Self-reported smoking, urine cotinine, and risk of type 2 diabetes: Findings from the PREVEND prospective cohort study

IF 2.6 4区 医学 Q3 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM Primary Care Diabetes Pub Date : 2024-08-01 DOI:10.1016/j.pcd.2024.04.004
{"title":"Self-reported smoking, urine cotinine, and risk of type 2 diabetes: Findings from the PREVEND prospective cohort study","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.pcd.2024.04.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Smoking is a major risk factor for type 2 diabetes (T2D), but the evidence has mostly relied on self-reports. We aimed to compare the associations of smoking exposure as assessed by self-reports and urine cotinine with T2D.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Using the PREVEND prospective study, smoking status was assessed at baseline by self-reports and urine cotinine in 4708 participants (mean age, 53 years) without a history of diabetes. Participants were classified as never, former, light current and heavy current smokers according to self-reports and analogous cut-offs for urine cotinine. Hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% CIs were estimated for T2D.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>During a median follow-up of 7.3 years, 259 participants developed T2D. Compared with self-reported never smokers, the multivariable adjusted HRs (95% CI) of T2D for former, light current, and heavy current smokers were 1.02 (0.75–1.4), 1.41 (0.89–2.22), and 1.30 (0.88–1.93), respectively. The corresponding adjusted HRs (95% CI) were 0.84 (0.43–1.67), 1.61 (1.12–2.31), and 1.58 (1.08–2.32), respectively, as assessed by urine cotinine. Urine cotinine-assessed but not self-reported smoking status improved T2D risk prediction beyond established risk factors.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Urine cotinine assessed smoking status may be a stronger risk indicator and predictor of T2D compared to self-reported smoking status.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48997,"journal":{"name":"Primary Care Diabetes","volume":"18 4","pages":"Pages 414-421"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1751991824000767/pdfft?md5=2f27f9e4d3fd789a4094ea3e3aa5fb1d&pid=1-s2.0-S1751991824000767-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Primary Care Diabetes","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1751991824000767","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Smoking is a major risk factor for type 2 diabetes (T2D), but the evidence has mostly relied on self-reports. We aimed to compare the associations of smoking exposure as assessed by self-reports and urine cotinine with T2D.

Methods

Using the PREVEND prospective study, smoking status was assessed at baseline by self-reports and urine cotinine in 4708 participants (mean age, 53 years) without a history of diabetes. Participants were classified as never, former, light current and heavy current smokers according to self-reports and analogous cut-offs for urine cotinine. Hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% CIs were estimated for T2D.

Results

During a median follow-up of 7.3 years, 259 participants developed T2D. Compared with self-reported never smokers, the multivariable adjusted HRs (95% CI) of T2D for former, light current, and heavy current smokers were 1.02 (0.75–1.4), 1.41 (0.89–2.22), and 1.30 (0.88–1.93), respectively. The corresponding adjusted HRs (95% CI) were 0.84 (0.43–1.67), 1.61 (1.12–2.31), and 1.58 (1.08–2.32), respectively, as assessed by urine cotinine. Urine cotinine-assessed but not self-reported smoking status improved T2D risk prediction beyond established risk factors.

Conclusion

Urine cotinine assessed smoking status may be a stronger risk indicator and predictor of T2D compared to self-reported smoking status.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
自我报告的吸烟、尿液中的可替宁与罹患 2 型糖尿病的风险:PREVEND前瞻性队列研究的结果。
背景:吸烟是2型糖尿病(T2D)的主要风险因素,但证据大多依赖于自我报告。我们旨在比较通过自我报告和尿液可替宁评估的吸烟暴露与 T2D 的关系:利用 PREVEND 前瞻性研究,通过自我报告和尿液中的可替宁对 4708 名无糖尿病史的参与者(平均年龄 53 岁)的基线吸烟状况进行评估。根据自我报告和尿液中可替宁的类似临界值,将参与者分为从未吸烟者、曾经吸烟者、轻度吸烟者和重度吸烟者。结果估算出了T2D的危险比(HRs)和95% CIs:结果:在中位 7.3 年的随访期间,259 名参与者患上了终末期糖尿病。与自我报告的从不吸烟者相比,曾吸烟者、轻度吸烟者和重度吸烟者患 T2D 的多变量调整 HRs(95% CI)分别为 1.02(0.75-1.4)、1.41(0.89-2.22)和 1.30(0.88-1.93)。根据尿液中可替宁的评估,相应的调整后 HRs(95% CI)分别为 0.84(0.43-1.67)、1.61(1.12-2.31)和 1.58(1.08-2.32)。尿可替宁评估的吸烟状况比自我报告的吸烟状况更能预测T2D风险,而不是既有的风险因素:结论:与自我报告的吸烟状况相比,尿液中可替宁评估的吸烟状况可能是更强的T2D风险指标和预测因子。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Primary Care Diabetes
Primary Care Diabetes ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM-PRIMARY HEALTH CARE
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
3.40%
发文量
134
审稿时长
47 days
期刊介绍: The journal publishes original research articles and high quality reviews in the fields of clinical care, diabetes education, nutrition, health services, psychosocial research and epidemiology and other areas as far as is relevant for diabetology in a primary-care setting. The purpose of the journal is to encourage interdisciplinary research and discussion between all those who are involved in primary diabetes care on an international level. The Journal also publishes news and articles concerning the policies and activities of Primary Care Diabetes Europe and reflects the society''s aim of improving the care for people with diabetes mellitus within the primary-care setting.
期刊最新文献
Contents Editorial Board and Aims & Scopes Proactive total diet replacement referral for type 2 diabetes: A service evaluation Impact of lifestyle intervention on vitamin D, Adiponectin, Insulin-like growth factor 1 and Proneurotensin in overweight individuals from the Middle East Re-purposing SGLT-2 inhibitors for diabetic striatopathy
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1