Optimal fertilization strategy promotes the sustainability of rice–crayfish farming systems by improving productivity and decreasing carbon footprint

IF 6.4 1区 农林科学 Q1 AGRONOMY Agronomy for Sustainable Development Pub Date : 2024-05-08 DOI:10.1007/s13593-024-00952-w
Wanyang Zhang, Mingshuang Xu, Tianqiao Ma, Jianwei Lu, Jun Zhu, Xiaokun Li
{"title":"Optimal fertilization strategy promotes the sustainability of rice–crayfish farming systems by improving productivity and decreasing carbon footprint","authors":"Wanyang Zhang, Mingshuang Xu, Tianqiao Ma, Jianwei Lu, Jun Zhu, Xiaokun Li","doi":"10.1007/s13593-024-00952-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Rice–crayfish farming systems (RCs), a novel rice cropping system, have gained rapid popularity in many countries due to their economic advantages. Fertilizers tend to be applied in large quantities for higher profits, but has high burden on resources and environment, especially in terms of the carbon emissions. It is crucial to explore an optimal fertilization strategy with high productivity and low carbon emissions for the sustainable development of RCs. However, information about C emissions is incomplete, regarding the indirect C emissions during the rice growing season as well as C emissions during the crayfish culture period. We conducted field experiments to investigate the effects of five fertilization strategies including no fertilization (CK), farmer’s practices (FP), optimized fertilization (OPT), organic fertilization only (OF), and organic fertilizer substitution (OPTOF) on the productivity, economic benefits, greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, carbon footprint, and sustainability index of RCs. Results showed that OPT reduced direct (by 6.7%) and indirect (by 37.0%) GHG emissions during the rice growing season while maintaining rice (95%) and crayfish (104%) yields compared with that of FP. Additionally, the soil organic carbon storage and annual economic benefit of the OPT increased by 20.1% and 4.7%, respectively, whereas the carbon footprints of unit area, unit grain yield, unit energy yield, and unit of economic output decreased by 29.5%, 27.2%, 24.5%, and 32.7%, compared to the FP, respectively. The sustainability index (0.78) of the OPT treatment was significantly higher than that of other treatments due to its higher productivity and lower the carbon footprint. In conclusion, optimal fertilization strategy in RCs could achieve to increase productivity while reducing carbon footprint. This is conducive to the sustainability of RCs. Future attention in RCs should be focused on the development and promotion of such strategies.</p>","PeriodicalId":7721,"journal":{"name":"Agronomy for Sustainable Development","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":6.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Agronomy for Sustainable Development","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13593-024-00952-w","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Rice–crayfish farming systems (RCs), a novel rice cropping system, have gained rapid popularity in many countries due to their economic advantages. Fertilizers tend to be applied in large quantities for higher profits, but has high burden on resources and environment, especially in terms of the carbon emissions. It is crucial to explore an optimal fertilization strategy with high productivity and low carbon emissions for the sustainable development of RCs. However, information about C emissions is incomplete, regarding the indirect C emissions during the rice growing season as well as C emissions during the crayfish culture period. We conducted field experiments to investigate the effects of five fertilization strategies including no fertilization (CK), farmer’s practices (FP), optimized fertilization (OPT), organic fertilization only (OF), and organic fertilizer substitution (OPTOF) on the productivity, economic benefits, greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, carbon footprint, and sustainability index of RCs. Results showed that OPT reduced direct (by 6.7%) and indirect (by 37.0%) GHG emissions during the rice growing season while maintaining rice (95%) and crayfish (104%) yields compared with that of FP. Additionally, the soil organic carbon storage and annual economic benefit of the OPT increased by 20.1% and 4.7%, respectively, whereas the carbon footprints of unit area, unit grain yield, unit energy yield, and unit of economic output decreased by 29.5%, 27.2%, 24.5%, and 32.7%, compared to the FP, respectively. The sustainability index (0.78) of the OPT treatment was significantly higher than that of other treatments due to its higher productivity and lower the carbon footprint. In conclusion, optimal fertilization strategy in RCs could achieve to increase productivity while reducing carbon footprint. This is conducive to the sustainability of RCs. Future attention in RCs should be focused on the development and promotion of such strategies.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
通过提高生产力和减少碳足迹,优化施肥策略促进稻田小龙虾养殖系统的可持续发展
水稻-小龙虾养殖系统(RC)是一种新型水稻种植系统,因其经济优势在许多国家迅速普及。为了获得更高的利润,人们倾向于大量施用化肥,但这对资源和环境造成了沉重的负担,尤其是碳排放。为实现可持续发展,探索一种高生产率、低碳排放的最佳施肥策略至关重要。然而,关于水稻生长季节的间接碳排放以及小龙虾养殖期间的碳排放的信息并不完整。我们进行了田间试验,研究五种施肥策略(包括不施肥(CK)、农民实践(FP)、优化施肥(OPT)、只施有机肥(OF)和有机肥替代(OPTOF))对 RCs 的生产力、经济效益、温室气体(GHG)排放、碳足迹和可持续性指数的影响。结果表明,与只施用有机肥相比,OPT 在保持水稻(95%)和小龙虾(104%)产量的同时,减少了水稻生长期的直接温室气体排放(6.7%)和间接温室气体排放(37.0%)。此外,与 FP 相比,OPT 的土壤有机碳储量和年经济效益分别增加了 20.1%和 4.7%,而单位面积、单位粮食产量、单位能源产量和单位经济产出的碳足迹分别减少了 29.5%、27.2%、24.5% 和 32.7%。OPT 处理的可持续发展指数(0.78)明显高于其他处理,这是因为它具有更高的生产率和更低的碳足迹。总之,区域中心的优化施肥策略可以在提高生产力的同时减少碳足迹。这有利于区域中心的可持续发展。未来应重点关注此类战略的开发和推广。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Agronomy for Sustainable Development
Agronomy for Sustainable Development 农林科学-农艺学
CiteScore
10.70
自引率
8.20%
发文量
108
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Agronomy for Sustainable Development (ASD) is a peer-reviewed scientific journal of international scope, dedicated to publishing original research articles, review articles, and meta-analyses aimed at improving sustainability in agricultural and food systems. The journal serves as a bridge between agronomy, cropping, and farming system research and various other disciplines including ecology, genetics, economics, and social sciences. ASD encourages studies in agroecology, participatory research, and interdisciplinary approaches, with a focus on systems thinking applied at different scales from field to global levels. Research articles published in ASD should present significant scientific advancements compared to existing knowledge, within an international context. Review articles should critically evaluate emerging topics, and opinion papers may also be submitted as reviews. Meta-analysis articles should provide clear contributions to resolving widely debated scientific questions.
期刊最新文献
Strategies to improve field establishment of cover crops. A review Economic optimization of sustainable soil management: a Dutch case study Biotic stress and yield stability in English organic silvoarable agroforestry Beekeeping and agropastoralism interactions through floral resources in the French Mount Lozère A multifunctional life cycle assessment of durum wheat cropping systems
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1