Bridging cognitive neuroscience and education: Insights from EEG recording during mathematical proof evaluation

IF 3.4 Q2 NEUROSCIENCES Trends in Neuroscience and Education Pub Date : 2024-05-07 DOI:10.1016/j.tine.2024.100226
Venera Gashaj , Dragan Trninić , Cléa Formaz , Samuel Tobler , Juan Sebastián Gómez‑Cañón , Hanna Poikonen , Manu Kapur
{"title":"Bridging cognitive neuroscience and education: Insights from EEG recording during mathematical proof evaluation","authors":"Venera Gashaj ,&nbsp;Dragan Trninić ,&nbsp;Cléa Formaz ,&nbsp;Samuel Tobler ,&nbsp;Juan Sebastián Gómez‑Cañón ,&nbsp;Hanna Poikonen ,&nbsp;Manu Kapur","doi":"10.1016/j.tine.2024.100226","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Much of modern mathematics education prioritizes symbolic formalism even at the expense of non-symbolic intuition, we contextualize our study in the ongoing debates on the balance between symbolic and non-symbolic reasoning. We explore the dissociation of oscillatory dynamics between algebraic (symbolic) and geometric (non-symbolic) processing in advanced mathematical reasoning during a naturalistic design.</p></div><div><h3>Method</h3><p>Employing mobile EEG technology, we investigated students' beta and gamma wave patterns over frontal and parietal regions while they engaged with mathematical demonstrations in symbolic and non-symbolic formats within a tutor-student framework. We used extended, naturalistic stimuli to approximate an authentic educational setting.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Our findings reveal nuanced distinctions in neural processing, particularly in terms of gamma waves and activity in parietal regions. Furthermore, no clear overall format preference emerged from the neuroscientific perspective despite students rating symbolic demonstrations higher for understanding and familiarity.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":46228,"journal":{"name":"Trends in Neuroscience and Education","volume":"35 ","pages":"Article 100226"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2211949324000073/pdfft?md5=885be7731b945b589b60a6a7c0844fac&pid=1-s2.0-S2211949324000073-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Trends in Neuroscience and Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2211949324000073","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Much of modern mathematics education prioritizes symbolic formalism even at the expense of non-symbolic intuition, we contextualize our study in the ongoing debates on the balance between symbolic and non-symbolic reasoning. We explore the dissociation of oscillatory dynamics between algebraic (symbolic) and geometric (non-symbolic) processing in advanced mathematical reasoning during a naturalistic design.

Method

Employing mobile EEG technology, we investigated students' beta and gamma wave patterns over frontal and parietal regions while they engaged with mathematical demonstrations in symbolic and non-symbolic formats within a tutor-student framework. We used extended, naturalistic stimuli to approximate an authentic educational setting.

Conclusion

Our findings reveal nuanced distinctions in neural processing, particularly in terms of gamma waves and activity in parietal regions. Furthermore, no clear overall format preference emerged from the neuroscientific perspective despite students rating symbolic demonstrations higher for understanding and familiarity.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
连接认知神经科学与教育:数学证明评估过程中的脑电图记录带来的启示
背景现代数学教育大多将符号形式主义放在首位,甚至以牺牲非符号直觉为代价,我们将我们的研究与正在进行的关于符号推理和非符号推理之间平衡的辩论联系起来。我们采用移动脑电图技术,调查了学生在辅导员-学生框架内参与符号和非符号形式的数学演示时,额叶和顶叶区域的β和γ波模式。我们使用了扩展的自然主义刺激,以接近真实的教育环境。此外,尽管学生对符号演示的理解和熟悉程度评价较高,但从神经科学的角度来看,他们并没有出现明显的总体形式偏好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.30
自引率
6.10%
发文量
22
审稿时长
65 days
期刊最新文献
Dimensional versus categorical approach: A comparative study of mathematical cognition Translating neuroscience research to practice through grassroots professional learning communities Combining cognitive and affective factors related to mathematical achievement in 4th graders: A psychological network analysis study Neurobiological stress markers in educational research: A systematic review of physiological insights in health science education Applying the science of learning to teacher professional development and back again: Lessons from 3 country contexts
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1