Pulmonary Hypertension and Anastrozole (PHANTOM): A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial.

IF 19.3 1区 医学 Q1 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine Pub Date : 2024-11-01 DOI:10.1164/rccm.202402-0371OC
Steven M Kawut, Rui Feng, Susan S Ellenberg, Roham Zamanian, Todd Bull, Murali Chakinala, Stephen C Mathai, Anna Hemnes, Grace Lin, Margaret Doyle, Ruth Andrew, Margaret MacLean, Ioannis Stasinopoulos, Eric Austin, Angela DeMichele, Haochang Shou, Jasleen Minhas, Nianfu Song, Jude Moutchia, Corey E Ventetuolo
{"title":"Pulmonary Hypertension and Anastrozole (PHANTOM): A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial.","authors":"Steven M Kawut, Rui Feng, Susan S Ellenberg, Roham Zamanian, Todd Bull, Murali Chakinala, Stephen C Mathai, Anna Hemnes, Grace Lin, Margaret Doyle, Ruth Andrew, Margaret MacLean, Ioannis Stasinopoulos, Eric Austin, Angela DeMichele, Haochang Shou, Jasleen Minhas, Nianfu Song, Jude Moutchia, Corey E Ventetuolo","doi":"10.1164/rccm.202402-0371OC","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Rationale:</b> Inhibition of aromatase with anastrozole reduces pulmonary hypertension in experimental models. <b>Objectives:</b> We aimed to determine whether anastrozole improved the 6-minute-walk distance (6MWD) at 6 months in pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH). <b>Methods:</b> We performed a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase II clinical trial of anastrozole in subjects with PAH at seven centers. Eighty-four postmenopausal women with PAH and men with PAH were randomized in a 1:1 ratio to receive anastrozole 1 mg or placebo by mouth daily, stratified by sex using permuted blocks of variable sizes. All subjects and study staff were masked. The primary outcome was the change from baseline in 6MWD at 6 months. By intention-to-treat analysis, we estimated the treatment effect of anastrozole using linear regression models adjusted for sex and baseline 6MWD. Assuming 10% loss to follow-up, we anticipated having 80% power to detect a difference in the change in 6MWD of 22 meters. <b>Measurements and Main Results:</b> Forty-one subjects were randomized to placebo and 43 to anastrozole, and all received the allocated treatment. Three subjects in the placebo group and two in the anastrozole group discontinued the study drug. There was no significant difference in the change in 6MWD at 6 months (placebo-corrected treatment effect, -7.9 m; 95% confidence interval, -32.7 to 16.9; <i>P</i> = 0.53). There was no difference in adverse events between the groups. <b>Conclusions:</b> Anastrozole did not show a significant effect on 6MWD compared with placebo in postmenopausal women with PAH and in men with PAH. Anastrozole was safe and did not have adverse effects. Clinical trial registered with www.clincialtrials.gov (NCT03229499).</p>","PeriodicalId":7664,"journal":{"name":"American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine","volume":" ","pages":"1143-1151"},"PeriodicalIF":19.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11544352/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1164/rccm.202402-0371OC","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Rationale: Inhibition of aromatase with anastrozole reduces pulmonary hypertension in experimental models. Objectives: We aimed to determine whether anastrozole improved the 6-minute-walk distance (6MWD) at 6 months in pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH). Methods: We performed a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase II clinical trial of anastrozole in subjects with PAH at seven centers. Eighty-four postmenopausal women with PAH and men with PAH were randomized in a 1:1 ratio to receive anastrozole 1 mg or placebo by mouth daily, stratified by sex using permuted blocks of variable sizes. All subjects and study staff were masked. The primary outcome was the change from baseline in 6MWD at 6 months. By intention-to-treat analysis, we estimated the treatment effect of anastrozole using linear regression models adjusted for sex and baseline 6MWD. Assuming 10% loss to follow-up, we anticipated having 80% power to detect a difference in the change in 6MWD of 22 meters. Measurements and Main Results: Forty-one subjects were randomized to placebo and 43 to anastrozole, and all received the allocated treatment. Three subjects in the placebo group and two in the anastrozole group discontinued the study drug. There was no significant difference in the change in 6MWD at 6 months (placebo-corrected treatment effect, -7.9 m; 95% confidence interval, -32.7 to 16.9; P = 0.53). There was no difference in adverse events between the groups. Conclusions: Anastrozole did not show a significant effect on 6MWD compared with placebo in postmenopausal women with PAH and in men with PAH. Anastrozole was safe and did not have adverse effects. Clinical trial registered with www.clincialtrials.gov (NCT03229499).

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
肺动脉高压与阿那曲唑(PHANTOM):随机、双盲、安慰剂对照试验。
理由:用阿那曲唑抑制芳香化酶可降低实验模型中的肺动脉高压:我们旨在确定阿那曲唑是否能改善肺动脉高压(PAH)患者六个月后的六分钟步行距离(6MWD):我们在七个中心对阿那曲唑进行了随机、双盲、安慰剂对照的II期临床试验。84名绝经后女性和男性 PAH 患者按 1:1 的比例被随机分配到每天口服阿那曲唑 1 毫克或安慰剂的治疗方案中,根据性别采用不同大小的置换区块进行分层。所有受试者和研究人员均蒙面。主要研究结果是 6 个月时 6MWD 与基线相比的变化。通过意向治疗分析,我们使用线性回归模型估算了阿那曲唑的治疗效果,并对性别和基线 6MWD 进行了调整。假设随访损失率为 10%,我们预计有 80% 的力量可以检测到 22 米的 6MWD 变化差异:41名受试者被随机分配到安慰剂组,43名受试者被随机分配到阿那曲唑组,所有受试者都接受了分配的治疗。安慰剂组和阿那曲唑组分别有 3 名和 2 名受试者停药。6个月时6MWD的变化无明显差异(安慰剂校正治疗效果-7.9米,95%CI -32.7 - 16.9,P = 0.53)。两组之间的不良反应没有差异:结论:与安慰剂相比,阿那曲唑对绝经后女性和男性 PAH 患者的 6MWD 没有显著影响。阿那曲唑安全且无不良反应。临床试验注册请访问 www.Clinicaltrials: gov,ID:NCT03229499。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
27.30
自引率
4.50%
发文量
1313
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine focuses on human biology and disease, as well as animal studies that contribute to the understanding of pathophysiology and treatment of diseases that affect the respiratory system and critically ill patients. Papers that are solely or predominantly based in cell and molecular biology are published in the companion journal, the American Journal of Respiratory Cell and Molecular Biology. The Journal also seeks to publish clinical trials and outstanding review articles on areas of interest in several forms. The State-of-the-Art review is a treatise usually covering a broad field that brings bench research to the bedside. Shorter reviews are published as Critical Care Perspectives or Pulmonary Perspectives. These are generally focused on a more limited area and advance a concerted opinion about care for a specific process. Concise Clinical Reviews provide an evidence-based synthesis of the literature pertaining to topics of fundamental importance to the practice of pulmonary, critical care, and sleep medicine. Images providing advances or unusual contributions to the field are published as Images in Pulmonary, Critical Care, Sleep Medicine and the Sciences. A recent trend and future direction of the Journal has been to include debates of a topical nature on issues of importance in pulmonary and critical care medicine and to the membership of the American Thoracic Society. Other recent changes have included encompassing works from the field of critical care medicine and the extension of the editorial governing of journal policy to colleagues outside of the United States of America. The focus and direction of the Journal is to establish an international forum for state-of-the-art respiratory and critical care medicine.
期刊最新文献
Similar Weaning Success Rate with High-Intensity and Sham Inspiratory Muscle Training: A Randomized Controlled Trial (IMweanT). Best in Class: Immunoglobulin G as a Treatable Trait for Exacerbation Prevention in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease. Decoding Sex Differences in Right Ventricular Function through BMPR1A. Quantitative Lung Ultrasound and Pediatric Critical Care: Any Excuse Not to Use It? Simple vs Extended Lung Ultrasound Score to Guide Surfactant Replacement in the First 24h of Life.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1