Operative management of primary hyperparathyroidism in Europe.

IF 3.5 3区 医学 Q1 SURGERY BJS Open Pub Date : 2024-05-08 DOI:10.1093/bjsopen/zrae037
Erik Norén, Erik Nordenström, Anders O J Bergenfelz
{"title":"Operative management of primary hyperparathyroidism in Europe.","authors":"Erik Norén, Erik Nordenström, Anders O J Bergenfelz","doi":"10.1093/bjsopen/zrae037","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Multicentre studies have previously reported on national outcomes of surgery for primary hyperparathyroidism, but not investigated whether management and outcome are uniform among countries. This study investigated whether there are differences among European countries in operative management and outcome of surgery for primary hyperparathyroidism.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using data from Eurocrine®, a pan-European registry for endocrine surgeries, a retrospective observational cross-sectional multicentre study with 99 participating centres in 14 European countries was performed. Data on age, sex, calcium levels, operative strategy, conversion rate and rate of failed exploration were analysed for patients who underwent initial surgery for sporadic primary hyperparathyroidism. Primary outcome measures were intention to perform limited parathyroidectomy and the rate of hypercalcaemia at first follow-up.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 9548 patients were registered between 2015 and 2020. There were 7642 (80%, range 74.5-93.2%) females. There was intention to perform limited parathyroidectomy in 7320 of 9548 (76.7%) operations, ranging from 498 of 1007 (49.5%) to 40 of 41 (97.6%) among countries. Hypercalcaemia at first follow-up (median time to follow-up 15 days) was found in 416 of 9548 (4.4%) operations, ranging from 0 of 119 (0%) to 3 of 38 (7.9%) among countries.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study demonstrated large differences in the intention to perform limited parathyroidectomy for primary hyperparathyroidism among European countries, as well as differences in the rate of postoperative hypercalcaemia. Future studies are needed to evaluate the impact of these different healthcare practices on patient outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":9028,"journal":{"name":"BJS Open","volume":"8 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11094469/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BJS Open","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsopen/zrae037","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Multicentre studies have previously reported on national outcomes of surgery for primary hyperparathyroidism, but not investigated whether management and outcome are uniform among countries. This study investigated whether there are differences among European countries in operative management and outcome of surgery for primary hyperparathyroidism.

Methods: Using data from Eurocrine®, a pan-European registry for endocrine surgeries, a retrospective observational cross-sectional multicentre study with 99 participating centres in 14 European countries was performed. Data on age, sex, calcium levels, operative strategy, conversion rate and rate of failed exploration were analysed for patients who underwent initial surgery for sporadic primary hyperparathyroidism. Primary outcome measures were intention to perform limited parathyroidectomy and the rate of hypercalcaemia at first follow-up.

Results: A total of 9548 patients were registered between 2015 and 2020. There were 7642 (80%, range 74.5-93.2%) females. There was intention to perform limited parathyroidectomy in 7320 of 9548 (76.7%) operations, ranging from 498 of 1007 (49.5%) to 40 of 41 (97.6%) among countries. Hypercalcaemia at first follow-up (median time to follow-up 15 days) was found in 416 of 9548 (4.4%) operations, ranging from 0 of 119 (0%) to 3 of 38 (7.9%) among countries.

Conclusion: This study demonstrated large differences in the intention to perform limited parathyroidectomy for primary hyperparathyroidism among European countries, as well as differences in the rate of postoperative hypercalcaemia. Future studies are needed to evaluate the impact of these different healthcare practices on patient outcomes.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
欧洲原发性甲状旁腺功能亢进症的手术治疗。
背景:以前曾有多中心研究报告了各国原发性甲状旁腺功能亢进症的手术治疗结果,但没有调查各国的手术治疗和结果是否一致。本研究调查了欧洲各国在原发性甲状旁腺功能亢进症手术治疗和结果方面是否存在差异:利用泛欧内分泌手术登记处 Eurocrine® 的数据,在 14 个欧洲国家的 99 个参与中心开展了一项回顾性观察横断面多中心研究。研究分析了因散发性原发性甲状旁腺功能亢进而接受初次手术的患者的年龄、性别、血钙水平、手术策略、转换率和探查失败率等数据。主要结果指标是进行局限性甲状旁腺切除术的意向和首次随访时的高钙血症发生率:2015年至2020年间,共有9548名患者登记在册。其中7642人(80%,范围74.5-93.2%)为女性。在 9548 例手术中,有 7320 例(76.7%)有意进行局限性甲状旁腺切除术,各国之间的比例从 1007 例中的 498 例(49.5%)到 41 例中的 40 例(97.6%)不等。9548 例手术中有 416 例(4.4%)在首次随访(中位随访时间为 15 天)时发现了高钙血症,各国之间的差异从 119 例中的 0 例(0%)到 38 例中的 3 例(7.9%)不等:本研究表明,欧洲各国对原发性甲状旁腺功能亢进症实施局限性甲状旁腺切除术的意向存在很大差异,术后高钙血症的发生率也存在差异。今后还需要开展研究,评估这些不同的医疗实践对患者预后的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BJS Open
BJS Open SURGERY-
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
3.20%
发文量
144
期刊最新文献
Classifying histopathological growth patterns for resected colorectal liver metastasis with a deep learning analysis. Short-term outcomes depending on type of oesophagojejunostomy in laparoscopic total gastrectomy for gastric cancer: retrospective study based on a Korean Nationwide Survey for Gastric Cancer in 2019. Association of postoperative opioid type with mortality and readmission rates: multicentre retrospective cohort study. Effects of the superior mesenteric artery approach versus the no-touch approach during pancreatoduodenectomy on the mobilization of circulating tumour cells and clusters in pancreatic cancer (CETUPANC): randomized clinical trial. Reported outcomes in studies of intermittent claudication - first step toward a core outcome set: systematic review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1