Narcissistic personality disorder in the ICD-11: Severity and trait profiles of grandiosity and vulnerability

IF 2.5 3区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL Journal of Clinical Psychology Pub Date : 2024-05-14 DOI:10.1002/jclp.23701
Nicholas J. S. Day, Ava Green, Georgia Denmeade, Bo Bach, Brin F. S. Grenyer
{"title":"Narcissistic personality disorder in the ICD-11: Severity and trait profiles of grandiosity and vulnerability","authors":"Nicholas J. S. Day,&nbsp;Ava Green,&nbsp;Georgia Denmeade,&nbsp;Bo Bach,&nbsp;Brin F. S. Grenyer","doi":"10.1002/jclp.23701","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Modern diagnostic and classification frameworks such as the ICD-11 and DSM-5-AMPD have adopted a dimensional approach to diagnosing personality disorder using a dual “severity” and “trait” model. As narcissistic personality has historically struggled to be adequately captured in dominant diagnostic systems, this study investigated the utility of the new ICD-11 framework in capturing diverse narcissistic expressions. Participants were mental health clinicians (<i>N</i> = 180, 67% female, age = 38.9), who completed ratings of ICD-11 personality severity, trait domains and a clinical reflection for two hypothetical case vignettes reflecting either prototypical “grandiose” or “vulnerable” narcissism. The majority of clinicians (82%) endorsed a diagnosis of personality disorder for both grandiose and vulnerable vignettes. Discriminant elements of personality impairment included rigid, unrealistically positive self-view, low empathy and high conflict with others for grandiosity, and incoherent identity, low self-esteem and hypervigilant, avoidant relations with others for vulnerability. Regarding trait profile, grandiose narcissism was predominately dissocial whereas vulnerable narcissism was primarily associated with negative affectivity and detachment. Qualitative responses highlight distinct clinical themes for each presentation. These findings suggest that clinicians using the ICD-11 framework are able to identify common core elements of personality dysfunction in grandiose and vulnerable narcissism while also recognizing their distinctive differences.</p>","PeriodicalId":15395,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Psychology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/jclp.23701","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jclp.23701","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Modern diagnostic and classification frameworks such as the ICD-11 and DSM-5-AMPD have adopted a dimensional approach to diagnosing personality disorder using a dual “severity” and “trait” model. As narcissistic personality has historically struggled to be adequately captured in dominant diagnostic systems, this study investigated the utility of the new ICD-11 framework in capturing diverse narcissistic expressions. Participants were mental health clinicians (N = 180, 67% female, age = 38.9), who completed ratings of ICD-11 personality severity, trait domains and a clinical reflection for two hypothetical case vignettes reflecting either prototypical “grandiose” or “vulnerable” narcissism. The majority of clinicians (82%) endorsed a diagnosis of personality disorder for both grandiose and vulnerable vignettes. Discriminant elements of personality impairment included rigid, unrealistically positive self-view, low empathy and high conflict with others for grandiosity, and incoherent identity, low self-esteem and hypervigilant, avoidant relations with others for vulnerability. Regarding trait profile, grandiose narcissism was predominately dissocial whereas vulnerable narcissism was primarily associated with negative affectivity and detachment. Qualitative responses highlight distinct clinical themes for each presentation. These findings suggest that clinicians using the ICD-11 framework are able to identify common core elements of personality dysfunction in grandiose and vulnerable narcissism while also recognizing their distinctive differences.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
ICD-11 中的自恋型人格障碍:自大和脆弱的严重程度和特质特征。
ICD-11 和 DSM-5-AMPD 等现代诊断和分类框架采用了一种维度方法,使用 "严重程度 "和 "特质 "双重模型来诊断人格障碍。由于自恋型人格历来难以在主流诊断系统中得到充分体现,本研究调查了新的 ICD-11 框架在捕捉各种自恋表现方面的实用性。参与者为心理健康临床医生(人数 = 180,67% 为女性,年龄 = 38.9),他们完成了对 ICD-11 人格严重程度、特质领域的评分,并对两个反映 "自大 "或 "脆弱 "自恋原型的假设案例进行了临床反思。大多数临床医生(82%)对 "傲慢型 "和 "脆弱型 "小故事都认可人格障碍诊断。人格障碍的判别要素包括:自大的人格障碍表现为僵化的、不切实际的积极自我观、低移情能力和与他人的高冲突性;脆弱的人格障碍表现为不连贯的身份认同、低自尊和过度警惕、回避与他人的关系。在特质特征方面,自大型自恋主要是非社会性的,而脆弱型自恋则主要与消极情绪和疏离有关。定性回答突出了每种表现形式不同的临床主题。这些研究结果表明,使用 ICD-11 框架的临床医生能够识别傲慢型自恋和脆弱型自恋中人格功能障碍的共同核心要素,同时也能认识到它们之间的显著差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Clinical Psychology
Journal of Clinical Psychology PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL-
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
3.30%
发文量
177
期刊介绍: Founded in 1945, the Journal of Clinical Psychology is a peer-reviewed forum devoted to research, assessment, and practice. Published eight times a year, the Journal includes research studies; articles on contemporary professional issues, single case research; brief reports (including dissertations in brief); notes from the field; and news and notes. In addition to papers on psychopathology, psychodiagnostics, and the psychotherapeutic process, the journal welcomes articles focusing on psychotherapy effectiveness research, psychological assessment and treatment matching, clinical outcomes, clinical health psychology, and behavioral medicine.
期刊最新文献
Moving beyond vulnerability and focusing on resilience: An intersectional posttraumatic growth model for LGBTQ+ people of color. Introduction to In Session special issue: Psychotherapy for complex PTSD Associations between avoidant/restrictive food intake disorder profiles and trauma exposure in veteran men and women Issue Information Clinical psychology, social identities and societal challenges: Implications for diversity-sensitive practice and training.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1