Pub Date : 2026-02-06DOI: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000006194
Kevin J Rouse, William D Hazelton, Axel Frotscher, Ling Chen, Matthew T Prest, Jennifer S Ferris, Xiao Xu, Alexander Melamed, Chin Hur, Brandy M Heckman-Stoddard, Goli Samimi, Nina A Bickell, Tracy M Layne, Stephanie V Blank, Elena B Elkin, Evan R Myers, Laura J Havrilesky, Chung Yin Kong, Jason D Wright
Objective: To aid in cancer control and prevention activities by developing, calibrating, and validating three distinct natural history simulation models of uterine cancer, a growing public health concern.
Methods: To perform comparative analyses, we developed two state-transition microsimulation models and a multistage clonal expansion model of uterine cancer. The models simulate uterine cancer incidence and mortality. All three models were calibrated to common data on the incidence of uterine cancer from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) 18 database. Each model accounts for changing trends in hysterectomy and obesity over time and simulates incidence and mortality for endometrioid and nonendometrioid tumors and uterine sarcoma. After calibration, we projected the incidence and mortality of uterine cancer to 2050.
Results: The three uterine cancer models were well calibrated to population data and produced comparable results for projecting the burden of disease through 2050. Among non-Hispanic White women aged 40 years or older, the models project that by 2050 the incidence of uterine cancer will rise to 76.1-81.8 per 100,000 woman-years, up from 2018 SEER incidence of 60.0 per 100,000 woman-years. Among non-Hispanic Black women, new cases will rise to 90.3-107.2 per 100,000 woman-years, up from 2018 SEER incidence of 61.3 per 100,000 woman-years. Within these populations, incidence-based mortality will increase to 11.3-12.3 deaths per 100,000 woman-years for non-Hispanic White women and to 28.2-35.7 deaths per 100,000 woman-years for non-Hispanic Black women.
Conclusion: Three distinct mathematical simulation models of uterine cancer have been calibrated to observed population-based incidence and mortality. All three models project substantial and continued increases in the incidence and mortality of uterine cancer.
{"title":"Comparative Modeling of Recent and Projected Trends in the Incidence and Mortality of Uterine Cancer.","authors":"Kevin J Rouse, William D Hazelton, Axel Frotscher, Ling Chen, Matthew T Prest, Jennifer S Ferris, Xiao Xu, Alexander Melamed, Chin Hur, Brandy M Heckman-Stoddard, Goli Samimi, Nina A Bickell, Tracy M Layne, Stephanie V Blank, Elena B Elkin, Evan R Myers, Laura J Havrilesky, Chung Yin Kong, Jason D Wright","doi":"10.1097/AOG.0000000000006194","DOIUrl":"10.1097/AOG.0000000000006194","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To aid in cancer control and prevention activities by developing, calibrating, and validating three distinct natural history simulation models of uterine cancer, a growing public health concern.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>To perform comparative analyses, we developed two state-transition microsimulation models and a multistage clonal expansion model of uterine cancer. The models simulate uterine cancer incidence and mortality. All three models were calibrated to common data on the incidence of uterine cancer from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) 18 database. Each model accounts for changing trends in hysterectomy and obesity over time and simulates incidence and mortality for endometrioid and nonendometrioid tumors and uterine sarcoma. After calibration, we projected the incidence and mortality of uterine cancer to 2050.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The three uterine cancer models were well calibrated to population data and produced comparable results for projecting the burden of disease through 2050. Among non-Hispanic White women aged 40 years or older, the models project that by 2050 the incidence of uterine cancer will rise to 76.1-81.8 per 100,000 woman-years, up from 2018 SEER incidence of 60.0 per 100,000 woman-years. Among non-Hispanic Black women, new cases will rise to 90.3-107.2 per 100,000 woman-years, up from 2018 SEER incidence of 61.3 per 100,000 woman-years. Within these populations, incidence-based mortality will increase to 11.3-12.3 deaths per 100,000 woman-years for non-Hispanic White women and to 28.2-35.7 deaths per 100,000 woman-years for non-Hispanic Black women.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Three distinct mathematical simulation models of uterine cancer have been calibrated to observed population-based incidence and mortality. All three models project substantial and continued increases in the incidence and mortality of uterine cancer.</p>","PeriodicalId":19483,"journal":{"name":"Obstetrics and gynecology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.7,"publicationDate":"2026-02-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146125973","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-02-06DOI: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000006183
Anna Booman, Brian T Bateman, Sara Siadat, Caroline Berube, Irogue Igbinosa, Cecilia Leggett, Deirdre J Lyell, Elliott K Main, Stephanie A Leonard
Objective: Evidence related to anemia in early pregnancy, and its resolution or persistence by late pregnancy, is limited. We evaluated pregnancy outcomes associated with anemia in early pregnancy and resolution compared with persistence in late pregnancy.
Methods: We used the Merative™ Marketscan® Commercial Database of nationwide insurance claims (2018-2023) and included pregnant individuals without hereditary anemias. We used hemoglobin and hematocrit to identify anemia in early pregnancy (before 14 weeks of gestation) and late pregnancy (at or after 24 weeks of gestation). Pregnancy outcomes included preeclampsia, placenta previa, placental abruption, severe postpartum hemorrhage, blood products transfusion, cesarean birth, nontransfusion severe maternal morbidity (SMM), spontaneous preterm birth, medically indicated preterm birth, and small-for-gestational-age (SGA) birth weight. We used modified Poisson regression to estimate associations between: 1) anemia in early pregnancy and pregnancy outcomes; and 2) anemia resolution by late pregnancy and pregnancy outcomes, adjusting for confounders by inverse probability weighting.
Results: Among 73,586 individuals, 4.4% (95% CI, 4.3-4.6%) had anemia in early pregnancy. Early pregnancy anemia was associated with higher risk of each outcome assessed, with the exception of placenta previa, with the highest associated risk of blood products transfusion (2.4% vs 0.8%; adjusted risk ratio [aRR] 2.45; 95% CI, 1.91-3.13). Of those with early pregnancy anemia and laboratory values in late pregnancy (72.1%), 53.4% had persistent anemia and 46.6% had resolved anemia. Persistent anemia was associated with nontransfusion SMM (2.6% vs 1.1%, aRR 1.64; 95% CI, 1.13-2.37), blood products transfusion (2.9% vs 0.8%, aRR 2.60; 95% CI, 1.84-3.69), and SGA birth weight (8.5% vs 6.8%, aRR 1.23; 95% CI, 1.01-1.50), compared with those without anemia in the first trimester. The resolution of anemia by late pregnancy was not associated with nontransfusion SMM (1.6% vs 1.1%; aRR 1.07; 95% CI, 0.65-1.74) but was associated with blood products transfusion (1.6% vs 0.8%; aRR 1.64; 95% CI, 1.01-2.67) and SGA birth weight (10.0% vs 6.8%; aRR 1.38; 95% CI, 1.15-1.67) compared with those without anemia in the first trimester.
Conclusion: Anemia in the first trimester was associated with adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes. The resolution of anemia by late pregnancy eliminated the association with nontransfusion SMM but not other outcomes, emphasizing the importance of treating anemia in early pregnancy and before pregnancy.
{"title":"Pregnancy Outcomes Associated With Anemia in the First Trimester and Anemia Resolution by Late Pregnancy.","authors":"Anna Booman, Brian T Bateman, Sara Siadat, Caroline Berube, Irogue Igbinosa, Cecilia Leggett, Deirdre J Lyell, Elliott K Main, Stephanie A Leonard","doi":"10.1097/AOG.0000000000006183","DOIUrl":"10.1097/AOG.0000000000006183","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Evidence related to anemia in early pregnancy, and its resolution or persistence by late pregnancy, is limited. We evaluated pregnancy outcomes associated with anemia in early pregnancy and resolution compared with persistence in late pregnancy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We used the Merative™ Marketscan® Commercial Database of nationwide insurance claims (2018-2023) and included pregnant individuals without hereditary anemias. We used hemoglobin and hematocrit to identify anemia in early pregnancy (before 14 weeks of gestation) and late pregnancy (at or after 24 weeks of gestation). Pregnancy outcomes included preeclampsia, placenta previa, placental abruption, severe postpartum hemorrhage, blood products transfusion, cesarean birth, nontransfusion severe maternal morbidity (SMM), spontaneous preterm birth, medically indicated preterm birth, and small-for-gestational-age (SGA) birth weight. We used modified Poisson regression to estimate associations between: 1) anemia in early pregnancy and pregnancy outcomes; and 2) anemia resolution by late pregnancy and pregnancy outcomes, adjusting for confounders by inverse probability weighting.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 73,586 individuals, 4.4% (95% CI, 4.3-4.6%) had anemia in early pregnancy. Early pregnancy anemia was associated with higher risk of each outcome assessed, with the exception of placenta previa, with the highest associated risk of blood products transfusion (2.4% vs 0.8%; adjusted risk ratio [aRR] 2.45; 95% CI, 1.91-3.13). Of those with early pregnancy anemia and laboratory values in late pregnancy (72.1%), 53.4% had persistent anemia and 46.6% had resolved anemia. Persistent anemia was associated with nontransfusion SMM (2.6% vs 1.1%, aRR 1.64; 95% CI, 1.13-2.37), blood products transfusion (2.9% vs 0.8%, aRR 2.60; 95% CI, 1.84-3.69), and SGA birth weight (8.5% vs 6.8%, aRR 1.23; 95% CI, 1.01-1.50), compared with those without anemia in the first trimester. The resolution of anemia by late pregnancy was not associated with nontransfusion SMM (1.6% vs 1.1%; aRR 1.07; 95% CI, 0.65-1.74) but was associated with blood products transfusion (1.6% vs 0.8%; aRR 1.64; 95% CI, 1.01-2.67) and SGA birth weight (10.0% vs 6.8%; aRR 1.38; 95% CI, 1.15-1.67) compared with those without anemia in the first trimester.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Anemia in the first trimester was associated with adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes. The resolution of anemia by late pregnancy eliminated the association with nontransfusion SMM but not other outcomes, emphasizing the importance of treating anemia in early pregnancy and before pregnancy.</p>","PeriodicalId":19483,"journal":{"name":"Obstetrics and gynecology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.7,"publicationDate":"2026-02-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12880618/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146125975","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-02-06DOI: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000006187
Amanda N Labora, Nimmi S Kapoor
The care of young women with breast cancer can be influenced by pregnancy and desire for future fertility. Here, we provide an overview of breast cancer management in young women with special emphasis on gestational breast cancer and postpartum breast cancer, which are now understood to be distinct clinical entities with disparate outcomes. Typically, breast cancer is detected in young women after self-identification of a breast mass. The initial workup consists of diagnostic breast ultrasonogram and mammogram. Breast cancer treatments vary by histologic subtype of cancer and stage. Chemotherapy and surgery are safe during pregnancy, and it is now known that pregnant women with breast cancer have oncologic outcomes equivalent to those of nonpregnant women when treated according to standard of care. Postpartum breast cancer, however, has higher rates of metastatic disease and mortality. In general, breastfeeding can be safely continued during treatment with appropriate counseling and guidance from a breastfeeding medicine expert. Similarly, fertility preservation and future fertility can be safely pursued with appropriate interventions in young women with breast cancer.
{"title":"Breast Cancer in Young Women: Implications for Pregnancy, Lactation, and Fertility Preservation.","authors":"Amanda N Labora, Nimmi S Kapoor","doi":"10.1097/AOG.0000000000006187","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0000000000006187","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The care of young women with breast cancer can be influenced by pregnancy and desire for future fertility. Here, we provide an overview of breast cancer management in young women with special emphasis on gestational breast cancer and postpartum breast cancer, which are now understood to be distinct clinical entities with disparate outcomes. Typically, breast cancer is detected in young women after self-identification of a breast mass. The initial workup consists of diagnostic breast ultrasonogram and mammogram. Breast cancer treatments vary by histologic subtype of cancer and stage. Chemotherapy and surgery are safe during pregnancy, and it is now known that pregnant women with breast cancer have oncologic outcomes equivalent to those of nonpregnant women when treated according to standard of care. Postpartum breast cancer, however, has higher rates of metastatic disease and mortality. In general, breastfeeding can be safely continued during treatment with appropriate counseling and guidance from a breastfeeding medicine expert. Similarly, fertility preservation and future fertility can be safely pursued with appropriate interventions in young women with breast cancer.</p>","PeriodicalId":19483,"journal":{"name":"Obstetrics and gynecology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.7,"publicationDate":"2026-02-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146126054","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-02-05DOI: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000006178
Mark A Clapp, Siguo Li, Alexander Melamed, Emily Reiff, Cynthia Gyamfi-Bannerman, Anjali J Kaimal
<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To provide real-world data to inform benchmarking goals and practical issues that influence optimal antenatal corticosteroid timing and to examine patient factors, such as gestational age at steroid administration and presenting diagnoses, associated with steroid administration in relation to delivery.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is a retrospective cohort study of singleton deliveries between July 1, 2016, and December 31, 2024, at two large academic hospitals with level IV neonatal intensive care units in a single health system. The primary cohort of interest was individuals who delivered between 24 0/7 and 33 6/7 weeks of gestation. The primary outcome of interest was the timing of antenatal corticosteroid administration in relation to delivery, categorized as none, delivery between 6 hours and 7 days after the first dose of antenatal corticosteroid ("optimally timed" per the Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine's quality metric), and delivery less than 6 hours or more than 7 days after the first dose of antenatal corticosteroid ("suboptimally timed"). As a balancing measure to optimally timed antenatal corticosteroid administration, we also examined those who received antenatal corticosteroids before 34 weeks of gestation and delivered at term (after 37 weeks). We reported the rates of optimal timing and term delivery by their corresponding weeks of gestation and performed multivariable logistic regression modeling to understand patient factors and diagnoses associated with antenatal corticosteroid timing.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among the 1,694 pregnant patients who delivered before 34 weeks of gestation, 961 (56.7%) had optimally timed antenatal corticosteroid administration, 162 (9.6%) received the first dose of antenatal corticosteroids less than 6 hours before delivery, 320 (18.9%) delivered more than 7 days after antenatal corticosteroid administration, and 251 (14.8%) did not receive antenatal corticosteroids. Of those who received antenatal steroids before 34 weeks of gestation, 747 of 2,879 (25.9%) delivered at term. There was little variation in optimal timing or term delivery by gestational age. Clinical factors associated with optimally timed antenatal corticosteroid administration compared with delivery more than 7 days after administration included pregnancy-related hypertensive disorder (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 1.88, 95% CI, 1.31-2.69), preterm labor (aOR 2.78, 95% CI, 1.32-5.81), premature rupture of membranes (1.37, 95% CI, 1.33-1.42), anxiety disorder (aOR 079, 95% CI, 0.76-0.83), multiparous with no history of preterm birth (aOR 0.81, 95% CI, 0.77-0.86), placenta previa (aOR 0.76, 95% CI, 0.68-0.84), and placenta accreta (aOR 0.83, 95% CI, 0.81-0.85).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Achieving optimal timing of antenatal corticosteroid administration remains challenging. These findings underscore the need for improved prediction of preterm delivery and individualized patient
{"title":"Maximizing Benefit From Antenatal Steroid Use While Avoiding Overuse.","authors":"Mark A Clapp, Siguo Li, Alexander Melamed, Emily Reiff, Cynthia Gyamfi-Bannerman, Anjali J Kaimal","doi":"10.1097/AOG.0000000000006178","DOIUrl":"10.1097/AOG.0000000000006178","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To provide real-world data to inform benchmarking goals and practical issues that influence optimal antenatal corticosteroid timing and to examine patient factors, such as gestational age at steroid administration and presenting diagnoses, associated with steroid administration in relation to delivery.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is a retrospective cohort study of singleton deliveries between July 1, 2016, and December 31, 2024, at two large academic hospitals with level IV neonatal intensive care units in a single health system. The primary cohort of interest was individuals who delivered between 24 0/7 and 33 6/7 weeks of gestation. The primary outcome of interest was the timing of antenatal corticosteroid administration in relation to delivery, categorized as none, delivery between 6 hours and 7 days after the first dose of antenatal corticosteroid (\"optimally timed\" per the Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine's quality metric), and delivery less than 6 hours or more than 7 days after the first dose of antenatal corticosteroid (\"suboptimally timed\"). As a balancing measure to optimally timed antenatal corticosteroid administration, we also examined those who received antenatal corticosteroids before 34 weeks of gestation and delivered at term (after 37 weeks). We reported the rates of optimal timing and term delivery by their corresponding weeks of gestation and performed multivariable logistic regression modeling to understand patient factors and diagnoses associated with antenatal corticosteroid timing.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among the 1,694 pregnant patients who delivered before 34 weeks of gestation, 961 (56.7%) had optimally timed antenatal corticosteroid administration, 162 (9.6%) received the first dose of antenatal corticosteroids less than 6 hours before delivery, 320 (18.9%) delivered more than 7 days after antenatal corticosteroid administration, and 251 (14.8%) did not receive antenatal corticosteroids. Of those who received antenatal steroids before 34 weeks of gestation, 747 of 2,879 (25.9%) delivered at term. There was little variation in optimal timing or term delivery by gestational age. Clinical factors associated with optimally timed antenatal corticosteroid administration compared with delivery more than 7 days after administration included pregnancy-related hypertensive disorder (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 1.88, 95% CI, 1.31-2.69), preterm labor (aOR 2.78, 95% CI, 1.32-5.81), premature rupture of membranes (1.37, 95% CI, 1.33-1.42), anxiety disorder (aOR 079, 95% CI, 0.76-0.83), multiparous with no history of preterm birth (aOR 0.81, 95% CI, 0.77-0.86), placenta previa (aOR 0.76, 95% CI, 0.68-0.84), and placenta accreta (aOR 0.83, 95% CI, 0.81-0.85).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Achieving optimal timing of antenatal corticosteroid administration remains challenging. These findings underscore the need for improved prediction of preterm delivery and individualized patient","PeriodicalId":19483,"journal":{"name":"Obstetrics and gynecology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.7,"publicationDate":"2026-02-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12880614/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146125993","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-02-05DOI: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000006182
Alixandria F Pfeiffer
{"title":"Between Medicine's Reach and Its Limits.","authors":"Alixandria F Pfeiffer","doi":"10.1097/AOG.0000000000006182","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0000000000006182","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":19483,"journal":{"name":"Obstetrics and gynecology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.7,"publicationDate":"2026-02-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146126023","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-02-03DOI: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000006213
Immigrants face challenges in navigating complex policies that govern access to health care, shelter, food, and clean water, resulting in profound effects on health care outcomes, including increased risk of preterm births and decreased access to preventive health services. These disparities are further exacerbated when immigration policies result in mass detention, incarceration, and deportation, leading to profound trauma among undocumented immigrants and their communities. Obstetrician-gynecologists and other reproductive health care professionals should be prepared to practice immigration-informed care and ensure clinical spaces are welcoming to immigrants. Unless mandated by law, health care professionals should document only information related to a patient's migration history that is necessary for the ongoing clinical care. Health care institutions should provide robust guidance and support for health care personnel and patients faced with the continued complexities of the dynamic landscape of immigration policies. Obstetrician-gynecologists should advocate for the unique needs of patients who are immigrants to promote reproductive justice and health equity.
{"title":"Advocating for Safe and Equitable Obstetric and Gynecologic Care for Immigrants.","authors":"","doi":"10.1097/AOG.0000000000006213","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0000000000006213","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Immigrants face challenges in navigating complex policies that govern access to health care, shelter, food, and clean water, resulting in profound effects on health care outcomes, including increased risk of preterm births and decreased access to preventive health services. These disparities are further exacerbated when immigration policies result in mass detention, incarceration, and deportation, leading to profound trauma among undocumented immigrants and their communities. Obstetrician-gynecologists and other reproductive health care professionals should be prepared to practice immigration-informed care and ensure clinical spaces are welcoming to immigrants. Unless mandated by law, health care professionals should document only information related to a patient's migration history that is necessary for the ongoing clinical care. Health care institutions should provide robust guidance and support for health care personnel and patients faced with the continued complexities of the dynamic landscape of immigration policies. Obstetrician-gynecologists should advocate for the unique needs of patients who are immigrants to promote reproductive justice and health equity.</p>","PeriodicalId":19483,"journal":{"name":"Obstetrics and gynecology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.7,"publicationDate":"2026-02-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146113597","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-02-01Epub Date: 2025-12-05DOI: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000006137
Andrea Henkel, Erica P Cahill, Sonia Chavez, Jade M Shorter, Stephanie I Amaya, Simranvir Kaur, Amythis Soltani, Jayne Caron, Susan Crowe, Zakiyah Williams, Namrata Mastey, Deirdre J Lyell, Kate A Shaw
Objective: To evaluate cabergoline's efficacy at decreasing lactation symptoms after early second-trimester abortion or pregnancy loss.
Methods: This is a multisite, double-blind, gestational-age stratified superiority trial that compared cabergoline 1 mg once with placebo for preventing bothersome breast symptoms immediately after uterine evacuation. We enrolled pregnant people at 16-20 weeks of gestation who were English- or Spanish-speaking and without contraindication to the study drug. Participants received cabergoline within 4 hours of uterine evacuation or fetal expulsion and, at baseline and at multiple time points through 2 weeks postprocedure, completed a validated electronic survey that assessed breast symptoms, side effects, and bother. Our primary outcome was breast symptoms (a composite of engorgement, milk leakage, tenderness, and need for pain relief) on day 4; we planned to enroll 30 participants in each gestational duration strata to show a 40% difference in breast symptoms (80% power, α=0.049).
Results: After screening 145 patients from February 2024 through May 2025, we enrolled 69 eligible participants. Baseline demographics were balanced between groups: Median gestational duration was 18 weeks (range 16 0/7-19 6/7 weeks), 53.0% were nulliparous, 63.6% self-identified as Hispanic, and 68.2% had public insurance. On day 4, significantly fewer participants who received cabergoline reported any breast symptoms compared with placebo (50.0% vs 88.2%, P<.001) (primary outcome) and fewer participants reported significant bother from breast symptoms (3.1% vs 20.6%, P=.05) (secondary outcome). These differences persist even in the earlier gestational duration strata.
Conclusion: Cabergoline is an effective and well-tolerated medication to prevent breast symptoms after early second-trimester abortion or pregnancy loss.
目的:评价卡麦角林对早期中期流产或流产后泌乳症状的疗效。方法:这是一项多地点、双盲、胎龄分层的优势试验,比较卡麦角林1mg 1次与安慰剂预防子宫排出后立即出现乳房不适症状的效果。我们招募了孕16-20周的孕妇,她们说英语或西班牙语,没有研究药物的禁忌症。参与者在子宫排出或胎儿排出4小时内接受卡麦角林治疗,并在基线和术后2周的多个时间点完成一项有效的电子调查,评估乳房症状、副作用和麻烦。我们的主要结局是第4天的乳房症状(充血、漏奶、压痛和需要缓解疼痛的综合症状);我们计划在每个妊娠阶段招募30名参与者,以显示40%的乳房症状差异(80%幂,α=0.049)。结果:在2024年2月至2025年5月筛选了145名患者后,我们招募了69名符合条件的参与者。各组之间的基线人口统计数据是平衡的:中位妊娠期为18周(范围16 0/7-19 6/7周),53.0%为未生育,63.6%为西班牙裔,68.2%有公共保险。在第4天,与安慰剂相比,接受卡麦角林治疗的参与者报告的任何乳房症状明显减少(50.0% vs 88.2%)。结论:卡麦角林是一种有效且耐受性良好的药物,可预防早期中期妊娠流产或流产后的乳房症状。临床试验注册:ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT06029673。
{"title":"Cabergoline for Lactation Inhibition After Early Second-Trimester Abortion or Pregnancy Loss: A Randomized Controlled Trial.","authors":"Andrea Henkel, Erica P Cahill, Sonia Chavez, Jade M Shorter, Stephanie I Amaya, Simranvir Kaur, Amythis Soltani, Jayne Caron, Susan Crowe, Zakiyah Williams, Namrata Mastey, Deirdre J Lyell, Kate A Shaw","doi":"10.1097/AOG.0000000000006137","DOIUrl":"10.1097/AOG.0000000000006137","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate cabergoline's efficacy at decreasing lactation symptoms after early second-trimester abortion or pregnancy loss.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is a multisite, double-blind, gestational-age stratified superiority trial that compared cabergoline 1 mg once with placebo for preventing bothersome breast symptoms immediately after uterine evacuation. We enrolled pregnant people at 16-20 weeks of gestation who were English- or Spanish-speaking and without contraindication to the study drug. Participants received cabergoline within 4 hours of uterine evacuation or fetal expulsion and, at baseline and at multiple time points through 2 weeks postprocedure, completed a validated electronic survey that assessed breast symptoms, side effects, and bother. Our primary outcome was breast symptoms (a composite of engorgement, milk leakage, tenderness, and need for pain relief) on day 4; we planned to enroll 30 participants in each gestational duration strata to show a 40% difference in breast symptoms (80% power, α=0.049).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>After screening 145 patients from February 2024 through May 2025, we enrolled 69 eligible participants. Baseline demographics were balanced between groups: Median gestational duration was 18 weeks (range 16 0/7-19 6/7 weeks), 53.0% were nulliparous, 63.6% self-identified as Hispanic, and 68.2% had public insurance. On day 4, significantly fewer participants who received cabergoline reported any breast symptoms compared with placebo (50.0% vs 88.2%, P<.001) (primary outcome) and fewer participants reported significant bother from breast symptoms (3.1% vs 20.6%, P=.05) (secondary outcome). These differences persist even in the earlier gestational duration strata.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Cabergoline is an effective and well-tolerated medication to prevent breast symptoms after early second-trimester abortion or pregnancy loss.</p><p><strong>Clinical trial registration: </strong>ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT06029673.</p>","PeriodicalId":19483,"journal":{"name":"Obstetrics and gynecology","volume":"147 2","pages":"277-284"},"PeriodicalIF":4.7,"publicationDate":"2026-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145985186","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-02-01DOI: 10.1097/aog.0000000000006155
Positive human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) test results have been associated with unnecessary workup and treatment, including invasive procedures and chemotherapy. It is important for health care professionals to consider alternative explanations for positive hCG results when pregnancy and malignancy have been excluded, particularly before proceeding with more invasive interventions. Due to the multiple potential etiologies of persistently elevated hCG, health care professionals should evaluate test results according to a systematic framework. When serum hCG test results are elevated, the first steps are to evaluate for pregnancy (both intrauterine and ectopic). Appropriate retesting to rule out various etiologies and to identify the main cause of persistently elevated hCG is necessary to avoid misdiagnosis or mismanagement of elevated hCG levels.
{"title":"ACOG Clinical Consensus No. 11: Management of Positive Human Chorionic Gonadotropin Test Results in Nonpregnant Patients Without Gynecologic Malignancy.","authors":"","doi":"10.1097/aog.0000000000006155","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1097/aog.0000000000006155","url":null,"abstract":"Positive human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) test results have been associated with unnecessary workup and treatment, including invasive procedures and chemotherapy. It is important for health care professionals to consider alternative explanations for positive hCG results when pregnancy and malignancy have been excluded, particularly before proceeding with more invasive interventions. Due to the multiple potential etiologies of persistently elevated hCG, health care professionals should evaluate test results according to a systematic framework. When serum hCG test results are elevated, the first steps are to evaluate for pregnancy (both intrauterine and ectopic). Appropriate retesting to rule out various etiologies and to identify the main cause of persistently elevated hCG is necessary to avoid misdiagnosis or mismanagement of elevated hCG levels.","PeriodicalId":19483,"journal":{"name":"Obstetrics and gynecology","volume":"8 1","pages":"e32-e38"},"PeriodicalIF":7.2,"publicationDate":"2026-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145971873","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-02-01Epub Date: 2025-11-06DOI: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000006118
Jill M Krapf, Paul J Yong, Marlene D Berke, Nina Bohm-Starke, Jacob Bornstein, Emanuelle Chrysilla, Tania T Dempsey, Megan L Falsetta, David Foster, Sue W Goldstein, Michael J Iadarola, Susan Kellogg-Spadt, Andrew J Mannes, John Vogel, Andrew T Goldstein
The current treatment of provoked vestibulodynia involving neuroproliferation is often complete vestibulectomy; however, less invasive treatments are biologically plausible, yet lack study. The International Society for the Study of Women's Sexual Health, the National Vulvodynia Association, the Gynecologic Cancers Research Foundation, and Tight Lipped, a grassroots nonprofit organization that supports people with chronic vulvovaginal and pelvic pain, collectively sponsored a conference, the Vulvodynia Therapeutic Research Summit, held in April 2024. The primary objective of the Vulvodynia Therapeutic Research Summit was to identify options for further research of the treatment of provoked vestibulodynia through expert consensus. After the conference, attendees scored the presented therapeutics in rank order, leading to a hierarchy of merit. Fifteen therapeutic options were presented and ranked in order of most promising to least promising for further study on treating the neuroinflammation of provoked vestibulodynia. The top identified therapeutics for further research were: 1) ketotifen fumarate (mast cell stabilizer with potential to prevent mast cell activation), 2) resiniferatoxin (transient receptor vanilloid 1 agonist causing chemo-inactivation of nerve terminals), 3) specialized pro-resolving mediators or strategies to boost their levels (eg, maresin 1 and 1-trifluoromethoxy-phenyl-3-[1-propionylpiperidin-4-yl] urea), 4) luteolin (flavonoid with potent anti-inflammatory, antioxidant, and neuroprotective properties), 5) alpha-lipoic acid (antioxidant with nerve-specific anti-inflammatory and mast cell stabilizing qualities), and 6) NGFR121W -SNAP IR700 trimer exposed to near-infared light (photoablation targeting nociceptors and sparing surrounding tissue). This executive summary describes the rationale for identifying specific pharmacologic agents and medical devices as targets for research directed toward treatment of the neuroinflammatory process found in the vestibular mucosa of provoked vestibulodynia.
{"title":"Executive Summary of the Vulvodynia Therapeutic Research Summit.","authors":"Jill M Krapf, Paul J Yong, Marlene D Berke, Nina Bohm-Starke, Jacob Bornstein, Emanuelle Chrysilla, Tania T Dempsey, Megan L Falsetta, David Foster, Sue W Goldstein, Michael J Iadarola, Susan Kellogg-Spadt, Andrew J Mannes, John Vogel, Andrew T Goldstein","doi":"10.1097/AOG.0000000000006118","DOIUrl":"10.1097/AOG.0000000000006118","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The current treatment of provoked vestibulodynia involving neuroproliferation is often complete vestibulectomy; however, less invasive treatments are biologically plausible, yet lack study. The International Society for the Study of Women's Sexual Health, the National Vulvodynia Association, the Gynecologic Cancers Research Foundation, and Tight Lipped, a grassroots nonprofit organization that supports people with chronic vulvovaginal and pelvic pain, collectively sponsored a conference, the Vulvodynia Therapeutic Research Summit, held in April 2024. The primary objective of the Vulvodynia Therapeutic Research Summit was to identify options for further research of the treatment of provoked vestibulodynia through expert consensus. After the conference, attendees scored the presented therapeutics in rank order, leading to a hierarchy of merit. Fifteen therapeutic options were presented and ranked in order of most promising to least promising for further study on treating the neuroinflammation of provoked vestibulodynia. The top identified therapeutics for further research were: 1) ketotifen fumarate (mast cell stabilizer with potential to prevent mast cell activation), 2) resiniferatoxin (transient receptor vanilloid 1 agonist causing chemo-inactivation of nerve terminals), 3) specialized pro-resolving mediators or strategies to boost their levels (eg, maresin 1 and 1-trifluoromethoxy-phenyl-3-[1-propionylpiperidin-4-yl] urea), 4) luteolin (flavonoid with potent anti-inflammatory, antioxidant, and neuroprotective properties), 5) alpha-lipoic acid (antioxidant with nerve-specific anti-inflammatory and mast cell stabilizing qualities), and 6) NGFR121W -SNAP IR700 trimer exposed to near-infared light (photoablation targeting nociceptors and sparing surrounding tissue). This executive summary describes the rationale for identifying specific pharmacologic agents and medical devices as targets for research directed toward treatment of the neuroinflammatory process found in the vestibular mucosa of provoked vestibulodynia.</p>","PeriodicalId":19483,"journal":{"name":"Obstetrics and gynecology","volume":" ","pages":"266-276"},"PeriodicalIF":4.7,"publicationDate":"2026-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145459176","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-02-01Epub Date: 2025-10-16DOI: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000006083
W Thomas Gregory, Alyssa R Hersh, Sara B Cichowski
Obstetric anal sphincter injuries occur in 4% or less of vaginal deliveries, but the potential downstream consequences of the injury (most commonly anal incontinence) can drastically alter a person's quality of life. The main risk factors for obstetric anal sphincter injuries are those that contribute to difficult vaginal birth and the need to perform an operative vaginal delivery (most notably forceps-assisted vaginal delivery). Successful repair of an obstetric anal sphincter injury is achieved with a thorough understanding of the perineal and perianal anatomy and careful attention to layer-by-layer reconstruction. Close follow-up of patients who sustain obstetric anal sphincter injuries can help identify possible complications earlier in their course. For patients who are considering subsequent pregnancy and delivery, there should be a thoughtful, patient-centered discussion, recognizing that, although cesarean delivery can prevent recurrent sphincter laceration itself, it has its own immediate surgical and future pregnancy risks and is not guaranteed to prevent anal incontinence.
{"title":"Risk Factors for and Repair of Obstetric Anal Sphincter Injuries.","authors":"W Thomas Gregory, Alyssa R Hersh, Sara B Cichowski","doi":"10.1097/AOG.0000000000006083","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0000000000006083","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Obstetric anal sphincter injuries occur in 4% or less of vaginal deliveries, but the potential downstream consequences of the injury (most commonly anal incontinence) can drastically alter a person's quality of life. The main risk factors for obstetric anal sphincter injuries are those that contribute to difficult vaginal birth and the need to perform an operative vaginal delivery (most notably forceps-assisted vaginal delivery). Successful repair of an obstetric anal sphincter injury is achieved with a thorough understanding of the perineal and perianal anatomy and careful attention to layer-by-layer reconstruction. Close follow-up of patients who sustain obstetric anal sphincter injuries can help identify possible complications earlier in their course. For patients who are considering subsequent pregnancy and delivery, there should be a thoughtful, patient-centered discussion, recognizing that, although cesarean delivery can prevent recurrent sphincter laceration itself, it has its own immediate surgical and future pregnancy risks and is not guaranteed to prevent anal incontinence.</p>","PeriodicalId":19483,"journal":{"name":"Obstetrics and gynecology","volume":"147 2","pages":"175-185"},"PeriodicalIF":4.7,"publicationDate":"2026-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145985146","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}