Development and Validation of an Automated, Real-Time Predictive Model for Postpartum Hemorrhage.

IF 5.7 2区 医学 Q1 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY Obstetrics and gynecology Pub Date : 2024-07-01 Epub Date: 2024-05-10 DOI:10.1097/AOG.0000000000005600
Holly B Ende, Henry J Domenico, Aleksandra Polic, Amber Wesoloski, Lisa C Zuckerwise, Allison B Mccoy, Annastacia R Woytash, Ryan P Moore, Daniel W Byrne
{"title":"Development and Validation of an Automated, Real-Time Predictive Model for Postpartum Hemorrhage.","authors":"Holly B Ende, Henry J Domenico, Aleksandra Polic, Amber Wesoloski, Lisa C Zuckerwise, Allison B Mccoy, Annastacia R Woytash, Ryan P Moore, Daniel W Byrne","doi":"10.1097/AOG.0000000000005600","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To develop and validate a predictive model for postpartum hemorrhage that can be deployed in clinical care using automated, real-time electronic health record (EHR) data and to compare performance of the model with a nationally published risk prediction tool.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A multivariable logistic regression model was developed from retrospective EHR data from 21,108 patients delivering at a quaternary medical center between January 1, 2018, and April 30, 2022. Deliveries were divided into derivation and validation sets based on an 80/20 split by date of delivery. Postpartum hemorrhage was defined as blood loss of 1,000 mL or more in addition to postpartum transfusion of 1 or more units of packed red blood cells. Model performance was evaluated by the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) and was compared with a postpartum hemorrhage risk assessment tool published by the CMQCC (California Maternal Quality Care Collaborative). The model was then programmed into the EHR and again validated with prospectively collected data from 928 patients between November 7, 2023, and January 31, 2024.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Postpartum hemorrhage occurred in 235 of 16,862 patients (1.4%) in the derivation cohort. The predictive model included 21 risk factors and demonstrated an AUC of 0.81 (95% CI, 0.79-0.84) and calibration slope of 1.0 (Brier score 0.013). During external temporal validation, the model maintained discrimination (AUC 0.80, 95% CI, 0.72-0.84) and calibration (calibration slope 0.95, Brier score 0.014). This was superior to the CMQCC tool (AUC 0.69 [95% CI, 0.67-0.70], P <.001). The model maintained performance in prospective, automated data collected with the predictive model in real time (AUC 0.82 [95% CI, 0.73-0.91]).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>We created and temporally validated a postpartum hemorrhage prediction model, demonstrated its superior performance over a commonly used risk prediction tool, successfully coded the model into the EHR, and prospectively validated the model using risk factor data collected in real time. Future work should evaluate external generalizability and effects on patient outcomes; to facilitate this work, we have included the model coefficients and examples of EHR integration in the article.</p>","PeriodicalId":19483,"journal":{"name":"Obstetrics and gynecology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Obstetrics and gynecology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0000000000005600","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/5/10 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To develop and validate a predictive model for postpartum hemorrhage that can be deployed in clinical care using automated, real-time electronic health record (EHR) data and to compare performance of the model with a nationally published risk prediction tool.

Methods: A multivariable logistic regression model was developed from retrospective EHR data from 21,108 patients delivering at a quaternary medical center between January 1, 2018, and April 30, 2022. Deliveries were divided into derivation and validation sets based on an 80/20 split by date of delivery. Postpartum hemorrhage was defined as blood loss of 1,000 mL or more in addition to postpartum transfusion of 1 or more units of packed red blood cells. Model performance was evaluated by the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) and was compared with a postpartum hemorrhage risk assessment tool published by the CMQCC (California Maternal Quality Care Collaborative). The model was then programmed into the EHR and again validated with prospectively collected data from 928 patients between November 7, 2023, and January 31, 2024.

Results: Postpartum hemorrhage occurred in 235 of 16,862 patients (1.4%) in the derivation cohort. The predictive model included 21 risk factors and demonstrated an AUC of 0.81 (95% CI, 0.79-0.84) and calibration slope of 1.0 (Brier score 0.013). During external temporal validation, the model maintained discrimination (AUC 0.80, 95% CI, 0.72-0.84) and calibration (calibration slope 0.95, Brier score 0.014). This was superior to the CMQCC tool (AUC 0.69 [95% CI, 0.67-0.70], P <.001). The model maintained performance in prospective, automated data collected with the predictive model in real time (AUC 0.82 [95% CI, 0.73-0.91]).

Conclusion: We created and temporally validated a postpartum hemorrhage prediction model, demonstrated its superior performance over a commonly used risk prediction tool, successfully coded the model into the EHR, and prospectively validated the model using risk factor data collected in real time. Future work should evaluate external generalizability and effects on patient outcomes; to facilitate this work, we have included the model coefficients and examples of EHR integration in the article.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
产后出血自动实时预测模型的开发与验证。
目的利用自动、实时的电子健康记录(EHR)数据,开发并验证一种可用于临床护理的产后出血预测模型,并将该模型的性能与国家发布的风险预测工具进行比较:根据一家四级医疗中心 2018 年 1 月 1 日至 2022 年 4 月 30 日期间 21108 名分娩患者的回顾性电子病历数据,建立了一个多变量逻辑回归模型。按照分娩日期的 80/20 比例将分娩分为推导集和验证集。产后出血被定义为除产后输注 1 个或 1 个以上单位的包装红细胞外,还失血 1000 毫升或以上。模型的性能通过接收者操作特征曲线下面积(AUC)进行评估,并与 CMQCC(加州产妇优质护理协作组织)发布的产后出血风险评估工具进行比较。然后,将该模型编入电子病历,并利用 2023 年 11 月 7 日至 2024 年 1 月 31 日期间收集的 928 名患者的前瞻性数据再次进行验证:结果:在衍生队列的 16,862 名患者中,有 235 人(1.4%)发生了产后出血。预测模型包括 21 个风险因素,AUC 为 0.81(95% CI,0.79-0.84),校准斜率为 1.0(布赖尔评分 0.013)。在外部时间验证过程中,该模型保持了区分度(AUC 0.80,95% CI,0.72-0.84)和校准度(校准斜率 0.95,布赖尔评分 0.014)。这优于 CMQCC 工具(AUC 0.69 [95% CI, 0.67-0.70],PC 结论:我们创建并在时间上验证了产后出血预测模型,证明其性能优于常用的风险预测工具,成功地将模型编码到电子病历中,并使用实时收集的风险因素数据对模型进行了前瞻性验证。未来的工作应评估外部可推广性和对患者预后的影响;为便于开展这项工作,我们在文章中加入了模型系数和电子病历整合实例。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Obstetrics and gynecology
Obstetrics and gynecology 医学-妇产科学
CiteScore
11.10
自引率
4.20%
发文量
867
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: "Obstetrics & Gynecology," affectionately known as "The Green Journal," is the official publication of the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG). Since its inception in 1953, the journal has been dedicated to advancing the clinical practice of obstetrics and gynecology, as well as related fields. The journal's mission is to promote excellence in these areas by publishing a diverse range of articles that cover translational and clinical topics. "Obstetrics & Gynecology" provides a platform for the dissemination of evidence-based research, clinical guidelines, and expert opinions that are essential for the continuous improvement of women's health care. The journal's content is designed to inform and educate obstetricians, gynecologists, and other healthcare professionals, ensuring that they stay abreast of the latest developments and best practices in their field.
期刊最新文献
False-Positive Human Immunodeficiency Virus-1 Test Results With Rapid Seroreversion After Third-Trimester Tdap Booster Vaccination. Compliance Rate With Triage Test and Treatment for Participants Screening Positive in Cervical Cancer Screening Programs: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Effects of Antihypertensive Therapy During Pregnancy on Postpartum Blood Pressure Control. Management of Vulvovaginal Stevens-Johnson Syndrome and Toxic Epidermal Necrolysis. Navigating the Legal Landscape of Reproductive Rights and Medical Training After LePage v. Mobile Infirmary Clinic.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1