Ulnar Neuropathy after Distal Radius Fractures - A Case Series and Review of Literature.

IF 0.5 Q4 SURGERY Journal of Hand Surgery-Asian-Pacific Volume Pub Date : 2024-06-01 Epub Date: 2024-05-10 DOI:10.1142/S2424835524500243
Ian Jason Magtoto, Gavrielle Hui-Ying Kang, Lam Chuan Teoh
{"title":"Ulnar Neuropathy after Distal Radius Fractures - A Case Series and Review of Literature.","authors":"Ian Jason Magtoto, Gavrielle Hui-Ying Kang, Lam Chuan Teoh","doi":"10.1142/S2424835524500243","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Ulnar neuropathy after a distal radius fracture is rare and has limited reports in literature. As such, there is no consensus regarding the optimal treatment and management of such injuries. We report our experience with managing these uncommon injuries. <b>Methods:</b> A retrospective review was conducted where patients presenting with ulnar neuropathy after sustaining a distal radius fracture were identified from January 2021 to December 2023 from our hospital database. <b>Results:</b> A total of four patients were identified. All of them underwent surgical fixation for their respective fractures. None of them underwent immediate or delayed exploration and decompression of the ulnar nerve. All patients had clinical improvement at 3 months after their initial injuries. Three patients eventually had resolution of the neuropathy between 5 and 9 months post injury, while one had partial recovery and developed a neuroma but declined surgery due to symptoms minimally affecting work and daily activities. <b>Conclusions:</b> Ulnar neuropathy after distal radius fractures may not be as rare as previously thought. Expectant management of the neuropathy would be a reasonable treatment as long as there is no evidence of nerve discontinuity or translocation and that there is clinical and/or electrodiagnostic improvement at 3-4 months after the initial injury. <b>Level of Evidence:</b> Level IV (Therapeutic).</p>","PeriodicalId":51689,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Hand Surgery-Asian-Pacific Volume","volume":" ","pages":"225-230"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Hand Surgery-Asian-Pacific Volume","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1142/S2424835524500243","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/5/10 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Ulnar neuropathy after a distal radius fracture is rare and has limited reports in literature. As such, there is no consensus regarding the optimal treatment and management of such injuries. We report our experience with managing these uncommon injuries. Methods: A retrospective review was conducted where patients presenting with ulnar neuropathy after sustaining a distal radius fracture were identified from January 2021 to December 2023 from our hospital database. Results: A total of four patients were identified. All of them underwent surgical fixation for their respective fractures. None of them underwent immediate or delayed exploration and decompression of the ulnar nerve. All patients had clinical improvement at 3 months after their initial injuries. Three patients eventually had resolution of the neuropathy between 5 and 9 months post injury, while one had partial recovery and developed a neuroma but declined surgery due to symptoms minimally affecting work and daily activities. Conclusions: Ulnar neuropathy after distal radius fractures may not be as rare as previously thought. Expectant management of the neuropathy would be a reasonable treatment as long as there is no evidence of nerve discontinuity or translocation and that there is clinical and/or electrodiagnostic improvement at 3-4 months after the initial injury. Level of Evidence: Level IV (Therapeutic).

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
桡骨远端骨折后的尺神经病变--病例系列和文献综述。
背景:桡骨远端骨折后的尺神经病变非常罕见,文献报道也很有限。因此,关于此类损伤的最佳治疗和管理方法尚未达成共识。我们报告了我们处理这类罕见损伤的经验。方法:从 2021 年 1 月到 2023 年 12 月,我们从医院数据库中找到了桡骨远端骨折后出现尺神经病变的患者,并进行了回顾性分析。结果共发现四名患者。他们都接受了各自骨折的手术固定。他们都没有立即或延迟对尺神经进行探查和减压。所有患者在初次受伤 3 个月后临床症状均有所改善。三名患者最终在受伤后 5 至 9 个月之间缓解了神经病变,一名患者部分康复并出现了神经瘤,但由于症状对工作和日常活动的影响很小而拒绝了手术治疗。结论桡骨远端骨折后出现的尺神经病变可能并不像之前认为的那样罕见。只要没有证据表明神经不连续或移位,并且在初次损伤后 3-4 个月内临床和/或电诊断有所改善,对神经病变进行预期管理将是一种合理的治疗方法。证据等级:四级(治疗)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
304
期刊最新文献
An Algorithm for Management of Radial Longitudinal Deficiency. Camptodactyly. Factors Affecting Appearance after Thumb Polydactyly Reconstruction - A Caregiver's Perspective in an Asian Population. Paediatric Hand Fractures - A Review. Surgical Treatment for Chronic Anterior Dislocation of the Radial Head.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1