New methods, persistent issues, and one solution: Gene-environment interaction studies of childhood cognitive development

IF 2.8 2区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Intelligence Pub Date : 2024-05-09 DOI:10.1016/j.intell.2024.101834
Sophie von Stumm , Allie F. Nancarrow
{"title":"New methods, persistent issues, and one solution: Gene-environment interaction studies of childhood cognitive development","authors":"Sophie von Stumm ,&nbsp;Allie F. Nancarrow","doi":"10.1016/j.intell.2024.101834","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Children's differences in cognitive development stem from the complex interplay of genetic and environmental factors. Identifying gene-environment interactions in cognitive development is key for effectively targeting interventions that improve children's life chances. The advent of polygenic scores, which aggregate DNA variants to index a person's genetic propensities for phenotypic development, has created unprecedented opportunities for pinpointing gene-environment interactions. Yet, the issue of statistical power – the probability of detecting a true effect – prevails, and no replicable gene-environment interactions in child cognitive development have been reported. In this review article, we recapitulate three approaches to studying gene-environment interactions, including twin studies, candidate gene models, and polygenic score methods. We then discuss the issue of statistical power in gene-environment interaction research and conclude that larger samples are key to ushering a new era of replicable gene-environment interaction findings.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":13862,"journal":{"name":"Intelligence","volume":"105 ","pages":"Article 101834"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S016028962400028X/pdfft?md5=cd9adebcc50ca60cf1f5082cffb111b9&pid=1-s2.0-S016028962400028X-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Intelligence","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S016028962400028X","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Children's differences in cognitive development stem from the complex interplay of genetic and environmental factors. Identifying gene-environment interactions in cognitive development is key for effectively targeting interventions that improve children's life chances. The advent of polygenic scores, which aggregate DNA variants to index a person's genetic propensities for phenotypic development, has created unprecedented opportunities for pinpointing gene-environment interactions. Yet, the issue of statistical power – the probability of detecting a true effect – prevails, and no replicable gene-environment interactions in child cognitive development have been reported. In this review article, we recapitulate three approaches to studying gene-environment interactions, including twin studies, candidate gene models, and polygenic score methods. We then discuss the issue of statistical power in gene-environment interaction research and conclude that larger samples are key to ushering a new era of replicable gene-environment interaction findings.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
新方法、老大难问题和一个解决方案:儿童认知发展的基因-环境交互作用研究
儿童在认知发展方面的差异源于遗传和环境因素的复杂相互作用。识别基因与环境在认知发展中的相互作用,是有效定位干预措施以改善儿童生活机会的关键。多基因评分的出现为精确定位基因与环境的相互作用创造了前所未有的机会。然而,统计能力--即检测到真实效应的概率--的问题仍然普遍存在,在儿童认知发展中还没有可复制的基因-环境交互作用的报道。在这篇综述文章中,我们概述了研究基因与环境相互作用的三种方法,包括双生子研究、候选基因模型和多基因评分法。然后,我们讨论了基因-环境交互作用研究中的统计能力问题,并得出结论:要开创一个可复制的基因-环境交互作用研究结果的新时代,更大的样本是关键。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Intelligence
Intelligence PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
13.30%
发文量
64
审稿时长
69 days
期刊介绍: This unique journal in psychology is devoted to publishing original research and theoretical studies and review papers that substantially contribute to the understanding of intelligence. It provides a new source of significant papers in psychometrics, tests and measurement, and all other empirical and theoretical studies in intelligence and mental retardation.
期刊最新文献
Heterogeneous relationships between working speed and ability on the Reasoning and Intelligence Online Test (RIOT) Editorial Board More than correlates: Longitudinal evidence of bidirectional effects between associative learning and fluid intelligence in elementary school children Corrigendum to ‘analysis of the intelligence quotient and its contribution to reactive violence: A systematic review and meta-analysis’ [intelligence 114 (2026) 101969] What should replicate in intelligence research? Setting the bar for a cumulative science
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1