A Scoping Review of Suicide Prevention Interventions for Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender, Queer, and Other Sexual and Gender Minority Individuals.

IF 3.9 2区 医学 Q1 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH LGBT health Pub Date : 2024-05-09 DOI:10.1089/lgbt.2023.0262
Cindy J Chang, Nicholas A Livingston, Katerine T Rashkovsky, Kelly L Harper, Kevin S Kuehn, Chandra Khalifian, Melanie S Harned, Raymond P Tucker, Colin A Depp
{"title":"A Scoping Review of Suicide Prevention Interventions for Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender, Queer, and Other Sexual and Gender Minority Individuals.","authors":"Cindy J Chang, Nicholas A Livingston, Katerine T Rashkovsky, Kelly L Harper, Kevin S Kuehn, Chandra Khalifian, Melanie S Harned, Raymond P Tucker, Colin A Depp","doi":"10.1089/lgbt.2023.0262","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b><i>Purpose:</i></b> This scoping review summarizes the literature on suicide-specific psychological interventions among lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, queer, and other sexual and gender minority (LGBTQ+) people to synthesize existing findings and support future intervention research and dissemination. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> Electronic databases PsycInfo and PubMed were searched for reports of psychological intervention studies with suicide-related outcome data among LGBTQ+ people. A total of 1269 articles were screened, and 19 studies met inclusion criteria (<i>k</i> = 3 examined suicide-specific interventions tailored to LGBTQ+ people, <i>k</i> = 4 examined nontailored suicide-specific interventions, <i>k</i> = 11 examined minority stress- or LGBTQ+ interventions that were not suicide-specific, and <i>k</i> = 1 examined other types of interventions). <b><i>Results:</i></b> Synthesis of this literature was made challenging by varied study designs, and features limit confidence in the degree of internal and external validity of the interventions evaluated. The only established suicide-specific intervention examined was Dialectical Behavior Therapy, and minority stress- and LGBTQ-specific interventions rarely targeted suicidal thoughts and behaviors (STBs). Nevertheless, most interventions reviewed demonstrated support for feasibility and/or acceptability. Only five studies tested suicide-related outcome differences between an LGBTQ+ group and a cisgender/heterosexual group. These studies did not find significant differences in STBs, but certain subgroups such as bisexual individuals may exhibit specific treatment disparities. <b><i>Conclusion:</i></b> Given the dearth of research, more research examining interventions that may reduce STBs among LGBTQ+ people is critically needed to address this public health issue.</p>","PeriodicalId":18062,"journal":{"name":"LGBT health","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"LGBT health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/lgbt.2023.0262","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: This scoping review summarizes the literature on suicide-specific psychological interventions among lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, queer, and other sexual and gender minority (LGBTQ+) people to synthesize existing findings and support future intervention research and dissemination. Methods: Electronic databases PsycInfo and PubMed were searched for reports of psychological intervention studies with suicide-related outcome data among LGBTQ+ people. A total of 1269 articles were screened, and 19 studies met inclusion criteria (k = 3 examined suicide-specific interventions tailored to LGBTQ+ people, k = 4 examined nontailored suicide-specific interventions, k = 11 examined minority stress- or LGBTQ+ interventions that were not suicide-specific, and k = 1 examined other types of interventions). Results: Synthesis of this literature was made challenging by varied study designs, and features limit confidence in the degree of internal and external validity of the interventions evaluated. The only established suicide-specific intervention examined was Dialectical Behavior Therapy, and minority stress- and LGBTQ-specific interventions rarely targeted suicidal thoughts and behaviors (STBs). Nevertheless, most interventions reviewed demonstrated support for feasibility and/or acceptability. Only five studies tested suicide-related outcome differences between an LGBTQ+ group and a cisgender/heterosexual group. These studies did not find significant differences in STBs, but certain subgroups such as bisexual individuals may exhibit specific treatment disparities. Conclusion: Given the dearth of research, more research examining interventions that may reduce STBs among LGBTQ+ people is critically needed to address this public health issue.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
针对女同性恋、男同性恋、双性恋、变性人、同性恋者及其他在性取向和性别上属于少数群体的人的自杀预防干预措施的范围界定审查。
目的:本范围综述总结了针对女同性恋、男同性恋、双性恋、变性人、同性恋者以及其他性少数群体和性别少数群体(LGBTQ+)的自杀心理干预文献,以归纳现有研究结果,支持未来的干预研究和传播。研究方法在电子数据库 PsycInfo 和 PubMed 中搜索了有关 LGBTQ+ 自杀相关结果数据的心理干预研究报告。共筛选出 1269 篇文章,其中 19 项研究符合纳入标准(k = 3 项研究针对 LGBTQ+ 群体的自杀干预,k = 4 项研究非针对自杀的干预,k = 11 项研究非针对自杀的少数群体压力或 LGBTQ+ 干预,k = 1 项研究其他类型的干预)。结果:由于研究设计各不相同,对这些文献进行综合具有挑战性,这些特点限制了人们对所评估干预措施的内部和外部有效性的信心。唯一一项针对自杀的成熟干预措施是辩证行为疗法,而针对少数群体压力和 LGBTQ 的干预措施很少针对自杀想法和行为(STBs)。尽管如此,所审查的大多数干预措施都证明了其可行性和/或可接受性。只有五项研究测试了 LGBTQ+ 群体与顺性别/异性恋群体之间与自杀相关的结果差异。这些研究并未发现 STB 的显著差异,但某些亚群体(如双性恋者)可能会表现出特殊的治疗差异。结论:鉴于研究的匮乏,我们亟需更多的研究来探讨可减少 LGBTQ+ 人士 STBs 的干预措施,以解决这一公共卫生问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
LGBT health
LGBT health PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH -
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
6.20%
发文量
80
期刊介绍: LGBT Health is the premier peer-reviewed journal dedicated to promoting optimal healthcare for millions of sexual and gender minority persons worldwide by focusing specifically on health while maintaining sufficient breadth to encompass the full range of relevant biopsychosocial and health policy issues. This Journal aims to promote greater awareness of the health concerns particular to each sexual minority population, and to improve availability and delivery of culturally appropriate healthcare services. LGBT Health also encourages further research and increased funding in this critical but currently underserved domain. The Journal provides a much-needed authoritative source and international forum in all areas pertinent to LGBT health and healthcare services. Contributions from all continents are solicited including Asia and Africa which are currently underrepresented in sex research.
期刊最新文献
Prevalence of Cardiac Arrhythmias in Transgender and Nonbinary Adult Community Health Center Patients. Comparing Behavioral Health of Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Questioning, and Heterosexual Middle School Students. An Evaluation of Resilience as a Protective Factor for Mental Health Among Sexual and Gender Minority Young People. Gender Nonconformity, Minority Stress, and Psychological Distress Among Sexual Minority Adolescents. Navigating Stigma Against At-Risk Sexual and Gender Minority Populations to End the HIV Epidemic in Sub-Saharan Africa.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1