Information Seeking and Receiving of Older Adults with Diabetes in the Online Health Community: An Information Need Contextualization Perspective.

IF 3 3区 医学 Q1 COMMUNICATION Health Communication Pub Date : 2025-03-01 Epub Date: 2024-05-12 DOI:10.1080/10410236.2024.2349314
Dan Ma, Jilei Zhou, Meiyun Zuo
{"title":"Information Seeking and Receiving of Older Adults with Diabetes in the Online Health Community: An Information Need Contextualization Perspective.","authors":"Dan Ma, Jilei Zhou, Meiyun Zuo","doi":"10.1080/10410236.2024.2349314","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Online health communities (OHCs) are important online health communication channels for older adults with diabetes to access health information. When seeking health information, they often disclose a variety of contextual information (e.g., socio-economic situations) in their questions. Selective contextual information disclosure is a type of communication strategy for users in OHCs to elicit replies from others. In this study, we adopted text analysis to investigate what contextual information older adults with diabetes disclose to articulate their information needs and used the fixed-effect Poisson model to examine the relationships between different types of contextual information disclosure and informational support receipt. Our analyses were based on a dataset of 4,505 questions and corresponding replies from an online diabetes community. The results showed that cognitive information is the most frequently disclosed contextual information, while older adults tend to disclose demographic information in their questions less. Providing demographic and situational details in questions can enhance informational support receiving, resulting in an increased number of informational supports. However, disclosing cognitive, affective, informational channels, or support information does not significantly affect the informational support receiving. These findings can contribute to extending our existing understanding of information seekers' communication strategies in OHCs.</p>","PeriodicalId":12889,"journal":{"name":"Health Communication","volume":" ","pages":"500-511"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Communication","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2024.2349314","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/5/12 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMMUNICATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Online health communities (OHCs) are important online health communication channels for older adults with diabetes to access health information. When seeking health information, they often disclose a variety of contextual information (e.g., socio-economic situations) in their questions. Selective contextual information disclosure is a type of communication strategy for users in OHCs to elicit replies from others. In this study, we adopted text analysis to investigate what contextual information older adults with diabetes disclose to articulate their information needs and used the fixed-effect Poisson model to examine the relationships between different types of contextual information disclosure and informational support receipt. Our analyses were based on a dataset of 4,505 questions and corresponding replies from an online diabetes community. The results showed that cognitive information is the most frequently disclosed contextual information, while older adults tend to disclose demographic information in their questions less. Providing demographic and situational details in questions can enhance informational support receiving, resulting in an increased number of informational supports. However, disclosing cognitive, affective, informational channels, or support information does not significantly affect the informational support receiving. These findings can contribute to extending our existing understanding of information seekers' communication strategies in OHCs.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在线健康社区中老年糖尿病患者的信息寻求与接收:信息需求情境化视角》。
在线健康社区(OHC)是老年糖尿病患者获取健康信息的重要在线健康交流渠道。在寻求健康信息时,他们往往会在问题中披露各种背景信息(如社会经济状况)。有选择性地披露背景信息是用户在网络健康中心获取他人回复的一种沟通策略。在本研究中,我们采用文本分析法来调查老年糖尿病患者披露哪些背景信息来表达他们的信息需求,并使用固定效应泊松模型来研究不同类型的背景信息披露与信息支持接收之间的关系。我们的分析基于一个在线糖尿病社区的 4,505 个问题和相应回复的数据集。结果表明,认知信息是最常披露的情境信息,而老年人在问题中倾向于较少披露人口信息。在问题中提供人口统计和情境细节可以提高信息支持的接收率,从而增加信息支持的数量。然而,披露认知信息、情感信息、信息渠道信息或支持信息并不会对信息支持接收产生显著影响。这些发现有助于扩展我们现有的对开放式健康中心中信息寻求者沟通策略的理解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.20
自引率
10.30%
发文量
184
期刊介绍: As an outlet for scholarly intercourse between medical and social sciences, this noteworthy journal seeks to improve practical communication between caregivers and patients and between institutions and the public. Outstanding editorial board members and contributors from both medical and social science arenas collaborate to meet the challenges inherent in this goal. Although most inclusions are data-based, the journal also publishes pedagogical, methodological, theoretical, and applied articles using both quantitative or qualitative methods.
期刊最新文献
"Just Listen … Really Listen": Expectations of Youth When Disclosing Mental Health Concerns with Parents. Other Management of Patient Privacy: How Physicians Navigate Disclosure of Late-Stage Cancer in China's General Hospitals. Examining Social Support Conversations on Reddit During COVID-19 Using Computational Methods. Decoding the Discourse: Analyzing the Linguistic Features and Strategies Behind the Querdenken Movement's COVID-19 Narrative. Healing Health Care Disparities: Development and Pilot Testing of a Virtual Reality Implicit Bias Training Module for Physicians in the Context of Black Maternal Health.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1