All FODMAPs Aren’t Created Equal: Results of a Randomized Reintroduction Trial in Patients With Irritable Bowel Syndrome

IF 11.6 1区 医学 Q1 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology Pub Date : 2025-02-01 DOI:10.1016/j.cgh.2024.03.047
Shanti Eswaran , Kara J. Jencks , Prashant Singh , Samara Rifkin , Theresa Han-Markey , William D. Chey
{"title":"All FODMAPs Aren’t Created Equal: Results of a Randomized Reintroduction Trial in Patients With Irritable Bowel Syndrome","authors":"Shanti Eswaran ,&nbsp;Kara J. Jencks ,&nbsp;Prashant Singh ,&nbsp;Samara Rifkin ,&nbsp;Theresa Han-Markey ,&nbsp;William D. Chey","doi":"10.1016/j.cgh.2024.03.047","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background &amp; Aims</h3><div><span>A diet low in fermentable oligo, di, monosaccharides<span>, and polyols (FODMAPs) is one of the recommended management strategies for </span></span>irritable bowel syndrome (IBS). However, while effective, adherence to restricting dietary FODMAPs can be challenging and burdensome. The question remains whether limiting all FODMAPs during the restrictive phase of the diet is necessary for symptomatic improvement in the dietary treatment of IBS, or if targeting selected groups of FODMAPs for restriction is sufficient for clinical response. Our study aimed to determine which individual FODMAPs are most likely to lead to symptom generation in patients with IBS who have improved with fodmap restriction.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Patients meeting Rome IV criteria for IBS were invited to participate in a 12-week study to identify individual FODMAP sensitivities. Those subjects who demonstrated symptom improvement after a 2- to 4-week open-label FODMAP elimination period were recruited to a 10-week blinded-phased FODMAP reintroduction phase of 7 days for each FODMAP. Throughout the study period, daily symptom severity (0–10 point numerical rating system) was recorded. A mixed effect statistical analysis model was used.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div><span>Between 2018 and 2020, 45 subjects were enrolled. Twenty-five subjects improved with FODMAP elimination, and 21 patients continued into the reintroduction phase of the study. Fructans and galacto-oligosaccharides (GOS) both were associated with worsened abdominal pain (</span><em>P</em> = .007 and <em>P</em> = .04, respectively). GOS were associated with an increase in bloating (<em>P</em> = 03). Both bloating and abdominal pain worsened throughout the study, regardless of the FODMAP reintroduction (<em>P</em> = .006).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Our results suggest that the reintroduction of select FODMAPs may be responsible for symptom generation in patients with IBS who have responded to a low FODMAP diet, and provide a strong rationale for performing a future trial comparing the treatment effects of a limited low-FODMAP diet and a standard low-FODMAP diet.</div></div><div><h3>Clinicaltrials.gov</h3><div><span><span>NCT03052439</span><svg><path></path></svg></span></div></div>","PeriodicalId":10347,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology","volume":"23 2","pages":"Pages 351-358.e5"},"PeriodicalIF":11.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1542356524004130","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background & Aims

A diet low in fermentable oligo, di, monosaccharides, and polyols (FODMAPs) is one of the recommended management strategies for irritable bowel syndrome (IBS). However, while effective, adherence to restricting dietary FODMAPs can be challenging and burdensome. The question remains whether limiting all FODMAPs during the restrictive phase of the diet is necessary for symptomatic improvement in the dietary treatment of IBS, or if targeting selected groups of FODMAPs for restriction is sufficient for clinical response. Our study aimed to determine which individual FODMAPs are most likely to lead to symptom generation in patients with IBS who have improved with fodmap restriction.

Methods

Patients meeting Rome IV criteria for IBS were invited to participate in a 12-week study to identify individual FODMAP sensitivities. Those subjects who demonstrated symptom improvement after a 2- to 4-week open-label FODMAP elimination period were recruited to a 10-week blinded-phased FODMAP reintroduction phase of 7 days for each FODMAP. Throughout the study period, daily symptom severity (0–10 point numerical rating system) was recorded. A mixed effect statistical analysis model was used.

Results

Between 2018 and 2020, 45 subjects were enrolled. Twenty-five subjects improved with FODMAP elimination, and 21 patients continued into the reintroduction phase of the study. Fructans and galacto-oligosaccharides (GOS) both were associated with worsened abdominal pain (P = .007 and P = .04, respectively). GOS were associated with an increase in bloating (P = 03). Both bloating and abdominal pain worsened throughout the study, regardless of the FODMAP reintroduction (P = .006).

Conclusion

Our results suggest that the reintroduction of select FODMAPs may be responsible for symptom generation in patients with IBS who have responded to a low FODMAP diet, and provide a strong rationale for performing a future trial comparing the treatment effects of a limited low-FODMAP diet and a standard low-FODMAP diet.

Clinicaltrials.gov

NCT03052439
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
并非所有的 FODMAP 都是一样的:肠易激综合征患者随机再引入试验的结果。
可发酵低聚糖、双糖、单糖和多元醇(FODMAPs)含量低的饮食是肠易激综合征(IBS)的推荐治疗策略之一。然而,限制膳食中的 FODMAPs 虽然有效,但坚持食用却可能是一项挑战和负担。在肠易激综合征的饮食治疗中,在饮食限制阶段限制所有的 FODMAPs 是否是改善症状的必要条件,或者针对选定的 FODMAPs 组进行限制是否足以产生临床反应,这仍然是一个问题。我们的研究旨在确定哪些单个 FODMAPs 最有可能导致肠易激综合征患者在限制 Fodmap 后症状得到改善:方法:我们邀请符合罗马IV标准的肠易激综合征患者参加为期12周的研究,以确定他们对哪些FODMAP敏感。经过 2-4 周开放标签 FODMAP 禁食期后症状有所改善的受试者被招募参加为期 10 周的盲法 FODMAP 重引入期,每种 FODMAP 重引入期为 7 天。在整个研究期间,每天都会记录症状的严重程度(0-10 分数字评级系统)。采用混合效应统计分析模型:2018-2020 年间,共有 45 名受试者入组。25名受试者在消除 FODMAP 后病情有所改善,21 名患者继续进入研究的重新引入阶段。果聚糖和半乳寡糖(GOS)均与腹痛加剧有关(p=0.007 和 0.04)。半乳寡糖与腹胀加剧有关(p= 0.03)。在整个研究过程中,无论是否重新引入 FODMAP,腹胀和腹痛都会加剧(p=0.006):我们的研究结果表明,重新引入特定的 FODMAPs 可能是对低 FODMAP 饮食有反应的肠易激综合征患者产生症状的原因,并为今后比较有限的低 FODMAP 饮食和标准的低 FODMAP 饮食的治疗效果提供了有力的依据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
16.90
自引率
4.80%
发文量
903
审稿时长
22 days
期刊介绍: Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology (CGH) is dedicated to offering readers a comprehensive exploration of themes in clinical gastroenterology and hepatology. Encompassing diagnostic, endoscopic, interventional, and therapeutic advances, the journal covers areas such as cancer, inflammatory diseases, functional gastrointestinal disorders, nutrition, absorption, and secretion. As a peer-reviewed publication, CGH features original articles and scholarly reviews, ensuring immediate relevance to the practice of gastroenterology and hepatology. Beyond peer-reviewed content, the journal includes invited key reviews and articles on endoscopy/practice-based technology, health-care policy, and practice management. Multimedia elements, including images, video abstracts, and podcasts, enhance the reader's experience. CGH remains actively engaged with its audience through updates and commentary shared via platforms such as Facebook and Twitter.
期刊最新文献
Association of Alcohol and Incremental Cardiometabolic Risk Factors with Liver Disease: A National Cross-Sectional Study. Extended Risankizumab Treatment in Patients With Crohn's Disease Who Did Not Achieve Clinical Response to Induction Treatment. Reply Correction Correction
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1