An Aerobic Cooldown After Morning, Fasted Resistance Exercise Has Limited Impact on Post-exercise Hyperglycemia in Adults With Type 1 Diabetes: A Randomized Crossover Study

IF 2.3 4区 医学 Q3 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM Canadian Journal of Diabetes Pub Date : 2024-08-01 DOI:10.1016/j.jcjd.2024.05.001
{"title":"An Aerobic Cooldown After Morning, Fasted Resistance Exercise Has Limited Impact on Post-exercise Hyperglycemia in Adults With Type 1 Diabetes: A Randomized Crossover Study","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.jcjd.2024.05.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>Expert guidelines recommend an aerobic cooldown to lower blood glucose for the management of post-exercise hyperglycemia. This strategy has never been empirically tested. Our aim in this study was to compare the glycemic effects of performing an aerobic cooldown vs not performing a cooldown after a fasted resistance exercise session. We hypothesized that the cooldown would lower blood glucose in the 30 minutes after exercise and would result in less time in hyperglycemia in the 6 hours after exercise.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Participants completed 2 identical resistance exercise sessions. One was followed by a low-intensity (30% of peak oxygen consumption) 10-minute cycle ergometer cooldown, and the other was followed by 10 minutes of sitting. We compared the changes in capillary glucose concentration during these sessions and continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) outcomes over 24 hours post-exercise.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Sixteen participants completed the trial. Capillary glucose was similar between conditions at the start of exercise (p=0.07). Capillary glucose concentration decreased by 0.6±1.0 mmol/L during the 10-minute cooldown, but it increased by 0.7±1.3 mmol/L during the same time in the no-cooldown condition. The resulting difference in glucose trajectory led to a significant interaction (p=0.02), with no effect from treatment (p=0.7). Capillary glucose values at the end of recovery were similar between conditions (p&gt;0.05). There were no significant differences in CGM outcomes.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>An aerobic cooldown reduces glucose concentration in the post-exercise period, but the small and brief nature of this reduction makes this strategy unlikely to be an effective treatment for hyperglycemia occurring after fasted exercise.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":9565,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Journal of Diabetes","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1499267124001059/pdfft?md5=eb4e6d14b68b6f17cb657272d3cddfb1&pid=1-s2.0-S1499267124001059-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Canadian Journal of Diabetes","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1499267124001059","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives

Expert guidelines recommend an aerobic cooldown to lower blood glucose for the management of post-exercise hyperglycemia. This strategy has never been empirically tested. Our aim in this study was to compare the glycemic effects of performing an aerobic cooldown vs not performing a cooldown after a fasted resistance exercise session. We hypothesized that the cooldown would lower blood glucose in the 30 minutes after exercise and would result in less time in hyperglycemia in the 6 hours after exercise.

Methods

Participants completed 2 identical resistance exercise sessions. One was followed by a low-intensity (30% of peak oxygen consumption) 10-minute cycle ergometer cooldown, and the other was followed by 10 minutes of sitting. We compared the changes in capillary glucose concentration during these sessions and continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) outcomes over 24 hours post-exercise.

Results

Sixteen participants completed the trial. Capillary glucose was similar between conditions at the start of exercise (p=0.07). Capillary glucose concentration decreased by 0.6±1.0 mmol/L during the 10-minute cooldown, but it increased by 0.7±1.3 mmol/L during the same time in the no-cooldown condition. The resulting difference in glucose trajectory led to a significant interaction (p=0.02), with no effect from treatment (p=0.7). Capillary glucose values at the end of recovery were similar between conditions (p>0.05). There were no significant differences in CGM outcomes.

Conclusions

An aerobic cooldown reduces glucose concentration in the post-exercise period, but the small and brief nature of this reduction makes this strategy unlikely to be an effective treatment for hyperglycemia occurring after fasted exercise.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
清晨空腹阻力运动后的有氧冷却对 1 型糖尿病成人运动后高血糖的影响有限:随机交叉研究。
目的:专家指南建议采用有氧冷却来降低血糖,以控制运动后高血糖。这一策略从未经过实证测试。我们的目的是比较空腹阻力运动后进行有氧冷却与不进行有氧冷却对血糖的影响。我们假设,有氧冷却会降低运动后 30 分钟内的血糖,并减少运动后 6 小时内的高血糖时间:方法:参与者完成两节相同的阻力运动。方法:参与者完成了两次相同的阻力运动,其中一次运动后进行了 10 分钟的低强度(30% VO2 峰值)循环测力计冷却,另一次运动后进行了 10 分钟的静坐。我们比较了运动过程中毛细血管葡萄糖浓度的变化以及运动后 24 小时内连续血糖监测(CGM)的结果:结果:16 名参与者完成了试验。运动开始时,不同条件下的毛细血管葡萄糖浓度相似(P=0.07)。在 10 分钟的冷却过程中,毛细血管葡萄糖浓度下降了 0.6 ± 1.0 毫摩尔/升,但在无冷却条件下,毛细血管葡萄糖浓度在同一时间内上升了 0.7 ± 1.3 毫摩尔/升。由此产生的血糖轨迹差异导致了显著的交互作用(p=0.02),而治疗没有影响(p=0.7)。恢复结束时的毛细血管葡萄糖值在不同条件下相似(p>0.05)。CGM结果无明显差异:结论:有氧冷却可降低运动后的血糖浓度,但由于降低幅度较小且持续时间较短,因此这一策略不太可能有效治疗空腹运动后出现的高血糖。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Canadian Journal of Diabetes
Canadian Journal of Diabetes ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM-
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
4.00%
发文量
130
审稿时长
54 days
期刊介绍: The Canadian Journal of Diabetes is Canada''s only diabetes-oriented, peer-reviewed, interdisciplinary journal for diabetes health-care professionals. Published bimonthly, the Canadian Journal of Diabetes contains original articles; reviews; case reports; shorter articles such as Perspectives in Practice, Practical Diabetes and Innovations in Diabetes Care; Diabetes Dilemmas and Letters to the Editor.
期刊最新文献
Masthead Table of Contents Editorial Board Calling All Clinicians: A Brief 5-Step Model for Exploring Diabetes Distress in Routine Diabetes Care Association of Sodium-Glucose Cotransporter-2 Inhibitors vs Dipeptidyl Peptidase-4 Inhibitors With Pneumonia, COVID-19, and Other Adverse Respiratory Events in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1