Pub Date : 2026-04-01DOI: 10.1097/aog.0000000000006221
Emma L Barber
{"title":"Uterine Manipulators in Endometrial Cancer: Making Sense of Heterogeneous Evidence.","authors":"Emma L Barber","doi":"10.1097/aog.0000000000006221","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1097/aog.0000000000006221","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":19483,"journal":{"name":"Obstetrics and gynecology","volume":"8 1","pages":"460-462"},"PeriodicalIF":7.2,"publicationDate":"2026-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147483394","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-04-01Epub Date: 2026-02-06DOI: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000006194
Kevin J Rouse, William D Hazelton, Axel Frotscher, Ling Chen, Matthew T Prest, Jennifer S Ferris, Xiao Xu, Alexander Melamed, Chin Hur, Brandy M Heckman-Stoddard, Goli Samimi, Nina A Bickell, Tracy M Layne, Stephanie V Blank, Elena B Elkin, Evan R Myers, Laura J Havrilesky, Chung Yin Kong, Jason D Wright
Objective: To aid in cancer control and prevention activities by developing, calibrating, and validating three distinct natural history simulation models of uterine cancer, a growing public health concern.
Methods: To perform comparative analyses, we developed two state-transition microsimulation models and a multistage clonal expansion model of uterine cancer. The models simulate uterine cancer incidence and mortality. All three models were calibrated to common data on the incidence of uterine cancer from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) 18 database. Each model accounts for changing trends in hysterectomy and obesity over time and simulates incidence and mortality for endometrioid and nonendometrioid tumors and uterine sarcoma. After calibration, we projected the incidence and mortality of uterine cancer to 2050.
Results: The three uterine cancer models were well calibrated to population data and produced comparable results for projecting the burden of disease through 2050. Among non-Hispanic White women aged 40 years or older, the models project that by 2050 the incidence of uterine cancer will rise to 76.1-81.8 per 100,000 woman-years, up from 2018 SEER incidence of 60.0 per 100,000 woman-years. Among non-Hispanic Black women, new cases will rise to 90.3-107.2 per 100,000 woman-years, up from 2018 SEER incidence of 61.3 per 100,000 woman-years. Within these populations, incidence-based mortality will increase to 11.3-12.3 deaths per 100,000 woman-years for non-Hispanic White women and to 28.2-35.7 deaths per 100,000 woman-years for non-Hispanic Black women.
Conclusion: Three distinct mathematical simulation models of uterine cancer have been calibrated to observed population-based incidence and mortality. All three models project substantial and continued increases in the incidence and mortality of uterine cancer.
{"title":"Comparative Modeling of Recent and Projected Trends in the Incidence and Mortality of Uterine Cancer.","authors":"Kevin J Rouse, William D Hazelton, Axel Frotscher, Ling Chen, Matthew T Prest, Jennifer S Ferris, Xiao Xu, Alexander Melamed, Chin Hur, Brandy M Heckman-Stoddard, Goli Samimi, Nina A Bickell, Tracy M Layne, Stephanie V Blank, Elena B Elkin, Evan R Myers, Laura J Havrilesky, Chung Yin Kong, Jason D Wright","doi":"10.1097/AOG.0000000000006194","DOIUrl":"10.1097/AOG.0000000000006194","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To aid in cancer control and prevention activities by developing, calibrating, and validating three distinct natural history simulation models of uterine cancer, a growing public health concern.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>To perform comparative analyses, we developed two state-transition microsimulation models and a multistage clonal expansion model of uterine cancer. The models simulate uterine cancer incidence and mortality. All three models were calibrated to common data on the incidence of uterine cancer from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) 18 database. Each model accounts for changing trends in hysterectomy and obesity over time and simulates incidence and mortality for endometrioid and nonendometrioid tumors and uterine sarcoma. After calibration, we projected the incidence and mortality of uterine cancer to 2050.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The three uterine cancer models were well calibrated to population data and produced comparable results for projecting the burden of disease through 2050. Among non-Hispanic White women aged 40 years or older, the models project that by 2050 the incidence of uterine cancer will rise to 76.1-81.8 per 100,000 woman-years, up from 2018 SEER incidence of 60.0 per 100,000 woman-years. Among non-Hispanic Black women, new cases will rise to 90.3-107.2 per 100,000 woman-years, up from 2018 SEER incidence of 61.3 per 100,000 woman-years. Within these populations, incidence-based mortality will increase to 11.3-12.3 deaths per 100,000 woman-years for non-Hispanic White women and to 28.2-35.7 deaths per 100,000 woman-years for non-Hispanic Black women.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Three distinct mathematical simulation models of uterine cancer have been calibrated to observed population-based incidence and mortality. All three models project substantial and continued increases in the incidence and mortality of uterine cancer.</p>","PeriodicalId":19483,"journal":{"name":"Obstetrics and gynecology","volume":" ","pages":"585-595"},"PeriodicalIF":4.7,"publicationDate":"2026-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12991337/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146125973","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-04-01Epub Date: 2026-02-19DOI: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000006195
Yoshikazu Nagase, Shinya Matsuzaki, Hiroshi Yoshida, Satoru Nagase, Yoshitomo Tanaka, Aoi Yamaguchi, Tsuyoshi Hisa, Takeshi Yokoi, Yutaka Ueda, Michiko Kodama, Masaki Mandai, Maximilian Klar, Lynda D Roman, Pedro T Ramirez, Jason D Wright, Koji Matsuo
<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the association between intrauterine manipulator use and survival outcomes in patients undergoing minimally invasive hysterectomy for endometrial cancer because the oncologic effects of intrauterine manipulator use remain controversial.</p><p><strong>Data sources: </strong>A comprehensive systematic review of the literature published up to December 31, 2024, was conducted with the PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library databases.</p><p><strong>Methods of study selection: </strong>Two independent investigators screened comparative studies, including prospective or retrospective studies and randomized controlled trials, examining oncologic outcomes in patients with endometrial cancer who underwent minimally invasive hysterectomy with or without an intrauterine manipulator. Studies with insufficient outcome data, including those involving patients who underwent open abdominal hysterectomy and those published in languages other than English, were excluded.</p><p><strong>Tabulation, integration, and results: </strong>Data extraction and synthesis were performed in accordance with the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses) guidelines. Random-effects analysis was used for data pooling. The primary outcomes were disease-free survival and overall survival. Confounding factors affecting prognosis and risk of bias were also evaluated. Between 2013 and 2024, 12 eligible studies, including 10 retrospective studies and two randomized controlled trials, enrolled 6,029 patients who underwent minimally invasive hysterectomy with an intrauterine manipulator and 4,776 patients without one. In the unadjusted pooled analysis, disease-free survival was lower in patients who underwent surgery with an intrauterine manipulator than in those without (nine studies, hazard ratio 1.18, 95% CI, 1.01-1.38, P =.04). Albeit statistically nonsignificant, the hazard ratio for all-cause mortality comparing intrauterine manipulator use with nonuse was 1.27 (six studies, 95% CI, 0.99-1.62, P =.06). Only a limited number of studies (4 of 12 studies, 33.3%) examined survival outcomes after adjustment for factors such as adjuvant treatment and tumor histology. Most studies (7 of 12, 58.3%) had a moderate risk of bias, and five (41.6%) had a serious risk of bias.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This meta-analysis suggests that intrauterine manipulator use during minimally invasive hysterectomy may be associated with decreased disease-free survival in patients with endometrial cancer; however, the association with overall survival is marginal and did not reach statistical significance. Considering that most studies included in this meta-analysis were retrospective, did not adjust for prognostic factors such as postoperative treatment, and were of low to moderate quality, the associations found in this study warrant further investigation in future prospective trials.</p><p><strong>Systematic re
{"title":"Survival Association of Intrauterine Manipulator Use During Minimally Invasive Hysterectomy for Endometrial Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.","authors":"Yoshikazu Nagase, Shinya Matsuzaki, Hiroshi Yoshida, Satoru Nagase, Yoshitomo Tanaka, Aoi Yamaguchi, Tsuyoshi Hisa, Takeshi Yokoi, Yutaka Ueda, Michiko Kodama, Masaki Mandai, Maximilian Klar, Lynda D Roman, Pedro T Ramirez, Jason D Wright, Koji Matsuo","doi":"10.1097/AOG.0000000000006195","DOIUrl":"10.1097/AOG.0000000000006195","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the association between intrauterine manipulator use and survival outcomes in patients undergoing minimally invasive hysterectomy for endometrial cancer because the oncologic effects of intrauterine manipulator use remain controversial.</p><p><strong>Data sources: </strong>A comprehensive systematic review of the literature published up to December 31, 2024, was conducted with the PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library databases.</p><p><strong>Methods of study selection: </strong>Two independent investigators screened comparative studies, including prospective or retrospective studies and randomized controlled trials, examining oncologic outcomes in patients with endometrial cancer who underwent minimally invasive hysterectomy with or without an intrauterine manipulator. Studies with insufficient outcome data, including those involving patients who underwent open abdominal hysterectomy and those published in languages other than English, were excluded.</p><p><strong>Tabulation, integration, and results: </strong>Data extraction and synthesis were performed in accordance with the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses) guidelines. Random-effects analysis was used for data pooling. The primary outcomes were disease-free survival and overall survival. Confounding factors affecting prognosis and risk of bias were also evaluated. Between 2013 and 2024, 12 eligible studies, including 10 retrospective studies and two randomized controlled trials, enrolled 6,029 patients who underwent minimally invasive hysterectomy with an intrauterine manipulator and 4,776 patients without one. In the unadjusted pooled analysis, disease-free survival was lower in patients who underwent surgery with an intrauterine manipulator than in those without (nine studies, hazard ratio 1.18, 95% CI, 1.01-1.38, P =.04). Albeit statistically nonsignificant, the hazard ratio for all-cause mortality comparing intrauterine manipulator use with nonuse was 1.27 (six studies, 95% CI, 0.99-1.62, P =.06). Only a limited number of studies (4 of 12 studies, 33.3%) examined survival outcomes after adjustment for factors such as adjuvant treatment and tumor histology. Most studies (7 of 12, 58.3%) had a moderate risk of bias, and five (41.6%) had a serious risk of bias.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This meta-analysis suggests that intrauterine manipulator use during minimally invasive hysterectomy may be associated with decreased disease-free survival in patients with endometrial cancer; however, the association with overall survival is marginal and did not reach statistical significance. Considering that most studies included in this meta-analysis were retrospective, did not adjust for prognostic factors such as postoperative treatment, and were of low to moderate quality, the associations found in this study warrant further investigation in future prospective trials.</p><p><strong>Systematic re","PeriodicalId":19483,"journal":{"name":"Obstetrics and gynecology","volume":" ","pages":"463-477"},"PeriodicalIF":4.7,"publicationDate":"2026-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146227670","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-04-01DOI: 10.1097/aog.0000000000006200
{"title":"ACOG Clinical Practice Update, Zuranolone and Brexanolone for the Treatment of Postpartum Depression: Correction.","authors":"","doi":"10.1097/aog.0000000000006200","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1097/aog.0000000000006200","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":19483,"journal":{"name":"Obstetrics and gynecology","volume":"12 1","pages":"e96"},"PeriodicalIF":7.2,"publicationDate":"2026-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147483739","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-04-01Epub Date: 2025-12-04DOI: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000006136
Jessica L Gleason, Zhen Chen, Dian He, Madeleine E St Ville, Katherine L Grantz
Objective: To develop twin-specific birth weight percentiles with corresponding singleton percentiles from the same population.
Methods: Using 5 years (2019-2023) of twin and singleton birth data from the U.S. National Vital Statistics System, we applied two established methods for generating centile curves: quantile regression and the lambda-mu-sigma (LMS) method. We created birth weight curves by gestational age and corresponding reference values for twins and singletons separately for girls and boys. We compared percentage classified under specific percentiles of birth weight between our curves and an existing reference previously developed for twins (Alexander), which had errors in last menstrual period gestational dating among fetuses born more than 30 years ago, and a separate reference developed for preterm neonates (Fenton).
Results: The quantile regression and LMS methods produced similar twin and singleton growth curves, classifying an almost identical proportion of neonates as less than the 3rd, 5th, or 10th percentile and more than the 90th, 95th, or 97th percentile. The Alexander twin reference classified fewer twin neonates than expected with birth weight below the 10th percentile (6.4%) or above the 90th percentile (6.6%). In contrast, the Fenton reference developed among primarily singletons for preterm neonates classified more twin neonates than expected with birth weight below the 10th percentile (18.7%) and fewer than expected for above the 90th percentile (1.4%).
Conclusion: In a modern cohort of neonates, our twin reference provides improved classification of birth weight percentiles over the existing Alexander reference and over the Fenton reference for preterm neonates. Our singleton reference is a useful addition for studies that examine birth weight centiles among both twins and singletons because it is derived from the same underlying population as the twin reference.
{"title":"Establishing Modern Birth Weight Centiles for Twins in the United States.","authors":"Jessica L Gleason, Zhen Chen, Dian He, Madeleine E St Ville, Katherine L Grantz","doi":"10.1097/AOG.0000000000006136","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0000000000006136","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To develop twin-specific birth weight percentiles with corresponding singleton percentiles from the same population.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using 5 years (2019-2023) of twin and singleton birth data from the U.S. National Vital Statistics System, we applied two established methods for generating centile curves: quantile regression and the lambda-mu-sigma (LMS) method. We created birth weight curves by gestational age and corresponding reference values for twins and singletons separately for girls and boys. We compared percentage classified under specific percentiles of birth weight between our curves and an existing reference previously developed for twins (Alexander), which had errors in last menstrual period gestational dating among fetuses born more than 30 years ago, and a separate reference developed for preterm neonates (Fenton).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The quantile regression and LMS methods produced similar twin and singleton growth curves, classifying an almost identical proportion of neonates as less than the 3rd, 5th, or 10th percentile and more than the 90th, 95th, or 97th percentile. The Alexander twin reference classified fewer twin neonates than expected with birth weight below the 10th percentile (6.4%) or above the 90th percentile (6.6%). In contrast, the Fenton reference developed among primarily singletons for preterm neonates classified more twin neonates than expected with birth weight below the 10th percentile (18.7%) and fewer than expected for above the 90th percentile (1.4%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In a modern cohort of neonates, our twin reference provides improved classification of birth weight percentiles over the existing Alexander reference and over the Fenton reference for preterm neonates. Our singleton reference is a useful addition for studies that examine birth weight centiles among both twins and singletons because it is derived from the same underlying population as the twin reference.</p>","PeriodicalId":19483,"journal":{"name":"Obstetrics and gynecology","volume":"147 4","pages":"551-559"},"PeriodicalIF":4.7,"publicationDate":"2026-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147486821","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-04-01Epub Date: 2026-02-03DOI: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000006213
Immigrants face challenges in navigating complex policies that govern access to health care, shelter, food, and clean water, resulting in profound effects on health care outcomes, including increased risk of preterm births and decreased access to preventive health services. These disparities are further exacerbated when immigration policies result in mass detention, incarceration, and deportation, leading to profound trauma among undocumented immigrants and their communities. Obstetrician-gynecologists and other reproductive health care professionals should be prepared to practice immigration-informed care and ensure clinical spaces are welcoming to immigrants. Unless mandated by law, health care professionals should document only information related to a patient's migration history that is necessary for the ongoing clinical care. Health care institutions should provide robust guidance and support for health care personnel and patients faced with the continued complexities of the dynamic landscape of immigration policies. Obstetrician-gynecologists should advocate for the unique needs of patients who are immigrants to promote reproductive justice and health equity.
{"title":"ACOG Committee Statement No. 25: Advocating for Safe and Equitable Obstetric and Gynecologic Care for Immigrants.","authors":"","doi":"10.1097/AOG.0000000000006213","DOIUrl":"10.1097/AOG.0000000000006213","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Immigrants face challenges in navigating complex policies that govern access to health care, shelter, food, and clean water, resulting in profound effects on health care outcomes, including increased risk of preterm births and decreased access to preventive health services. These disparities are further exacerbated when immigration policies result in mass detention, incarceration, and deportation, leading to profound trauma among undocumented immigrants and their communities. Obstetrician-gynecologists and other reproductive health care professionals should be prepared to practice immigration-informed care and ensure clinical spaces are welcoming to immigrants. Unless mandated by law, health care professionals should document only information related to a patient's migration history that is necessary for the ongoing clinical care. Health care institutions should provide robust guidance and support for health care personnel and patients faced with the continued complexities of the dynamic landscape of immigration policies. Obstetrician-gynecologists should advocate for the unique needs of patients who are immigrants to promote reproductive justice and health equity.</p>","PeriodicalId":19483,"journal":{"name":"Obstetrics and gynecology","volume":" ","pages":"598-607"},"PeriodicalIF":4.7,"publicationDate":"2026-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146113597","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-04-01Epub Date: 2025-11-07DOI: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000006114
Dana Senderoff Berger, Diana S Abbas, Lindsay N Marty, Kate Tolleson, Cole Turner, Steven Friedman, Erinn M Hade, Justin S Brandt, Meghana A Limaye
<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To determine whether administration of antenatal corticosteroids to patients with twin gestations at risk for late preterm delivery is associated with reduced risk for neonatal respiratory morbidity compared with unexposed twins.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a multicenter, retrospective cohort study in a large, urban health network (2013-2022) of patients with twin gestations at risk for preterm delivery between 34 0/7 and 36 6/7 weeks of gestation. Patients were excluded if they received antenatal corticosteroids before 34 weeks of gestation or had pregestational diabetes, single-twin death before 34 weeks, or oral steroid exposure during pregnancy. Neonates were excluded if they had major congenital anomalies. The primary outcome was a composite of neonatal respiratory morbidity requiring respiratory support within 72 hours of birth, including continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) or high-flow nasal cannula for 2 hours or more, supplemental oxygen of 30% for 2 hours or more, extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, mechanical ventilation, and fetal or neonatal death. Secondary outcomes included neonatal hypoglycemia and indications for neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) admission. Adjusted and unadjusted relative risks with 95% CIs were calculated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>During the study period, 366 twin gestations and 722 patient-neonate dyads were included: 162 gestations (321 neonates) in the exposed group and 204 (401 neonates) in the unexposed group. There was no difference in the composite outcome of respiratory morbidity in those exposed to antenatal corticosteroids (23.4% vs 20.4%, P =.40, adjusted relative risk [RR] 1.00, 95% CI, 0.71-1.42). The composite was driven mostly by rates of CPAP use (21.2% vs 18.5%, P =.41, adjusted RR 1.05, 95% CI, 0.73-1.53) and high-flow nasal cannula use (6.2% vs 2.2%, P =.02, RR 2.77, 95% CI, 1.16-6.66). Antenatal corticosteroid exposure was associated with a lower risk of need for supplemental oxygen (0.6% vs 3.5%, P =.02, RR 0.18, 95% CI, 0.04-0.79) and mechanical ventilation (0.6% vs 3.2%, P =.03, RR 0.19, 95% CI, 0.04-0.87). Although antenatal corticosteroids exposure was not associated with higher rates of hypoglycemia (44.2% vs 41.7%, P =.57, adjusted RR 0.99, 95% CI, 0.82-1.19), exposure was associated with a higher risk of having hypoglycemia as the only indication for NICU admission (10.3% vs 5.2%, P =.03, RR 1.96, 95% CI, 1.07-3.59).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In a large, multicenter, network-wide retrospective cohort study of patients with twin gestations at risk for late preterm birth, antenatal corticosteroid use was not associated with a decrease in overall respiratory morbidity but was associated with a decreased risk of need for supplemental oxygen and mechanical ventilation, as well as a higher risk of NICU admission for hypoglycemia. These results underscore the ongoing need to elucidate the risks and benefits of late preter
目的:确定与未暴露的双胞胎相比,有晚期早产风险的双胎妊娠患者产前给予皮质类固醇是否与新生儿呼吸系统疾病风险降低有关。方法:这是一项在大型城市卫生网络(2013-2022)中进行的多中心回顾性队列研究,研究对象是妊娠34 0/7周至36 6/7周之间有早产风险的双胎妊娠患者。如果患者在妊娠34周前接受了产前皮质类固醇治疗,或在妊娠34周前患有妊娠糖尿病、单胎死亡或妊娠期间口服类固醇暴露,则排除在外。如果新生儿有重大先天性异常,则排除在外。主要结局是新生儿呼吸系统疾病的复合,在出生72小时内需要呼吸支持,包括持续气道正压通气(CPAP)或高流量鼻插管2小时或更长时间,补充氧气30% 2小时或更长时间,体外膜氧合,机械通气,胎儿或新生儿死亡。次要结局包括新生儿低血糖和新生儿重症监护病房(NICU)入院指征。计算95% ci的调整和未调整相对危险度。结果:研究期间共纳入366例双胎妊娠和722例双胎新生儿:暴露组162例(321例新生儿),未暴露组204例(401例新生儿)。产前皮质类固醇暴露组呼吸系统发病率的综合结局无差异(23.4% vs 20.4%, P= 0.40,校正相对危险度[RR] 1.00, 95% CI, 0.71-1.42)。该组合主要由CPAP使用率(21.2% vs 18.5%, P= 0.41,调整RR 1.05, 95% CI, 0.73-1.53)和高流量鼻插管使用率(6.2% vs 2.2%, P= 0.02, RR 2.77, 95% CI, 1.16-6.66)驱动。产前皮质类固醇暴露与需要补充氧气的风险较低相关(0.6% vs 3.5%, P= 0.02, RR 0.18, 95% CI, 0.04-0.79)和机械通气(0.6% vs 3.2%, P= 0.03, RR 0.19, 95% CI, 0.04-0.87)。虽然产前皮质类固醇暴露与高低血糖发生率无关(44.2% vs 41.7%, P= 0.57,校正RR 0.99, 95% CI, 0.82-1.19),但暴露与高低血糖发生率相关(10.3% vs 5.2%, P= 0.03, RR 1.96, 95% CI, 1.07-3.59)。低血糖是新生儿重症监护病房入院的唯一指状。结论:在一项大型、多中心、网络范围的双胎妊娠晚期早产风险患者的回顾性队列研究中,产前使用皮质类固醇与总体呼吸系统发病率的降低无关,但与需要补充氧气和机械通气的风险降低有关,以及因低血糖入院新生儿重症监护病房的风险较高。这些结果强调了对有晚期早产风险的双胎妊娠患者使用糖皮质激素的风险和益处的持续需求。
{"title":"Antenatal Corticosteroids and Neonatal Outcomes Among Patients With Twin Gestations at Risk for Late Preterm Birth.","authors":"Dana Senderoff Berger, Diana S Abbas, Lindsay N Marty, Kate Tolleson, Cole Turner, Steven Friedman, Erinn M Hade, Justin S Brandt, Meghana A Limaye","doi":"10.1097/AOG.0000000000006114","DOIUrl":"10.1097/AOG.0000000000006114","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To determine whether administration of antenatal corticosteroids to patients with twin gestations at risk for late preterm delivery is associated with reduced risk for neonatal respiratory morbidity compared with unexposed twins.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a multicenter, retrospective cohort study in a large, urban health network (2013-2022) of patients with twin gestations at risk for preterm delivery between 34 0/7 and 36 6/7 weeks of gestation. Patients were excluded if they received antenatal corticosteroids before 34 weeks of gestation or had pregestational diabetes, single-twin death before 34 weeks, or oral steroid exposure during pregnancy. Neonates were excluded if they had major congenital anomalies. The primary outcome was a composite of neonatal respiratory morbidity requiring respiratory support within 72 hours of birth, including continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) or high-flow nasal cannula for 2 hours or more, supplemental oxygen of 30% for 2 hours or more, extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, mechanical ventilation, and fetal or neonatal death. Secondary outcomes included neonatal hypoglycemia and indications for neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) admission. Adjusted and unadjusted relative risks with 95% CIs were calculated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>During the study period, 366 twin gestations and 722 patient-neonate dyads were included: 162 gestations (321 neonates) in the exposed group and 204 (401 neonates) in the unexposed group. There was no difference in the composite outcome of respiratory morbidity in those exposed to antenatal corticosteroids (23.4% vs 20.4%, P =.40, adjusted relative risk [RR] 1.00, 95% CI, 0.71-1.42). The composite was driven mostly by rates of CPAP use (21.2% vs 18.5%, P =.41, adjusted RR 1.05, 95% CI, 0.73-1.53) and high-flow nasal cannula use (6.2% vs 2.2%, P =.02, RR 2.77, 95% CI, 1.16-6.66). Antenatal corticosteroid exposure was associated with a lower risk of need for supplemental oxygen (0.6% vs 3.5%, P =.02, RR 0.18, 95% CI, 0.04-0.79) and mechanical ventilation (0.6% vs 3.2%, P =.03, RR 0.19, 95% CI, 0.04-0.87). Although antenatal corticosteroids exposure was not associated with higher rates of hypoglycemia (44.2% vs 41.7%, P =.57, adjusted RR 0.99, 95% CI, 0.82-1.19), exposure was associated with a higher risk of having hypoglycemia as the only indication for NICU admission (10.3% vs 5.2%, P =.03, RR 1.96, 95% CI, 1.07-3.59).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In a large, multicenter, network-wide retrospective cohort study of patients with twin gestations at risk for late preterm birth, antenatal corticosteroid use was not associated with a decrease in overall respiratory morbidity but was associated with a decreased risk of need for supplemental oxygen and mechanical ventilation, as well as a higher risk of NICU admission for hypoglycemia. These results underscore the ongoing need to elucidate the risks and benefits of late preter","PeriodicalId":19483,"journal":{"name":"Obstetrics and gynecology","volume":" ","pages":"510-517"},"PeriodicalIF":4.7,"publicationDate":"2026-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145459136","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-04-01Epub Date: 2026-02-06DOI: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000006183
Anna Booman, Brian T Bateman, Sara Siadat, Caroline Berube, Irogue Igbinosa, Cecilia Leggett, Deirdre J Lyell, Elliott K Main, Stephanie A Leonard
Objective: Evidence related to anemia in early pregnancy, and its resolution or persistence by late pregnancy, is limited. We evaluated pregnancy outcomes associated with anemia in early pregnancy and resolution compared with persistence in late pregnancy.
Methods: We used the Merative™ Marketscan ® Commercial Database of nationwide insurance claims (2018-2023) and included pregnant individuals without hereditary anemias. We used hemoglobin and hematocrit to identify anemia in early pregnancy (before 14 weeks of gestation) and late pregnancy (at or after 24 weeks of gestation). Pregnancy outcomes included preeclampsia, placenta previa, placental abruption, severe postpartum hemorrhage, blood products transfusion, cesarean birth, nontransfusion severe maternal morbidity (SMM), spontaneous preterm birth, medically indicated preterm birth, and small-for-gestational-age (SGA) birth weight. We used modified Poisson regression to estimate associations between: 1) anemia in early pregnancy and pregnancy outcomes; and 2) anemia resolution by late pregnancy and pregnancy outcomes, adjusting for confounders by inverse probability weighting.
Results: Among 73,586 individuals, 4.4% (95% CI, 4.3-4.6%) had anemia in early pregnancy. Early pregnancy anemia was associated with higher risk of each outcome assessed, with the exception of placenta previa, with the highest associated risk of blood products transfusion (2.4% vs 0.8%; adjusted risk ratio [aRR] 2.45; 95% CI, 1.91-3.13). Of those with early pregnancy anemia and laboratory values in late pregnancy (72.1%), 53.4% had persistent anemia and 46.6% had resolved anemia. Persistent anemia was associated with nontransfusion SMM (2.6% vs 1.1%, aRR 1.64; 95% CI, 1.13-2.37), blood products transfusion (2.9% vs 0.8%, aRR 2.60; 95% CI, 1.84-3.69), and SGA birth weight (8.5% vs 6.8%, aRR 1.23; 95% CI, 1.01-1.50), compared with those without anemia in the first trimester. The resolution of anemia by late pregnancy was not associated with nontransfusion SMM (1.6% vs 1.1%; aRR 1.07; 95% CI, 0.65-1.74) but was associated with blood products transfusion (1.6% vs 0.8%; aRR 1.64; 95% CI, 1.01-2.67) and SGA birth weight (10.0% vs 6.8%; aRR 1.38; 95% CI, 1.15-1.67) compared with those without anemia in the first trimester.
Conclusion: Anemia in the first trimester was associated with adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes. The resolution of anemia by late pregnancy eliminated the association with nontransfusion SMM but not other outcomes, emphasizing the importance of treating anemia in early pregnancy and before pregnancy.
{"title":"Pregnancy Outcomes Associated With Anemia in the First Trimester and Anemia Resolution by Late Pregnancy.","authors":"Anna Booman, Brian T Bateman, Sara Siadat, Caroline Berube, Irogue Igbinosa, Cecilia Leggett, Deirdre J Lyell, Elliott K Main, Stephanie A Leonard","doi":"10.1097/AOG.0000000000006183","DOIUrl":"10.1097/AOG.0000000000006183","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Evidence related to anemia in early pregnancy, and its resolution or persistence by late pregnancy, is limited. We evaluated pregnancy outcomes associated with anemia in early pregnancy and resolution compared with persistence in late pregnancy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We used the Merative™ Marketscan ® Commercial Database of nationwide insurance claims (2018-2023) and included pregnant individuals without hereditary anemias. We used hemoglobin and hematocrit to identify anemia in early pregnancy (before 14 weeks of gestation) and late pregnancy (at or after 24 weeks of gestation). Pregnancy outcomes included preeclampsia, placenta previa, placental abruption, severe postpartum hemorrhage, blood products transfusion, cesarean birth, nontransfusion severe maternal morbidity (SMM), spontaneous preterm birth, medically indicated preterm birth, and small-for-gestational-age (SGA) birth weight. We used modified Poisson regression to estimate associations between: 1) anemia in early pregnancy and pregnancy outcomes; and 2) anemia resolution by late pregnancy and pregnancy outcomes, adjusting for confounders by inverse probability weighting.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 73,586 individuals, 4.4% (95% CI, 4.3-4.6%) had anemia in early pregnancy. Early pregnancy anemia was associated with higher risk of each outcome assessed, with the exception of placenta previa, with the highest associated risk of blood products transfusion (2.4% vs 0.8%; adjusted risk ratio [aRR] 2.45; 95% CI, 1.91-3.13). Of those with early pregnancy anemia and laboratory values in late pregnancy (72.1%), 53.4% had persistent anemia and 46.6% had resolved anemia. Persistent anemia was associated with nontransfusion SMM (2.6% vs 1.1%, aRR 1.64; 95% CI, 1.13-2.37), blood products transfusion (2.9% vs 0.8%, aRR 2.60; 95% CI, 1.84-3.69), and SGA birth weight (8.5% vs 6.8%, aRR 1.23; 95% CI, 1.01-1.50), compared with those without anemia in the first trimester. The resolution of anemia by late pregnancy was not associated with nontransfusion SMM (1.6% vs 1.1%; aRR 1.07; 95% CI, 0.65-1.74) but was associated with blood products transfusion (1.6% vs 0.8%; aRR 1.64; 95% CI, 1.01-2.67) and SGA birth weight (10.0% vs 6.8%; aRR 1.38; 95% CI, 1.15-1.67) compared with those without anemia in the first trimester.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Anemia in the first trimester was associated with adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes. The resolution of anemia by late pregnancy eliminated the association with nontransfusion SMM but not other outcomes, emphasizing the importance of treating anemia in early pregnancy and before pregnancy.</p>","PeriodicalId":19483,"journal":{"name":"Obstetrics and gynecology","volume":" ","pages":"518-527"},"PeriodicalIF":4.7,"publicationDate":"2026-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12880618/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146125975","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-04-01Epub Date: 2026-02-12DOI: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000006197
Eliza C Miller, Chair Natalie A Bello, Peng R Chen, Lisa Leffert, Michelle Leppert, Tracy Madsen, Katelyn Skeels, Alan Tita, Eduard Valdes, Andrea Shields
Abstract: Stroke remains a rare but life-threatening complication of pregnancy, with significant implications for both maternal and fetal health. Current stroke prevention and treatment guidelines offer limited guidance for managing stroke in pregnant and postpartum patients. Despite advances in obstetric and neurological care, the diagnosis and management of pregnancy-associated stroke continue to be challenged by delayed recognition, a lack of tailored clinical guidelines, and persistent disparities in outcomes. This scientific statement represents a multidisciplinary effort to synthesize current knowledge of the risk factors and diverse causes of stroke in pregnancy and to offer consensus-driven suggestions for prevention, acute management, and postpartum recovery. Nearly half of all US pregnancy-associated stroke hospitalizations occur in the setting of hypertensive disorders. Primary stroke prevention strategies include risk factor modification, aggressive hypertension management and prompt treatment of severe hypertension in pregnancy and postpartum, and antithrombotic therapy in some high-risk groups. Secondary stroke prevention strategies in pregnancy depend on the mechanism of the prior stroke. Pregnancy should not delay evidence-based treatments for acute stroke. The use of telemedicine can facilitate early consultation with a vascular neurologist and a maternal-fetal medicine specialist in cases of acute pregnancy-related stroke, helping to guide initial decision-making. Computed tomography, computed tomography angiography, and magnetic resonance imaging without contrast are all safe neuroimaging modalities for rapid evaluation of pregnant patients with acute stroke symptoms. Acute stroke alone is not an indication for immediate delivery, and stabilization of the mother should come first. Vaginal delivery after stroke is preferred when feasible because it avoids the surgical risks and hemodynamic stress associated with cesarean delivery. Survivors of pregnancy-associated stroke face unique challenges such as caring for an infant and breastfeeding and require support from a multidisciplinary rehabilitation team. Continued research, including inclusive clinical trials, is urgently needed to refine stroke risk assessment, to expand treatment options, and to improve maternal outcomes.
{"title":"Prevention and Treatment of Maternal Stroke in Pregnancy and Postpartum: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association.","authors":"Eliza C Miller, Chair Natalie A Bello, Peng R Chen, Lisa Leffert, Michelle Leppert, Tracy Madsen, Katelyn Skeels, Alan Tita, Eduard Valdes, Andrea Shields","doi":"10.1097/AOG.0000000000006197","DOIUrl":"10.1097/AOG.0000000000006197","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Abstract: </strong>Stroke remains a rare but life-threatening complication of pregnancy, with significant implications for both maternal and fetal health. Current stroke prevention and treatment guidelines offer limited guidance for managing stroke in pregnant and postpartum patients. Despite advances in obstetric and neurological care, the diagnosis and management of pregnancy-associated stroke continue to be challenged by delayed recognition, a lack of tailored clinical guidelines, and persistent disparities in outcomes. This scientific statement represents a multidisciplinary effort to synthesize current knowledge of the risk factors and diverse causes of stroke in pregnancy and to offer consensus-driven suggestions for prevention, acute management, and postpartum recovery. Nearly half of all US pregnancy-associated stroke hospitalizations occur in the setting of hypertensive disorders. Primary stroke prevention strategies include risk factor modification, aggressive hypertension management and prompt treatment of severe hypertension in pregnancy and postpartum, and antithrombotic therapy in some high-risk groups. Secondary stroke prevention strategies in pregnancy depend on the mechanism of the prior stroke. Pregnancy should not delay evidence-based treatments for acute stroke. The use of telemedicine can facilitate early consultation with a vascular neurologist and a maternal-fetal medicine specialist in cases of acute pregnancy-related stroke, helping to guide initial decision-making. Computed tomography, computed tomography angiography, and magnetic resonance imaging without contrast are all safe neuroimaging modalities for rapid evaluation of pregnant patients with acute stroke symptoms. Acute stroke alone is not an indication for immediate delivery, and stabilization of the mother should come first. Vaginal delivery after stroke is preferred when feasible because it avoids the surgical risks and hemodynamic stress associated with cesarean delivery. Survivors of pregnancy-associated stroke face unique challenges such as caring for an infant and breastfeeding and require support from a multidisciplinary rehabilitation team. Continued research, including inclusive clinical trials, is urgently needed to refine stroke risk assessment, to expand treatment options, and to improve maternal outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":19483,"journal":{"name":"Obstetrics and gynecology","volume":" ","pages":"e43-e65"},"PeriodicalIF":4.7,"publicationDate":"2026-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146181475","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2026-04-01Epub Date: 2026-02-19DOI: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000006154
Xiao-Yu Wang, William A Grobman, Jiqiang Wu, Rita Suzawa, Jenna Kralik, Taryn Summerfield, Shaylyn Vickers, Brenda Widmayer, Melissa Rainier, Julie Somppi, Lisa Buccilla, Bridget Iadicicco, Elizabeth Buschur, Steven Gabbe, Mark B Landon, Kartik K Venkatesh
Objective: To conduct a randomized controlled trial (RCT) to assess whether patient-led insulin titration (intervention) compared with clinician-led insulin titration (control) resulted in improved glycemic management and pregnancy outcomes for individuals with gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM).
Methods: EMPOWER (Patient Versus Provider-Led Titration of Insulin for Glycemic Control in Gestational Diabetes) was a single-center, nonblinded RCT among individuals with GDM requiring insulin between 20 and 32 weeks of gestation that was conducted from October 19, 2023, to January 10, 2025. Intervention participants self-titrated long-acting insulin, which was started at 10 units nightly and decreased or increased by 2 units per fasting glucose above or below 70 and 95 mg/dL, respectively, every day. Control participants started an insulin dose with weekly titration at the clinician's discretion. The primary outcome was mean fasting glucose in the 36th week or the week before delivery for preterm deliveries. Secondary outcomes included pregnancy outcomes and patient-reported measures. With 80% power, two-sided α of 0.05, and 5% loss-to-follow-up, 56 individuals needed to be randomized to demonstrate at least a 15% difference in mean fasting glucose. Analysis was by intention to treat.
Results: Of 89 individuals who were eligible during the study period, 56 consented and were randomized (29 intervention, 27 control). The median duration from starting insulin to delivery was 7.7 weeks. Patient-led insulin titration resulted in a similar mean fasting glucose before delivery compared with clinician-led titration (88.8 vs 90.3 mg/dL; β coefficient -1.50 mg/dL, 95% CI, -5.50 to 2.50) but resulted in more rapid achievement of fasting glucose below 95 mg/dL (mean 1.8 weeks vs 2.5 weeks; hazard ratio 1.48, 95% CI, 1.16 to 1.90). Patient-led titration was associated with a lower risk of macrosomia (6.9% vs 37.0%, relative risk 0.18, 95% CI, 0.04 to 0.84) and large-for-gestational-age (LGA) birth weight (3.3% vs 34.6%, relative risk 0.10, 95% CI, 0.08 to 0.12). Other pregnancy and patient-reported outcomes did not differ between the groups.
Conclusion: Patient-led insulin titration for GDM resulted in a similar mean fasting glucose compared with clinician-led insulin titration but was associated with more rapid achievement of glycemic control and a lower risk of macrosomia and LGA birth weight. These data support the need for larger patient-centered GDM treatment trials.
目的:通过一项随机对照试验(RCT)来评估患者主导的胰岛素滴入(干预)与临床主导的胰岛素滴入(对照组)是否能改善妊娠期糖尿病(GDM)患者的血糖管理和妊娠结局。方法:EMPOWER(患者与提供者主导的胰岛素滴定用于妊娠糖尿病血糖控制)是一项单中心、非盲随机对照试验,在妊娠20 - 32周需要胰岛素的GDM患者中进行,于2023年10月19日至2025年1月10日进行。干预参与者自行滴定长效胰岛素,开始时为每晚10个单位,每天空腹血糖分别高于或低于70和95 mg/dL,减少或增加2个单位。对照受试者开始胰岛素剂量,根据临床医生的判断每周滴定一次。主要终点是36周或早产前一周的平均空腹血糖。次要结局包括妊娠结局和患者报告的措施。在80%的功效,双侧α为0.05,5%的随访损失的情况下,需要随机分配56个个体来证明至少有15%的平均空腹血糖差异。分析的目的是治疗。结果:在研究期间符合条件的89人中,56人同意并随机分组(干预29人,对照组27人)。从开始注射胰岛素到给药的中位持续时间为7.7周。患者主导的胰岛素滴定与临床主导的滴定相比,分娩前的平均空腹血糖相似(88.8 vs 90.3 mg/dL; β系数-1.50 mg/dL, 95% CI, -5.50至2.50),但空腹血糖低于95 mg/dL的速度更快(平均1.8周vs 2.5周;风险比1.48,95% CI, 1.16至1.90)。患者主导的滴注与巨大儿(6.9% vs 37.0%,相对风险0.18,95% CI, 0.04 ~ 0.84)和大胎龄(LGA)出生体重(3.3% vs 34.6%,相对风险0.10,95% CI, 0.08 ~ 0.12)的低风险相关。其他妊娠和患者报告的结果在两组之间没有差异。结论:与临床主导的胰岛素滴定相比,患者主导的GDM胰岛素滴定导致的平均空腹血糖相似,但与更快实现血糖控制和更低的巨大儿和LGA出生体重风险相关。这些数据支持需要更大规模的以患者为中心的GDM治疗试验。临床试验注册:ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT05922033。
{"title":"Patient-Led Insulin Titration for Glycemic Management With Gestational Diabetes Mellitus: A Randomized Controlled Trial.","authors":"Xiao-Yu Wang, William A Grobman, Jiqiang Wu, Rita Suzawa, Jenna Kralik, Taryn Summerfield, Shaylyn Vickers, Brenda Widmayer, Melissa Rainier, Julie Somppi, Lisa Buccilla, Bridget Iadicicco, Elizabeth Buschur, Steven Gabbe, Mark B Landon, Kartik K Venkatesh","doi":"10.1097/AOG.0000000000006154","DOIUrl":"10.1097/AOG.0000000000006154","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To conduct a randomized controlled trial (RCT) to assess whether patient-led insulin titration (intervention) compared with clinician-led insulin titration (control) resulted in improved glycemic management and pregnancy outcomes for individuals with gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>EMPOWER (Patient Versus Provider-Led Titration of Insulin for Glycemic Control in Gestational Diabetes) was a single-center, nonblinded RCT among individuals with GDM requiring insulin between 20 and 32 weeks of gestation that was conducted from October 19, 2023, to January 10, 2025. Intervention participants self-titrated long-acting insulin, which was started at 10 units nightly and decreased or increased by 2 units per fasting glucose above or below 70 and 95 mg/dL, respectively, every day. Control participants started an insulin dose with weekly titration at the clinician's discretion. The primary outcome was mean fasting glucose in the 36th week or the week before delivery for preterm deliveries. Secondary outcomes included pregnancy outcomes and patient-reported measures. With 80% power, two-sided α of 0.05, and 5% loss-to-follow-up, 56 individuals needed to be randomized to demonstrate at least a 15% difference in mean fasting glucose. Analysis was by intention to treat.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 89 individuals who were eligible during the study period, 56 consented and were randomized (29 intervention, 27 control). The median duration from starting insulin to delivery was 7.7 weeks. Patient-led insulin titration resulted in a similar mean fasting glucose before delivery compared with clinician-led titration (88.8 vs 90.3 mg/dL; β coefficient -1.50 mg/dL, 95% CI, -5.50 to 2.50) but resulted in more rapid achievement of fasting glucose below 95 mg/dL (mean 1.8 weeks vs 2.5 weeks; hazard ratio 1.48, 95% CI, 1.16 to 1.90). Patient-led titration was associated with a lower risk of macrosomia (6.9% vs 37.0%, relative risk 0.18, 95% CI, 0.04 to 0.84) and large-for-gestational-age (LGA) birth weight (3.3% vs 34.6%, relative risk 0.10, 95% CI, 0.08 to 0.12). Other pregnancy and patient-reported outcomes did not differ between the groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Patient-led insulin titration for GDM resulted in a similar mean fasting glucose compared with clinician-led insulin titration but was associated with more rapid achievement of glycemic control and a lower risk of macrosomia and LGA birth weight. These data support the need for larger patient-centered GDM treatment trials.</p><p><strong>Clinical trial registration: </strong>ClinicalTrials.gov , NCT05922033.</p>","PeriodicalId":19483,"journal":{"name":"Obstetrics and gynecology","volume":" ","pages":"501-509"},"PeriodicalIF":4.7,"publicationDate":"2026-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146227641","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}