Prairie restoration promotes the abundance and diversity of mutualistic arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi

IF 4.3 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ECOLOGY Ecological Applications Pub Date : 2024-05-13 DOI:10.1002/eap.2981
Kevin A. MacColl, Micaela Tosi, Pierre-Luc Chagnon, Andrew S. MacDougall, Kari E. Dunfield, Hafiz Maherali
{"title":"Prairie restoration promotes the abundance and diversity of mutualistic arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi","authors":"Kevin A. MacColl,&nbsp;Micaela Tosi,&nbsp;Pierre-Luc Chagnon,&nbsp;Andrew S. MacDougall,&nbsp;Kari E. Dunfield,&nbsp;Hafiz Maherali","doi":"10.1002/eap.2981","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Predicting how biological communities assemble in restored ecosystems can assist in conservation efforts, but most research has focused on plants, with relatively little attention paid to soil microbial organisms that plants interact with. Arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) fungi are an ecologically significant functional group of soil microbes that form mutualistic symbioses with plants and could therefore respond positively to plant community restoration. To evaluate the effects of plant community restoration on AM fungi, we compared AM fungal abundance, species richness, and community composition of five annually cultivated, conventionally managed agricultural fields with paired adjacent retired agricultural fields that had undergone prairie restoration 5–9 years prior to sampling. We hypothesized that restoration stimulates AM fungal abundance and species richness, particularly for disturbance-sensitive taxa, and that gains of new taxa would not displace AM fungal species present prior to restoration due to legacy effects. AM fungal abundance was quantified by measuring soil spore density and root colonization. AM fungal species richness and community composition were determined in soils and plant roots using DNA high-throughput sequencing. Soil spore density was 2.3 times higher in restored prairies compared to agricultural fields, but AM fungal root colonization did not differ between land use types. AM fungal species richness was 2.7 and 1.4 times higher in restored prairies versus agricultural fields for soil and roots, respectively. The abundance of Glomeraceae, a disturbance-tolerant family, decreased by 25% from agricultural to restored prairie soils but did not differ in plant roots. The abundance of Claroideoglomeraceae and Diversisporaceae, both disturbance-sensitive families, was 4.6 and 3.2 times higher in restored prairie versus agricultural soils, respectively. Species turnover was higher than expected relative to a null model, indicating that AM fungal species were gained by replacement. Our findings demonstrate that restoration can promote a relatively rapid increase in the abundance and diversity of soil microbial communities that had been degraded by decades of intensive land use, and community compositional change can be predicted by the disturbance tolerance of soil microbial taxonomic and functional groups.</p>","PeriodicalId":55168,"journal":{"name":"Ecological Applications","volume":"34 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/eap.2981","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecological Applications","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/eap.2981","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Predicting how biological communities assemble in restored ecosystems can assist in conservation efforts, but most research has focused on plants, with relatively little attention paid to soil microbial organisms that plants interact with. Arbuscular mycorrhizal (AM) fungi are an ecologically significant functional group of soil microbes that form mutualistic symbioses with plants and could therefore respond positively to plant community restoration. To evaluate the effects of plant community restoration on AM fungi, we compared AM fungal abundance, species richness, and community composition of five annually cultivated, conventionally managed agricultural fields with paired adjacent retired agricultural fields that had undergone prairie restoration 5–9 years prior to sampling. We hypothesized that restoration stimulates AM fungal abundance and species richness, particularly for disturbance-sensitive taxa, and that gains of new taxa would not displace AM fungal species present prior to restoration due to legacy effects. AM fungal abundance was quantified by measuring soil spore density and root colonization. AM fungal species richness and community composition were determined in soils and plant roots using DNA high-throughput sequencing. Soil spore density was 2.3 times higher in restored prairies compared to agricultural fields, but AM fungal root colonization did not differ between land use types. AM fungal species richness was 2.7 and 1.4 times higher in restored prairies versus agricultural fields for soil and roots, respectively. The abundance of Glomeraceae, a disturbance-tolerant family, decreased by 25% from agricultural to restored prairie soils but did not differ in plant roots. The abundance of Claroideoglomeraceae and Diversisporaceae, both disturbance-sensitive families, was 4.6 and 3.2 times higher in restored prairie versus agricultural soils, respectively. Species turnover was higher than expected relative to a null model, indicating that AM fungal species were gained by replacement. Our findings demonstrate that restoration can promote a relatively rapid increase in the abundance and diversity of soil microbial communities that had been degraded by decades of intensive land use, and community compositional change can be predicted by the disturbance tolerance of soil microbial taxonomic and functional groups.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
草原恢复促进了互生节肢菌根真菌的丰富性和多样性。
预测生物群落如何在恢复后的生态系统中组合有助于保护工作,但大多数研究都集中在植物上,对与植物相互作用的土壤微生物的关注相对较少。丛枝菌根(AM)真菌是具有重要生态意义的土壤微生物功能群,它们与植物形成互利共生关系,因此能对植物群落恢复产生积极影响。为了评估植物群落恢复对 AM 真菌的影响,我们比较了五块每年耕种、采用传统管理方式的农田与相邻的退耕农田的 AM 真菌丰度、物种丰富度和群落组成,前者在取样前 5-9 年进行了草原恢复。我们的假设是,植被恢复会刺激调幅真菌的丰度和物种丰富度,尤其是对干扰敏感的类群,而新类群的增加不会因遗留效应而取代植被恢复前存在的调幅真菌物种。通过测量土壤孢子密度和根部定植情况来量化 AM 真菌的丰度。利用 DNA 高通量测序技术测定了土壤和植物根部中 AM 真菌物种的丰富度和群落组成。与农田相比,恢复后的草原土壤孢子密度高出 2.3 倍,但土地利用类型之间的 AM 真菌根部定植率并无差异。恢复后的大草原土壤和根部的 AM 真菌物种丰富度分别是农田的 2.7 倍和 1.4 倍。从农田到恢复后的草原土壤中,耐扰动的团扇科(Glomeraceae)物种丰富度下降了 25%,但在植物根系中并无差异。对干扰敏感的 Claroideoglomeraceae 和 Diversisporaceae 在恢复后的草原土壤中的丰度分别是农业土壤的 4.6 倍和 3.2 倍。相对于空模型,物种更替率高于预期,这表明通过更替获得了调幅真菌物种。我们的研究结果表明,对于因数十年密集使用土地而退化的土壤微生物群落,恢复可以促进其丰度和多样性的相对快速增长,而且群落组成的变化可以通过土壤微生物分类群和功能群的干扰耐受性来预测。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Ecological Applications
Ecological Applications 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
9.50
自引率
2.00%
发文量
268
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: The pages of Ecological Applications are open to research and discussion papers that integrate ecological science and concepts with their application and implications. Of special interest are papers that develop the basic scientific principles on which environmental decision-making should rest, and those that discuss the application of ecological concepts to environmental problem solving, policy, and management. Papers that deal explicitly with policy matters are welcome. Interdisciplinary approaches are encouraged, as are short communications on emerging environmental challenges.
期刊最新文献
Ecosystem service indicators on military-managed drylands in the Western United States. Smaller and bolder fish enhance ecosystem-scale primary production around artificial reefs in seagrass beds. Divergent trajectories of regeneration in early-successional forests after logging and wildfire. Global dynamics of functional composition in CITES-traded reptiles. Incorporating stressor interactions into spatially explicit cumulative impact assessments.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1