首页 > 最新文献

Obstetrics and gynecology最新文献

英文 中文
Uterine Manipulators in Endometrial Cancer: Making Sense of Heterogeneous Evidence. 子宫内膜癌中的子宫操纵器:异质证据的意义。
IF 7.2 2区 医学 Q1 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY Pub Date : 2026-04-01 DOI: 10.1097/aog.0000000000006221
Emma L Barber
{"title":"Uterine Manipulators in Endometrial Cancer: Making Sense of Heterogeneous Evidence.","authors":"Emma L Barber","doi":"10.1097/aog.0000000000006221","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1097/aog.0000000000006221","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":19483,"journal":{"name":"Obstetrics and gynecology","volume":"8 1","pages":"460-462"},"PeriodicalIF":7.2,"publicationDate":"2026-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147483394","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Comparative Modeling of Recent and Projected Trends in the Incidence and Mortality of Uterine Cancer. 子宫癌发病率和死亡率近期趋势和预测趋势的比较模型。
IF 4.7 2区 医学 Q1 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY Pub Date : 2026-04-01 Epub Date: 2026-02-06 DOI: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000006194
Kevin J Rouse, William D Hazelton, Axel Frotscher, Ling Chen, Matthew T Prest, Jennifer S Ferris, Xiao Xu, Alexander Melamed, Chin Hur, Brandy M Heckman-Stoddard, Goli Samimi, Nina A Bickell, Tracy M Layne, Stephanie V Blank, Elena B Elkin, Evan R Myers, Laura J Havrilesky, Chung Yin Kong, Jason D Wright

Objective: To aid in cancer control and prevention activities by developing, calibrating, and validating three distinct natural history simulation models of uterine cancer, a growing public health concern.

Methods: To perform comparative analyses, we developed two state-transition microsimulation models and a multistage clonal expansion model of uterine cancer. The models simulate uterine cancer incidence and mortality. All three models were calibrated to common data on the incidence of uterine cancer from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) 18 database. Each model accounts for changing trends in hysterectomy and obesity over time and simulates incidence and mortality for endometrioid and nonendometrioid tumors and uterine sarcoma. After calibration, we projected the incidence and mortality of uterine cancer to 2050.

Results: The three uterine cancer models were well calibrated to population data and produced comparable results for projecting the burden of disease through 2050. Among non-Hispanic White women aged 40 years or older, the models project that by 2050 the incidence of uterine cancer will rise to 76.1-81.8 per 100,000 woman-years, up from 2018 SEER incidence of 60.0 per 100,000 woman-years. Among non-Hispanic Black women, new cases will rise to 90.3-107.2 per 100,000 woman-years, up from 2018 SEER incidence of 61.3 per 100,000 woman-years. Within these populations, incidence-based mortality will increase to 11.3-12.3 deaths per 100,000 woman-years for non-Hispanic White women and to 28.2-35.7 deaths per 100,000 woman-years for non-Hispanic Black women.

Conclusion: Three distinct mathematical simulation models of uterine cancer have been calibrated to observed population-based incidence and mortality. All three models project substantial and continued increases in the incidence and mortality of uterine cancer.

目的:通过开发、校准和验证三种不同的子宫癌自然历史模拟模型,帮助癌症控制和预防活动,这是一个日益关注的公共卫生问题。方法:建立子宫癌状态转移微观模拟模型和子宫癌多期克隆扩增模型进行对比分析。模型模拟子宫癌的发病率和死亡率。所有三种模型均根据监测、流行病学和最终结果(SEER) 18数据库中子宫癌发病率的共同数据进行校准。每个模型都解释了子宫切除术和肥胖随时间的变化趋势,并模拟了子宫内膜样和非子宫内膜样肿瘤和子宫肉瘤的发病率和死亡率。校正后,我们预测子宫癌的发病率和死亡率至2050年。结果:三种子宫癌模型很好地校准了人口数据,并为预测到2050年的疾病负担产生了可比较的结果。该模型预测,在40岁及以上的非西班牙裔白人女性中,到2050年,子宫癌的发病率将从2018年的60.0 / 10万女性年上升到76.1-81.8 / 10万女性年。在非西班牙裔黑人女性中,新病例将上升至每10万女性年90.3-107.2例,高于2018年每10万女性年61.3例的SEER发病率。在这些人群中,非西班牙裔白人妇女的发病率死亡率将增加到每10万妇女年11.3-12.3例死亡,非西班牙裔黑人妇女的发病率死亡率将增加到每10万妇女年28.2-35.7例死亡。结论:三种不同的子宫癌数学模拟模型已被校准以观察基于人群的发病率和死亡率。所有三种模式都预测子宫癌的发病率和死亡率将持续大幅上升。
{"title":"Comparative Modeling of Recent and Projected Trends in the Incidence and Mortality of Uterine Cancer.","authors":"Kevin J Rouse, William D Hazelton, Axel Frotscher, Ling Chen, Matthew T Prest, Jennifer S Ferris, Xiao Xu, Alexander Melamed, Chin Hur, Brandy M Heckman-Stoddard, Goli Samimi, Nina A Bickell, Tracy M Layne, Stephanie V Blank, Elena B Elkin, Evan R Myers, Laura J Havrilesky, Chung Yin Kong, Jason D Wright","doi":"10.1097/AOG.0000000000006194","DOIUrl":"10.1097/AOG.0000000000006194","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To aid in cancer control and prevention activities by developing, calibrating, and validating three distinct natural history simulation models of uterine cancer, a growing public health concern.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>To perform comparative analyses, we developed two state-transition microsimulation models and a multistage clonal expansion model of uterine cancer. The models simulate uterine cancer incidence and mortality. All three models were calibrated to common data on the incidence of uterine cancer from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) 18 database. Each model accounts for changing trends in hysterectomy and obesity over time and simulates incidence and mortality for endometrioid and nonendometrioid tumors and uterine sarcoma. After calibration, we projected the incidence and mortality of uterine cancer to 2050.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The three uterine cancer models were well calibrated to population data and produced comparable results for projecting the burden of disease through 2050. Among non-Hispanic White women aged 40 years or older, the models project that by 2050 the incidence of uterine cancer will rise to 76.1-81.8 per 100,000 woman-years, up from 2018 SEER incidence of 60.0 per 100,000 woman-years. Among non-Hispanic Black women, new cases will rise to 90.3-107.2 per 100,000 woman-years, up from 2018 SEER incidence of 61.3 per 100,000 woman-years. Within these populations, incidence-based mortality will increase to 11.3-12.3 deaths per 100,000 woman-years for non-Hispanic White women and to 28.2-35.7 deaths per 100,000 woman-years for non-Hispanic Black women.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Three distinct mathematical simulation models of uterine cancer have been calibrated to observed population-based incidence and mortality. All three models project substantial and continued increases in the incidence and mortality of uterine cancer.</p>","PeriodicalId":19483,"journal":{"name":"Obstetrics and gynecology","volume":" ","pages":"585-595"},"PeriodicalIF":4.7,"publicationDate":"2026-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12991337/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146125973","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Survival Association of Intrauterine Manipulator Use During Minimally Invasive Hysterectomy for Endometrial Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. 子宫内膜癌微创子宫切除术中使用宫内机械手的生存关系:系统回顾和荟萃分析。
IF 4.7 2区 医学 Q1 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY Pub Date : 2026-04-01 Epub Date: 2026-02-19 DOI: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000006195
Yoshikazu Nagase, Shinya Matsuzaki, Hiroshi Yoshida, Satoru Nagase, Yoshitomo Tanaka, Aoi Yamaguchi, Tsuyoshi Hisa, Takeshi Yokoi, Yutaka Ueda, Michiko Kodama, Masaki Mandai, Maximilian Klar, Lynda D Roman, Pedro T Ramirez, Jason D Wright, Koji Matsuo
<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the association between intrauterine manipulator use and survival outcomes in patients undergoing minimally invasive hysterectomy for endometrial cancer because the oncologic effects of intrauterine manipulator use remain controversial.</p><p><strong>Data sources: </strong>A comprehensive systematic review of the literature published up to December 31, 2024, was conducted with the PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library databases.</p><p><strong>Methods of study selection: </strong>Two independent investigators screened comparative studies, including prospective or retrospective studies and randomized controlled trials, examining oncologic outcomes in patients with endometrial cancer who underwent minimally invasive hysterectomy with or without an intrauterine manipulator. Studies with insufficient outcome data, including those involving patients who underwent open abdominal hysterectomy and those published in languages other than English, were excluded.</p><p><strong>Tabulation, integration, and results: </strong>Data extraction and synthesis were performed in accordance with the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses) guidelines. Random-effects analysis was used for data pooling. The primary outcomes were disease-free survival and overall survival. Confounding factors affecting prognosis and risk of bias were also evaluated. Between 2013 and 2024, 12 eligible studies, including 10 retrospective studies and two randomized controlled trials, enrolled 6,029 patients who underwent minimally invasive hysterectomy with an intrauterine manipulator and 4,776 patients without one. In the unadjusted pooled analysis, disease-free survival was lower in patients who underwent surgery with an intrauterine manipulator than in those without (nine studies, hazard ratio 1.18, 95% CI, 1.01-1.38, P =.04). Albeit statistically nonsignificant, the hazard ratio for all-cause mortality comparing intrauterine manipulator use with nonuse was 1.27 (six studies, 95% CI, 0.99-1.62, P =.06). Only a limited number of studies (4 of 12 studies, 33.3%) examined survival outcomes after adjustment for factors such as adjuvant treatment and tumor histology. Most studies (7 of 12, 58.3%) had a moderate risk of bias, and five (41.6%) had a serious risk of bias.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This meta-analysis suggests that intrauterine manipulator use during minimally invasive hysterectomy may be associated with decreased disease-free survival in patients with endometrial cancer; however, the association with overall survival is marginal and did not reach statistical significance. Considering that most studies included in this meta-analysis were retrospective, did not adjust for prognostic factors such as postoperative treatment, and were of low to moderate quality, the associations found in this study warrant further investigation in future prospective trials.</p><p><strong>Systematic re
目的:评估微创子宫切除术子宫内膜癌患者使用子宫内机械臂与生存结果的关系,因为使用子宫内机械臂的肿瘤效应仍然存在争议。数据来源:通过PubMed、Scopus、Web of Science和Cochrane Library数据库,对截至2024年12月31日发表的文献进行了全面的系统综述。研究方法选择:两名独立研究人员筛选了比较研究,包括前瞻性或回顾性研究和随机对照试验,检查子宫内膜癌患者在有或没有宫内操纵器的情况下进行微创子宫切除术的肿瘤预后。结果数据不充分的研究,包括那些接受开放式腹式子宫切除术的患者和那些以非英语语言发表的研究,被排除在外。制表、整合和结果:根据PRISMA(系统评价和荟萃分析首选报告项目)指南进行数据提取和合成。随机效应分析用于数据池。主要结局为无病生存期和总生存期。影响预后和偏倚风险的混杂因素也进行了评估。在2013年至2024年期间,12项符合条件的研究,包括10项回顾性研究和2项随机对照试验,纳入了6029例采用宫内机械手进行微创子宫切除术的患者和4776例未采用微创子宫机械手的患者。在未经调整的汇总分析中,使用宫内操纵器手术的患者的无病生存率低于未使用的患者(9项研究,风险比1.18,95% CI, 1.01-1.38, P= 0.04)。虽然没有统计学意义,但使用和不使用宫内操作器的全因死亡率风险比为1.27(6项研究,95% CI, 0.99-1.62, P= 0.06)。只有有限数量的研究(12项研究中的4项,33.3%)检查了辅助治疗和肿瘤组织学等因素调整后的生存结果。大多数研究(12项研究中的7项,58.3%)具有中度偏倚风险,5项研究(41.6%)具有严重偏倚风险。结论:本荟萃分析提示微创子宫切除术中使用宫内机械手可能与子宫内膜癌患者无病生存率降低有关;然而,与总生存率的关联是边际的,没有达到统计学意义。考虑到本荟萃分析中纳入的大多数研究是回顾性的,没有对术后治疗等预后因素进行调整,质量为中低水平,因此本研究中发现的关联值得在未来的前瞻性试验中进一步研究。系统评价注册号:PROSPERO, CRD42023428140。
{"title":"Survival Association of Intrauterine Manipulator Use During Minimally Invasive Hysterectomy for Endometrial Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.","authors":"Yoshikazu Nagase, Shinya Matsuzaki, Hiroshi Yoshida, Satoru Nagase, Yoshitomo Tanaka, Aoi Yamaguchi, Tsuyoshi Hisa, Takeshi Yokoi, Yutaka Ueda, Michiko Kodama, Masaki Mandai, Maximilian Klar, Lynda D Roman, Pedro T Ramirez, Jason D Wright, Koji Matsuo","doi":"10.1097/AOG.0000000000006195","DOIUrl":"10.1097/AOG.0000000000006195","url":null,"abstract":"&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Objective: &lt;/strong&gt;To evaluate the association between intrauterine manipulator use and survival outcomes in patients undergoing minimally invasive hysterectomy for endometrial cancer because the oncologic effects of intrauterine manipulator use remain controversial.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Data sources: &lt;/strong&gt;A comprehensive systematic review of the literature published up to December 31, 2024, was conducted with the PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library databases.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Methods of study selection: &lt;/strong&gt;Two independent investigators screened comparative studies, including prospective or retrospective studies and randomized controlled trials, examining oncologic outcomes in patients with endometrial cancer who underwent minimally invasive hysterectomy with or without an intrauterine manipulator. Studies with insufficient outcome data, including those involving patients who underwent open abdominal hysterectomy and those published in languages other than English, were excluded.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Tabulation, integration, and results: &lt;/strong&gt;Data extraction and synthesis were performed in accordance with the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses) guidelines. Random-effects analysis was used for data pooling. The primary outcomes were disease-free survival and overall survival. Confounding factors affecting prognosis and risk of bias were also evaluated. Between 2013 and 2024, 12 eligible studies, including 10 retrospective studies and two randomized controlled trials, enrolled 6,029 patients who underwent minimally invasive hysterectomy with an intrauterine manipulator and 4,776 patients without one. In the unadjusted pooled analysis, disease-free survival was lower in patients who underwent surgery with an intrauterine manipulator than in those without (nine studies, hazard ratio 1.18, 95% CI, 1.01-1.38, P =.04). Albeit statistically nonsignificant, the hazard ratio for all-cause mortality comparing intrauterine manipulator use with nonuse was 1.27 (six studies, 95% CI, 0.99-1.62, P =.06). Only a limited number of studies (4 of 12 studies, 33.3%) examined survival outcomes after adjustment for factors such as adjuvant treatment and tumor histology. Most studies (7 of 12, 58.3%) had a moderate risk of bias, and five (41.6%) had a serious risk of bias.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Conclusion: &lt;/strong&gt;This meta-analysis suggests that intrauterine manipulator use during minimally invasive hysterectomy may be associated with decreased disease-free survival in patients with endometrial cancer; however, the association with overall survival is marginal and did not reach statistical significance. Considering that most studies included in this meta-analysis were retrospective, did not adjust for prognostic factors such as postoperative treatment, and were of low to moderate quality, the associations found in this study warrant further investigation in future prospective trials.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Systematic re","PeriodicalId":19483,"journal":{"name":"Obstetrics and gynecology","volume":" ","pages":"463-477"},"PeriodicalIF":4.7,"publicationDate":"2026-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146227670","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
ACOG Clinical Practice Update, Zuranolone and Brexanolone for the Treatment of Postpartum Depression: Correction. ACOG临床实践更新:舒拉诺酮与布雷沙诺酮治疗产后抑郁症:纠正。
IF 7.2 2区 医学 Q1 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY Pub Date : 2026-04-01 DOI: 10.1097/aog.0000000000006200
{"title":"ACOG Clinical Practice Update, Zuranolone and Brexanolone for the Treatment of Postpartum Depression: Correction.","authors":"","doi":"10.1097/aog.0000000000006200","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1097/aog.0000000000006200","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":19483,"journal":{"name":"Obstetrics and gynecology","volume":"12 1","pages":"e96"},"PeriodicalIF":7.2,"publicationDate":"2026-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147483739","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Establishing Modern Birth Weight Centiles for Twins in the United States. 在美国建立现代双胞胎出生体重百分位数。
IF 4.7 2区 医学 Q1 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY Pub Date : 2026-04-01 Epub Date: 2025-12-04 DOI: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000006136
Jessica L Gleason, Zhen Chen, Dian He, Madeleine E St Ville, Katherine L Grantz

Objective: To develop twin-specific birth weight percentiles with corresponding singleton percentiles from the same population.

Methods: Using 5 years (2019-2023) of twin and singleton birth data from the U.S. National Vital Statistics System, we applied two established methods for generating centile curves: quantile regression and the lambda-mu-sigma (LMS) method. We created birth weight curves by gestational age and corresponding reference values for twins and singletons separately for girls and boys. We compared percentage classified under specific percentiles of birth weight between our curves and an existing reference previously developed for twins (Alexander), which had errors in last menstrual period gestational dating among fetuses born more than 30 years ago, and a separate reference developed for preterm neonates (Fenton).

Results: The quantile regression and LMS methods produced similar twin and singleton growth curves, classifying an almost identical proportion of neonates as less than the 3rd, 5th, or 10th percentile and more than the 90th, 95th, or 97th percentile. The Alexander twin reference classified fewer twin neonates than expected with birth weight below the 10th percentile (6.4%) or above the 90th percentile (6.6%). In contrast, the Fenton reference developed among primarily singletons for preterm neonates classified more twin neonates than expected with birth weight below the 10th percentile (18.7%) and fewer than expected for above the 90th percentile (1.4%).

Conclusion: In a modern cohort of neonates, our twin reference provides improved classification of birth weight percentiles over the existing Alexander reference and over the Fenton reference for preterm neonates. Our singleton reference is a useful addition for studies that examine birth weight centiles among both twins and singletons because it is derived from the same underlying population as the twin reference.

目的:利用同一人群中相应的单胎百分位数,建立双胎特异性出生体重百分位数。方法:利用美国国家生命统计系统(National Vital Statistics System) 5年(2019-2023年)的双胎和单胎出生数据,采用分位数回归和lambda-mu-sigma (LMS)方法生成百分位曲线。我们根据胎龄分别绘制了双胞胎和单胎的出生体重曲线,并给出了相应的参考值。我们比较了我们的曲线与先前为双胞胎(Alexander)开发的现有参考数据之间的百分比,该参考数据在30多年前出生的胎儿中有最后一次月经期妊娠日期的错误,以及为早产儿开发的单独参考数据(Fenton)。结果:分位数回归和LMS方法产生了相似的双胎和单胎生长曲线,将几乎相同比例的新生儿分类为小于第3、第5或第10百分位,大于第90、第95或第97百分位。亚历山大双胞胎参考文献将出生体重低于第10百分位(6.4%)或高于第90百分位(6.6%)的双胞胎新生儿分类为低于预期的双胞胎新生儿。相比之下,芬顿参考在主要单胎早产儿分类中,出生体重低于第10百分位数的双胞胎新生儿多于预期(18.7%),高于第90百分位数的双胞胎新生儿少于预期(1.4%)。结论:在现代新生儿队列中,我们的双胞胎参考文献为早产儿提供了比现有Alexander参考文献和Fenton参考文献更好的出生体重百分位数分类。我们的单胎参考资料对于检查双胞胎和单胎出生体重百分位数的研究是一个有用的补充,因为它与双胞胎参考资料来自相同的潜在人群。
{"title":"Establishing Modern Birth Weight Centiles for Twins in the United States.","authors":"Jessica L Gleason, Zhen Chen, Dian He, Madeleine E St Ville, Katherine L Grantz","doi":"10.1097/AOG.0000000000006136","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0000000000006136","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To develop twin-specific birth weight percentiles with corresponding singleton percentiles from the same population.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using 5 years (2019-2023) of twin and singleton birth data from the U.S. National Vital Statistics System, we applied two established methods for generating centile curves: quantile regression and the lambda-mu-sigma (LMS) method. We created birth weight curves by gestational age and corresponding reference values for twins and singletons separately for girls and boys. We compared percentage classified under specific percentiles of birth weight between our curves and an existing reference previously developed for twins (Alexander), which had errors in last menstrual period gestational dating among fetuses born more than 30 years ago, and a separate reference developed for preterm neonates (Fenton).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The quantile regression and LMS methods produced similar twin and singleton growth curves, classifying an almost identical proportion of neonates as less than the 3rd, 5th, or 10th percentile and more than the 90th, 95th, or 97th percentile. The Alexander twin reference classified fewer twin neonates than expected with birth weight below the 10th percentile (6.4%) or above the 90th percentile (6.6%). In contrast, the Fenton reference developed among primarily singletons for preterm neonates classified more twin neonates than expected with birth weight below the 10th percentile (18.7%) and fewer than expected for above the 90th percentile (1.4%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In a modern cohort of neonates, our twin reference provides improved classification of birth weight percentiles over the existing Alexander reference and over the Fenton reference for preterm neonates. Our singleton reference is a useful addition for studies that examine birth weight centiles among both twins and singletons because it is derived from the same underlying population as the twin reference.</p>","PeriodicalId":19483,"journal":{"name":"Obstetrics and gynecology","volume":"147 4","pages":"551-559"},"PeriodicalIF":4.7,"publicationDate":"2026-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"147486821","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
ACOG Committee Statement No. 25: Advocating for Safe and Equitable Obstetric and Gynecologic Care for Immigrants. 倡导移民安全和公平的妇产科护理。
IF 4.7 2区 医学 Q1 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY Pub Date : 2026-04-01 Epub Date: 2026-02-03 DOI: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000006213

Immigrants face challenges in navigating complex policies that govern access to health care, shelter, food, and clean water, resulting in profound effects on health care outcomes, including increased risk of preterm births and decreased access to preventive health services. These disparities are further exacerbated when immigration policies result in mass detention, incarceration, and deportation, leading to profound trauma among undocumented immigrants and their communities. Obstetrician-gynecologists and other reproductive health care professionals should be prepared to practice immigration-informed care and ensure clinical spaces are welcoming to immigrants. Unless mandated by law, health care professionals should document only information related to a patient's migration history that is necessary for the ongoing clinical care. Health care institutions should provide robust guidance and support for health care personnel and patients faced with the continued complexities of the dynamic landscape of immigration policies. Obstetrician-gynecologists should advocate for the unique needs of patients who are immigrants to promote reproductive justice and health equity.

移民在处理管理获得保健、住所、食物和清洁水的复杂政策方面面临挑战,对保健结果产生深远影响,包括早产风险增加和获得预防性保健服务的机会减少。当移民政策导致大规模拘留、监禁和驱逐出境时,这些差距进一步加剧,给无证移民及其社区带来了深刻的创伤。妇产科医生和其他生殖保健专业人员应该准备好实践移民知情护理,并确保临床空间欢迎移民。除非法律强制规定,否则卫生保健专业人员应仅记录与正在进行的临床护理所必需的患者迁移史相关的信息。卫生保健机构应为面临移民政策不断变化的复杂局面的卫生保健人员和患者提供强有力的指导和支持。妇产科医生应倡导移民患者的独特需求,以促进生殖正义和健康公平。
{"title":"ACOG Committee Statement No. 25: Advocating for Safe and Equitable Obstetric and Gynecologic Care for Immigrants.","authors":"","doi":"10.1097/AOG.0000000000006213","DOIUrl":"10.1097/AOG.0000000000006213","url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Immigrants face challenges in navigating complex policies that govern access to health care, shelter, food, and clean water, resulting in profound effects on health care outcomes, including increased risk of preterm births and decreased access to preventive health services. These disparities are further exacerbated when immigration policies result in mass detention, incarceration, and deportation, leading to profound trauma among undocumented immigrants and their communities. Obstetrician-gynecologists and other reproductive health care professionals should be prepared to practice immigration-informed care and ensure clinical spaces are welcoming to immigrants. Unless mandated by law, health care professionals should document only information related to a patient's migration history that is necessary for the ongoing clinical care. Health care institutions should provide robust guidance and support for health care personnel and patients faced with the continued complexities of the dynamic landscape of immigration policies. Obstetrician-gynecologists should advocate for the unique needs of patients who are immigrants to promote reproductive justice and health equity.</p>","PeriodicalId":19483,"journal":{"name":"Obstetrics and gynecology","volume":" ","pages":"598-607"},"PeriodicalIF":4.7,"publicationDate":"2026-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146113597","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Antenatal Corticosteroids and Neonatal Outcomes Among Patients With Twin Gestations at Risk for Late Preterm Birth. 双胎晚期早产风险患者的产前糖皮质激素和新生儿结局
IF 4.7 2区 医学 Q1 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY Pub Date : 2026-04-01 Epub Date: 2025-11-07 DOI: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000006114
Dana Senderoff Berger, Diana S Abbas, Lindsay N Marty, Kate Tolleson, Cole Turner, Steven Friedman, Erinn M Hade, Justin S Brandt, Meghana A Limaye
<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To determine whether administration of antenatal corticosteroids to patients with twin gestations at risk for late preterm delivery is associated with reduced risk for neonatal respiratory morbidity compared with unexposed twins.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a multicenter, retrospective cohort study in a large, urban health network (2013-2022) of patients with twin gestations at risk for preterm delivery between 34 0/7 and 36 6/7 weeks of gestation. Patients were excluded if they received antenatal corticosteroids before 34 weeks of gestation or had pregestational diabetes, single-twin death before 34 weeks, or oral steroid exposure during pregnancy. Neonates were excluded if they had major congenital anomalies. The primary outcome was a composite of neonatal respiratory morbidity requiring respiratory support within 72 hours of birth, including continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) or high-flow nasal cannula for 2 hours or more, supplemental oxygen of 30% for 2 hours or more, extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, mechanical ventilation, and fetal or neonatal death. Secondary outcomes included neonatal hypoglycemia and indications for neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) admission. Adjusted and unadjusted relative risks with 95% CIs were calculated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>During the study period, 366 twin gestations and 722 patient-neonate dyads were included: 162 gestations (321 neonates) in the exposed group and 204 (401 neonates) in the unexposed group. There was no difference in the composite outcome of respiratory morbidity in those exposed to antenatal corticosteroids (23.4% vs 20.4%, P =.40, adjusted relative risk [RR] 1.00, 95% CI, 0.71-1.42). The composite was driven mostly by rates of CPAP use (21.2% vs 18.5%, P =.41, adjusted RR 1.05, 95% CI, 0.73-1.53) and high-flow nasal cannula use (6.2% vs 2.2%, P =.02, RR 2.77, 95% CI, 1.16-6.66). Antenatal corticosteroid exposure was associated with a lower risk of need for supplemental oxygen (0.6% vs 3.5%, P =.02, RR 0.18, 95% CI, 0.04-0.79) and mechanical ventilation (0.6% vs 3.2%, P =.03, RR 0.19, 95% CI, 0.04-0.87). Although antenatal corticosteroids exposure was not associated with higher rates of hypoglycemia (44.2% vs 41.7%, P =.57, adjusted RR 0.99, 95% CI, 0.82-1.19), exposure was associated with a higher risk of having hypoglycemia as the only indication for NICU admission (10.3% vs 5.2%, P =.03, RR 1.96, 95% CI, 1.07-3.59).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In a large, multicenter, network-wide retrospective cohort study of patients with twin gestations at risk for late preterm birth, antenatal corticosteroid use was not associated with a decrease in overall respiratory morbidity but was associated with a decreased risk of need for supplemental oxygen and mechanical ventilation, as well as a higher risk of NICU admission for hypoglycemia. These results underscore the ongoing need to elucidate the risks and benefits of late preter
目的:确定与未暴露的双胞胎相比,有晚期早产风险的双胎妊娠患者产前给予皮质类固醇是否与新生儿呼吸系统疾病风险降低有关。方法:这是一项在大型城市卫生网络(2013-2022)中进行的多中心回顾性队列研究,研究对象是妊娠34 0/7周至36 6/7周之间有早产风险的双胎妊娠患者。如果患者在妊娠34周前接受了产前皮质类固醇治疗,或在妊娠34周前患有妊娠糖尿病、单胎死亡或妊娠期间口服类固醇暴露,则排除在外。如果新生儿有重大先天性异常,则排除在外。主要结局是新生儿呼吸系统疾病的复合,在出生72小时内需要呼吸支持,包括持续气道正压通气(CPAP)或高流量鼻插管2小时或更长时间,补充氧气30% 2小时或更长时间,体外膜氧合,机械通气,胎儿或新生儿死亡。次要结局包括新生儿低血糖和新生儿重症监护病房(NICU)入院指征。计算95% ci的调整和未调整相对危险度。结果:研究期间共纳入366例双胎妊娠和722例双胎新生儿:暴露组162例(321例新生儿),未暴露组204例(401例新生儿)。产前皮质类固醇暴露组呼吸系统发病率的综合结局无差异(23.4% vs 20.4%, P= 0.40,校正相对危险度[RR] 1.00, 95% CI, 0.71-1.42)。该组合主要由CPAP使用率(21.2% vs 18.5%, P= 0.41,调整RR 1.05, 95% CI, 0.73-1.53)和高流量鼻插管使用率(6.2% vs 2.2%, P= 0.02, RR 2.77, 95% CI, 1.16-6.66)驱动。产前皮质类固醇暴露与需要补充氧气的风险较低相关(0.6% vs 3.5%, P= 0.02, RR 0.18, 95% CI, 0.04-0.79)和机械通气(0.6% vs 3.2%, P= 0.03, RR 0.19, 95% CI, 0.04-0.87)。虽然产前皮质类固醇暴露与高低血糖发生率无关(44.2% vs 41.7%, P= 0.57,校正RR 0.99, 95% CI, 0.82-1.19),但暴露与高低血糖发生率相关(10.3% vs 5.2%, P= 0.03, RR 1.96, 95% CI, 1.07-3.59)。低血糖是新生儿重症监护病房入院的唯一指状。结论:在一项大型、多中心、网络范围的双胎妊娠晚期早产风险患者的回顾性队列研究中,产前使用皮质类固醇与总体呼吸系统发病率的降低无关,但与需要补充氧气和机械通气的风险降低有关,以及因低血糖入院新生儿重症监护病房的风险较高。这些结果强调了对有晚期早产风险的双胎妊娠患者使用糖皮质激素的风险和益处的持续需求。
{"title":"Antenatal Corticosteroids and Neonatal Outcomes Among Patients With Twin Gestations at Risk for Late Preterm Birth.","authors":"Dana Senderoff Berger, Diana S Abbas, Lindsay N Marty, Kate Tolleson, Cole Turner, Steven Friedman, Erinn M Hade, Justin S Brandt, Meghana A Limaye","doi":"10.1097/AOG.0000000000006114","DOIUrl":"10.1097/AOG.0000000000006114","url":null,"abstract":"&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Objective: &lt;/strong&gt;To determine whether administration of antenatal corticosteroids to patients with twin gestations at risk for late preterm delivery is associated with reduced risk for neonatal respiratory morbidity compared with unexposed twins.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Methods: &lt;/strong&gt;This was a multicenter, retrospective cohort study in a large, urban health network (2013-2022) of patients with twin gestations at risk for preterm delivery between 34 0/7 and 36 6/7 weeks of gestation. Patients were excluded if they received antenatal corticosteroids before 34 weeks of gestation or had pregestational diabetes, single-twin death before 34 weeks, or oral steroid exposure during pregnancy. Neonates were excluded if they had major congenital anomalies. The primary outcome was a composite of neonatal respiratory morbidity requiring respiratory support within 72 hours of birth, including continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) or high-flow nasal cannula for 2 hours or more, supplemental oxygen of 30% for 2 hours or more, extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, mechanical ventilation, and fetal or neonatal death. Secondary outcomes included neonatal hypoglycemia and indications for neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) admission. Adjusted and unadjusted relative risks with 95% CIs were calculated.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Results: &lt;/strong&gt;During the study period, 366 twin gestations and 722 patient-neonate dyads were included: 162 gestations (321 neonates) in the exposed group and 204 (401 neonates) in the unexposed group. There was no difference in the composite outcome of respiratory morbidity in those exposed to antenatal corticosteroids (23.4% vs 20.4%, P =.40, adjusted relative risk [RR] 1.00, 95% CI, 0.71-1.42). The composite was driven mostly by rates of CPAP use (21.2% vs 18.5%, P =.41, adjusted RR 1.05, 95% CI, 0.73-1.53) and high-flow nasal cannula use (6.2% vs 2.2%, P =.02, RR 2.77, 95% CI, 1.16-6.66). Antenatal corticosteroid exposure was associated with a lower risk of need for supplemental oxygen (0.6% vs 3.5%, P =.02, RR 0.18, 95% CI, 0.04-0.79) and mechanical ventilation (0.6% vs 3.2%, P =.03, RR 0.19, 95% CI, 0.04-0.87). Although antenatal corticosteroids exposure was not associated with higher rates of hypoglycemia (44.2% vs 41.7%, P =.57, adjusted RR 0.99, 95% CI, 0.82-1.19), exposure was associated with a higher risk of having hypoglycemia as the only indication for NICU admission (10.3% vs 5.2%, P =.03, RR 1.96, 95% CI, 1.07-3.59).&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Conclusion: &lt;/strong&gt;In a large, multicenter, network-wide retrospective cohort study of patients with twin gestations at risk for late preterm birth, antenatal corticosteroid use was not associated with a decrease in overall respiratory morbidity but was associated with a decreased risk of need for supplemental oxygen and mechanical ventilation, as well as a higher risk of NICU admission for hypoglycemia. These results underscore the ongoing need to elucidate the risks and benefits of late preter","PeriodicalId":19483,"journal":{"name":"Obstetrics and gynecology","volume":" ","pages":"510-517"},"PeriodicalIF":4.7,"publicationDate":"2026-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"145459136","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Pregnancy Outcomes Associated With Anemia in the First Trimester and Anemia Resolution by Late Pregnancy. 妊娠结局与妊娠早期贫血和妊娠晚期贫血消退相关。
IF 4.7 2区 医学 Q1 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY Pub Date : 2026-04-01 Epub Date: 2026-02-06 DOI: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000006183
Anna Booman, Brian T Bateman, Sara Siadat, Caroline Berube, Irogue Igbinosa, Cecilia Leggett, Deirdre J Lyell, Elliott K Main, Stephanie A Leonard

Objective: Evidence related to anemia in early pregnancy, and its resolution or persistence by late pregnancy, is limited. We evaluated pregnancy outcomes associated with anemia in early pregnancy and resolution compared with persistence in late pregnancy.

Methods: We used the Merative™ Marketscan ® Commercial Database of nationwide insurance claims (2018-2023) and included pregnant individuals without hereditary anemias. We used hemoglobin and hematocrit to identify anemia in early pregnancy (before 14 weeks of gestation) and late pregnancy (at or after 24 weeks of gestation). Pregnancy outcomes included preeclampsia, placenta previa, placental abruption, severe postpartum hemorrhage, blood products transfusion, cesarean birth, nontransfusion severe maternal morbidity (SMM), spontaneous preterm birth, medically indicated preterm birth, and small-for-gestational-age (SGA) birth weight. We used modified Poisson regression to estimate associations between: 1) anemia in early pregnancy and pregnancy outcomes; and 2) anemia resolution by late pregnancy and pregnancy outcomes, adjusting for confounders by inverse probability weighting.

Results: Among 73,586 individuals, 4.4% (95% CI, 4.3-4.6%) had anemia in early pregnancy. Early pregnancy anemia was associated with higher risk of each outcome assessed, with the exception of placenta previa, with the highest associated risk of blood products transfusion (2.4% vs 0.8%; adjusted risk ratio [aRR] 2.45; 95% CI, 1.91-3.13). Of those with early pregnancy anemia and laboratory values in late pregnancy (72.1%), 53.4% had persistent anemia and 46.6% had resolved anemia. Persistent anemia was associated with nontransfusion SMM (2.6% vs 1.1%, aRR 1.64; 95% CI, 1.13-2.37), blood products transfusion (2.9% vs 0.8%, aRR 2.60; 95% CI, 1.84-3.69), and SGA birth weight (8.5% vs 6.8%, aRR 1.23; 95% CI, 1.01-1.50), compared with those without anemia in the first trimester. The resolution of anemia by late pregnancy was not associated with nontransfusion SMM (1.6% vs 1.1%; aRR 1.07; 95% CI, 0.65-1.74) but was associated with blood products transfusion (1.6% vs 0.8%; aRR 1.64; 95% CI, 1.01-2.67) and SGA birth weight (10.0% vs 6.8%; aRR 1.38; 95% CI, 1.15-1.67) compared with those without anemia in the first trimester.

Conclusion: Anemia in the first trimester was associated with adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes. The resolution of anemia by late pregnancy eliminated the association with nontransfusion SMM but not other outcomes, emphasizing the importance of treating anemia in early pregnancy and before pregnancy.

目的:与妊娠早期贫血相关的证据,以及其在妊娠后期的解决或持续,是有限的。我们评估了妊娠早期与贫血相关的妊娠结局,并比较了妊娠晚期贫血的消退和持续。方法:我们使用全国保险索赔的Merative™Marketscan®商业数据库(2018-2023),并纳入无遗传性贫血的孕妇。我们使用血红蛋白和红细胞压积来鉴别妊娠早期(妊娠14周前)和妊娠晚期(妊娠24周或24周后)的贫血。妊娠结局包括先兆子痫、前置胎盘、胎盘早剥、产后严重出血、血制品输血、剖宫产、非输血严重产妇发病率(SMM)、自发性早产、医学指征早产和小胎龄出生体重(SGA)。我们使用修正泊松回归来估计:1)妊娠早期贫血与妊娠结局之间的关联;2)贫血消退与妊娠晚期和妊娠结局有关,通过逆概率加权调整混杂因素。结果:在73,586例个体中,4.4% (95% CI, 4.3-4.6%)在妊娠早期有贫血。妊娠早期贫血与所有评估结果的较高风险相关,前置胎盘除外,输血相关风险最高(2.4% vs 0.8%;调整风险比[aRR] 2.45; 95% CI, 1.91-3.13)。妊娠早期贫血及妊娠晚期实验室检查值者(72.1%)中,持续性贫血占53.4%,缓解性贫血占46.6%。与妊娠早期无贫血者相比,持续性贫血与非输血SMM(2.6%对1.1%,aRR 1.64; 95% CI, 1.13-2.37)、输血血制品(2.9%对0.8%,aRR 2.60; 95% CI, 1.84-3.69)和SGA出生体重(8.5%对6.8%,aRR 1.23; 95% CI, 1.01-1.50)相关。妊娠晚期贫血的消退与非输血SMM无关(1.6% vs 1.1%; aRR 1.07; 95% CI, 0.65-1.74),但与妊娠早期无贫血者相比,与输血血制品相关(1.6% vs 0.8%; aRR 1.64; 95% CI, 1.01-2.67)和SGA出生体重相关(10.0% vs 6.8%; aRR 1.38; 95% CI, 1.15-1.67)。结论:妊娠早期贫血与孕产妇和新生儿预后不良相关。妊娠晚期贫血的消退消除了与非输血SMM的关联,但没有其他结果,强调了妊娠早期和孕前治疗贫血的重要性。
{"title":"Pregnancy Outcomes Associated With Anemia in the First Trimester and Anemia Resolution by Late Pregnancy.","authors":"Anna Booman, Brian T Bateman, Sara Siadat, Caroline Berube, Irogue Igbinosa, Cecilia Leggett, Deirdre J Lyell, Elliott K Main, Stephanie A Leonard","doi":"10.1097/AOG.0000000000006183","DOIUrl":"10.1097/AOG.0000000000006183","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Evidence related to anemia in early pregnancy, and its resolution or persistence by late pregnancy, is limited. We evaluated pregnancy outcomes associated with anemia in early pregnancy and resolution compared with persistence in late pregnancy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We used the Merative™ Marketscan ® Commercial Database of nationwide insurance claims (2018-2023) and included pregnant individuals without hereditary anemias. We used hemoglobin and hematocrit to identify anemia in early pregnancy (before 14 weeks of gestation) and late pregnancy (at or after 24 weeks of gestation). Pregnancy outcomes included preeclampsia, placenta previa, placental abruption, severe postpartum hemorrhage, blood products transfusion, cesarean birth, nontransfusion severe maternal morbidity (SMM), spontaneous preterm birth, medically indicated preterm birth, and small-for-gestational-age (SGA) birth weight. We used modified Poisson regression to estimate associations between: 1) anemia in early pregnancy and pregnancy outcomes; and 2) anemia resolution by late pregnancy and pregnancy outcomes, adjusting for confounders by inverse probability weighting.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 73,586 individuals, 4.4% (95% CI, 4.3-4.6%) had anemia in early pregnancy. Early pregnancy anemia was associated with higher risk of each outcome assessed, with the exception of placenta previa, with the highest associated risk of blood products transfusion (2.4% vs 0.8%; adjusted risk ratio [aRR] 2.45; 95% CI, 1.91-3.13). Of those with early pregnancy anemia and laboratory values in late pregnancy (72.1%), 53.4% had persistent anemia and 46.6% had resolved anemia. Persistent anemia was associated with nontransfusion SMM (2.6% vs 1.1%, aRR 1.64; 95% CI, 1.13-2.37), blood products transfusion (2.9% vs 0.8%, aRR 2.60; 95% CI, 1.84-3.69), and SGA birth weight (8.5% vs 6.8%, aRR 1.23; 95% CI, 1.01-1.50), compared with those without anemia in the first trimester. The resolution of anemia by late pregnancy was not associated with nontransfusion SMM (1.6% vs 1.1%; aRR 1.07; 95% CI, 0.65-1.74) but was associated with blood products transfusion (1.6% vs 0.8%; aRR 1.64; 95% CI, 1.01-2.67) and SGA birth weight (10.0% vs 6.8%; aRR 1.38; 95% CI, 1.15-1.67) compared with those without anemia in the first trimester.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Anemia in the first trimester was associated with adverse maternal and neonatal outcomes. The resolution of anemia by late pregnancy eliminated the association with nontransfusion SMM but not other outcomes, emphasizing the importance of treating anemia in early pregnancy and before pregnancy.</p>","PeriodicalId":19483,"journal":{"name":"Obstetrics and gynecology","volume":" ","pages":"518-527"},"PeriodicalIF":4.7,"publicationDate":"2026-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12880618/pdf/","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146125975","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"OA","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Prevention and Treatment of Maternal Stroke in Pregnancy and Postpartum: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association. 预防和治疗怀孕和产后的母亲中风:美国心脏协会的科学声明。
IF 4.7 2区 医学 Q1 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY Pub Date : 2026-04-01 Epub Date: 2026-02-12 DOI: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000006197
Eliza C Miller, Chair Natalie A Bello, Peng R Chen, Lisa Leffert, Michelle Leppert, Tracy Madsen, Katelyn Skeels, Alan Tita, Eduard Valdes, Andrea Shields

Abstract: Stroke remains a rare but life-threatening complication of pregnancy, with significant implications for both maternal and fetal health. Current stroke prevention and treatment guidelines offer limited guidance for managing stroke in pregnant and postpartum patients. Despite advances in obstetric and neurological care, the diagnosis and management of pregnancy-associated stroke continue to be challenged by delayed recognition, a lack of tailored clinical guidelines, and persistent disparities in outcomes. This scientific statement represents a multidisciplinary effort to synthesize current knowledge of the risk factors and diverse causes of stroke in pregnancy and to offer consensus-driven suggestions for prevention, acute management, and postpartum recovery. Nearly half of all US pregnancy-associated stroke hospitalizations occur in the setting of hypertensive disorders. Primary stroke prevention strategies include risk factor modification, aggressive hypertension management and prompt treatment of severe hypertension in pregnancy and postpartum, and antithrombotic therapy in some high-risk groups. Secondary stroke prevention strategies in pregnancy depend on the mechanism of the prior stroke. Pregnancy should not delay evidence-based treatments for acute stroke. The use of telemedicine can facilitate early consultation with a vascular neurologist and a maternal-fetal medicine specialist in cases of acute pregnancy-related stroke, helping to guide initial decision-making. Computed tomography, computed tomography angiography, and magnetic resonance imaging without contrast are all safe neuroimaging modalities for rapid evaluation of pregnant patients with acute stroke symptoms. Acute stroke alone is not an indication for immediate delivery, and stabilization of the mother should come first. Vaginal delivery after stroke is preferred when feasible because it avoids the surgical risks and hemodynamic stress associated with cesarean delivery. Survivors of pregnancy-associated stroke face unique challenges such as caring for an infant and breastfeeding and require support from a multidisciplinary rehabilitation team. Continued research, including inclusive clinical trials, is urgently needed to refine stroke risk assessment, to expand treatment options, and to improve maternal outcomes.

摘要:脑卒中是一种罕见但危及生命的妊娠并发症,对孕产妇和胎儿健康都有重要影响。目前的脑卒中预防和治疗指南对管理孕妇和产后患者的脑卒中提供了有限的指导。尽管产科和神经学护理取得了进步,但妊娠相关中风的诊断和管理仍然面临着识别延迟、缺乏量身定制的临床指南以及结果持续差异的挑战。这一科学声明代表了多学科的努力,综合了目前关于妊娠期中风的危险因素和多种原因的知识,并为预防、急性管理和产后恢复提供了共识驱动的建议。近一半的美国妊娠相关中风住院发生在高血压疾病的设置。初级卒中预防策略包括改变危险因素、积极的高血压管理和妊娠期及产后严重高血压的及时治疗,以及对一些高危人群进行抗血栓治疗。妊娠期二级卒中预防策略取决于先前卒中的机制。妊娠不应延迟急性中风的循证治疗。在急性妊娠相关中风病例中,远程医疗的使用可以促进与血管神经科医生和母胎医学专家的早期咨询,有助于指导最初的决策。计算机断层扫描、计算机断层血管成像和无对比磁共振成像都是快速评估急性卒中孕妇症状的安全神经成像方式。急性中风本身不是立即分娩的指征,母亲的稳定应该是第一位的。在可行的情况下,中风后阴道分娩是首选,因为它避免了与剖宫产相关的手术风险和血流动力学压力。怀孕相关中风的幸存者面临着独特的挑战,如照顾婴儿和母乳喂养,需要多学科康复团队的支持。迫切需要继续研究,包括包容性临床试验,以完善卒中风险评估,扩大治疗选择,并改善产妇结局。
{"title":"Prevention and Treatment of Maternal Stroke in Pregnancy and Postpartum: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association.","authors":"Eliza C Miller, Chair Natalie A Bello, Peng R Chen, Lisa Leffert, Michelle Leppert, Tracy Madsen, Katelyn Skeels, Alan Tita, Eduard Valdes, Andrea Shields","doi":"10.1097/AOG.0000000000006197","DOIUrl":"10.1097/AOG.0000000000006197","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Abstract: </strong>Stroke remains a rare but life-threatening complication of pregnancy, with significant implications for both maternal and fetal health. Current stroke prevention and treatment guidelines offer limited guidance for managing stroke in pregnant and postpartum patients. Despite advances in obstetric and neurological care, the diagnosis and management of pregnancy-associated stroke continue to be challenged by delayed recognition, a lack of tailored clinical guidelines, and persistent disparities in outcomes. This scientific statement represents a multidisciplinary effort to synthesize current knowledge of the risk factors and diverse causes of stroke in pregnancy and to offer consensus-driven suggestions for prevention, acute management, and postpartum recovery. Nearly half of all US pregnancy-associated stroke hospitalizations occur in the setting of hypertensive disorders. Primary stroke prevention strategies include risk factor modification, aggressive hypertension management and prompt treatment of severe hypertension in pregnancy and postpartum, and antithrombotic therapy in some high-risk groups. Secondary stroke prevention strategies in pregnancy depend on the mechanism of the prior stroke. Pregnancy should not delay evidence-based treatments for acute stroke. The use of telemedicine can facilitate early consultation with a vascular neurologist and a maternal-fetal medicine specialist in cases of acute pregnancy-related stroke, helping to guide initial decision-making. Computed tomography, computed tomography angiography, and magnetic resonance imaging without contrast are all safe neuroimaging modalities for rapid evaluation of pregnant patients with acute stroke symptoms. Acute stroke alone is not an indication for immediate delivery, and stabilization of the mother should come first. Vaginal delivery after stroke is preferred when feasible because it avoids the surgical risks and hemodynamic stress associated with cesarean delivery. Survivors of pregnancy-associated stroke face unique challenges such as caring for an infant and breastfeeding and require support from a multidisciplinary rehabilitation team. Continued research, including inclusive clinical trials, is urgently needed to refine stroke risk assessment, to expand treatment options, and to improve maternal outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":19483,"journal":{"name":"Obstetrics and gynecology","volume":" ","pages":"e43-e65"},"PeriodicalIF":4.7,"publicationDate":"2026-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146181475","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Patient-Led Insulin Titration for Glycemic Management With Gestational Diabetes Mellitus: A Randomized Controlled Trial. 患者主导的胰岛素滴入治疗妊娠期糖尿病血糖控制:一项随机对照试验。
IF 4.7 2区 医学 Q1 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY Pub Date : 2026-04-01 Epub Date: 2026-02-19 DOI: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000006154
Xiao-Yu Wang, William A Grobman, Jiqiang Wu, Rita Suzawa, Jenna Kralik, Taryn Summerfield, Shaylyn Vickers, Brenda Widmayer, Melissa Rainier, Julie Somppi, Lisa Buccilla, Bridget Iadicicco, Elizabeth Buschur, Steven Gabbe, Mark B Landon, Kartik K Venkatesh

Objective: To conduct a randomized controlled trial (RCT) to assess whether patient-led insulin titration (intervention) compared with clinician-led insulin titration (control) resulted in improved glycemic management and pregnancy outcomes for individuals with gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM).

Methods: EMPOWER (Patient Versus Provider-Led Titration of Insulin for Glycemic Control in Gestational Diabetes) was a single-center, nonblinded RCT among individuals with GDM requiring insulin between 20 and 32 weeks of gestation that was conducted from October 19, 2023, to January 10, 2025. Intervention participants self-titrated long-acting insulin, which was started at 10 units nightly and decreased or increased by 2 units per fasting glucose above or below 70 and 95 mg/dL, respectively, every day. Control participants started an insulin dose with weekly titration at the clinician's discretion. The primary outcome was mean fasting glucose in the 36th week or the week before delivery for preterm deliveries. Secondary outcomes included pregnancy outcomes and patient-reported measures. With 80% power, two-sided α of 0.05, and 5% loss-to-follow-up, 56 individuals needed to be randomized to demonstrate at least a 15% difference in mean fasting glucose. Analysis was by intention to treat.

Results: Of 89 individuals who were eligible during the study period, 56 consented and were randomized (29 intervention, 27 control). The median duration from starting insulin to delivery was 7.7 weeks. Patient-led insulin titration resulted in a similar mean fasting glucose before delivery compared with clinician-led titration (88.8 vs 90.3 mg/dL; β coefficient -1.50 mg/dL, 95% CI, -5.50 to 2.50) but resulted in more rapid achievement of fasting glucose below 95 mg/dL (mean 1.8 weeks vs 2.5 weeks; hazard ratio 1.48, 95% CI, 1.16 to 1.90). Patient-led titration was associated with a lower risk of macrosomia (6.9% vs 37.0%, relative risk 0.18, 95% CI, 0.04 to 0.84) and large-for-gestational-age (LGA) birth weight (3.3% vs 34.6%, relative risk 0.10, 95% CI, 0.08 to 0.12). Other pregnancy and patient-reported outcomes did not differ between the groups.

Conclusion: Patient-led insulin titration for GDM resulted in a similar mean fasting glucose compared with clinician-led insulin titration but was associated with more rapid achievement of glycemic control and a lower risk of macrosomia and LGA birth weight. These data support the need for larger patient-centered GDM treatment trials.

Clinical trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov , NCT05922033.

目的:通过一项随机对照试验(RCT)来评估患者主导的胰岛素滴入(干预)与临床主导的胰岛素滴入(对照组)是否能改善妊娠期糖尿病(GDM)患者的血糖管理和妊娠结局。方法:EMPOWER(患者与提供者主导的胰岛素滴定用于妊娠糖尿病血糖控制)是一项单中心、非盲随机对照试验,在妊娠20 - 32周需要胰岛素的GDM患者中进行,于2023年10月19日至2025年1月10日进行。干预参与者自行滴定长效胰岛素,开始时为每晚10个单位,每天空腹血糖分别高于或低于70和95 mg/dL,减少或增加2个单位。对照受试者开始胰岛素剂量,根据临床医生的判断每周滴定一次。主要终点是36周或早产前一周的平均空腹血糖。次要结局包括妊娠结局和患者报告的措施。在80%的功效,双侧α为0.05,5%的随访损失的情况下,需要随机分配56个个体来证明至少有15%的平均空腹血糖差异。分析的目的是治疗。结果:在研究期间符合条件的89人中,56人同意并随机分组(干预29人,对照组27人)。从开始注射胰岛素到给药的中位持续时间为7.7周。患者主导的胰岛素滴定与临床主导的滴定相比,分娩前的平均空腹血糖相似(88.8 vs 90.3 mg/dL; β系数-1.50 mg/dL, 95% CI, -5.50至2.50),但空腹血糖低于95 mg/dL的速度更快(平均1.8周vs 2.5周;风险比1.48,95% CI, 1.16至1.90)。患者主导的滴注与巨大儿(6.9% vs 37.0%,相对风险0.18,95% CI, 0.04 ~ 0.84)和大胎龄(LGA)出生体重(3.3% vs 34.6%,相对风险0.10,95% CI, 0.08 ~ 0.12)的低风险相关。其他妊娠和患者报告的结果在两组之间没有差异。结论:与临床主导的胰岛素滴定相比,患者主导的GDM胰岛素滴定导致的平均空腹血糖相似,但与更快实现血糖控制和更低的巨大儿和LGA出生体重风险相关。这些数据支持需要更大规模的以患者为中心的GDM治疗试验。临床试验注册:ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT05922033。
{"title":"Patient-Led Insulin Titration for Glycemic Management With Gestational Diabetes Mellitus: A Randomized Controlled Trial.","authors":"Xiao-Yu Wang, William A Grobman, Jiqiang Wu, Rita Suzawa, Jenna Kralik, Taryn Summerfield, Shaylyn Vickers, Brenda Widmayer, Melissa Rainier, Julie Somppi, Lisa Buccilla, Bridget Iadicicco, Elizabeth Buschur, Steven Gabbe, Mark B Landon, Kartik K Venkatesh","doi":"10.1097/AOG.0000000000006154","DOIUrl":"10.1097/AOG.0000000000006154","url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To conduct a randomized controlled trial (RCT) to assess whether patient-led insulin titration (intervention) compared with clinician-led insulin titration (control) resulted in improved glycemic management and pregnancy outcomes for individuals with gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>EMPOWER (Patient Versus Provider-Led Titration of Insulin for Glycemic Control in Gestational Diabetes) was a single-center, nonblinded RCT among individuals with GDM requiring insulin between 20 and 32 weeks of gestation that was conducted from October 19, 2023, to January 10, 2025. Intervention participants self-titrated long-acting insulin, which was started at 10 units nightly and decreased or increased by 2 units per fasting glucose above or below 70 and 95 mg/dL, respectively, every day. Control participants started an insulin dose with weekly titration at the clinician's discretion. The primary outcome was mean fasting glucose in the 36th week or the week before delivery for preterm deliveries. Secondary outcomes included pregnancy outcomes and patient-reported measures. With 80% power, two-sided α of 0.05, and 5% loss-to-follow-up, 56 individuals needed to be randomized to demonstrate at least a 15% difference in mean fasting glucose. Analysis was by intention to treat.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 89 individuals who were eligible during the study period, 56 consented and were randomized (29 intervention, 27 control). The median duration from starting insulin to delivery was 7.7 weeks. Patient-led insulin titration resulted in a similar mean fasting glucose before delivery compared with clinician-led titration (88.8 vs 90.3 mg/dL; β coefficient -1.50 mg/dL, 95% CI, -5.50 to 2.50) but resulted in more rapid achievement of fasting glucose below 95 mg/dL (mean 1.8 weeks vs 2.5 weeks; hazard ratio 1.48, 95% CI, 1.16 to 1.90). Patient-led titration was associated with a lower risk of macrosomia (6.9% vs 37.0%, relative risk 0.18, 95% CI, 0.04 to 0.84) and large-for-gestational-age (LGA) birth weight (3.3% vs 34.6%, relative risk 0.10, 95% CI, 0.08 to 0.12). Other pregnancy and patient-reported outcomes did not differ between the groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Patient-led insulin titration for GDM resulted in a similar mean fasting glucose compared with clinician-led insulin titration but was associated with more rapid achievement of glycemic control and a lower risk of macrosomia and LGA birth weight. These data support the need for larger patient-centered GDM treatment trials.</p><p><strong>Clinical trial registration: </strong>ClinicalTrials.gov , NCT05922033.</p>","PeriodicalId":19483,"journal":{"name":"Obstetrics and gynecology","volume":" ","pages":"501-509"},"PeriodicalIF":4.7,"publicationDate":"2026-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"146227641","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
期刊
Obstetrics and gynecology
全部 Acc. Chem. Res. ACS Applied Bio Materials ACS Appl. Electron. Mater. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces ACS Appl. Nano Mater. ACS Appl. Polym. Mater. ACS BIOMATER-SCI ENG ACS Catal. ACS Cent. Sci. ACS Chem. Biol. ACS Chemical Health & Safety ACS Chem. Neurosci. ACS Comb. Sci. ACS Earth Space Chem. ACS Energy Lett. ACS Infect. Dis. ACS Macro Lett. ACS Mater. Lett. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. ACS Nano ACS Omega ACS Photonics ACS Sens. ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng. ACS Synth. Biol. Anal. Chem. BIOCHEMISTRY-US Bioconjugate Chem. BIOMACROMOLECULES Chem. Res. Toxicol. Chem. Rev. Chem. Mater. CRYST GROWTH DES ENERG FUEL Environ. Sci. Technol. Environ. Sci. Technol. Lett. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. IND ENG CHEM RES Inorg. Chem. J. Agric. Food. Chem. J. Chem. Eng. Data J. Chem. Educ. J. Chem. Inf. Model. J. Chem. Theory Comput. J. Med. Chem. J. Nat. Prod. J PROTEOME RES J. Am. Chem. Soc. LANGMUIR MACROMOLECULES Mol. Pharmaceutics Nano Lett. Org. Lett. ORG PROCESS RES DEV ORGANOMETALLICS J. Org. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. J. Phys. Chem. A J. Phys. Chem. B J. Phys. Chem. C J. Phys. Chem. Lett. Analyst Anal. Methods Biomater. Sci. Catal. Sci. Technol. Chem. Commun. Chem. Soc. Rev. CHEM EDUC RES PRACT CRYSTENGCOMM Dalton Trans. Energy Environ. Sci. ENVIRON SCI-NANO ENVIRON SCI-PROC IMP ENVIRON SCI-WAT RES Faraday Discuss. Food Funct. Green Chem. Inorg. Chem. Front. Integr. Biol. J. Anal. At. Spectrom. J. Mater. Chem. A J. Mater. Chem. B J. Mater. Chem. C Lab Chip Mater. Chem. Front. Mater. Horiz. MEDCHEMCOMM Metallomics Mol. Biosyst. Mol. Syst. Des. Eng. Nanoscale Nanoscale Horiz. Nat. Prod. Rep. New J. Chem. Org. Biomol. Chem. Org. Chem. Front. PHOTOCH PHOTOBIO SCI PCCP Polym. Chem.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1