Cheuk Bun Tse, Mark Zhu, Matthew Peter James Fisk, Joshua Andy Sevao
{"title":"The Safety of Volar to Dorsal Percutaneous Screw Fixation of Bennett Fracture-Dislocation - A Cadaveric Study.","authors":"Cheuk Bun Tse, Mark Zhu, Matthew Peter James Fisk, Joshua Andy Sevao","doi":"10.1142/S2424835524500188","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Bennett fractures are traditionally fixed with percutaneous K-wires from dorsal to volar, or with a volar to dorsal screw via a volar open approach. While volar to dorsal screw fixation is biomechanically advantageous, an open approach requires extensive soft tissue dissection, thus increasing morbidity. This study aims to investigate the practicality and safety of Bennett fracture fixation using a percutaneous, volar to dorsal screw, particularly with regard to the median nerve and its motor branch during wire and screw insertion. <b>Methods:</b> Fifteen fresh frozen forearm and hand specimens were obtained from the University of Auckland human cadaver laboratory. A guidewire is placed under image intensifier from volar to dorsal with the thumb held in traction, abduction and pronation. The wire is passed through the skin volarly under image intensifier, then the median nerve is dissected from the carpal tunnel and the motor branch of the median nerve (MBMN) is dissected from its origin to where it supplies the thenar musculature. The distance between the K-wire to the MBMN is measured. <b>Results:</b> In 14 of 15 specimens, the wire was superficial and radial to the carpal tunnel. The mean distance to the origin of the MBMN is 6.2 mm (95% CI 4.1-8.3) with the closest specimen 1 mm away. The mean closest distance the wire gets to any part of the MBMN is 3.7 mm (95% CI 1.6-5.8); in two specimens, the wire was through the MBMN. <b>Conclusions:</b> Wire placement, although done under image intensifier, is subject to significant variation in exiting location. While research has shown the thenar portal in arthroscopic thumb surgery is safe, our guidewire needs to exit further ulnar to capture the Bennett fracture fragment, placing the MBMN at risk. This cadaveric study has demonstrated the proposed technique is unsafe for use.</p>","PeriodicalId":51689,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Hand Surgery-Asian-Pacific Volume","volume":" ","pages":"179-183"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Hand Surgery-Asian-Pacific Volume","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1142/S2424835524500188","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/5/10 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Bennett fractures are traditionally fixed with percutaneous K-wires from dorsal to volar, or with a volar to dorsal screw via a volar open approach. While volar to dorsal screw fixation is biomechanically advantageous, an open approach requires extensive soft tissue dissection, thus increasing morbidity. This study aims to investigate the practicality and safety of Bennett fracture fixation using a percutaneous, volar to dorsal screw, particularly with regard to the median nerve and its motor branch during wire and screw insertion. Methods: Fifteen fresh frozen forearm and hand specimens were obtained from the University of Auckland human cadaver laboratory. A guidewire is placed under image intensifier from volar to dorsal with the thumb held in traction, abduction and pronation. The wire is passed through the skin volarly under image intensifier, then the median nerve is dissected from the carpal tunnel and the motor branch of the median nerve (MBMN) is dissected from its origin to where it supplies the thenar musculature. The distance between the K-wire to the MBMN is measured. Results: In 14 of 15 specimens, the wire was superficial and radial to the carpal tunnel. The mean distance to the origin of the MBMN is 6.2 mm (95% CI 4.1-8.3) with the closest specimen 1 mm away. The mean closest distance the wire gets to any part of the MBMN is 3.7 mm (95% CI 1.6-5.8); in two specimens, the wire was through the MBMN. Conclusions: Wire placement, although done under image intensifier, is subject to significant variation in exiting location. While research has shown the thenar portal in arthroscopic thumb surgery is safe, our guidewire needs to exit further ulnar to capture the Bennett fracture fragment, placing the MBMN at risk. This cadaveric study has demonstrated the proposed technique is unsafe for use.
背景:传统上,贝内特骨折是通过经皮K线从背侧固定到外侧,或通过外侧开放入路用外侧到背侧的螺钉固定。虽然从外侧到背侧的螺钉固定在生物力学上具有优势,但开放式方法需要进行广泛的软组织剥离,从而增加了发病率。本研究旨在探究使用经皮外侧至背侧螺钉固定贝内特骨折的实用性和安全性,尤其是在钢丝和螺钉插入过程中对正中神经及其运动分支的影响。方法:从奥克兰大学人体尸体实验室获得 15 个新鲜冷冻的前臂和手部标本。在图像增强器下将导丝从拇指外侧至背侧放置,拇指保持牵引、外展和前屈状态。在图像增强仪下将导线穿过皮肤,然后从腕管中解剖出正中神经,并将正中神经的运动分支(MBMN)从其发源地解剖到其供应肘部肌肉组织的位置。测量 K 线与正中神经运动支之间的距离。结果:15 例标本中有 14 例的 K 线位于腕管的浅表和桡侧。与髓核起源的平均距离为 6.2 毫米(95% CI 4.1-8.3),最近的标本距离为 1 毫米。导线与髓核任何部分的平均最近距离为 3.7 毫米(95% CI 1.6-5.8);在两个标本中,导线穿过了髓核。结论:虽然钢丝放置是在图像增强仪下进行的,但其出口位置存在很大差异。研究表明,拇指关节镜手术中的腕骨入口是安全的,但我们的导丝需要从尺侧更远的位置穿出,以捕捉贝内特骨折片段,这就给髓核带来了风险。这项尸体研究表明,所建议的技术使用起来并不安全。