Eco-sustainable design of seawater sea-sand slag-based geopolymer mortars incorporating ternary solid waste

IF 7.4 1区 工程技术 Q1 CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY Construction and Building Materials Pub Date : 2024-05-11 DOI:10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2024.136512
Zhiyuan Yang , Xiewei Zhan , Hong Zhu , Bai Zhang , Ruya Li , Zhiqiang Dong , Harn Wei Kua
{"title":"Eco-sustainable design of seawater sea-sand slag-based geopolymer mortars incorporating ternary solid waste","authors":"Zhiyuan Yang ,&nbsp;Xiewei Zhan ,&nbsp;Hong Zhu ,&nbsp;Bai Zhang ,&nbsp;Ruya Li ,&nbsp;Zhiqiang Dong ,&nbsp;Harn Wei Kua","doi":"10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2024.136512","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This study aimed to explore the feasibility of utilizing geopolymer as alternatives to Ordinary Portland Cement (OPC) in marine engineering. Eco-friendly seawater sea-sand slag-based geopolymer mortars (SS-SGMs) were prepared by blending seawater, sea-sand, Basalt Fibres (<em>BF</em>), Polypropylene Fibres (<em>PPF</em>), and ternary solid waste. The effects of activator modulus, alkaline content, water-to-binder ratio, and the volume fractions of <em>BF</em> and <em>PPF</em> on the mechanical performance, environmental impact, and cost of SS-SGMs were researched using the L<sub>16</sub>(4)<sup>5</sup> Taguchi orthogonal method. Three evaluation methods were used to assess the impact of the different factors. First, the influence of a single factor was analyzed using methods of range and variance analysis. Subsequently, three new evaluation metrics were proposed to consider the synergistic effects of mechanical performance, environment, and cost. Finally, a Gray-Technique of Ordering Preferences by Similarity to Ideal Solution (Gray-TOPSIS) model was established, and the influence weights of each factor were proposed, thereby determining the optimal solution in a multi-index evaluation system. The recommended optimal mix proportion for SS-SGMs was determined as follows: activator modulus of 1.0, alkaline content of 4%, water-to-binder ratio of 0.42, <em>PPF</em> volume fraction of 0.4%, and <em>BF</em> volume fraction of 0.3%. Compared to OPC with the same strength grade, SS-SGMs demonstrated similar costs, a reduction in carbon emissions by approximately 75–83%, a decrease in energy consumption by around 50–67%, and lower drying shrinkage than traditional geopolymer. Under the influence of seawater, the products of SS-SGMs were capable of forming chloride-ion adsorbing products like hydrotalcite and Brucite. Additionally, the formation of C<sub>4</sub>AH<sub>13</sub> and ion clusters can enhance the matrix density, thereby improving the mechanical performance of SS-SGMs.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":288,"journal":{"name":"Construction and Building Materials","volume":"431 ","pages":"Article 136512"},"PeriodicalIF":7.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Construction and Building Materials","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0950061824016532","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study aimed to explore the feasibility of utilizing geopolymer as alternatives to Ordinary Portland Cement (OPC) in marine engineering. Eco-friendly seawater sea-sand slag-based geopolymer mortars (SS-SGMs) were prepared by blending seawater, sea-sand, Basalt Fibres (BF), Polypropylene Fibres (PPF), and ternary solid waste. The effects of activator modulus, alkaline content, water-to-binder ratio, and the volume fractions of BF and PPF on the mechanical performance, environmental impact, and cost of SS-SGMs were researched using the L16(4)5 Taguchi orthogonal method. Three evaluation methods were used to assess the impact of the different factors. First, the influence of a single factor was analyzed using methods of range and variance analysis. Subsequently, three new evaluation metrics were proposed to consider the synergistic effects of mechanical performance, environment, and cost. Finally, a Gray-Technique of Ordering Preferences by Similarity to Ideal Solution (Gray-TOPSIS) model was established, and the influence weights of each factor were proposed, thereby determining the optimal solution in a multi-index evaluation system. The recommended optimal mix proportion for SS-SGMs was determined as follows: activator modulus of 1.0, alkaline content of 4%, water-to-binder ratio of 0.42, PPF volume fraction of 0.4%, and BF volume fraction of 0.3%. Compared to OPC with the same strength grade, SS-SGMs demonstrated similar costs, a reduction in carbon emissions by approximately 75–83%, a decrease in energy consumption by around 50–67%, and lower drying shrinkage than traditional geopolymer. Under the influence of seawater, the products of SS-SGMs were capable of forming chloride-ion adsorbing products like hydrotalcite and Brucite. Additionally, the formation of C4AH13 and ion clusters can enhance the matrix density, thereby improving the mechanical performance of SS-SGMs.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
包含三元固体废弃物的海水海砂渣基土工聚合物砂浆的生态可持续设计
本研究旨在探讨在海洋工程中利用土工聚合物替代普通硅酸盐水泥(OPC)的可行性。通过混合海水、海砂、玄武岩纤维(BF)、聚丙烯纤维(PPF)和三元固体废弃物,制备了生态友好型海水海砂矿渣基土工聚合物砂浆(SS-SGM)。采用 L16(4)5 Taguchi 正交法研究了活化剂模量、碱含量、水与粘合剂的比例以及 BF 和 PPF 的体积分数对 SS-SGM 的机械性能、环境影响和成本的影响。采用了三种评估方法来评估不同因素的影响。首先,使用范围和方差分析方法分析了单个因素的影响。随后,提出了三个新的评价指标,以考虑机械性能、环境和成本的协同效应。最后,建立了与理想解相似的灰色偏好排序技术(Gray-TOPSIS)模型,并提出了各因素的影响权重,从而确定了多指标评价系统中的最优解。推荐的 SS-SGM 最佳混合比例确定如下:活化剂模量为 1.0,碱含量为 4%,水与粘结剂比为 0.42,PPF 体积分数为 0.4%,BF 体积分数为 0.3%。与相同强度等级的 OPC 相比,SS-SGM 的成本相近,碳排放量减少约 75-83%,能耗降低约 50-67%,干燥收缩率低于传统的土工聚合物。在海水的影响下,SS-SGMs 的产物能够形成像水滑石和白云石这样的氯离子吸附产物。此外,C4AH13 和离子簇的形成可提高基体密度,从而改善 SS-SGM 的机械性能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Construction and Building Materials
Construction and Building Materials 工程技术-材料科学:综合
CiteScore
13.80
自引率
21.60%
发文量
3632
审稿时长
82 days
期刊介绍: Construction and Building Materials offers an international platform for sharing innovative and original research and development in the realm of construction and building materials, along with their practical applications in new projects and repair practices. The journal publishes a diverse array of pioneering research and application papers, detailing laboratory investigations and, to a limited extent, numerical analyses or reports on full-scale projects. Multi-part papers are discouraged. Additionally, Construction and Building Materials features comprehensive case studies and insightful review articles that contribute to new insights in the field. Our focus is on papers related to construction materials, excluding those on structural engineering, geotechnics, and unbound highway layers. Covered materials and technologies encompass cement, concrete reinforcement, bricks and mortars, additives, corrosion technology, ceramics, timber, steel, polymers, glass fibers, recycled materials, bamboo, rammed earth, non-conventional building materials, bituminous materials, and applications in railway materials.
期刊最新文献
Research on the durability of composite epoxy resin modified repair mortars based on water-oil gradient phase change: From macroscopic to nanoscopic scales Activation of ultra-fine steel slag and ground granulated blast furnace slag in alkaline waste solutions via phosphogypsum and calcium carbide slag Experimental research on fatigue behavior of concrete under acid rain corrosive environment Fiber distribution in UHPC under different influencing factors evaluated with a novel method based on deep learning Recycling biopolymer stabilised earthen construction materials using β-mannanase
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1