Lessons from short chest drain management for primary spontaneous pneumothorax.

IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q4 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS General Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery Pub Date : 2024-12-01 Epub Date: 2024-05-13 DOI:10.1007/s11748-024-02039-5
Atsushi Kagimoto, Atsushi Kamigaichi, Masayuki Ishida, Takeshi Mimura
{"title":"Lessons from short chest drain management for primary spontaneous pneumothorax.","authors":"Atsushi Kagimoto, Atsushi Kamigaichi, Masayuki Ishida, Takeshi Mimura","doi":"10.1007/s11748-024-02039-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) bullectomy is the mainstay treatment for primary spontaneous pneumothorax (PSP) but we encounter patients with pain due to chest tube. This study investigated the postoperative outcomes of shortened silicone drain as a chest tube after VATS bullectomy to reduce pain.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The current study included patients aged < 30 years who underwent VATS bullectomy for PSP. Patients with normal intrathoracic lengths of the silicone drain placed in a loop at the apex toward the diaphragm were categorized as Group L, whereas those with the silicone drain shortened to approximately 10 cm and placed toward the apex were classified as Group S. Postoperative pain evaluated using a numerical rating scale (NRS) and other perioperative outcomes were compared between the groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Altogether, 43 patients were included, with 22 in Group L and 21 in Group S, respectively. The NRS before chest tube removal was significantly lower in Group S (mean, 2.1) than in Group L (4.4; p = 0.001). In Group L, 4 patients (p = 0.017) required early chest tube removal than expected due to severe pain whereas none in Group S required this intervention; additionally, more patients needed additional analgesics than in Group S (p = 0.003).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In VATS bullectomy for PSP, the pain intensity could be reduced by shortening the intrathoracic length of the silicone drain, compared to a longer intrathoracic length of the silicon drain. Our findings contribute to the establishment of optimal postoperative management of general thoracic surgery.</p>","PeriodicalId":12585,"journal":{"name":"General Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery","volume":" ","pages":"796-801"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"General Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11748-024-02039-5","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/5/13 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) bullectomy is the mainstay treatment for primary spontaneous pneumothorax (PSP) but we encounter patients with pain due to chest tube. This study investigated the postoperative outcomes of shortened silicone drain as a chest tube after VATS bullectomy to reduce pain.

Methods: The current study included patients aged < 30 years who underwent VATS bullectomy for PSP. Patients with normal intrathoracic lengths of the silicone drain placed in a loop at the apex toward the diaphragm were categorized as Group L, whereas those with the silicone drain shortened to approximately 10 cm and placed toward the apex were classified as Group S. Postoperative pain evaluated using a numerical rating scale (NRS) and other perioperative outcomes were compared between the groups.

Results: Altogether, 43 patients were included, with 22 in Group L and 21 in Group S, respectively. The NRS before chest tube removal was significantly lower in Group S (mean, 2.1) than in Group L (4.4; p = 0.001). In Group L, 4 patients (p = 0.017) required early chest tube removal than expected due to severe pain whereas none in Group S required this intervention; additionally, more patients needed additional analgesics than in Group S (p = 0.003).

Conclusion: In VATS bullectomy for PSP, the pain intensity could be reduced by shortening the intrathoracic length of the silicone drain, compared to a longer intrathoracic length of the silicon drain. Our findings contribute to the establishment of optimal postoperative management of general thoracic surgery.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
从原发性自发性气胸的短胸腔引流管治疗中汲取的经验。
目的:视频辅助胸腔镜手术(VATS)鼓室切除术是治疗原发性自发性气胸(PSP)的主要方法,但我们会遇到因胸腔置管而疼痛的患者。本研究探讨了在 VATS 鼓室切除术后使用缩短的硅胶引流管作为胸管以减轻疼痛的术后效果:方法:本研究纳入了年龄为 岁的患者:共纳入 43 例患者,其中 L 组和 S 组分别有 22 例和 21 例。S 组患者拔除胸管前的 NRS 值(平均 2.1)明显低于 L 组(4.4;P = 0.001)。L 组中有 4 名患者(p = 0.017)因剧烈疼痛而需要提前拔除胸管,而 S 组中没有人需要这种干预;此外,需要额外镇痛剂的患者人数多于 S 组(p = 0.003):结论:在针对 PSP 的 VATS 球切除术中,与延长硅胶引流管的胸内长度相比,缩短硅胶引流管的胸内长度可减轻疼痛强度。我们的研究结果有助于建立普胸手术的最佳术后管理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
General Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery
General Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery Medicine-Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
8.30%
发文量
142
期刊介绍: The General Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery is the official publication of The Japanese Association for Thoracic Surgery and The Japanese Association for Chest Surgery, the affiliated journal of The Japanese Society for Cardiovascular Surgery, that publishes clinical and experimental studies in fields related to thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.
期刊最新文献
Postoperative pulmonary function of patients with lung cancer and interstitial lung abnormalities. Lessons from short chest drain management for primary spontaneous pneumothorax. Long-term results of the frozen elephant trunk technique in primary chronic type B aortic dissection. A balanced mitral leaflet and large ring strategy avoids systolic anterior motion in Barlow's disease. Preoperative neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio predicts recurrence of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma after neoadjuvant triplet chemotherapy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1