Carrie Janerka , Gavin D. Leslie , Fenella J. Gill
{"title":"Patient experience of emergency department triage: An integrative review","authors":"Carrie Janerka , Gavin D. Leslie , Fenella J. Gill","doi":"10.1016/j.ienj.2024.101456","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Emergency department (ED) triage is often patients’ first contact with a health service and a critical point for patient experience. This review aimed to understand patient experience of ED triage and the waiting room.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A systematic six-stage approach guided the integrative review. Medline, CINAHL, EmCare, Scopus, ProQuest, Cochrane Library, and JBI database were systematically searched for primary research published between 2000–2022 that reported patient experience of ED triage and/or waiting room. Quality was assessed using established critical appraisal tools. Data were analysed for descriptive statistics and themes using the constant comparison method.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Twenty-nine articles were included. Studies were mostly observational (n = 17), conducted at a single site (n = 23), and involved low-moderate acuity patients (n = 13). Nine interventions were identified. Five themes emerged: ‘the who, what and how of triage’, ‘the patient as a person’, ‘to know or not to know’, ‘the waiting game’, and ‘to leave or not to leave’.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Wait times, initiation of assessment and treatment, information provision and interactions with triage staff appeared to have the most impact on patient experience, though patients’ desires for each varied. A person-centred approach to triage is recommended.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48914,"journal":{"name":"International Emergency Nursing","volume":"74 ","pages":"Article 101456"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1755599X2400051X/pdfft?md5=292be3edbdc75783d19a7a9f6906eead&pid=1-s2.0-S1755599X2400051X-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Emergency Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1755599X2400051X","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background
Emergency department (ED) triage is often patients’ first contact with a health service and a critical point for patient experience. This review aimed to understand patient experience of ED triage and the waiting room.
Methods
A systematic six-stage approach guided the integrative review. Medline, CINAHL, EmCare, Scopus, ProQuest, Cochrane Library, and JBI database were systematically searched for primary research published between 2000–2022 that reported patient experience of ED triage and/or waiting room. Quality was assessed using established critical appraisal tools. Data were analysed for descriptive statistics and themes using the constant comparison method.
Results
Twenty-nine articles were included. Studies were mostly observational (n = 17), conducted at a single site (n = 23), and involved low-moderate acuity patients (n = 13). Nine interventions were identified. Five themes emerged: ‘the who, what and how of triage’, ‘the patient as a person’, ‘to know or not to know’, ‘the waiting game’, and ‘to leave or not to leave’.
Conclusion
Wait times, initiation of assessment and treatment, information provision and interactions with triage staff appeared to have the most impact on patient experience, though patients’ desires for each varied. A person-centred approach to triage is recommended.
期刊介绍:
International Emergency Nursing is a peer-reviewed journal devoted to nurses and other professionals involved in emergency care. It aims to promote excellence through dissemination of high quality research findings, specialist knowledge and discussion of professional issues that reflect the diversity of this field. With an international readership and authorship, it provides a platform for practitioners worldwide to communicate and enhance the evidence-base of emergency care.
The journal publishes a broad range of papers, from personal reflection to primary research findings, created by first-time through to reputable authors from a number of disciplines. It brings together research from practice, education, theory, and operational management, relevant to all levels of staff working in emergency care settings worldwide.