Evaluating the Effectiveness of Expert Modeling Videos on Nursing Student Competency Behaviors.

IF 3 3区 医学 Q1 NURSING Nurse Educator Pub Date : 2024-11-01 Epub Date: 2024-05-09 DOI:10.1097/NNE.0000000000001654
Tracy M Dodson, Janet M Reed
{"title":"Evaluating the Effectiveness of Expert Modeling Videos on Nursing Student Competency Behaviors.","authors":"Tracy M Dodson, Janet M Reed","doi":"10.1097/NNE.0000000000001654","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Expert modeling videos (EMVs) have shown promise in improving students' performance in simulation. However, research evaluating the impact of EMVs is limited to major performance areas, lacking exploration into specific student competency behaviors.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study evaluated the effect of an EMV intervention on undergraduate nursing students' behavioral competencies as measured by the Creighton Competency Evaluation Instrument (CCEI).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using a quasi-experimental pragmatic evaluation design, students in a medical surgical nursing course (n = 160) viewed either an expert model demonstration video (experimental) or expert model discussion video (control). Students' behavioral competencies were measured and compared between groups using the CCEI.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Students who viewed an expert model demonstration video performed at a higher level of competency in 11 of the 18 CCEI behaviors.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Using EMVs in nursing simulation may improve students' ability to achieve clinical competency in nursing specific behaviors.</p>","PeriodicalId":54706,"journal":{"name":"Nurse Educator","volume":" ","pages":"300-305"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nurse Educator","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/NNE.0000000000001654","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/5/9 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Expert modeling videos (EMVs) have shown promise in improving students' performance in simulation. However, research evaluating the impact of EMVs is limited to major performance areas, lacking exploration into specific student competency behaviors.

Purpose: This study evaluated the effect of an EMV intervention on undergraduate nursing students' behavioral competencies as measured by the Creighton Competency Evaluation Instrument (CCEI).

Methods: Using a quasi-experimental pragmatic evaluation design, students in a medical surgical nursing course (n = 160) viewed either an expert model demonstration video (experimental) or expert model discussion video (control). Students' behavioral competencies were measured and compared between groups using the CCEI.

Results: Students who viewed an expert model demonstration video performed at a higher level of competency in 11 of the 18 CCEI behaviors.

Conclusion: Using EMVs in nursing simulation may improve students' ability to achieve clinical competency in nursing specific behaviors.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
评估专家示范视频对护理专业学生能力行为的影响。
背景:专家建模视频(EMV专家建模视频(EMV)有望提高学生的模拟成绩。目的:本研究评估了 EMV 干预对护理本科生行为能力的影响,该能力由克里顿能力评估工具(CCEI)衡量:采用准实验实用评价设计,内外科护理课程的学生(n = 160)观看了专家示范视频(实验)或专家示范讨论视频(对照)。使用 CCEI 对学生的行为能力进行了测量和组间比较:结果:观看专家模型演示视频的学生在 18 种 CCEI 行为中的 11 种行为中表现出更高的能力水平:结论:在护理模拟中使用 EMV 可提高学生在护理特定行为方面的临床能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Nurse Educator
Nurse Educator 医学-护理
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
7.70%
发文量
300
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Nurse Educator, a scholarly, peer reviewed journal for faculty and administrators in schools of nursing and nurse educators in other settings, provides practical information and research related to nursing education. Topics include program, curriculum, course, and faculty development; teaching and learning in nursing; technology in nursing education; simulation; clinical teaching and evaluation; testing and measurement; trends and issues; and research in nursing education.
期刊最新文献
From Clinical Learning Environment Comparison Survey (CLECS) 2.0 to 3.0: Evaluating Reliability Characteristics. A 5-Week Intensive for Nursing Students: Confronting Incivility in the Workplace. AI-ABCs in Action: Graduate Nursing Students' Perspectives on Artificial Intelligence Literacy Education. Expanding Career Awareness Through a Nursing Student Engagement Series. From Paperwork to Presence: Using Postconference Coaching Questions to Promote Clinical Judgment in Undergraduate Nursing Students.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1