Michał Tkaczyk , Martin Tancoš , David Smahel , Steriani Elavsky , Jaromír Plhák
{"title":"(In)accuracy and convergent validity of daily end-of-day and single-time self-reported estimations of smartphone use among adolescents","authors":"Michał Tkaczyk , Martin Tancoš , David Smahel , Steriani Elavsky , Jaromír Plhák","doi":"10.1016/j.chb.2024.108281","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Understanding the measurement inaccuracy and bias introduced by self-reports of smartphone use is essential for making meaningful inferences about smartphone use and its effects. Evidence for the self-reports of smartphone use in intensive longitudinal studies is largely missing. Based on self-reported and digital trace data from 137 Czech adolescents (41% girls, M<sub>age</sub> = 14.95 years), this study examined the accuracy, directional bias, and convergent validity of daily end-of-day and single-time reports of screen time and phone-checking behavior. Overall, the study found considerable discrepancies between self-reported smartphone use and digital trace and low between-person convergent validity for all self-reports considered for the study. Respondents usually reported shorter screen time and lower frequency of phone-checking behavior as compared to digital trace, both in daily and single-time self-reports. The within-person convergent validity between daily reports and digital tracking was low, indicating poor self-reports ability to capture the actual day-to-day fluctuations in smartphone use. This study adds to the existing evidence showing that self-reports based insights into how people use smartphones differ considerably from digital trace data and shows that both person and situational levels contribute to explaining the discrepancy between digital trace and self-report data among adolescents.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48471,"journal":{"name":"Computers in Human Behavior","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":9.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0747563224001493/pdfft?md5=f63781b3a1c59d5f35bc1a37d5741820&pid=1-s2.0-S0747563224001493-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Computers in Human Behavior","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0747563224001493","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Understanding the measurement inaccuracy and bias introduced by self-reports of smartphone use is essential for making meaningful inferences about smartphone use and its effects. Evidence for the self-reports of smartphone use in intensive longitudinal studies is largely missing. Based on self-reported and digital trace data from 137 Czech adolescents (41% girls, Mage = 14.95 years), this study examined the accuracy, directional bias, and convergent validity of daily end-of-day and single-time reports of screen time and phone-checking behavior. Overall, the study found considerable discrepancies between self-reported smartphone use and digital trace and low between-person convergent validity for all self-reports considered for the study. Respondents usually reported shorter screen time and lower frequency of phone-checking behavior as compared to digital trace, both in daily and single-time self-reports. The within-person convergent validity between daily reports and digital tracking was low, indicating poor self-reports ability to capture the actual day-to-day fluctuations in smartphone use. This study adds to the existing evidence showing that self-reports based insights into how people use smartphones differ considerably from digital trace data and shows that both person and situational levels contribute to explaining the discrepancy between digital trace and self-report data among adolescents.
期刊介绍:
Computers in Human Behavior is a scholarly journal that explores the psychological aspects of computer use. It covers original theoretical works, research reports, literature reviews, and software and book reviews. The journal examines both the use of computers in psychology, psychiatry, and related fields, and the psychological impact of computer use on individuals, groups, and society. Articles discuss topics such as professional practice, training, research, human development, learning, cognition, personality, and social interactions. It focuses on human interactions with computers, considering the computer as a medium through which human behaviors are shaped and expressed. Professionals interested in the psychological aspects of computer use will find this journal valuable, even with limited knowledge of computers.