{"title":"Assessing road safety performance in Chinese provinces: A comprehensive analysis of the past decade","authors":"Liangguo Kang","doi":"10.1016/j.rtbm.2024.101133","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The issue of road safety is a growing global concern, and evaluating performance in this area is crucial for the development of effective safety policies and the allocation of safety resources. Amidst the input-output perspective of road safety risks, this study endeavors to assess the performance of provincial road safety in China from 2012 to 2021. To achieve this goal, the research employs data envelopment analysis (DEA) and the DEA-window approach, grounded in the framework of variable/constant returns to scale (VRS/CRS) models. The results reveal that Shanghai and Tibet consistently achieved efficient scores using both the DEA-VRS and DEA-CRS methods throughout the past decade. There is a small difference of 0.028 and 0.025 between the average scores obtained from the DEA and DEA-window analysis using the VRS and CRS models, respectively. Shanghai, Tibet, and Beijing demonstrate exceptional performance in both the DEA-CRS-window and DEA-VRS-window analysis, while North China, Southwest China, Central China, and South China exhibits the significant variations in performance ranking. This study enhances the understanding of the current road safety status in China and offers valuable insights for policymakers to formulate targeted measures, aiming to continuously improve road safety performance across various provinces through benchmarking management</p></div>","PeriodicalId":47453,"journal":{"name":"Research in Transportation Business and Management","volume":"54 ","pages":"Article 101133"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research in Transportation Business and Management","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S221053952400035X","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The issue of road safety is a growing global concern, and evaluating performance in this area is crucial for the development of effective safety policies and the allocation of safety resources. Amidst the input-output perspective of road safety risks, this study endeavors to assess the performance of provincial road safety in China from 2012 to 2021. To achieve this goal, the research employs data envelopment analysis (DEA) and the DEA-window approach, grounded in the framework of variable/constant returns to scale (VRS/CRS) models. The results reveal that Shanghai and Tibet consistently achieved efficient scores using both the DEA-VRS and DEA-CRS methods throughout the past decade. There is a small difference of 0.028 and 0.025 between the average scores obtained from the DEA and DEA-window analysis using the VRS and CRS models, respectively. Shanghai, Tibet, and Beijing demonstrate exceptional performance in both the DEA-CRS-window and DEA-VRS-window analysis, while North China, Southwest China, Central China, and South China exhibits the significant variations in performance ranking. This study enhances the understanding of the current road safety status in China and offers valuable insights for policymakers to formulate targeted measures, aiming to continuously improve road safety performance across various provinces through benchmarking management
期刊介绍:
Research in Transportation Business & Management (RTBM) will publish research on international aspects of transport management such as business strategy, communication, sustainability, finance, human resource management, law, logistics, marketing, franchising, privatisation and commercialisation. Research in Transportation Business & Management welcomes proposals for themed volumes from scholars in management, in relation to all modes of transport. Issues should be cross-disciplinary for one mode or single-disciplinary for all modes. We are keen to receive proposals that combine and integrate theories and concepts that are taken from or can be traced to origins in different disciplines or lessons learned from different modes and approaches to the topic. By facilitating the development of interdisciplinary or intermodal concepts, theories and ideas, and by synthesizing these for the journal''s audience, we seek to contribute to both scholarly advancement of knowledge and the state of managerial practice. Potential volume themes include: -Sustainability and Transportation Management- Transport Management and the Reduction of Transport''s Carbon Footprint- Marketing Transport/Branding Transportation- Benchmarking, Performance Measurement and Best Practices in Transport Operations- Franchising, Concessions and Alternate Governance Mechanisms for Transport Organisations- Logistics and the Integration of Transportation into Freight Supply Chains- Risk Management (or Asset Management or Transportation Finance or ...): Lessons from Multiple Modes- Engaging the Stakeholder in Transportation Governance- Reliability in the Freight Sector