Identifying factors associated with physical therapy use versus non-use among injured workers with back pain in Washington State

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH American journal of industrial medicine Pub Date : 2024-05-09 DOI:10.1002/ajim.23591
Brian Chin PhD, MSPH, Sean D. Rundell PT, DPT, PhD, Jeanne M. Sears PhD, RN, Deborah Fulton-Kehoe PhD, MPH, June T. Spector MD, MPH, Gary M. Franklin MD, MPH
{"title":"Identifying factors associated with physical therapy use versus non-use among injured workers with back pain in Washington State","authors":"Brian Chin PhD, MSPH,&nbsp;Sean D. Rundell PT, DPT, PhD,&nbsp;Jeanne M. Sears PhD, RN,&nbsp;Deborah Fulton-Kehoe PhD, MPH,&nbsp;June T. Spector MD, MPH,&nbsp;Gary M. Franklin MD, MPH","doi":"10.1002/ajim.23591","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>There is little information about predictors of physical therapy (PT) use among injured workers with back pain. The primary objective of this study is to investigate the associations between PT use and baseline factors not routinely captured in workers’ compensation (WC) data.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>We conducted a secondary analysis using the Washington State Workers’ Compensation Disability Risk Identification Study Cohort, which combines self-reported surveys with claims data from the Washington State Department of Labor and Industries State Fund. Workers with an accepted or provisional WC claim for back injury between June 2002 and April 2004 were eligible. Baseline factors for PT use were selected from six domains (socio-demographic, pain and function, psychosocial, clinical, health behaviors, and employment-related). The outcome was a binary measure for PT use within 1 year of injury. Bivariate and multivariable logistic regression models were conducted to evaluate the associations between PT use and baseline factors.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Among the 1370 eligible study participants, we identified 673 (49%) who received at least one PT service. Baseline factors from five of the six domains (all but health behaviors) were associated with PT use, including gender, income, pain and function measures, injury severity rating, catastrophizing, recovery expectations, fear avoidance, mental health score, body mass index, first provider seen for injury, previous injury, and several work-related factors.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>We identify baseline factors that are associated with PT use, which may be useful in addressing disparities in access to care for injured workers with back pain in a WC system.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":7873,"journal":{"name":"American journal of industrial medicine","volume":"67 7","pages":"592-609"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of industrial medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ajim.23591","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

There is little information about predictors of physical therapy (PT) use among injured workers with back pain. The primary objective of this study is to investigate the associations between PT use and baseline factors not routinely captured in workers’ compensation (WC) data.

Methods

We conducted a secondary analysis using the Washington State Workers’ Compensation Disability Risk Identification Study Cohort, which combines self-reported surveys with claims data from the Washington State Department of Labor and Industries State Fund. Workers with an accepted or provisional WC claim for back injury between June 2002 and April 2004 were eligible. Baseline factors for PT use were selected from six domains (socio-demographic, pain and function, psychosocial, clinical, health behaviors, and employment-related). The outcome was a binary measure for PT use within 1 year of injury. Bivariate and multivariable logistic regression models were conducted to evaluate the associations between PT use and baseline factors.

Results

Among the 1370 eligible study participants, we identified 673 (49%) who received at least one PT service. Baseline factors from five of the six domains (all but health behaviors) were associated with PT use, including gender, income, pain and function measures, injury severity rating, catastrophizing, recovery expectations, fear avoidance, mental health score, body mass index, first provider seen for injury, previous injury, and several work-related factors.

Conclusion

We identify baseline factors that are associated with PT use, which may be useful in addressing disparities in access to care for injured workers with back pain in a WC system.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
确定华盛顿州背部疼痛的受伤工人使用与不使用物理治疗的相关因素。
背景:有关背痛受伤工人使用物理治疗(PT)的预测因素的信息很少。本研究的主要目的是调查物理治疗的使用与工伤赔偿(WC)数据中未常规记录的基线因素之间的关联:我们利用华盛顿州工人赔偿残疾风险识别研究队列进行了二次分析,该队列将自我报告调查与华盛顿州劳工和工业部国家基金的理赔数据相结合。在 2002 年 6 月至 2004 年 4 月期间,因背部受伤而接受或临时申请工伤赔偿的工人均符合条件。从六个领域(社会人口、疼痛和功能、社会心理、临床、健康行为和就业相关)中选择了使用物理治疗的基线因素。结果是受伤后 1 年内使用康复治疗的二元测量。研究人员采用二元和多元逻辑回归模型来评估使用运动疗法与基线因素之间的关系:在 1370 名符合条件的研究参与者中,我们发现有 673 人(49%)至少接受过一次 PT 服务。六个领域中五个领域的基线因素(除健康行为外的所有因素)都与使用物理治疗相关,包括性别、收入、疼痛和功能测量、受伤严重程度评级、灾难化、康复预期、恐惧回避、心理健康评分、体重指数、首次因伤就诊的医疗服务提供者、之前的受伤情况以及几个与工作相关的因素:我们发现了与使用康复治疗相关的基线因素,这些因素可能有助于解决在工伤医疗系统中背部疼痛的工伤工人在获得医疗服务方面的差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
American journal of industrial medicine
American journal of industrial medicine 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
5.70%
发文量
108
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: American Journal of Industrial Medicine considers for publication reports of original research, review articles, instructive case reports, and analyses of policy in the fields of occupational and environmental health and safety. The Journal also accepts commentaries, book reviews and letters of comment and criticism. The goals of the journal are to advance and disseminate knowledge, promote research and foster the prevention of disease and injury. Specific topics of interest include: occupational disease; environmental disease; pesticides; cancer; occupational epidemiology; environmental epidemiology; disease surveillance systems; ergonomics; dust diseases; lead poisoning; neurotoxicology; endocrine disruptors.
期刊最新文献
A Review of Job Assignments and Asbestos Workplace Exposure Measurements for TAWP Mesothelioma Deaths Through 2011. Issue Information Association Between Employment Factors and Prevalence of Cardiovascular Disease in US Law Enforcement Workers: The National Health Interview Survey, 2006-2018. Practical considerations for using personal cooling garments for heat stress management in physically demanding occupations: A systematic review and meta-analysis using realist evaluation. Functional disabilities and adverse well-being by COVID-19 and Long COVID history and employment status: 2022 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1