Tumor microenvironment and clinical efficacy of first line immunotherapy-based combinations in metastatic renal cell carcinoma.

IF 2.8 4区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY Medical Oncology Pub Date : 2024-05-13 DOI:10.1007/s12032-024-02370-0
Enrico Sammarco, Martina Rossetti, Alessia Salfi, Adele Bonato, Paolo Viacava, Gianluca Masi, Luca Galli, Pinuccia Faviana
{"title":"Tumor microenvironment and clinical efficacy of first line immunotherapy-based combinations in metastatic renal cell carcinoma.","authors":"Enrico Sammarco, Martina Rossetti, Alessia Salfi, Adele Bonato, Paolo Viacava, Gianluca Masi, Luca Galli, Pinuccia Faviana","doi":"10.1007/s12032-024-02370-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The impact of tumor microenvironment (TME) in influencing clinical response to first-line immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI)-based treatment in advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is unclear. Immunohistochemistry (IHC) could identify biomarkers related to immune checkpoints and immune cell population. This study retrospectively characterized TME from 28 RCC patients who received first line ICI-based therapy through IHC assessment of selected markers and explored preliminary evidence about their possible correlation with treatment efficacy. We found a significantly higher count of CD80+, CD163+ cells and their ratio in RCC with clear cell component compared to those without clear cell features; additionally, patients with metastatic disease at diagnosis were associated with higher expression of CD163+ cells, while higher count of CD4+ cells and CD4+/CD8+ ratio were found in RCC with sarcomatoid features. Patients achieving partial or complete response were associated with lower expression of CD163+ cells (median 28 vs 47; p = 0.049). Furthermore, lower expression of CD163+ was associated with better PFS (median PFS 20.0 vs 4.7 months; HR 0.22 p = 0.011) and OS (median OS NR vs 14.4 months; HR 0.28 p = 0.036). A longer OS was reported in PD-L1 CPS negative patients (median OS NR vs 11.8 months; HR 0.20 p = 0.024). High infiltration of CD163+ macrophages, who typically present \"anti-inflammatory\" M2-like phenotype, could identify a subgroup of patients with poor survival after receiving first-line ICI.</p>","PeriodicalId":18433,"journal":{"name":"Medical Oncology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11090963/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12032-024-02370-0","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The impact of tumor microenvironment (TME) in influencing clinical response to first-line immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI)-based treatment in advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is unclear. Immunohistochemistry (IHC) could identify biomarkers related to immune checkpoints and immune cell population. This study retrospectively characterized TME from 28 RCC patients who received first line ICI-based therapy through IHC assessment of selected markers and explored preliminary evidence about their possible correlation with treatment efficacy. We found a significantly higher count of CD80+, CD163+ cells and their ratio in RCC with clear cell component compared to those without clear cell features; additionally, patients with metastatic disease at diagnosis were associated with higher expression of CD163+ cells, while higher count of CD4+ cells and CD4+/CD8+ ratio were found in RCC with sarcomatoid features. Patients achieving partial or complete response were associated with lower expression of CD163+ cells (median 28 vs 47; p = 0.049). Furthermore, lower expression of CD163+ was associated with better PFS (median PFS 20.0 vs 4.7 months; HR 0.22 p = 0.011) and OS (median OS NR vs 14.4 months; HR 0.28 p = 0.036). A longer OS was reported in PD-L1 CPS negative patients (median OS NR vs 11.8 months; HR 0.20 p = 0.024). High infiltration of CD163+ macrophages, who typically present "anti-inflammatory" M2-like phenotype, could identify a subgroup of patients with poor survival after receiving first-line ICI.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
肿瘤微环境与转移性肾细胞癌一线免疫疗法组合的临床疗效。
肿瘤微环境(TME)对晚期肾细胞癌(RCC)一线免疫检查点抑制剂(ICI)治疗临床反应的影响尚不明确。免疫组化(IHC)可以确定与免疫检查点和免疫细胞群相关的生物标记物。本研究通过对选定标记物进行IHC评估,对28例接受一线ICI治疗的RCC患者的TME进行了回顾性特征描述,并探讨了这些标记物与治疗效果之间可能存在的相关性的初步证据。我们发现,与无透明细胞特征的患者相比,有透明细胞成分的RCC患者中CD80+、CD163+细胞的数量及其比值明显更高;此外,诊断时患有转移性疾病的患者与CD163+细胞的高表达相关,而有肉瘤特征的RCC患者中CD4+细胞的数量和CD4+/CD8+比值更高。获得部分或完全应答的患者 CD163+ 细胞表达量较低(中位数为 28 vs 47;p = 0.049)。此外,较低的 CD163+ 表达与较好的 PFS(中位 PFS 20.0 个月 vs 4.7 个月;HR 0.22 p = 0.011)和 OS(中位 OS NR vs 14.4 个月;HR 0.28 p = 0.036)相关。PD-L1 CPS阴性患者的OS更长(中位OS NR vs 11.8个月;HR 0.20 p = 0.024)。CD163+ 巨噬细胞的高浸润率通常表现为 "抗炎 "的 M2 样表型,可识别出接受一线 ICI 后生存率较低的患者亚群。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Medical Oncology
Medical Oncology 医学-肿瘤学
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
2.90%
发文量
259
审稿时长
1.4 months
期刊介绍: Medical Oncology (MO) communicates the results of clinical and experimental research in oncology and hematology, particularly experimental therapeutics within the fields of immunotherapy and chemotherapy. It also provides state-of-the-art reviews on clinical and experimental therapies. Topics covered include immunobiology, pathogenesis, and treatment of malignant tumors.
期刊最新文献
Incidence of lymphedema related to various cancers The Sirt1/Nrf2 pathway is a key factor for drug therapy in chemotherapy-induced cardiotoxicity: a Mini-Review Lipid metabolism reprogramming in renal cell carcinomas. Current diagnostic and quantitative techniques in the field of lymphedema management: a critical review. The role of IL-22 in cancer.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1