The roles of phishing knowledge, cue utilization, and decision styles in phishing email detection

IF 3.1 2区 工程技术 Q2 ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL Applied Ergonomics Pub Date : 2024-05-09 DOI:10.1016/j.apergo.2024.104309
Daniel Sturman , Elliot A. Bell , Jaime C. Auton , Georgia R. Breakey , Mark W. Wiggins
{"title":"The roles of phishing knowledge, cue utilization, and decision styles in phishing email detection","authors":"Daniel Sturman ,&nbsp;Elliot A. Bell ,&nbsp;Jaime C. Auton ,&nbsp;Georgia R. Breakey ,&nbsp;Mark W. Wiggins","doi":"10.1016/j.apergo.2024.104309","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This study investigated the roles of phishing knowledge, cue utilization, and decision styles in contributing to phishing email detection. Participants (<em>N</em> = 145) completed an online email sorting task, and measures of phishing knowledge, email decision styles, cue utilization, and email security awareness. Cue utilization was the only factor that uniquely predicted the capacity to discriminate phishing from genuine emails. Phishing knowledge was associated with greater phishing detection and a bias towards classifying all emails as phishing. A preference for intuitive decision making predicted lower detection of phishing emails, driven by a greater tendency to classify emails as genuine. These findings support the proposition that cue utilization is a distinct cognitive process that enables expert performance. The outcomes indicate that, in addition to increasing phishing knowledge and developing safe behavioral patterns, anti-phishing training needs to provide opportunities for trainees to develop meaningful cue associations.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":55502,"journal":{"name":"Applied Ergonomics","volume":"119 ","pages":"Article 104309"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0003687024000863/pdfft?md5=33585251109a9dc65e75390e64382e39&pid=1-s2.0-S0003687024000863-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Ergonomics","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0003687024000863","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study investigated the roles of phishing knowledge, cue utilization, and decision styles in contributing to phishing email detection. Participants (N = 145) completed an online email sorting task, and measures of phishing knowledge, email decision styles, cue utilization, and email security awareness. Cue utilization was the only factor that uniquely predicted the capacity to discriminate phishing from genuine emails. Phishing knowledge was associated with greater phishing detection and a bias towards classifying all emails as phishing. A preference for intuitive decision making predicted lower detection of phishing emails, driven by a greater tendency to classify emails as genuine. These findings support the proposition that cue utilization is a distinct cognitive process that enables expert performance. The outcomes indicate that, in addition to increasing phishing knowledge and developing safe behavioral patterns, anti-phishing training needs to provide opportunities for trainees to develop meaningful cue associations.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
网络钓鱼知识、线索利用和决策风格在网络钓鱼电子邮件检测中的作用
本研究调查了网络钓鱼知识、线索利用和决策风格对网络钓鱼电子邮件检测的作用。参与者(145 人)完成了一项在线电子邮件分类任务,并对网络钓鱼知识、电子邮件决策风格、线索利用和电子邮件安全意识进行了测量。线索利用是唯一能独特预测辨别网络钓鱼邮件和真实邮件能力的因素。网络钓鱼知识与更高的网络钓鱼检测能力和将所有电子邮件都归类为网络钓鱼的偏差有关。由于更倾向于将电子邮件归类为真实邮件,因此偏好直观决策的人对网络钓鱼邮件的检测率较低。这些研究结果支持这样一种观点,即线索的利用是一个独特的认知过程,它能使专家的表现更加出色。这些结果表明,除了增加网络钓鱼知识和发展安全行为模式外,反网络钓鱼培训还需要为受训者提供发展有意义的线索关联的机会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Applied Ergonomics
Applied Ergonomics 工程技术-工程:工业
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
9.40%
发文量
248
审稿时长
53 days
期刊介绍: Applied Ergonomics is aimed at ergonomists and all those interested in applying ergonomics/human factors in the design, planning and management of technical and social systems at work or leisure. Readership is truly international with subscribers in over 50 countries. Professionals for whom Applied Ergonomics is of interest include: ergonomists, designers, industrial engineers, health and safety specialists, systems engineers, design engineers, organizational psychologists, occupational health specialists and human-computer interaction specialists.
期刊最新文献
Effects of different block designs on low back and shoulders biomechanical loads and postural stability during crab pot handling. Digital technologies and resilient performance in socio-technical systems: A human factors and ergonomics perspective. Understanding older adults' needs for and perceptions of shared autonomous vehicle interior features: A focus group and user enactment study. Assessing operator stress in collaborative robotics: A multimodal approach Corrigendum to "Gender, sex and desk-based postural behaviour: A systematic review re-interpreting biomechanical evidence from a social perspective" [Appl. Ergon. 114 (2023) 104073].
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1