Efficiencies of filtration sampling and extraction for recovery of viable Staphylococcus aureus bioaerosols

Abstract

Airborne Staphylococcus aureus is detected in various locations and linked to human infection. Reliable quantification of viable S. aureus bioaerosols by filter-based samplers helps characterize personal exposure, requiring efficient sampling and post-sampling processing. However, the efficiencies of filtration sampling and cell extraction are undetermined for viable S. aureus. In coupled with quantitative PCR and propidium monoazide, the performance of three widely-used samplers (IOM, Button, and Cassette) loaded with polycarbonate (PC) or gelatin filters was evaluated over 30–270 min of sampling and compared to that of BioSampler containing deionized water (DW). Effects of sampler type, filter type, and sampling time on cell recovery efficiency of sampling methods were assessed. Methods to extract cells from filters were also studied. The 1.5-min vortexing in peptone-Tween mixture and 10-min heating in DW were respectively granted optimal for cell extraction from PC and gelatin filters with extraction efficiencies averaged 1.0–1.76 (n = 4). Both Button and IOM with 3-μm gelatin filter performed best to capture S. aureus, significantly greater than Button with 0.8-μm PC by a factor of 9–11 (P < 0.05) and Cassette or IOM with 0.2-μm PC by a factor of 15–79 (P < 0.05). Cassette and IOM with 0.2-μm PC also showed less efficiencies than BioSampler/DW by a factor of 4–16 (P < 0.05). Cell recovery efficiency was not affected by sampling time except for the Button with 0.8-μm PC. Overall, filter type is the most critical factor governing cell recovery efficiency. Button and IOM with gelatin filter and 10-min heating in DW are considered the most efficient filtration sampling and extraction methods for viable S. aureus.