Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) in construction and demolition debris (CDD): discerning sources and fate during waste management.

Journal of hazardous materials Pub Date : 2024-07-05 Epub Date: 2024-05-10 DOI:10.1016/j.jhazmat.2024.134567
Yalan Liu, Ashley Lin, Jake Thompson, John A Bowden, Timothy G Townsend
{"title":"Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) in construction and demolition debris (CDD): discerning sources and fate during waste management.","authors":"Yalan Liu, Ashley Lin, Jake Thompson, John A Bowden, Timothy G Townsend","doi":"10.1016/j.jhazmat.2024.134567","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>As regulatory frameworks for per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) evolve, the solid waste community seeks to manage PFAS risks effectively. Despite extensive research on PFAS in municipal solid waste (MSW) and wastewater sludge, there is limited information on a major global waste stream which seldom gleans regulatory oversight - construction and demolition debris (CDD). This study sampled a CDD processing facility to provide material-specific information on the PFAS profile within CDD. The bulk CDD accepted by this facility was separated into major categories, representatively sampled, then characterized for total available PFAS (∑<sub>92</sub>PFAS). As reprocessed CDD is ultimately recycled or landfilled, often unencapsulated or in unlined landfills, the PFAS leaching potential was also examined using two leaching procedures. Among the categories assessed for total PFAS, carpeting, carpet padding, and gypsum drywall showed elevated concentrations compared to other components, with most of the PFAS mass contributed by precursor species. However, materials with the highest total PFAS, such as carpeting, did not necessarily exhibit the highest leaching, and leachate was predominantly composed of terminal species rather than precursors. Extrapolating these findings with national CDD generation and management data inventories suggests that despite MSW having higher total available PFAS concentrations, the leachability of PFAS from landfilled CDD is comparable, raising legitimate concerns with CDD disposal practices, particularly in unlined CDD landfills.</p>","PeriodicalId":94082,"journal":{"name":"Journal of hazardous materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of hazardous materials","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2024.134567","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/5/10 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

As regulatory frameworks for per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) evolve, the solid waste community seeks to manage PFAS risks effectively. Despite extensive research on PFAS in municipal solid waste (MSW) and wastewater sludge, there is limited information on a major global waste stream which seldom gleans regulatory oversight - construction and demolition debris (CDD). This study sampled a CDD processing facility to provide material-specific information on the PFAS profile within CDD. The bulk CDD accepted by this facility was separated into major categories, representatively sampled, then characterized for total available PFAS (∑92PFAS). As reprocessed CDD is ultimately recycled or landfilled, often unencapsulated or in unlined landfills, the PFAS leaching potential was also examined using two leaching procedures. Among the categories assessed for total PFAS, carpeting, carpet padding, and gypsum drywall showed elevated concentrations compared to other components, with most of the PFAS mass contributed by precursor species. However, materials with the highest total PFAS, such as carpeting, did not necessarily exhibit the highest leaching, and leachate was predominantly composed of terminal species rather than precursors. Extrapolating these findings with national CDD generation and management data inventories suggests that despite MSW having higher total available PFAS concentrations, the leachability of PFAS from landfilled CDD is comparable, raising legitimate concerns with CDD disposal practices, particularly in unlined CDD landfills.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
建筑和拆除废墟 (CDD) 中的全氟和多氟烷基物质 (PFAS):在废物管理过程中辨别来源和归宿。
随着全氟烷基和多氟烷基物质(PFAS)监管框架的不断发展,固体废物界也在寻求有效管理 PFAS 风险。尽管对城市固体废物 (MSW) 和废水污泥中的 PFAS 进行了广泛的研究,但对很少受到监管的全球主要废物流--建筑和拆除垃圾 (CDD) --的信息却很有限。本研究对一家 CDD 处理设施进行了采样,以提供 CDD 中 PFAS 特征的特定材料信息。该设施接收的散装 CDD 被分为几大类,对其进行代表性采样,然后对可获得的 PFAS 总量(∑92PFAS)进行表征。由于再加工的 CDD 最终会被回收或填埋,而且通常没有封装或填埋在无衬里的填埋场中,因此还使用两种浸出程序对 PFAS 浸出潜力进行了检测。在对全氟辛烷磺酸总量进行评估的类别中,地毯、地毯衬垫和石膏干墙的浓度高于其他成分,其中大部分全氟辛烷磺酸质量由前体物质贡献。不过,PFAS 总量最高的材料(如地毯)并不一定显示出最高的沥滤量,沥滤液主要由末端物质而非前体物质组成。将这些发现与国家清洁发展机制产生和管理数据清单进行推断表明,尽管城市固体废物的可获得全氟辛烷磺酸总浓度较高,但填埋的清洁发展机制中的全氟辛烷磺酸沥滤性相当,这引起了人们对清洁发展机制处置方法的合理关注,特别是在无内衬的清洁发展机制填埋场中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Variation in photoactivity of dissolved black carbon during the fractionation process and the role in the photodegradation of various antibiotics. Antimony-bearing schwertmannite transformation to goethite: A driver of antimony mobilization in acid mine drainage. Assessing the stereoselective bioactivity and biotoxicity of penthiopyrad in soil environment for efficacy improvement and hazard reduction. Gene biomarkers in estuarine oysters indicate pollution profiles of metals, brominated flame retardants, and poly- and perfluoroalkyl substances in and near the Laizhou Bay. Gut microbiota modulation by L-Fucose as a strategy to alleviate Ochratoxin A toxicity on primordial follicle formation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1