Trainees as Agents of Change: A Theory-Informed Model for Trainee-Driven Curricular Advocacy in Medical Education.

IF 5.3 2区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES Academic Medicine Pub Date : 2024-09-01 Epub Date: 2024-05-07 DOI:10.1097/ACM.0000000000005754
Lauren Clarke
{"title":"Trainees as Agents of Change: A Theory-Informed Model for Trainee-Driven Curricular Advocacy in Medical Education.","authors":"Lauren Clarke","doi":"10.1097/ACM.0000000000005754","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Abstract: </strong>Trainees (medical students, residents, and fellows) are beginning to make strides in pushing for changes to their education. While there are many examples of successful trainee-led curriculum reform efforts, the path to success remains unclear. To better understand the process of trainee-driven curricular advocacy, the author analyzes this process through the lens of ecological systems theory (EST) not only to provide readers with context for the barriers and facilitators to trainee-driven curricular advocacy but also to further medical education's understanding of the sociopolitical forces influencing the process of trainee-driven curricular advocacy and reform through the lens of the trainee. EST explains how individuals are influenced by a complex web of social and environmental forces. The theory outlines 5 ecological systems of influence: the microsystem, mesosystem, exosystem, macrosystem, and chronosystem. Using EST to explore the process of trainee-driven curricular advocacy therefore clarifies the many layers of influence that trainees must navigate while advocating for curriculum change. The author then draws on this theory and their own experience as a medical student advocating for local and national curriculum reform to develop a model to facilitate trainee-driven curricular advocacy in medical education. The proposed model outlines concrete steps trainees can take while going through the process of curricular advocacy both within their own institutions and on a national level. Through developing this model, the author hopes not only to empower trainees to become agents of change in medical education but also to encourage faculty members and administrators within health professional training programs to support trainees in these efforts.</p>","PeriodicalId":50929,"journal":{"name":"Academic Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"953-958"},"PeriodicalIF":5.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Academic Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0000000000005754","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/5/7 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC DISCIPLINES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract: Trainees (medical students, residents, and fellows) are beginning to make strides in pushing for changes to their education. While there are many examples of successful trainee-led curriculum reform efforts, the path to success remains unclear. To better understand the process of trainee-driven curricular advocacy, the author analyzes this process through the lens of ecological systems theory (EST) not only to provide readers with context for the barriers and facilitators to trainee-driven curricular advocacy but also to further medical education's understanding of the sociopolitical forces influencing the process of trainee-driven curricular advocacy and reform through the lens of the trainee. EST explains how individuals are influenced by a complex web of social and environmental forces. The theory outlines 5 ecological systems of influence: the microsystem, mesosystem, exosystem, macrosystem, and chronosystem. Using EST to explore the process of trainee-driven curricular advocacy therefore clarifies the many layers of influence that trainees must navigate while advocating for curriculum change. The author then draws on this theory and their own experience as a medical student advocating for local and national curriculum reform to develop a model to facilitate trainee-driven curricular advocacy in medical education. The proposed model outlines concrete steps trainees can take while going through the process of curricular advocacy both within their own institutions and on a national level. Through developing this model, the author hopes not only to empower trainees to become agents of change in medical education but also to encourage faculty members and administrators within health professional training programs to support trainees in these efforts.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
学员是变革的推动者:医学教育中以学员为主导的课程宣传的理论依据模式。
摘要:受训人员(医学生、住院医师和研究员)开始大步推动教育改革。虽然有许多由受训者主导的课程改革取得成功的例子,但通往成功的道路仍不明确。为了更好地理解受训者主导的课程倡导过程,作者通过生态系统论(EST)的视角对这一过程进行了分析,不仅为读者提供了受训者主导的课程倡导过程中的障碍和促进因素,还通过受训者的视角进一步加深了医学教育对影响受训者主导的课程倡导和改革过程的社会政治力量的理解。EST 解释了个人如何受到复杂的社会和环境力量网络的影响。该理论概述了 5 个生态影响系统:微观系统、中观系统、外 观系统、宏观系统和时间系统。因此,利用 EST 来探讨受训人员推动课程倡导的过程,可以阐明受训人员在倡导课程变革时必须要驾驭的多层次影响。然后,作者借鉴这一理论和自己作为医学生倡导地方和国家课程改革的经验,建立了一个模型,以促进医学教育中由受训者驱动的课程倡导。所提出的模式概述了受训者在其所在机构和国家层面进行课程倡导过程中可以采取的具体步骤。作者希望通过建立这一模式,不仅能使受训人员成为医学教育改革的推动者,还能鼓励卫生专业培训项目的教师和管理人员支持受训人员的这些努力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Academic Medicine
Academic Medicine 医学-卫生保健
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
9.50%
发文量
982
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Academic Medicine, the official peer-reviewed journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges, acts as an international forum for exchanging ideas, information, and strategies to address the significant challenges in academic medicine. The journal covers areas such as research, education, clinical care, community collaboration, and leadership, with a commitment to serving the public interest.
期刊最新文献
Validating the 2023 Association of American Medical Colleges Graduate Medical Education Leadership Competencies. World Federation for Medical Education Recognizes 5 International Accrediting Bodies. Irony. Teaching Opportunities for Postgraduate Trainees in Primary Care. How Many Is Too Many? Using Cognitive Load Theory to Determine the Maximum Safe Number of Inpatient Consultations for Trainees.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1