Oral health-related quality of life in the LGBTIQ+ population: a cross-sectional study.

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q3 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE Brazilian oral research Pub Date : 2024-05-13 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1590/1807-3107bor-2024.vol38.0041
Luiz Eduardo de Almeida, Pablo Fellipe de Souza Almeida, Valéria de Oliveira, Fábio Luiz Mialhe
{"title":"Oral health-related quality of life in the LGBTIQ+ population: a cross-sectional study.","authors":"Luiz Eduardo de Almeida, Pablo Fellipe de Souza Almeida, Valéria de Oliveira, Fábio Luiz Mialhe","doi":"10.1590/1807-3107bor-2024.vol38.0041","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The aim of this cross-sectional study was to investigate the associations between oral health-related quality of life (OHRQoL) and socioeconomic and demographic variables, suicidal ideation, self-perception of oral health, and experiences of dental care in the Brazilian adult LGBTIQ+ population. A sample of 464 participants completed self-administered online questionnaires and provided information for OHRQoL assessment, using the OHIP-14 instrument at three hierarchical levels of explanatory variables: LGBTIQ+ identities; socioeconomic and demographic data and existential suffering; and self-perception of oral health and experience of dental care. The collected data were fitted to hierarchical multiple logistic regression models, in which the associations between each independent variable with the OHIP-14 prevalence outcome were analyzed. The OHIP-14-prevalence index showed that 33.2% of the participants answered 'frequently' or 'always', and the highest frequencies were obtained for the psychological discomfort (27.8%), psychological disability (18.3%), and physical pain (17.5%) domains. According to the adjusted final model, LGBTIQ+ individuals who were more likely to have their OHRQoL affected were those who were indifferent (OR=3.21; 95% CI: 1.26-8.20), dissatisfied (OR=10.45; 95% CI: 3.86-28.26), or very dissatisfied (OR=53.93; 95% CI: 12.12-239.93) with their oral health status, and also those who had or have difficulty accessing dental treatment (OR=2.06; 95% CI: 1.24-3.41) (p<0.05). It may be concluded that the OHRQoL of the investigated Brazilian LGBTIQ+ population showed associations with individual aspects and with access to dental services.</p>","PeriodicalId":9240,"journal":{"name":"Brazilian oral research","volume":"38 ","pages":"e041"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11376664/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brazilian oral research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/1807-3107bor-2024.vol38.0041","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The aim of this cross-sectional study was to investigate the associations between oral health-related quality of life (OHRQoL) and socioeconomic and demographic variables, suicidal ideation, self-perception of oral health, and experiences of dental care in the Brazilian adult LGBTIQ+ population. A sample of 464 participants completed self-administered online questionnaires and provided information for OHRQoL assessment, using the OHIP-14 instrument at three hierarchical levels of explanatory variables: LGBTIQ+ identities; socioeconomic and demographic data and existential suffering; and self-perception of oral health and experience of dental care. The collected data were fitted to hierarchical multiple logistic regression models, in which the associations between each independent variable with the OHIP-14 prevalence outcome were analyzed. The OHIP-14-prevalence index showed that 33.2% of the participants answered 'frequently' or 'always', and the highest frequencies were obtained for the psychological discomfort (27.8%), psychological disability (18.3%), and physical pain (17.5%) domains. According to the adjusted final model, LGBTIQ+ individuals who were more likely to have their OHRQoL affected were those who were indifferent (OR=3.21; 95% CI: 1.26-8.20), dissatisfied (OR=10.45; 95% CI: 3.86-28.26), or very dissatisfied (OR=53.93; 95% CI: 12.12-239.93) with their oral health status, and also those who had or have difficulty accessing dental treatment (OR=2.06; 95% CI: 1.24-3.41) (p<0.05). It may be concluded that the OHRQoL of the investigated Brazilian LGBTIQ+ population showed associations with individual aspects and with access to dental services.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
LGBTIQ+ 人口中与口腔健康相关的生活质量:一项横断面研究。
这项横断面研究旨在调查巴西成年 LGBTIQ+ 人口中与口腔健康相关的生活质量(OHRQoL)与社会经济和人口变量、自杀意念、对口腔健康的自我认知以及牙科保健经历之间的关联。464 名参与者填写了自填式在线问卷,并提供了用于 OHRQoL 评估的信息:LGBTIQ+ 身份;社会经济和人口数据及生存痛苦;以及对口腔健康的自我认知和牙科保健经验。将收集到的数据拟合到分层多元逻辑回归模型中,分析每个独立变量与 OHIP-14 流行率结果之间的关联。OHIP-14患病率指数显示,33.2%的参与者回答 "经常 "或 "总是",其中心理不适(27.8%)、心理残疾(18.3%)和身体疼痛(17.5%)领域的患病率最高。根据调整后的最终模型,LGBTIQ+ 患者的 OHRQoL 更有可能受到影响的是那些无所谓(OR=3.21;95% CI:1.26-8.20)、不满意(OR=10.45;95% CI:3.86-28.26),或非常不满意(OR=53.93;95% CI:12.12-239.93),以及曾经或很难获得牙科治疗的人群(OR=2.06;95% CI:1.24-3.41)(p
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
4.00%
发文量
107
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Assessment of Brazilian hospital and healthcare service infrastructure for cleft lip and palate patients. Comparison of the analgesic efficacy of spray and tablet flurbiprofen for pain after soft tissue surgery. Efficacy of xenogeneic collagen matrix in the treatment of gingival recessions: a controlled clinical trial. Facial morphology analysis of Caucasian Brazilian adult women using stereophotogrammetry. Impact of an educational intervention regarding tobacco counseling on dentists and dental students.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1