Effects of motor and cognitive complex training on obstacle walking and brain activity in people with Parkinson's disease: a randomized controlled trial.

IF 3.3 3区 医学 Q1 REHABILITATION European journal of physical and rehabilitation medicine Pub Date : 2024-08-01 Epub Date: 2024-05-14 DOI:10.23736/S1973-9087.24.08261-3
Pei-Ling Wong, Chen-Wei Hung, Yea-Ru Yang, Nai-Chen Yeh, Shih-Jung Cheng, Ying-Yi Liao, Ray-Yau Wang
{"title":"Effects of motor and cognitive complex training on obstacle walking and brain activity in people with Parkinson's disease: a randomized controlled trial.","authors":"Pei-Ling Wong, Chen-Wei Hung, Yea-Ru Yang, Nai-Chen Yeh, Shih-Jung Cheng, Ying-Yi Liao, Ray-Yau Wang","doi":"10.23736/S1973-9087.24.08261-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The difficulties in obstacle walking are significant in people with Parkinson's disease (PD) leading to an increased fall risk. Effective interventions to improve obstacle walking with possible training-related neuroplasticity changes are needed. We developed two different exercise programs, complex walking training and motor-cognitive training, both challenging motor and cognitive function for people with PD to improve obstacle walking.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>To investigate the effects of these two novel training programs on obstacle walking and brain activities in PD.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A single-center randomized, single-blind controlled study.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>University laboratory; outpatient.</p><p><strong>Population: </strong>Individuals with idiopathic PD.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Thirty-two participants were randomly assigned to the complex walking training group (N.=11), motor-cognitive training group (N.=11) or control group (N.=10). Participants in training groups received exercises for 40 minutes/session, with a total of 12-session over 6 weeks. Control group did not receive additional training. Primary outcomes included obstacle walking, and brain activities (prefrontal cortex (PFC), premotor cortex (PMC), and supplementary motor area (SMA)) during obstacle walking by using functional near-infrared spectroscopy. Secondary outcomes included obstacle crossing, timed up and go test (TUG), cognitive function in different domains, and fall efficacy scale (FES-I).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The motor-cognitive training group demonstrated greater improvements in obstacle walking speed and stride length, SMA activity, obstacle crossing velocity and stride length, digit span test, and TUG than the control group. The complex walking training did not show significant improvement in obstacle walking or change in brain activation compared with control group. However, the complex walking training resulted in greater improvements in Rey-Osterrieth Complex Figure test, TUG and FES-I compared with the control group.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our 12-session of the cognitive-motor training improved obstacle walking performance with increased SMA activities in people with PD. However, the complex walking training did not lead such beneficial effects as the cognitive-motor training.</p><p><strong>Clinical rehabilitation impact: </strong>The cognitive-motor training is suggested as an effective rehabilitation program to improve obstacle walking ability in individuals with PD.</p>","PeriodicalId":12044,"journal":{"name":"European journal of physical and rehabilitation medicine","volume":" ","pages":"611-620"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11391393/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European journal of physical and rehabilitation medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23736/S1973-9087.24.08261-3","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/5/14 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The difficulties in obstacle walking are significant in people with Parkinson's disease (PD) leading to an increased fall risk. Effective interventions to improve obstacle walking with possible training-related neuroplasticity changes are needed. We developed two different exercise programs, complex walking training and motor-cognitive training, both challenging motor and cognitive function for people with PD to improve obstacle walking.

Aim: To investigate the effects of these two novel training programs on obstacle walking and brain activities in PD.

Design: A single-center randomized, single-blind controlled study.

Setting: University laboratory; outpatient.

Population: Individuals with idiopathic PD.

Methods: Thirty-two participants were randomly assigned to the complex walking training group (N.=11), motor-cognitive training group (N.=11) or control group (N.=10). Participants in training groups received exercises for 40 minutes/session, with a total of 12-session over 6 weeks. Control group did not receive additional training. Primary outcomes included obstacle walking, and brain activities (prefrontal cortex (PFC), premotor cortex (PMC), and supplementary motor area (SMA)) during obstacle walking by using functional near-infrared spectroscopy. Secondary outcomes included obstacle crossing, timed up and go test (TUG), cognitive function in different domains, and fall efficacy scale (FES-I).

Results: The motor-cognitive training group demonstrated greater improvements in obstacle walking speed and stride length, SMA activity, obstacle crossing velocity and stride length, digit span test, and TUG than the control group. The complex walking training did not show significant improvement in obstacle walking or change in brain activation compared with control group. However, the complex walking training resulted in greater improvements in Rey-Osterrieth Complex Figure test, TUG and FES-I compared with the control group.

Conclusions: Our 12-session of the cognitive-motor training improved obstacle walking performance with increased SMA activities in people with PD. However, the complex walking training did not lead such beneficial effects as the cognitive-motor training.

Clinical rehabilitation impact: The cognitive-motor training is suggested as an effective rehabilitation program to improve obstacle walking ability in individuals with PD.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
运动和认知复合训练对帕金森病患者障碍行走和大脑活动的影响:随机对照试验。
背景:帕金森病(PD)患者在障碍行走时困难重重,导致跌倒风险增加。需要采取有效的干预措施来改善障碍行走,并可能改变与训练相关的神经可塑性。我们为帕金森病患者开发了两种不同的运动项目--复杂行走训练和运动认知训练,这两种训练都对运动和认知功能提出了挑战,以改善障碍行走。目的:研究这两种新型训练项目对帕金森病患者障碍行走和大脑活动的影响:设计:单中心随机、单盲对照研究:人群:特发性帕金森病患者:特发性帕金森病患者:32名参与者被随机分配到复杂行走训练组(11人)、运动认知训练组(11人)或对照组(10人)。训练组的参与者每节课接受 40 分钟的训练,共 12 节课,为期 6 周。对照组不接受额外训练。主要结果包括障碍行走,以及使用功能性近红外光谱分析障碍行走时的大脑活动(前额叶皮层(PFC)、前运动皮层(PMC)和辅助运动区(SMA))。次要结果包括跨越障碍、定时起立行走测试(TUG)、不同领域的认知功能和跌倒效能量表(FES-I):结果:与对照组相比,运动认知训练组在障碍行走速度和步长、SMA 活动、障碍跨越速度和步长、数字跨度测试和 TUG 方面均有较大改善。与对照组相比,复杂行走训练组在障碍行走和大脑激活方面没有明显改善。然而,与对照组相比,复杂行走训练在雷伊-奥斯特里艾斯复杂图形测试、TUG和FES-I方面带来了更大的改善:结论:我们进行了12次认知运动训练,提高了帕金森病患者的障碍行走能力,增加了SMA活动。临床康复影响:认知运动训练是一种有效的康复训练方法:临床康复影响:认知运动训练是提高帕金森病患者障碍行走能力的有效康复方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.50
自引率
4.40%
发文量
162
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The European Journal of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine publishes papers of clinical interest in physical and rehabilitation medicine.
期刊最新文献
Addressing the gap: stroke-related sarcopenia in Brazil. Behavior change theory and behavior change technique use in cancer rehabilitation interventions: a secondary analysis. The effect of patients' socioeconomic status in rehabilitation centers on the efficiency and performance. A continuum of balance performance between children with developmental coordination disorder, spastic cerebral palsy, and typical development. Efficacy of virtual reality on balance impairment in ataxic cerebral palsy children: randomized controlled trial.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1