Hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy in colorectal cancer.

IF 3.5 3区 医学 Q1 SURGERY BJS Open Pub Date : 2024-05-08 DOI:10.1093/bjsopen/zrae017
Oliver M Fisher, Chris Brown, Jesus Esquivel, Stein G Larsen, Winston Liauw, Nayef A Alzahrani, David L Morris, Vahan Kepenekian, Isabelle Sourrouille, Frédéric Dumont, Jean-Jacques Tuech, Cécilia Ceribelli, Béranger Doussot, Olivia Sgarbura, Mohammed Alhosni, Francois Quenet, Olivier Glehen, Peter H Cashin
{"title":"Hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy in colorectal cancer.","authors":"Oliver M Fisher, Chris Brown, Jesus Esquivel, Stein G Larsen, Winston Liauw, Nayef A Alzahrani, David L Morris, Vahan Kepenekian, Isabelle Sourrouille, Frédéric Dumont, Jean-Jacques Tuech, Cécilia Ceribelli, Béranger Doussot, Olivia Sgarbura, Mohammed Alhosni, Francois Quenet, Olivier Glehen, Peter H Cashin","doi":"10.1093/bjsopen/zrae017","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This study evaluated the efficacy of hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) in colorectal cancer with peritoneal metastases (pmCRC) in a large international data set of patients.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>Patients with pmCRC from 39 centres who underwent cytoreductive surgery with HIPEC between 1991 and 2018 were selected and compared for the HIPEC protocols received-oxaliplatin-HIPEC versus mitomycin-HIPEC. Following analysis of crude data, propensity-score matching (PSM) and Cox-proportional hazard modelling were performed. Outcomes of interest were overall survival (OS), recurrence-free survival (RFS) and the HIPEC dose-response effects (high versus low dose, dose intensification and double drug protocols) on OS, RFS and 90-day morbidity. Furthermore, the impact of the treatment time period was assessed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 2760 patients, 2093 patients were included. Median OS was 43 months (95% c.i. 41 to 46 months) with a median RFS of 12 months (95% c.i. 12 to 13 months). The oxaliplatin-HIPEC group had an OS of 47 months (95% c.i. 42 to 53 months) versus 39 months (95% c.i. 36 to 43 months) in the mitomycin-HIPEC group (P = 0.002), aHR 0.77, 95% c.i. 0.67 to 0.90, P < 0.001. The OS benefit persisted after PSM of the oxaliplatin-HIPEC group and mitomycin-HIPEC group (48 months (95% c.i. 42 to 59 months) versus 40 months (95% c.i. 37 to 44 months)), P < 0.001, aHR 0.78 (95% c.i. 0.65 to 0.94), P = 0.009. Similarly, matched RFS was significantly higher for oxaliplatin-HIPEC versus others (13 months (95% c.i. 12 to 15 months) versus 11 months (95% c.i. 10 to 12 months, P = 0.02)). High-dose mitomycin-HIPEC protocols had similar OS compared to oxaliplatin-HIPEC. HIPEC dose intensification within each protocol resulted in improved survival. Oxaliplatin + irinotecan-HIPEC resulted in the most improved OS (61 months (95% c.i. 51 to 101 months)). Ninety-day mortality in both crude and PSM analysis was worse for mitomycin-HIPEC. There was no change in treatment effect depending on the analysed time period.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Oxaliplatin-based HIPEC provided better outcomes compared to mitomycin-based HIPEC. High-dose mitomycin-HIPEC was similar to oxaliplatin-HIPEC. The 90-day mortality difference favours the oxaliplatin-HIPEC group. A trend for dose-response between low- and high-dose HIPEC was reported.</p>","PeriodicalId":9028,"journal":{"name":"BJS Open","volume":"8 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11081075/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BJS Open","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsopen/zrae017","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: This study evaluated the efficacy of hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) in colorectal cancer with peritoneal metastases (pmCRC) in a large international data set of patients.

Patients and methods: Patients with pmCRC from 39 centres who underwent cytoreductive surgery with HIPEC between 1991 and 2018 were selected and compared for the HIPEC protocols received-oxaliplatin-HIPEC versus mitomycin-HIPEC. Following analysis of crude data, propensity-score matching (PSM) and Cox-proportional hazard modelling were performed. Outcomes of interest were overall survival (OS), recurrence-free survival (RFS) and the HIPEC dose-response effects (high versus low dose, dose intensification and double drug protocols) on OS, RFS and 90-day morbidity. Furthermore, the impact of the treatment time period was assessed.

Results: Of 2760 patients, 2093 patients were included. Median OS was 43 months (95% c.i. 41 to 46 months) with a median RFS of 12 months (95% c.i. 12 to 13 months). The oxaliplatin-HIPEC group had an OS of 47 months (95% c.i. 42 to 53 months) versus 39 months (95% c.i. 36 to 43 months) in the mitomycin-HIPEC group (P = 0.002), aHR 0.77, 95% c.i. 0.67 to 0.90, P < 0.001. The OS benefit persisted after PSM of the oxaliplatin-HIPEC group and mitomycin-HIPEC group (48 months (95% c.i. 42 to 59 months) versus 40 months (95% c.i. 37 to 44 months)), P < 0.001, aHR 0.78 (95% c.i. 0.65 to 0.94), P = 0.009. Similarly, matched RFS was significantly higher for oxaliplatin-HIPEC versus others (13 months (95% c.i. 12 to 15 months) versus 11 months (95% c.i. 10 to 12 months, P = 0.02)). High-dose mitomycin-HIPEC protocols had similar OS compared to oxaliplatin-HIPEC. HIPEC dose intensification within each protocol resulted in improved survival. Oxaliplatin + irinotecan-HIPEC resulted in the most improved OS (61 months (95% c.i. 51 to 101 months)). Ninety-day mortality in both crude and PSM analysis was worse for mitomycin-HIPEC. There was no change in treatment effect depending on the analysed time period.

Conclusions: Oxaliplatin-based HIPEC provided better outcomes compared to mitomycin-based HIPEC. High-dose mitomycin-HIPEC was similar to oxaliplatin-HIPEC. The 90-day mortality difference favours the oxaliplatin-HIPEC group. A trend for dose-response between low- and high-dose HIPEC was reported.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
结直肠癌腹腔内热化疗。
背景:这项研究在一个大型国际患者数据集中评估了腹腔内热化疗(HIPEC)对伴有腹膜转移的结直肠癌(pmCRC)的疗效:选取1991年至2018年期间在39个中心接受细胞减毒手术并行HIPEC治疗的pmCRC患者,比较其接受的HIPEC方案--奥沙利铂-HIPEC与丝裂霉素-HIPEC。在对粗略数据进行分析后,进行了倾向分数匹配(PSM)和Cox比例危险建模。研究结果包括总生存期(OS)、无复发生存期(RFS)以及HIPEC剂量反应效应(高剂量与低剂量、剂量强化和双药方案)对OS、RFS和90天发病率的影响。此外,还评估了治疗时间段的影响:结果:在2760名患者中,共纳入了2093名患者。中位OS为43个月(95% 置信区间为41至46个月),中位RFS为12个月(95% 置信区间为12至13个月)。奥沙利铂-HIPEC组的OS为47个月(95% c.i.为42至53个月),而丝裂霉素-HIPEC组为39个月(95% c.i.为36至43个月)(P = 0.002),aHR为0.77,95% c.i.为0.67至0.90,P < 0.001。奥沙利铂-HIPEC组和丝裂霉素-HIPEC组的OS获益在PSM后持续存在(48个月(95% c.i.42至59个月)对40个月(95% c.i.37至44个月)),P < 0.001,aHR 0.78(95% c.i.0.65至0.94),P = 0.009。同样,奥沙利铂-HIPEC的匹配RFS明显高于其他疗法(13个月(95% c.i.12至15个月)对11个月(95% c.i.10至12个月,P = 0.02))。与奥沙利铂-HIPEC相比,高剂量丝裂霉素-HIPEC方案的OS相似。在每种方案中加强HIPEC剂量可提高生存率。奥沙利铂+伊立替康-HIPEC的OS改善幅度最大(61个月(95% c.i.51至101个月))。在粗略分析和 PSM 分析中,丝裂霉素-HIPEC 的 90 天死亡率都较低。不同分析时间段的治疗效果没有变化:结论:与丝裂霉素HIPEC相比,奥沙利铂HIPEC的疗效更好。大剂量丝裂霉素-HIPEC与奥沙利铂-HIPEC效果相似。奥沙利铂-HIPEC组的90天死亡率较高。据报道,低剂量和高剂量HIPEC之间存在剂量反应趋势。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BJS Open
BJS Open SURGERY-
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
3.20%
发文量
144
期刊最新文献
Classifying histopathological growth patterns for resected colorectal liver metastasis with a deep learning analysis. Short-term outcomes depending on type of oesophagojejunostomy in laparoscopic total gastrectomy for gastric cancer: retrospective study based on a Korean Nationwide Survey for Gastric Cancer in 2019. Association of postoperative opioid type with mortality and readmission rates: multicentre retrospective cohort study. Effects of the superior mesenteric artery approach versus the no-touch approach during pancreatoduodenectomy on the mobilization of circulating tumour cells and clusters in pancreatic cancer (CETUPANC): randomized clinical trial. Reported outcomes in studies of intermittent claudication - first step toward a core outcome set: systematic review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1