[Severe cholecystitis during the COVID-19 pandemic : Influence of the COVID-19 pandemic on the frequency of surgery and outcome for elective and emergency cholecystectomy: a monocentric retrospective cohort analysis].

Chirurgie (Heidelberg, Germany) Pub Date : 2024-08-01 Epub Date: 2024-05-14 DOI:10.1007/s00104-024-02085-y
Maria Neve Stolberg-Stolberg, Felix Becker, Joachim Gerß, Matthias Brüwer
{"title":"[Severe cholecystitis during the COVID-19 pandemic : Influence of the COVID-19 pandemic on the frequency of surgery and outcome for elective and emergency cholecystectomy: a monocentric retrospective cohort analysis].","authors":"Maria Neve Stolberg-Stolberg, Felix Becker, Joachim Gerß, Matthias Brüwer","doi":"10.1007/s00104-024-02085-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>With the outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic medical care focused on management of the infectious event. Elective interventions were cancelled and the general advice was to stay at home. How this impacted urgent and elective cholecystectomies is the subject of this work.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Urgent and elective cholecystectomy patients during the first year of the pandemic were compared with those of the previous year. The primary endpoint was the frequency of surgery. Furthermore, the American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score, symptom duration until presentation as well as until surgery, preoperative inflammatory parameters, imaging, positive Murphy's sign, type and duration of surgery, intraoperative drain placement, intraoperative and histological severity, need for and duration of postoperative antibiotic therapy, intensive care stay, length of stay and occurrence of postoperative complications were recorded.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>During the pandemic patients were sicker (ASA 2.13 vs. 2.31; p = 0.039), the operating time was prolonged (64.4 min vs. 74.9 min; p = 0.001) and patients were more likely to have concomitant peritonitis (15.4% vs. 29.1%: p = 0.007). Furthermore, there was a trend in the presence of leukocytosis, a positive Murphy's sign, intraoperative drain placement, intraoperative severity of inflammation, duration of postoperative antibiotic therapy and complication rate.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>During the COVID-19 pandemic cholecystitis presented with more pronounced inflammation, the surgical conditions were more difficult and postoperative recovery was prolonged.</p>","PeriodicalId":72588,"journal":{"name":"Chirurgie (Heidelberg, Germany)","volume":" ","pages":"656-662"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chirurgie (Heidelberg, Germany)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00104-024-02085-y","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/5/14 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: With the outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic medical care focused on management of the infectious event. Elective interventions were cancelled and the general advice was to stay at home. How this impacted urgent and elective cholecystectomies is the subject of this work.

Method: Urgent and elective cholecystectomy patients during the first year of the pandemic were compared with those of the previous year. The primary endpoint was the frequency of surgery. Furthermore, the American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score, symptom duration until presentation as well as until surgery, preoperative inflammatory parameters, imaging, positive Murphy's sign, type and duration of surgery, intraoperative drain placement, intraoperative and histological severity, need for and duration of postoperative antibiotic therapy, intensive care stay, length of stay and occurrence of postoperative complications were recorded.

Results: During the pandemic patients were sicker (ASA 2.13 vs. 2.31; p = 0.039), the operating time was prolonged (64.4 min vs. 74.9 min; p = 0.001) and patients were more likely to have concomitant peritonitis (15.4% vs. 29.1%: p = 0.007). Furthermore, there was a trend in the presence of leukocytosis, a positive Murphy's sign, intraoperative drain placement, intraoperative severity of inflammation, duration of postoperative antibiotic therapy and complication rate.

Conclusion: During the COVID-19 pandemic cholecystitis presented with more pronounced inflammation, the surgical conditions were more difficult and postoperative recovery was prolonged.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
[COVID-19大流行期间的严重胆囊炎:COVID-19大流行对择期和急诊胆囊切除术的手术频率和结果的影响:单中心回顾性队列分析]。
背景:COVID-19 大流行爆发后,医疗服务的重点是控制传染病。选择性介入治疗被取消,一般建议是待在家里。这对急诊和择期胆囊切除术有何影响?方法:将大流行第一年的急诊和择期胆囊切除术患者与前一年的患者进行比较。主要终点是手术频率。此外,还记录了美国麻醉医师协会(ASA)评分、症状持续时间(直至发病和手术)、术前炎症参数、影像学检查、墨菲氏征阳性、手术类型和持续时间、术中引流管放置情况、术中和组织学严重程度、术后抗生素治疗需求和持续时间、重症监护时间、住院时间和术后并发症发生情况:大流行期间,患者病情加重(ASA 2.13 对 2.31;p = 0.039),手术时间延长(64.4 分钟对 74.9 分钟;p = 0.001),患者更容易合并腹膜炎(15.4% 对 29.1%:p = 0.007)。此外,白细胞增多、墨菲氏征阳性、术中放置引流管、术中炎症严重程度、术后抗生素治疗持续时间和并发症发生率也呈上升趋势:结论:在 COVID-19 大流行期间,胆囊炎的炎症更加明显,手术条件更加困难,术后恢复时间更长。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Klinische Studien. S2k-Leitlinie „Behandlung thermischer Verletzungen im Kindesalter“. [Trauma-associated vascular injuries and the vascular surgical/interventional options for vascular reconstruction]. ["Surgical foresight: beyond the routine" : The challenge of complex visceral surgical emergencies for young medical specialists and senior physicians]. [Conversion to outpatient treatment beyond the hybrid DRG-A view abroad].
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1