Retrospective evaluation of the prevalence and risk factors associated with red blood cell transfusions in cats with urethral obstruction (2009–2019): 575 cases

IF 1.1 3区 农林科学 Q3 VETERINARY SCIENCES Journal of veterinary emergency and critical care Pub Date : 2024-05-10 DOI:10.1111/vec.13378
Francesca P. Solari DVM, Megan A. Mickelson DVM, DACVS, James Bilof DVM, Adesola Odunayo DVM, MS, DACVECC, Jourdan B. McPhetridge DVM, Valery F. Scharf DVM, MS, DACVS, Lingnan Yuan, Jonathan P. Mochel DVM, MSc, PhD, DECVPT, Rebecca A. Walton DVM, DACVECC
{"title":"Retrospective evaluation of the prevalence and risk factors associated with red blood cell transfusions in cats with urethral obstruction (2009–2019): 575 cases","authors":"Francesca P. Solari DVM,&nbsp;Megan A. Mickelson DVM, DACVS,&nbsp;James Bilof DVM,&nbsp;Adesola Odunayo DVM, MS, DACVECC,&nbsp;Jourdan B. McPhetridge DVM,&nbsp;Valery F. Scharf DVM, MS, DACVS,&nbsp;Lingnan Yuan,&nbsp;Jonathan P. Mochel DVM, MSc, PhD, DECVPT,&nbsp;Rebecca A. Walton DVM, DACVECC","doi":"10.1111/vec.13378","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objective</h3>\n \n <p>To evaluate the prevalence of red blood cell (RBC) transfusions and factors associated with the need for transfusion in cases of feline urethral obstruction (FUO). Secondarily, to compare survival to discharge in cats receiving an RBC transfusion versus those that did not.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Design</h3>\n \n <p>Retrospective, multi-institutional study from 2009 to 2019.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Setting</h3>\n \n <p>Four university teaching hospitals.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Animals</h3>\n \n <p>Six hundred twenty-two total occurrences of FUO in 575 cats.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Interventions</h3>\n \n <p>None.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Measurements and Main Results</h3>\n \n <p>Medical records were retrospectively reviewed for pertinent information. The overall prevalence of severe anemia (PCV &lt; 0.20 L/L [&lt;20%]) at presentation was 1.0% (6/622). The prevalence of RBC transfusions during hospitalization was 2.1% (13/622). Cats that received an RBC transfusion weighed significantly less than those that did not (4.9 vs 5.8 kg; <i>P</i> = 0.034) and had a lower PCV at presentation (0.30 L/L [30%] vs 0.41 L/L [41%]; <i>P</i> &lt; 0.001). Hospitalization time (240 vs 72 h) and indwelling urinary catheter time (168 vs 48 h) were significantly longer in cats receiving a transfusion compared with those that did not (<i>P</i> &lt; 0.001). Creatinine concentrations were not significantly associated with transfusion administration, while BUN was higher in cats receiving a transfusion (15.35 mmol/L [43 mg/dL] vs. 11.78 mmol/L [33 mg/dL]; <i>P</i> = 0.043). Transfusion rates were significantly higher in cats undergoing perineal urethrostomy (5.5%) compared with those that did not undergo surgery (0.97%; <i>P</i> &lt; 0.001). The overall survival to discharge rate was 96%. Cats not receiving an RBC transfusion were significantly more likely to survive to discharge than those that did (odds ratio: 14.7, 95% confidence interval: 1.8–37; <i>P</i> &lt; 0.001).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>FUO is rarely associated with severe anemia and the need for RBC transfusions. In this study, cats receiving an RBC transfusion were less likely to survive to discharge; therefore, requiring a blood transfusion may be associated with a worse prognosis. In addition, the need for surgical intervention was associated with a higher prevalence of RBC transfusions.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":17603,"journal":{"name":"Journal of veterinary emergency and critical care","volume":"34 3","pages":"262-267"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of veterinary emergency and critical care","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/vec.13378","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"VETERINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

To evaluate the prevalence of red blood cell (RBC) transfusions and factors associated with the need for transfusion in cases of feline urethral obstruction (FUO). Secondarily, to compare survival to discharge in cats receiving an RBC transfusion versus those that did not.

Design

Retrospective, multi-institutional study from 2009 to 2019.

Setting

Four university teaching hospitals.

Animals

Six hundred twenty-two total occurrences of FUO in 575 cats.

Interventions

None.

Measurements and Main Results

Medical records were retrospectively reviewed for pertinent information. The overall prevalence of severe anemia (PCV < 0.20 L/L [<20%]) at presentation was 1.0% (6/622). The prevalence of RBC transfusions during hospitalization was 2.1% (13/622). Cats that received an RBC transfusion weighed significantly less than those that did not (4.9 vs 5.8 kg; P = 0.034) and had a lower PCV at presentation (0.30 L/L [30%] vs 0.41 L/L [41%]; P < 0.001). Hospitalization time (240 vs 72 h) and indwelling urinary catheter time (168 vs 48 h) were significantly longer in cats receiving a transfusion compared with those that did not (P < 0.001). Creatinine concentrations were not significantly associated with transfusion administration, while BUN was higher in cats receiving a transfusion (15.35 mmol/L [43 mg/dL] vs. 11.78 mmol/L [33 mg/dL]; P = 0.043). Transfusion rates were significantly higher in cats undergoing perineal urethrostomy (5.5%) compared with those that did not undergo surgery (0.97%; P < 0.001). The overall survival to discharge rate was 96%. Cats not receiving an RBC transfusion were significantly more likely to survive to discharge than those that did (odds ratio: 14.7, 95% confidence interval: 1.8–37; P < 0.001).

Conclusions

FUO is rarely associated with severe anemia and the need for RBC transfusions. In this study, cats receiving an RBC transfusion were less likely to survive to discharge; therefore, requiring a blood transfusion may be associated with a worse prognosis. In addition, the need for surgical intervention was associated with a higher prevalence of RBC transfusions.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
对尿道梗阻猫输注红细胞的患病率和相关风险因素的回顾性评估(2009-2019 年):575例
目的评估猫尿道梗阻(FUO)病例中输注红细胞(RBC)的发生率以及与输血需求相关的因素。其次,比较接受输注红细胞与未接受输注红细胞的猫出院后的存活率:设计:2009年至2019年的多机构回顾性研究:四所大学教学医院:干预措施:无:测量和主要结果对病历进行回顾性审查,以获取相关信息。重度贫血的总体发病率(PCV 结论):FUO 很少与重度贫血相关:FUO 很少与严重贫血和需要输注红细胞有关。在这项研究中,接受红细胞输注的猫咪出院后存活的可能性较低;因此,需要输血可能与预后较差有关。此外,需要手术治疗的猫咪输注红细胞的比例也较高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
15.40%
发文量
121
审稿时长
18-36 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Veterinary Emergency and Critical Care’s primary aim is to advance the international clinical standard of care for emergency/critical care patients of all species. The journal’s content is relevant to specialist and non-specialist veterinarians practicing emergency/critical care medicine. The journal achieves it aims by publishing descriptions of unique presentation or management; retrospective and prospective evaluations of prognosis, novel diagnosis, or therapy; translational basic science studies with clinical relevance; in depth reviews of pertinent topics; topical news and letters; and regular themed issues. The journal is the official publication of the Veterinary Emergency and Critical Care Society, the American College of Veterinary Emergency and Critical Care, the European Veterinary Emergency and Critical Care Society, and the European College of Veterinary Emergency and Critical Care. It is a bimonthly publication with international impact and adheres to currently accepted ethical standards.
期刊最新文献
Fabio Viganó Jennifer J. Devey Issue Information - Prelim AUTHOR INDEX Abstracts from the International Veterinary Emergency and Critical Care Symposium and the European Veterinary Emergency and Critical Care Annual Congress 2024
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1