{"title":"Correction to: Comparison of two bundles for reducing surgical site infection in colorectal surgery: multicentre cohort study.","authors":"","doi":"10.1093/bjsopen/zrag009","DOIUrl":"10.1093/bjsopen/zrag009","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":9028,"journal":{"name":"BJS Open","volume":"10 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.5,"publicationDate":"2026-03-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12962300/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147364211","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"Best of upper gastrointestinal surgery in 2025.","authors":"Marcel Schneider, Ville Sallinen","doi":"10.1093/bjsopen/zraf176","DOIUrl":"10.1093/bjsopen/zraf176","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":9028,"journal":{"name":"BJS Open","volume":"10 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.5,"publicationDate":"2026-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12866664/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146112102","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Hendrik C Albrecht, Mateusz Trawa, Lennart Zimniak, Daniela Adolf, Ferdinand Köckerling, Stephan Gretschel
Background: Laparoscopic (transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP) and totally extraperitoneal (TEP)) and Lichtenstein procedures are the most commonly used approaches for primary unilateral inguinal hernia repair. However, only limited long-term data are available to compare the outcomes of these techniques, particularly from large cohorts. The aim of this study was to evaluate the long-term results of Lichtenstein and laparoscopic primary unilateral hernia repairs based on data from the Herniamed registry.
Methods: All patients registered in the Herniamed registry were included between 5 January 2009 and 4 October 2024. At the 5-year follow-up, a propensity score matched analysis was performed comparing Lichtenstein versus TEP, Lichtenstein versus TAPP, and TEP versus TAPP.
Results: In all, 109 130 patients with primary unilateral inguinal hernia and 5-year follow-up data were included in the study. Propensity score matching revealed 21 889, 27 439, and 29 475 matched pairs for comparisons of Lichtenstein versus TEP, Lichtenstein versus TAPP, and TEP versus TAPP, respectively. Lichtenstein repair had more general complications compared with TEP (1.2 versus 0.9%; P = 0.002), postoperative complications (3.4 versus 1.7%; P < 0.001), complication-related reoperations (1.0 versus 0.5%; P < 0.001), pain on exertion (6.7 versus 4.2%; P < 0.001), pain at rest (3.2 versus 2.3%; P < 0.001), pain requiring treatment (1.8 versus 1.3%; P < 0.001), and seroma (1.2 versus 0.9%; P < 0.001); discordant cases in matched-pair analyses. However, intraoperative complications were lower for Lichtenstein compared with TEP procedure (0.8% versus 1.0%; P = 0.038). Lichtenstein repair had more general complications compared with TAPP (1.2 versus 0.9%; P = 0.002), postoperative complications (3.5 versus 1.9%; P < 0.001), complication-related reoperations (1.0 versus 0.5%; P < 0.001), pain on exertion (6.3 versus 4.1%; P < 0.001), pain at rest (3.1 versus 2.2%; P < 0.001), and pain requiring treatment (1.8 versus 1.3%; P < 0.001).
Conclusion: In the evaluation of long-term results, laparoscopic techniques have advantages over the Lichtenstein procedure in primary unilateral inguinal hernia repair with regard to postoperative complications and chronic pain.
{"title":"Long-term outcomes of Lichtenstein and laparoscopic primary unilateral inguinal hernia repair: registry-based propensity score-matched analysis.","authors":"Hendrik C Albrecht, Mateusz Trawa, Lennart Zimniak, Daniela Adolf, Ferdinand Köckerling, Stephan Gretschel","doi":"10.1093/bjsopen/zraf134","DOIUrl":"10.1093/bjsopen/zraf134","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Laparoscopic (transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP) and totally extraperitoneal (TEP)) and Lichtenstein procedures are the most commonly used approaches for primary unilateral inguinal hernia repair. However, only limited long-term data are available to compare the outcomes of these techniques, particularly from large cohorts. The aim of this study was to evaluate the long-term results of Lichtenstein and laparoscopic primary unilateral hernia repairs based on data from the Herniamed registry.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>All patients registered in the Herniamed registry were included between 5 January 2009 and 4 October 2024. At the 5-year follow-up, a propensity score matched analysis was performed comparing Lichtenstein versus TEP, Lichtenstein versus TAPP, and TEP versus TAPP.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In all, 109 130 patients with primary unilateral inguinal hernia and 5-year follow-up data were included in the study. Propensity score matching revealed 21 889, 27 439, and 29 475 matched pairs for comparisons of Lichtenstein versus TEP, Lichtenstein versus TAPP, and TEP versus TAPP, respectively. Lichtenstein repair had more general complications compared with TEP (1.2 versus 0.9%; P = 0.002), postoperative complications (3.4 versus 1.7%; P < 0.001), complication-related reoperations (1.0 versus 0.5%; P < 0.001), pain on exertion (6.7 versus 4.2%; P < 0.001), pain at rest (3.2 versus 2.3%; P < 0.001), pain requiring treatment (1.8 versus 1.3%; P < 0.001), and seroma (1.2 versus 0.9%; P < 0.001); discordant cases in matched-pair analyses. However, intraoperative complications were lower for Lichtenstein compared with TEP procedure (0.8% versus 1.0%; P = 0.038). Lichtenstein repair had more general complications compared with TAPP (1.2 versus 0.9%; P = 0.002), postoperative complications (3.5 versus 1.9%; P < 0.001), complication-related reoperations (1.0 versus 0.5%; P < 0.001), pain on exertion (6.3 versus 4.1%; P < 0.001), pain at rest (3.1 versus 2.2%; P < 0.001), and pain requiring treatment (1.8 versus 1.3%; P < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In the evaluation of long-term results, laparoscopic techniques have advantages over the Lichtenstein procedure in primary unilateral inguinal hernia repair with regard to postoperative complications and chronic pain.</p>","PeriodicalId":9028,"journal":{"name":"BJS Open","volume":"10 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.5,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12755920/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145877649","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"BJS Open 2025 best HPB surgery articles: editors' choices.","authors":"","doi":"10.1093/bjsopen/zraf184","DOIUrl":"10.1093/bjsopen/zraf184","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":9028,"journal":{"name":"BJS Open","volume":"10 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.5,"publicationDate":"2025-12-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12851400/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146096854","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Megan Power Foley, Ciara Fahey, Anne-Marie Byrne, Roisín Leahy, Laura Dempsey, Daniel Westby, Stewart R Walsh
Background: Major lower extremity amputations are frequently performed for end-stage peripheral arterial disease and progressive diabetic foot complications. Wound complications after amputation affect up to one-third of limbs. The patient cohort undergoing amputation are typically high risk for poor wound healing, often with unmodifiable risk factors in an urgent clinical setting. Incisional negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) has been shown to reduce wound complications in other high-risk populations. This randomized controlled trial investigates whether prophylactic NPWT reduces wound complications in patients after major amputation compared with standard dry dressings.
Methods: This protocol describes a prospective, multicentre, randomized controlled trial with an internal pilot recruiting patients undergoing major lower extremity amputation for any indication. Limbs will be randomized to receive either a single-use NPWT device on their closed surgical incision or a dry dressing. The primary clinical outcome is the rate of wound complications. Secondary outcomes include reoperation rates, length of hospital stay, cost-effectiveness of NPWT, and patient-reported quality of life. Follow-up will continue to 6 months after surgery. The initial pilot phase has a recruitment target of 96 limbs, whereas an estimated 728 patients will be required to power a definitive trial adequately.
Discussion: This trial aims to supplement the existing poor-quality data on this important aspect of care and equip healthcare professionals to make cost-effective decisions regarding postoperative wound management.
{"title":"Prophylactic Incisional Negative Pressure wound therapy (NPWT) for major Amputations (PINTA): protocol for randomized controlled trial of single-use NPWT devices for closed-incision major lower extremity amputations.","authors":"Megan Power Foley, Ciara Fahey, Anne-Marie Byrne, Roisín Leahy, Laura Dempsey, Daniel Westby, Stewart R Walsh","doi":"10.1093/bjsopen/zraf159","DOIUrl":"10.1093/bjsopen/zraf159","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Major lower extremity amputations are frequently performed for end-stage peripheral arterial disease and progressive diabetic foot complications. Wound complications after amputation affect up to one-third of limbs. The patient cohort undergoing amputation are typically high risk for poor wound healing, often with unmodifiable risk factors in an urgent clinical setting. Incisional negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) has been shown to reduce wound complications in other high-risk populations. This randomized controlled trial investigates whether prophylactic NPWT reduces wound complications in patients after major amputation compared with standard dry dressings.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This protocol describes a prospective, multicentre, randomized controlled trial with an internal pilot recruiting patients undergoing major lower extremity amputation for any indication. Limbs will be randomized to receive either a single-use NPWT device on their closed surgical incision or a dry dressing. The primary clinical outcome is the rate of wound complications. Secondary outcomes include reoperation rates, length of hospital stay, cost-effectiveness of NPWT, and patient-reported quality of life. Follow-up will continue to 6 months after surgery. The initial pilot phase has a recruitment target of 96 limbs, whereas an estimated 728 patients will be required to power a definitive trial adequately.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>This trial aims to supplement the existing poor-quality data on this important aspect of care and equip healthcare professionals to make cost-effective decisions regarding postoperative wound management.</p>","PeriodicalId":9028,"journal":{"name":"BJS Open","volume":"10 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.5,"publicationDate":"2025-12-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12781197/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145931978","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Fabio Corsi, Sara Albasini, Matilde Pelizzola, Carlo Morasso, Giulia Armatura, Alessandro Asaro, Corrado Chiappa, Virginia Coli, Francesca Combi, Angelica Della Valle, Raimondo Di Giacomo, Secondo Folli, Maria Luisa Gasparri, Massimo Maria Grassi, Stefano Mancini, Ilaria Maugeri, Marica Melina, Andrea Papadia, Lorenzo Rossi, Laura Roveda, Francesca Rovera, Silvia Segattini, Adele Sgarella, Claudio Siani, Norma Stefenelli, Francesco Valenti, Simone Zanotti
Background: The increasing detection of non-palpable breast lesions has made accurate preoperative localization essential to optimize breast-conserving surgery. Although multiple localization methods exist, there is still a lack of robust, large-scale, multicentre evaluations comparing different techniques.
Methods: The LOCALIZATION01 study compares real-world data from 13 breast units in Italy and Switzerland on the impact of localization techniques on breast-conserving surgery for non-palpable lesions between 2016 and 2024. Four localization techniques were compared: wire-guided (WGL), radio-guided (ROLL), magnetic seed (MSL), and carbon (CL). The main outcomes were margin status, calculated resection ratio, postoperative complications, and surgical time. Subgroup analyses were performed for body mass index, lesion morphology and histopathology.
Results: In total, 3241 patients were enrolled (ROLL 985, MSL 592, WGL 1079, and CL 585). ROLL achieved the highest rate of negative surgical margins, significantly outperforming MSL, WGL, and CL (97.5% versus 94.7% versus 94.5% versus 90.6%, respectively; P < 0.05). CL was associated with the highest postoperative complications rate (16.7%) versus ROLL (4.1%), MSL (4.5%), and WGL (2.1%) (P < 0.0001). The surgical time for MSL was significantly shorter when compared with WGL (46 versus 70 minutes (min); P < 0.0001) and CL (55 min; P < 0.0001). WGL had the most favourable calculated resection ratio (2.4), followed by MSL (2.6), ROLL (2.7), and CL (3.0). Multivariable analysis identified CL as an independent predictor of positive margins (odds ratio 1.82; P = 0.004), whereas ROLL was protective (odds ratio 0.45; P = 0.009).
Conclusion: ROLL and MSL outperformed WGL and CL across multiple endpoints. CL data revealed objective limitations that suggest caution in its use. A personalized approach considering lesion morphology, body mass index, and logistics is recommended.
{"title":"Comparative effectiveness of preoperative localization techniques for non-palpable breast lesions: multicentre real-world study.","authors":"Fabio Corsi, Sara Albasini, Matilde Pelizzola, Carlo Morasso, Giulia Armatura, Alessandro Asaro, Corrado Chiappa, Virginia Coli, Francesca Combi, Angelica Della Valle, Raimondo Di Giacomo, Secondo Folli, Maria Luisa Gasparri, Massimo Maria Grassi, Stefano Mancini, Ilaria Maugeri, Marica Melina, Andrea Papadia, Lorenzo Rossi, Laura Roveda, Francesca Rovera, Silvia Segattini, Adele Sgarella, Claudio Siani, Norma Stefenelli, Francesco Valenti, Simone Zanotti","doi":"10.1093/bjsopen/zraf153","DOIUrl":"10.1093/bjsopen/zraf153","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The increasing detection of non-palpable breast lesions has made accurate preoperative localization essential to optimize breast-conserving surgery. Although multiple localization methods exist, there is still a lack of robust, large-scale, multicentre evaluations comparing different techniques.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The LOCALIZATION01 study compares real-world data from 13 breast units in Italy and Switzerland on the impact of localization techniques on breast-conserving surgery for non-palpable lesions between 2016 and 2024. Four localization techniques were compared: wire-guided (WGL), radio-guided (ROLL), magnetic seed (MSL), and carbon (CL). The main outcomes were margin status, calculated resection ratio, postoperative complications, and surgical time. Subgroup analyses were performed for body mass index, lesion morphology and histopathology.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 3241 patients were enrolled (ROLL 985, MSL 592, WGL 1079, and CL 585). ROLL achieved the highest rate of negative surgical margins, significantly outperforming MSL, WGL, and CL (97.5% versus 94.7% versus 94.5% versus 90.6%, respectively; P < 0.05). CL was associated with the highest postoperative complications rate (16.7%) versus ROLL (4.1%), MSL (4.5%), and WGL (2.1%) (P < 0.0001). The surgical time for MSL was significantly shorter when compared with WGL (46 versus 70 minutes (min); P < 0.0001) and CL (55 min; P < 0.0001). WGL had the most favourable calculated resection ratio (2.4), followed by MSL (2.6), ROLL (2.7), and CL (3.0). Multivariable analysis identified CL as an independent predictor of positive margins (odds ratio 1.82; P = 0.004), whereas ROLL was protective (odds ratio 0.45; P = 0.009).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>ROLL and MSL outperformed WGL and CL across multiple endpoints. CL data revealed objective limitations that suggest caution in its use. A personalized approach considering lesion morphology, body mass index, and logistics is recommended.</p>","PeriodicalId":9028,"journal":{"name":"BJS Open","volume":"10 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.5,"publicationDate":"2025-12-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12781200/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145931980","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Background: Tumour deposits are an important prognostic factor in colorectal cancer. In tumour node metastasis (TNM)8, the definition became stricter as TNM7's previous requirement for absence of lymphatic tissue was expanded to also include nerve and vascular tissue. TNM8 has been criticised for its limited prognostic value. This study aimed to compare prognostic differences for patients with colorectal cancer with tumour deposits staged with TNM7 and TNM8.
Methods: This national retrospective cohort study included patients with colorectal cancer who underwent surgical resection in 2011-2014 and 2017-2019. Exclusion criteria were metastatic stage IV disease, non-radical or non-curative surgery, unstated tumour deposit status, or early (≤ 30 days) mortality. Univariable, multivariable, and interaction term Cox regression analyses examined differences in overall survival and distant metastasis between TNM7 and TNM8 stagings. Multivariable models were adjusted for age, gender, American Society of Anesthesiologists score, number of positive lymph nodes, TNM stage, neoadjuvant, and adjuvant treatment.
Results: Of 19 413 patients operated on during 2011-2014 and 15 027 during 2017-2019, 23 966 were included. The TNM7 cohort had 1225 (9.5%) patients with tumour deposits, and the TNM8 cohort had 1407 (12.7%). There was an improved 5-year distant metastasis-free survival for patients with tumour deposits (hazard ratio 2.35 (95% confidence interval 2.14 to 2.58)) in the TNM8 cohort, but no benefit in overall survival, compared with patients in the TNM7 cohort. Interaction analysis revealed no prognostic difference associated with tumour deposit status between the two TNM editions.
Conclusion: Despite increased complexity, the revised definition of tumour deposits in TNM8 did not enhance prognostic ability compared with TNM7.
{"title":"Limited prognostic value of revised tumour deposit definition in tumour node metastasis (TNM)8 in colorectal cancer: national cohort study.","authors":"Frida Stoltz, Simon Lundström, Pamela Buchwald","doi":"10.1093/bjsopen/zraf148","DOIUrl":"10.1093/bjsopen/zraf148","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Tumour deposits are an important prognostic factor in colorectal cancer. In tumour node metastasis (TNM)8, the definition became stricter as TNM7's previous requirement for absence of lymphatic tissue was expanded to also include nerve and vascular tissue. TNM8 has been criticised for its limited prognostic value. This study aimed to compare prognostic differences for patients with colorectal cancer with tumour deposits staged with TNM7 and TNM8.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This national retrospective cohort study included patients with colorectal cancer who underwent surgical resection in 2011-2014 and 2017-2019. Exclusion criteria were metastatic stage IV disease, non-radical or non-curative surgery, unstated tumour deposit status, or early (≤ 30 days) mortality. Univariable, multivariable, and interaction term Cox regression analyses examined differences in overall survival and distant metastasis between TNM7 and TNM8 stagings. Multivariable models were adjusted for age, gender, American Society of Anesthesiologists score, number of positive lymph nodes, TNM stage, neoadjuvant, and adjuvant treatment.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 19 413 patients operated on during 2011-2014 and 15 027 during 2017-2019, 23 966 were included. The TNM7 cohort had 1225 (9.5%) patients with tumour deposits, and the TNM8 cohort had 1407 (12.7%). There was an improved 5-year distant metastasis-free survival for patients with tumour deposits (hazard ratio 2.35 (95% confidence interval 2.14 to 2.58)) in the TNM8 cohort, but no benefit in overall survival, compared with patients in the TNM7 cohort. Interaction analysis revealed no prognostic difference associated with tumour deposit status between the two TNM editions.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Despite increased complexity, the revised definition of tumour deposits in TNM8 did not enhance prognostic ability compared with TNM7.</p>","PeriodicalId":9028,"journal":{"name":"BJS Open","volume":"10 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.5,"publicationDate":"2025-12-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12822601/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146017353","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pablo Díaz-Vidal, Cristina Gil-Casado, Uxía Fernández-Vázquez, Eva Diz-Ferreira, Pedro Luna-Rojas, José Carlos Diz
Background: Low cardiorespiratory fitness (CRF) has been demonstrated to be associated with increased perioperative morbidity and mortality. However, evidence regarding the effect of prehabilitation on CRF and postoperative outcomes remains inconclusive.
Methods: A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted in accordance with the PRISMA statement encompassing randomized clinical trials (RCTs) published in PubMed and Web of Science up to June 2025 on the effects of prehabilitation with exercise, measured using the 6-minute walk test, for adult patients undergoing surgery. The primary objective was to examine the effect of prehabilitation based on physical exercise on the preoperative physical condition of adults scheduled to undergo elective surgery, measured as the change in the 6-minute walk distance (6MWD). Factors associated with changes in the 6MWD and the effect of prehabilitation on postoperative CRF were analysed, as were the length of hospital stay and mortality. Effect sizes and their 95% confidence interval (c.i.) were estimated with a random-effects model.
Results: Of 107 RCTs screened, 21 were included in the analysis, comprising 1649 patients (828 undergoing prehabilitation) across several specialities, the most prevalent being cardiac (501 patients), colorectal (423 patients), and thoracic surgery (364 patients). The prehabilitation group exhibited a greater improvement in the 6MWD before surgery (mean difference (MD) 29 m; 95% c.i. 14 to 42 m; P < 0.001; I2 = 84%) and in the first month after surgery (MD 22 m; 95% c.i. 0 to 43 m; P = 0.05; I2 = 92%). A greater proportion of patients in the prehabilitation group had a clinically significant improvement in the 6MWD both before (odds ratio (OR) 2.66; 95% c.i. 1.76 to 4.0; P < 0.001; I2 = 53%) and after (OR 2.59; 95% c.i. 1.05 to 6.35; P = 0.04; I2 = 69%) surgery. There were no differences between the groups in length of hospital stay (MD -0.24; 95% c.i. -0.65 to 0.17; P = 0.25; I2 = 25%) or mortality (OR 0.71; 95% c.i. 0.26 to 1.92; P = 0.5; I2 = 0%).
Conclusion: Prehabilitation involving physical exercise before surgery was associated with an improvement in preoperative CRF. However, no differences were observed between the groups in length of hospital stay or postoperative mortality. The improvement in CRF persists in the postoperative period, suggesting a potential benefit for patient recovery.
背景:低心肺适能(CRF)已被证明与围手术期发病率和死亡率增加有关。然而,关于康复对CRF和术后结果的影响的证据仍然没有定论。方法:根据PRISMA声明进行系统回顾和荟萃分析,其中包括截至2025年6月发表在PubMed和Web of Science上的随机临床试验(rct),使用6分钟步行测试对接受手术的成年患者进行锻炼预适应的影响。主要目的是检查基于体育锻炼的康复对计划接受择期手术的成年人术前身体状况的影响,以6分钟步行距离(6MWD)的变化来衡量。分析了与6MWD变化和康复对术后CRF的影响相关的因素,以及住院时间和死亡率。效应量及其95%置信区间(ci)用随机效应模型估计。结果:在筛选的107项随机对照试验中,21项纳入分析,包括1649例患者(828例接受康复治疗),涉及多个专业,最常见的是心脏(501例)、结肠直肠(423例)和胸外科(364例)。预康复组术前6MWD有较大改善(平均差值(MD) 29 m;95% c.i. 14至42米;P < 0.001;I2 = 84%)和术后第一个月(MD 22 m; 95% ci 0 ~ 43 m; P = 0.05; I2 = 92%)。康复组中有更大比例的患者在康复前的6MWD均有临床显著改善(优势比(OR) 2.66;95% ci 1.76 - 4.0;P < 0.001;I2 = 53%)和手术后(OR 2.59; 95% ci 1.05 ~ 6.35; P = 0.04; I2 = 69%)。两组间住院时间(MD = 0.24; 95% ci = 0.65 ~ 0.17; P = 0.25; I2 = 25%)或死亡率(or = 0.71; 95% ci = 0.26 ~ 1.92; P = 0.5; I2 = 0%)均无差异。结论:术前包括体育锻炼的康复训练与术前CRF的改善相关。然而,两组在住院时间和术后死亡率方面没有观察到差异。CRF的改善持续到术后,表明对患者的恢复有潜在的好处。
{"title":"Effect of preoperative prehabilitation on the 6-minute walk distance and postoperative outcomes in adult patients: meta-analysis.","authors":"Pablo Díaz-Vidal, Cristina Gil-Casado, Uxía Fernández-Vázquez, Eva Diz-Ferreira, Pedro Luna-Rojas, José Carlos Diz","doi":"10.1093/bjsopen/zraf162","DOIUrl":"10.1093/bjsopen/zraf162","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Low cardiorespiratory fitness (CRF) has been demonstrated to be associated with increased perioperative morbidity and mortality. However, evidence regarding the effect of prehabilitation on CRF and postoperative outcomes remains inconclusive.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted in accordance with the PRISMA statement encompassing randomized clinical trials (RCTs) published in PubMed and Web of Science up to June 2025 on the effects of prehabilitation with exercise, measured using the 6-minute walk test, for adult patients undergoing surgery. The primary objective was to examine the effect of prehabilitation based on physical exercise on the preoperative physical condition of adults scheduled to undergo elective surgery, measured as the change in the 6-minute walk distance (6MWD). Factors associated with changes in the 6MWD and the effect of prehabilitation on postoperative CRF were analysed, as were the length of hospital stay and mortality. Effect sizes and their 95% confidence interval (c.i.) were estimated with a random-effects model.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 107 RCTs screened, 21 were included in the analysis, comprising 1649 patients (828 undergoing prehabilitation) across several specialities, the most prevalent being cardiac (501 patients), colorectal (423 patients), and thoracic surgery (364 patients). The prehabilitation group exhibited a greater improvement in the 6MWD before surgery (mean difference (MD) 29 m; 95% c.i. 14 to 42 m; P < 0.001; I2 = 84%) and in the first month after surgery (MD 22 m; 95% c.i. 0 to 43 m; P = 0.05; I2 = 92%). A greater proportion of patients in the prehabilitation group had a clinically significant improvement in the 6MWD both before (odds ratio (OR) 2.66; 95% c.i. 1.76 to 4.0; P < 0.001; I2 = 53%) and after (OR 2.59; 95% c.i. 1.05 to 6.35; P = 0.04; I2 = 69%) surgery. There were no differences between the groups in length of hospital stay (MD -0.24; 95% c.i. -0.65 to 0.17; P = 0.25; I2 = 25%) or mortality (OR 0.71; 95% c.i. 0.26 to 1.92; P = 0.5; I2 = 0%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Prehabilitation involving physical exercise before surgery was associated with an improvement in preoperative CRF. However, no differences were observed between the groups in length of hospital stay or postoperative mortality. The improvement in CRF persists in the postoperative period, suggesting a potential benefit for patient recovery.</p>","PeriodicalId":9028,"journal":{"name":"BJS Open","volume":"10 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.5,"publicationDate":"2025-12-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12888387/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146148979","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
{"title":"BJS Open 2025 best colorectal surgery articles: editors' choices.","authors":"","doi":"10.1093/bjsopen/zraf181","DOIUrl":"10.1093/bjsopen/zraf181","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":9028,"journal":{"name":"BJS Open","volume":"10 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.5,"publicationDate":"2025-12-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12851109/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146096851","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Byungchul Yu, Jaehyeong Cho, Hyunjee Kim, Seung Ha Hwang, Jiyoung Hwang, Soeun Kim, Jiyeon Oh, Sooji Lee, Do Wan Kim, Junepill Seok, Kyounghwan Kim, Jinseok Lee, Dong Keon Yon, Wu Seong Kang
Background: Early triage for massive transfusion (MT) is essential in trauma care but most existing scoring systems rely on in-hospital data. To address this limitation, a machine learning model using only prehospital variables to predict MT and stratify mortality risk was developed and externally validated.
Methods: Data from the Korean Trauma Data Bank from 19 trauma centres (2017-22) was used for model development and internal validation, with 2023 data for patients from four additional centres used for external validation. Trauma cases were identified using S or T codes from the Korean Classification of Diseases, 7th edition. MT was defined as ≥ 5 units packed red blood cells within 4 hours or ≥ 10 units within 24 hours. Machine learning models were trained using 21 prehospital variables, with a final ensemble model constructed from the top-performing algorithms. Model interpretability was assessed using Shapley additive explanations (SHAP), and the association between predicted probability tertiles (T1-T3) and in-hospital mortality was evaluated using logistic regression.
Results: In all, 227 567 patients were included in the development cohort and internal validation cohort, with 8867 patients in the external validation cohort. The soft-voting ensemble model, combining random forest and AdaBoost, showed high predictive performance, with area under the receiver operating characteristic curve values of 0.837 (internal validation) and 0.837 (external validation). SHAP analysis identified accident type as the most influential predictor, followed by consciousness level, and circulatory assistance. Higher model probability was associated with increased in-hospital mortality (adjusted odds ratios (95% confidence intervals) 2.34 (2.16 to 2.55), 2.70 (2.49 to 2.92), and 3.53 (3.25 to 3.83) for T1, T2, and T3, respectively).
Conclusion: A prehospital ensemble learning model to predict MT was developed and validated, and its predictions were significantly associated with in-hospital mortality. However, this study is limited by the inclusion of a single ethnicity, and future research needs to integrate data from multiple populations to enhance generalizability.
{"title":"On-scene machine learning prediction model for massive transfusion in trauma and its association with in-hospital mortality.","authors":"Byungchul Yu, Jaehyeong Cho, Hyunjee Kim, Seung Ha Hwang, Jiyoung Hwang, Soeun Kim, Jiyeon Oh, Sooji Lee, Do Wan Kim, Junepill Seok, Kyounghwan Kim, Jinseok Lee, Dong Keon Yon, Wu Seong Kang","doi":"10.1093/bjsopen/zraf167","DOIUrl":"10.1093/bjsopen/zraf167","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Early triage for massive transfusion (MT) is essential in trauma care but most existing scoring systems rely on in-hospital data. To address this limitation, a machine learning model using only prehospital variables to predict MT and stratify mortality risk was developed and externally validated.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data from the Korean Trauma Data Bank from 19 trauma centres (2017-22) was used for model development and internal validation, with 2023 data for patients from four additional centres used for external validation. Trauma cases were identified using S or T codes from the Korean Classification of Diseases, 7th edition. MT was defined as ≥ 5 units packed red blood cells within 4 hours or ≥ 10 units within 24 hours. Machine learning models were trained using 21 prehospital variables, with a final ensemble model constructed from the top-performing algorithms. Model interpretability was assessed using Shapley additive explanations (SHAP), and the association between predicted probability tertiles (T1-T3) and in-hospital mortality was evaluated using logistic regression.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In all, 227 567 patients were included in the development cohort and internal validation cohort, with 8867 patients in the external validation cohort. The soft-voting ensemble model, combining random forest and AdaBoost, showed high predictive performance, with area under the receiver operating characteristic curve values of 0.837 (internal validation) and 0.837 (external validation). SHAP analysis identified accident type as the most influential predictor, followed by consciousness level, and circulatory assistance. Higher model probability was associated with increased in-hospital mortality (adjusted odds ratios (95% confidence intervals) 2.34 (2.16 to 2.55), 2.70 (2.49 to 2.92), and 3.53 (3.25 to 3.83) for T1, T2, and T3, respectively).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>A prehospital ensemble learning model to predict MT was developed and validated, and its predictions were significantly associated with in-hospital mortality. However, this study is limited by the inclusion of a single ethnicity, and future research needs to integrate data from multiple populations to enhance generalizability.</p>","PeriodicalId":9028,"journal":{"name":"BJS Open","volume":"10 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.5,"publicationDate":"2025-12-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12914466/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146218525","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}