and homogenous stands. In conclusion, this research underscores the critical role of input data resolution in forest planning and management, emphasizing the need for improved data collection practices to ensure sustainable forest management.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
数据汇总对长期林分发展预测的影响
森林管理规划通常依赖于基于机载激光扫描(ALS)的森林管理清单(FMI),以实现可持续和高效的决策。这些清查采用基于区域(ABA)的方法,对网格单元区域(像素)的森林特征进行估算,然后通常在林分层面进行汇总。本研究利用基于ALS的高分辨率挪威森林资源地图(像素分辨率为16米×16米)以及林分级生长和产量模型,探讨了三种像素聚合水平(林分级、林分级与树种分层以及像素级)对预测林分发展的影响。结果表明,不同的聚合水平对预测产出的影响存在显著差异。值得注意的是,在林分级和像素级聚合之间,估计体积的差异最大,单个林分的差异从-301 到+253 立方米-公顷-1 不等。平均而言,阔叶林的差异高于以云杉和松树为主的林分,混合林分和变异性较高的林分的差异也高于纯林和同质林分。总之,这项研究强调了输入数据分辨率在森林规划和管理中的关键作用,强调了改进数据收集方法以确保可持续森林管理的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Forest Ecosystems
Forest Ecosystems Environmental Science-Nature and Landscape Conservation
CiteScore
7.10
自引率
4.90%
发文量
1115
审稿时长
22 days
期刊介绍: Forest Ecosystems is an open access, peer-reviewed journal publishing scientific communications from any discipline that can provide interesting contributions about the structure and dynamics of "natural" and "domesticated" forest ecosystems, and their services to people. The journal welcomes innovative science as well as application oriented work that will enhance understanding of woody plant communities. Very specific studies are welcome if they are part of a thematic series that provides some holistic perspective that is of general interest.
期刊最新文献
Independent and interactive effects of N and P additions on foliar P fractions in evergreen forests of southern China Meta-analysis of 21st century studies shows that deforestation induces profound changes in soil characteristics, particularly soil organic carbon accumulation Unveiling urbanization effects on trees outside forests along the urban-rural gradient in megacity Bengaluru Quercus acutissima exhibits more adaptable water uptake patterns in response to seasonal changes compared to Pinus massoniana Effects of bamboo invasion on forest structures and diameter–height allometries
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1