HCI-modelling for improving the clinical usability of digital health technologies

IF 4.2 3区 生物学 Q1 BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS Methods Pub Date : 2024-05-09 DOI:10.1016/j.ymeth.2024.04.019
Chris Paton , Elizabeth M Borycki , Jim Warren , Andre W Kushniruk , Mike English
{"title":"HCI-modelling for improving the clinical usability of digital health technologies","authors":"Chris Paton ,&nbsp;Elizabeth M Borycki ,&nbsp;Jim Warren ,&nbsp;Andre W Kushniruk ,&nbsp;Mike English","doi":"10.1016/j.ymeth.2024.04.019","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Digital Health Technologies (DHTs) have been shown to have variable usability as measured by efficiency, effectiveness and user satisfaction despite large-scale government projects to regulate and standardise user interface (UI) design. We hypothesised that Human-Computer Interaction (HCI) modelling could improve the methodology for DHT design and regulation, and support the creation of future evidence-based UI standards and guidelines for DHTs.</p></div><div><h3>Methodology</h3><p>Using a Design Science Research (DSR) framework, we developed novel UI components that adhered to existing standards and guidelines (combining the NHS Common User Interface (CUI) standard and the NHS Design System). We firstly evaluated the Patient Banner UI component for compliance with the two guidelines and then used HCI-modelling to evaluate the “Add New Patient” workflow to measure time to task completion and cognitive load.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Combining the two guidelines to produce new UI elements is technically feasible for the Patient Banner and the Patient Name Input components. There are some inconsistencies between the NHS Design System and the NHS CUI when implementing the Patient Banner. HCI-modelling successfully quantified challenges adhering to the NHS CUI and the NHS Design system for the “Add New Patient” workflow.</p></div><div><h3>Discussion</h3><p>We successfully developed new design artefacts combing two major design guidelines for DHTs. By quantifying usability issues using HCI-modelling, we have demonstrated the feasibility of a methodology that combines HCI-modelling into a human-centred design (HCD) process could enable the development of standardised UI elements for DHTs that is more scientifically robust than HCD alone.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Combining HCI-modelling and Human-Centred Design could improve scientific progress towards developing safer and more user-friendly DHTs.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":390,"journal":{"name":"Methods","volume":"227 ","pages":"Pages 60-77"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1046202324001099/pdfft?md5=a2155e9404355a4307314524d17a6e4d&pid=1-s2.0-S1046202324001099-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Methods","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1046202324001099","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Digital Health Technologies (DHTs) have been shown to have variable usability as measured by efficiency, effectiveness and user satisfaction despite large-scale government projects to regulate and standardise user interface (UI) design. We hypothesised that Human-Computer Interaction (HCI) modelling could improve the methodology for DHT design and regulation, and support the creation of future evidence-based UI standards and guidelines for DHTs.

Methodology

Using a Design Science Research (DSR) framework, we developed novel UI components that adhered to existing standards and guidelines (combining the NHS Common User Interface (CUI) standard and the NHS Design System). We firstly evaluated the Patient Banner UI component for compliance with the two guidelines and then used HCI-modelling to evaluate the “Add New Patient” workflow to measure time to task completion and cognitive load.

Results

Combining the two guidelines to produce new UI elements is technically feasible for the Patient Banner and the Patient Name Input components. There are some inconsistencies between the NHS Design System and the NHS CUI when implementing the Patient Banner. HCI-modelling successfully quantified challenges adhering to the NHS CUI and the NHS Design system for the “Add New Patient” workflow.

Discussion

We successfully developed new design artefacts combing two major design guidelines for DHTs. By quantifying usability issues using HCI-modelling, we have demonstrated the feasibility of a methodology that combines HCI-modelling into a human-centred design (HCD) process could enable the development of standardised UI elements for DHTs that is more scientifically robust than HCD alone.

Conclusion

Combining HCI-modelling and Human-Centred Design could improve scientific progress towards developing safer and more user-friendly DHTs.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
改善数字医疗技术临床可用性的人机交互模型。
简介尽管政府开展了大规模的项目来规范和标准化用户界面(UI)设计,但数字医疗技术(DHT)在效率、有效性和用户满意度方面的可用性仍参差不齐。我们假设,人机交互(HCI)建模可以改进DHT的设计和监管方法,并支持未来为DHT创建基于证据的用户界面标准和指南:利用设计科学研究(DSR)框架,我们开发了符合现有标准和指南(结合英国国家医疗服务体系通用用户界面(CUI)标准和英国国家医疗服务体系设计系统)的新型用户界面组件。我们首先评估了病人横幅用户界面组件是否符合这两个指南,然后使用人机交互模型评估了 "添加新病人 "工作流程,以测量完成任务的时间和认知负荷:结果:对于 "病人横幅 "和 "病人姓名输入 "组件来说,结合两个指南来制作新的用户界面元素在技术上是可行的。在实施病人横幅时,NHS 设计系统和 NHS CUI 之间存在一些不一致。人机交互建模成功地量化了 "添加新病人 "工作流在遵守国家医疗服务系统用户界面和国家医疗服务系统设计系统方面所面临的挑战:讨论:我们成功地开发了新的设计作品,结合了DHT的两个主要设计准则。通过使用人机交互建模对可用性问题进行量化,我们证明了将人机交互建模与以人为本的设计(HCD)流程相结合的方法的可行性,这种方法可以为DHT开发标准化的用户界面元素,比单独使用HCD更具科学性:结论:将人机交互建模与以人为本的设计相结合,可以提高科学进步,开发出更安全、更方便用户的 DHT。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Methods
Methods 生物-生化研究方法
CiteScore
9.80
自引率
2.10%
发文量
222
审稿时长
11.3 weeks
期刊介绍: Methods focuses on rapidly developing techniques in the experimental biological and medical sciences. Each topical issue, organized by a guest editor who is an expert in the area covered, consists solely of invited quality articles by specialist authors, many of them reviews. Issues are devoted to specific technical approaches with emphasis on clear detailed descriptions of protocols that allow them to be reproduced easily. The background information provided enables researchers to understand the principles underlying the methods; other helpful sections include comparisons of alternative methods giving the advantages and disadvantages of particular methods, guidance on avoiding potential pitfalls, and suggestions for troubleshooting.
期刊最新文献
Optimizing retinal Imaging: Evaluation of ultrasmall TiO2 Nanoparticle- fluorescein conjugates for improved Fundus fluorescein angiography. Ab-Amy 2.0: Predicting light chain amyloidogenic risk of therapeutic antibodies based on antibody language model. Data preprocessing methods for selective sweep detection using convolutional neural networks. SITP: A single cell bioinformatics analysis flow captures proteasome markers in the development of breast cancer Exploring drug-target interaction prediction on cold-start scenarios via meta-learning-based graph transformer.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1