Validation of a Supportive and Palliative Care Indicator Tool Among Patients Hospitalized Due to Heart Failure

IF 6.7 2区 医学 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Journal of Cardiac Failure Pub Date : 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1016/j.cardfail.2024.04.016
YASUHIRO HAMATANI MD, PhD , KANAKO TERAMOTO MD, MPH, PhD , YURIKA IKEYAMA-HIDESHIMA RN , SOSHIRO OGATA PhD, MHS , ATSUKO KUNUGIDA RN , KENJIRO ISHIGAMI MD , KIMIHITO MINAMI MD , MAKI YAMAGUCHI RN , MINA TAKAMOTO , JUN NAKASHIMA , MITSUYO YAMAGUCHI RN , MISAKI SAKAI RN , TAE KINOSHITA MD , MORITAKE IGUCHI MD, PhD , KUNIHIRO NISHIMURA MD, PhD , MASAHARU AKAO MD, PhD
{"title":"Validation of a Supportive and Palliative Care Indicator Tool Among Patients Hospitalized Due to Heart Failure","authors":"YASUHIRO HAMATANI MD, PhD ,&nbsp;KANAKO TERAMOTO MD, MPH, PhD ,&nbsp;YURIKA IKEYAMA-HIDESHIMA RN ,&nbsp;SOSHIRO OGATA PhD, MHS ,&nbsp;ATSUKO KUNUGIDA RN ,&nbsp;KENJIRO ISHIGAMI MD ,&nbsp;KIMIHITO MINAMI MD ,&nbsp;MAKI YAMAGUCHI RN ,&nbsp;MINA TAKAMOTO ,&nbsp;JUN NAKASHIMA ,&nbsp;MITSUYO YAMAGUCHI RN ,&nbsp;MISAKI SAKAI RN ,&nbsp;TAE KINOSHITA MD ,&nbsp;MORITAKE IGUCHI MD, PhD ,&nbsp;KUNIHIRO NISHIMURA MD, PhD ,&nbsp;MASAHARU AKAO MD, PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.cardfail.2024.04.016","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Palliative care, including symptom alleviation and advance-care planning, is relevant for patients with heart failure (HF). The Supportive and Palliative Care Indicator Tool (SPICT) is a tool for identifying patients who may benefit from palliative-care assistance but has not been validated in patients hospitalized due to HF.</div></div><div><h3>Methods and Results</h3><div>Clinical backgrounds, symptom burdens and outcomes were evaluated using the SPICT as assessed on admission in consecutive hospitalized patients with HF. SPICT-positive was defined when 2 or more general indicators and a New York Heart Association class ≥ III were present. Of 601 patients hospitalized due to HF (mean age: 79 ± 12 years; male, 314 [52%]; and mean left ventricular ejection fraction: 44 ± 18%), 100 (17%) patients were SPICT-positive. SPICT-positive patients were older (85 ± 9 vs 78 ± 12 years; <em>P</em> &lt; 0.001) and had higher clinical frailty scales (6 ± 1 vs 4 ± 1 points; <em>P</em> &lt; 0.001), whereas symptom burdens assessed by the Integrated Palliative care Outcome Scale were not different (17 [13, 28] vs 20 [11, 26] points; <em>P</em> = 0.97) when compared with patients who were SPICT-negative. During the median follow-up period of 518 days, 178 patients (30%) died. Being SPICT-positive was independently associated with higher all-cause mortality (hazard ratio: 3.49, 95% confidence interval: 2.41–5.05; <em>P</em> &lt; 0.001) after adjusting for age, sex, New York Heart Association class IV, Get-With-The-Guideline risk score, N-terminal pro B-type natriuretic peptide levels, and left ventricular ejection fractions.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>In patients admitted for HF, being SPICT-positive was significantly associated with higher all-cause mortality rates, suggesting the utility of the SPICT as an indicator to initiate advance-care planning for end-of-life care among patients hospitalized due to HF.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":15204,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cardiac Failure","volume":"31 1","pages":"Pages 16-25"},"PeriodicalIF":6.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cardiac Failure","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S107191642400160X","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Palliative care, including symptom alleviation and advance-care planning, is relevant for patients with heart failure (HF). The Supportive and Palliative Care Indicator Tool (SPICT) is a tool for identifying patients who may benefit from palliative-care assistance but has not been validated in patients hospitalized due to HF.

Methods and Results

Clinical backgrounds, symptom burdens and outcomes were evaluated using the SPICT as assessed on admission in consecutive hospitalized patients with HF. SPICT-positive was defined when 2 or more general indicators and a New York Heart Association class ≥ III were present. Of 601 patients hospitalized due to HF (mean age: 79 ± 12 years; male, 314 [52%]; and mean left ventricular ejection fraction: 44 ± 18%), 100 (17%) patients were SPICT-positive. SPICT-positive patients were older (85 ± 9 vs 78 ± 12 years; P < 0.001) and had higher clinical frailty scales (6 ± 1 vs 4 ± 1 points; P < 0.001), whereas symptom burdens assessed by the Integrated Palliative care Outcome Scale were not different (17 [13, 28] vs 20 [11, 26] points; P = 0.97) when compared with patients who were SPICT-negative. During the median follow-up period of 518 days, 178 patients (30%) died. Being SPICT-positive was independently associated with higher all-cause mortality (hazard ratio: 3.49, 95% confidence interval: 2.41–5.05; P < 0.001) after adjusting for age, sex, New York Heart Association class IV, Get-With-The-Guideline risk score, N-terminal pro B-type natriuretic peptide levels, and left ventricular ejection fractions.

Conclusions

In patients admitted for HF, being SPICT-positive was significantly associated with higher all-cause mortality rates, suggesting the utility of the SPICT as an indicator to initiate advance-care planning for end-of-life care among patients hospitalized due to HF.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在住院心力衰竭患者中验证支持性姑息治疗指标工具。
背景:姑息治疗包括减轻症状和预先护理计划,与心力衰竭(HF)患者息息相关。支持性姑息治疗指标工具(SPICT)是一种用于识别可能从姑息治疗援助中受益的患者的工具,但尚未在因心力衰竭住院的患者中得到验证:使用 SPICT 评估连续住院的高血压患者入院时的临床背景、症状负担和预后。SPICT阳性的定义是有两个或两个以上的一般指标和纽约心脏协会≥III级。在 601 名住院的心房颤动患者中(平均年龄:79±12 岁,男性:314[52%],平均左室射血分数:44±18%),有 100 名患者(平均年龄:79±12 岁,男性:314[52%],平均左室射血分数:44±18%)接受了 SPICT 评估:44±18%)中,100 名(17%)患者为 SPICT 阳性。SPICT阳性患者的年龄更大(85±9岁对78±12岁;PC结论:在因心房颤动入院的患者中,SPICT阳性与较高的全因死亡率显著相关,这表明SPICT可作为一个指标,用于启动心房颤动住院患者临终关怀的预先护理计划。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Cardiac Failure
Journal of Cardiac Failure 医学-心血管系统
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
8.30%
发文量
653
审稿时长
21 days
期刊介绍: Journal of Cardiac Failure publishes original, peer-reviewed communications of scientific excellence and review articles on clinical research, basic human studies, animal studies, and bench research with potential clinical applications to heart failure - pathogenesis, etiology, epidemiology, pathophysiological mechanisms, assessment, prevention, and treatment.
期刊最新文献
Innovate and Translate: Highlights from THT (Technology and Heart Failure Therapeutics) 2025 in Boston. Heterogeneity in Treatment Effects in the Reduction of Dietary Sodium to Less than 100 mmol in Heart Failure (SODIUM-HF): A Secondary Post-hoc Analysis. Therapeutic Ketosis for Heart Failure: A State-of-the-Art-Review. Breaking Prescription Patterns: The Persistent Challenge of GDMT Underuse. Extending the reach: Ambulatory Specialty Palliative Care for People with Heart Failure.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1