Posterior Shoulder Instability, Part I—Diagnosis, Nonoperative Management, and Labral Repair for Posterior Shoulder Instability—An International Expert Delphi Consensus Statement

Eoghan T. Hurley M.D., Ph.D. , Zachary S. Aman M.D. , Tom R. Doyle M.B., M.Ch. , Jay M. Levin M.D., M.B.A. , Laith M. Jazrawi M.D. , Grant E. Garrigues M.D. , Surena Namdari M.D. , Jason E. Hsu M.D. , Christopher S. Klifto M.D. , Oke Anakwenze M.D., M.B.A. , Jonathan F. Dickens M.D.
{"title":"Posterior Shoulder Instability, Part I—Diagnosis, Nonoperative Management, and Labral Repair for Posterior Shoulder Instability—An International Expert Delphi Consensus Statement","authors":"Eoghan T. Hurley M.D., Ph.D. ,&nbsp;Zachary S. Aman M.D. ,&nbsp;Tom R. Doyle M.B., M.Ch. ,&nbsp;Jay M. Levin M.D., M.B.A. ,&nbsp;Laith M. Jazrawi M.D. ,&nbsp;Grant E. Garrigues M.D. ,&nbsp;Surena Namdari M.D. ,&nbsp;Jason E. Hsu M.D. ,&nbsp;Christopher S. Klifto M.D. ,&nbsp;Oke Anakwenze M.D., M.B.A. ,&nbsp;Jonathan F. Dickens M.D.","doi":"10.1016/j.arthro.2024.04.035","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>To establish consensus statements on the diagnosis, nonoperative management, and labral repair for posterior shoulder instability.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A consensus process on the treatment of posterior shoulder instability was conducted, with 71 shoulder/sports surgeons from 12 countries participating on the basis of their level of expertise in the field. Experts were assigned to 1 of 6 working groups defined by specific subtopics within posterior shoulder instability. Consensus was defined as achieving 80% to 89% agreement, whereas strong consensus was defined as 90% to 99% agreement, and unanimous consensus was indicated by 100% agreement with a proposed statement.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Unanimous agreement was reached on the indications for nonoperative management and labral repair, which include whether patients had primary or recurrent instability, with symptoms/functional limitations, and whether there was other underlying pathology, or patient’s preference to avoid or delay surgery. In addition, there was unanimous agreement that recurrence rates can be diminished by attention to detail, appropriate indication and assessment of risk factors, recognition of abnormalities in glenohumeral morphology, careful capsulolabral debridement and reattachment, small anchors with inferior placement and multiple fixation points that create a bumper with the labrum, treatment of concomitant pathologies, and a well-defined rehabilitation protocol with strict postoperative immobilization.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The study group achieved strong or unanimous consensus on 63% of statements related to the diagnosis, nonoperative treatment, and labrum repair for posterior shoulder instability. The statements that achieved unanimous consensus were the relative indications for nonoperative management, and the relative indications for labral repair, as well as the steps to minimize complications for labral repair. There was no consensus on whether an arthrogram is needed when performing advanced imaging, the role of corticosteroids/orthobiologics in nonoperative management, whether a posteroinferior portal is required.</div></div><div><h3>Level of Evidence</h3><div>Level V, expert opinion.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":55459,"journal":{"name":"Arthroscopy-The Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery","volume":"41 2","pages":"Pages 166-180.e11"},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Arthroscopy-The Journal of Arthroscopic and Related Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0749806324003414","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

To establish consensus statements on the diagnosis, nonoperative management, and labral repair for posterior shoulder instability.

Methods

A consensus process on the treatment of posterior shoulder instability was conducted, with 71 shoulder/sports surgeons from 12 countries participating on the basis of their level of expertise in the field. Experts were assigned to 1 of 6 working groups defined by specific subtopics within posterior shoulder instability. Consensus was defined as achieving 80% to 89% agreement, whereas strong consensus was defined as 90% to 99% agreement, and unanimous consensus was indicated by 100% agreement with a proposed statement.

Results

Unanimous agreement was reached on the indications for nonoperative management and labral repair, which include whether patients had primary or recurrent instability, with symptoms/functional limitations, and whether there was other underlying pathology, or patient’s preference to avoid or delay surgery. In addition, there was unanimous agreement that recurrence rates can be diminished by attention to detail, appropriate indication and assessment of risk factors, recognition of abnormalities in glenohumeral morphology, careful capsulolabral debridement and reattachment, small anchors with inferior placement and multiple fixation points that create a bumper with the labrum, treatment of concomitant pathologies, and a well-defined rehabilitation protocol with strict postoperative immobilization.

Conclusions

The study group achieved strong or unanimous consensus on 63% of statements related to the diagnosis, nonoperative treatment, and labrum repair for posterior shoulder instability. The statements that achieved unanimous consensus were the relative indications for nonoperative management, and the relative indications for labral repair, as well as the steps to minimize complications for labral repair. There was no consensus on whether an arthrogram is needed when performing advanced imaging, the role of corticosteroids/orthobiologics in nonoperative management, whether a posteroinferior portal is required.

Level of Evidence

Level V, expert opinion.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
肩关节后方失稳第一部分--肩关节后方失稳的诊断、非手术治疗和韧带修复--国际专家德尔菲共识声明。
目的:本研究旨在就肩关节后方不稳定的诊断、非手术治疗和唇瓣修复达成共识:方法:根据来自 12 个国家的 71 名肩关节/运动外科医生在该领域的专业水平,就肩关节后方不稳的治疗方法达成了共识。专家们被分配到 6 个工作组中的一个,这 6 个工作组是根据肩关节后方不稳定的特定子课题定义的。共识的定义是达成 80-89% 的一致意见,强烈共识的定义是达成 90-99% 的一致意见,而一致共识则是对某项建议声明达成 100% 的一致意见:就非手术治疗和唇瓣修复的适应症达成了一致意见,其中包括患者是否存在原发性或复发性不稳定,是否有症状/功能受限,是否存在其他潜在病变,或患者是否愿意避免或推迟手术。此外,研究小组还一致认为,关注细节、适当的适应症和风险因素评估、识别盂肱形态异常、仔细进行髋臼囊清创和重新连接、下置小锚和多个固定点以与髋臼唇形成缓冲、治疗并发病症以及术后严格固定的定义明确的康复方案可降低复发率:研究小组就63%的肩关节后方不稳的诊断、非手术治疗和盂唇修复相关声明达成了强烈或一致的共识。达成一致共识的声明包括非手术治疗的相对适应症、肩关节唇修复的相对适应症以及将肩关节唇修复并发症降至最低的步骤。对于在进行高级成像时是否需要关节造影、皮质类固醇/生物制剂在非手术治疗中的作用、是否需要后内侧入口等问题,与会者未达成共识。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.30
自引率
17.00%
发文量
555
审稿时长
58 days
期刊介绍: Nowhere is minimally invasive surgery explained better than in Arthroscopy, the leading peer-reviewed journal in the field. Every issue enables you to put into perspective the usefulness of the various emerging arthroscopic techniques. The advantages and disadvantages of these methods -- along with their applications in various situations -- are discussed in relation to their efficiency, efficacy and cost benefit. As a special incentive, paid subscribers also receive access to the journal expanded website.
期刊最新文献
Instructions for Authors Masthead Editorial Board Table of Contents Announcements
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1