Comparison of the diagnostic performance of tryptase and histamine for perioperative anaphylaxis: A multicenter prospective study

IF 6.2 2区 医学 Q1 ALLERGY Allergology International Pub Date : 2024-05-09 DOI:10.1016/j.alit.2024.04.005
{"title":"Comparison of the diagnostic performance of tryptase and histamine for perioperative anaphylaxis: A multicenter prospective study","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.alit.2024.04.005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Diagnosing perioperative anaphylaxis (POA) is often challenging. Although a guideline recommends measuring tryptase rather than histamine, there is little evidence for this. We aimed to examine the diagnostic performance and appropriate timing of tryptase and histamine measurements for diagnosing anaphylaxis, and the association between Hypersensitivity Clinical Scoring Scheme (HCSS) scores and elevated biomarkers.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>We measured tryptase and histamine levels thrice: 30 min, 2 h, and at least 24 h after an anaphylactic event for patients with suspected anaphylaxis, and at the induction of general anesthesia and 30 min and 2 h after the start of surgery for control patients without a reaction. Absolute values and the magnitude and rate of change from baseline were evaluated. We determined the thresholds of tryptase and histamine levels with the best diagnostic performance and compared their performance.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Forty-five patients with perioperative anaphylaxis were included in this study. The control group included 30 patients with uneventful general anesthesia and 12 patients with a suspected but unconfirmed diagnosis of perioperative anaphylaxis. Comparison at the same measurement timings showed that tryptase generally had better diagnostic performance than histamine. Both showed better diagnostic performance when assessed using multiple measurements rather than a single measurement. The best diagnostic performance was seen with the percentage change in the higher tryptase value, whether measured at 30 min or 2 h after anaphylaxis onset, as compared to baseline. However, neither tryptase nor histamine levels correlated with HCSS scores.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Overall, tryptase showed better diagnostic performance than histamine. When multiple tryptase measurements are possible, parameters calculated using two acute phase measurements and the baseline level have better diagnostic performance.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48861,"journal":{"name":"Allergology International","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":6.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1323893024000492/pdfft?md5=206748e87a17ddea853ca158b792c5aa&pid=1-s2.0-S1323893024000492-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Allergology International","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1323893024000492","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ALLERGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Diagnosing perioperative anaphylaxis (POA) is often challenging. Although a guideline recommends measuring tryptase rather than histamine, there is little evidence for this. We aimed to examine the diagnostic performance and appropriate timing of tryptase and histamine measurements for diagnosing anaphylaxis, and the association between Hypersensitivity Clinical Scoring Scheme (HCSS) scores and elevated biomarkers.

Methods

We measured tryptase and histamine levels thrice: 30 min, 2 h, and at least 24 h after an anaphylactic event for patients with suspected anaphylaxis, and at the induction of general anesthesia and 30 min and 2 h after the start of surgery for control patients without a reaction. Absolute values and the magnitude and rate of change from baseline were evaluated. We determined the thresholds of tryptase and histamine levels with the best diagnostic performance and compared their performance.

Results

Forty-five patients with perioperative anaphylaxis were included in this study. The control group included 30 patients with uneventful general anesthesia and 12 patients with a suspected but unconfirmed diagnosis of perioperative anaphylaxis. Comparison at the same measurement timings showed that tryptase generally had better diagnostic performance than histamine. Both showed better diagnostic performance when assessed using multiple measurements rather than a single measurement. The best diagnostic performance was seen with the percentage change in the higher tryptase value, whether measured at 30 min or 2 h after anaphylaxis onset, as compared to baseline. However, neither tryptase nor histamine levels correlated with HCSS scores.

Conclusions

Overall, tryptase showed better diagnostic performance than histamine. When multiple tryptase measurements are possible, parameters calculated using two acute phase measurements and the baseline level have better diagnostic performance.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
比较色氨酸酶和组胺对围手术期过敏性休克的诊断效果:一项多中心前瞻性研究。
背景:围手术期过敏性休克(POA)的诊断通常具有挑战性。虽然有指南建议测量胰蛋白酶而不是组胺,但几乎没有证据证明这一点。我们旨在研究诊断过敏性休克时测量胰蛋白酶和组胺的诊断性能和适当时机,以及过敏性休克临床评分计划(HCSS)评分与生物标志物升高之间的关联:我们对胰蛋白酶和组胺水平进行了三次测量:对疑似过敏性休克患者在过敏事件发生后 30 分钟、2 小时和至少 24 小时进行测量;对无反应的对照组患者在全身麻醉诱导时和手术开始后 30 分钟和 2 小时进行测量。我们评估了绝对值以及与基线相比的变化幅度和速率。我们确定了诊断效果最佳的胰蛋白酶和组胺水平阈值,并对其性能进行了比较:本研究共纳入 45 名围手术期过敏性休克患者。对照组包括 30 名全身麻醉顺利的患者和 12 名疑似但未确诊为围术期过敏性休克的患者。在相同的测量时间进行比较后发现,胰蛋白酶的诊断性能通常优于组胺。在使用多次测量而非单次测量进行评估时,两者都显示出更好的诊断性能。无论是在过敏性休克发生后 30 分钟还是 2 小时测量,胰蛋白酶较高值与基线值相比的百分比变化都能显示出最佳诊断性能。然而,无论是色氨酸酶还是组胺水平都与 HCSS 评分无关:总的来说,色氨酸酶的诊断性能优于组胺。当可以进行多次胰蛋白酶测量时,使用两次急性期测量值和基线水平计算出的参数具有更好的诊断性能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Allergology International
Allergology International ALLERGY-IMMUNOLOGY
CiteScore
12.60
自引率
5.90%
发文量
96
审稿时长
29 weeks
期刊介绍: Allergology International is the official journal of the Japanese Society of Allergology and publishes original papers dealing with the etiology, diagnosis and treatment of allergic and related diseases. Papers may include the study of methods of controlling allergic reactions, human and animal models of hypersensitivity and other aspects of basic and applied clinical allergy in its broadest sense. The Journal aims to encourage the international exchange of results and encourages authors from all countries to submit papers in the following three categories: Original Articles, Review Articles, and Letters to the Editor.
期刊最新文献
Follicular T cells and the control of IgE responses. Management of severe asthma during the COVID-19 pandemic: A retrospective study using a Japanese database. Skin health survey on atopic dermatitis among Japanese children: The Tohoku Medical Megabank Project Birth and Three-Generation Cohort Study. Critical pathomechanisms of NSAID-exacerbated respiratory disease (N-ERD) clarified by treatment with omalizumab, an anti-IgE antibody. Reliability of image-based morphometry of the bronchial tree.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1