Driving pressure, as opposed to tidal volume based on predicted body weight, is associated with mortality: results from a prospective cohort of COVID-19 acute respiratory distress syndrome patients.

Critical care science Pub Date : 2024-05-10 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.62675/2965-2774.20240208-en
Erich Vidal Carvalho, Maycon Moura Reboredo, Edimar Pedrosa Gomes, Pedro Nascimento Martins, Gabriel Paz Souza Mota, Giovani Bernardo Costa, Fernando Antonio Basile Colugnati, Bruno Valle Pinheiro
{"title":"Driving pressure, as opposed to tidal volume based on predicted body weight, is associated with mortality: results from a prospective cohort of COVID-19 acute respiratory distress syndrome patients.","authors":"Erich Vidal Carvalho, Maycon Moura Reboredo, Edimar Pedrosa Gomes, Pedro Nascimento Martins, Gabriel Paz Souza Mota, Giovani Bernardo Costa, Fernando Antonio Basile Colugnati, Bruno Valle Pinheiro","doi":"10.62675/2965-2774.20240208-en","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the association between driving pressure and tidal volume based on predicted body weight and mortality in a cohort of patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome caused by COVID-19.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a prospective, observational study that included patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome due to COVID-19 admitted to two intensive care units. We performed multivariable analyses to determine whether driving pressure and tidal volume/kg predicted body weight on the first day of mechanical ventilation, as independent variables, are associated with hospital mortality.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We included 231 patients. The mean age was 64 (53 - 74) years, and the mean Simplified Acute and Physiology Score 3 score was 45 (39 - 54). The hospital mortality rate was 51.9%. Driving pressure was independently associated with hospital mortality (odds ratio 1.21, 95%CI 1.04 - 1.41 for each cm H2O increase in driving pressure, p = 0.01). Based on a double stratification analysis, we found that for the same level of tidal volume/kg predicted body weight, the risk of hospital death increased with increasing driving pressure. However, changes in tidal volume/kg predicted body weight were not associated with mortality when they did not lead to an increase in driving pressure.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome caused by COVID-19, exposure to higher driving pressure, as opposed to higher tidal volume/kg predicted body weight, is associated with greater mortality. These results suggest that driving pressure might be a primary target for lung-protective mechanical ventilation in these patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":72721,"journal":{"name":"Critical care science","volume":"36 ","pages":"e20240208en"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11098065/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Critical care science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.62675/2965-2774.20240208-en","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the association between driving pressure and tidal volume based on predicted body weight and mortality in a cohort of patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome caused by COVID-19.

Methods: This was a prospective, observational study that included patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome due to COVID-19 admitted to two intensive care units. We performed multivariable analyses to determine whether driving pressure and tidal volume/kg predicted body weight on the first day of mechanical ventilation, as independent variables, are associated with hospital mortality.

Results: We included 231 patients. The mean age was 64 (53 - 74) years, and the mean Simplified Acute and Physiology Score 3 score was 45 (39 - 54). The hospital mortality rate was 51.9%. Driving pressure was independently associated with hospital mortality (odds ratio 1.21, 95%CI 1.04 - 1.41 for each cm H2O increase in driving pressure, p = 0.01). Based on a double stratification analysis, we found that for the same level of tidal volume/kg predicted body weight, the risk of hospital death increased with increasing driving pressure. However, changes in tidal volume/kg predicted body weight were not associated with mortality when they did not lead to an increase in driving pressure.

Conclusion: In patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome caused by COVID-19, exposure to higher driving pressure, as opposed to higher tidal volume/kg predicted body weight, is associated with greater mortality. These results suggest that driving pressure might be a primary target for lung-protective mechanical ventilation in these patients.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
驱动压力(而非基于预测体重的潮气量)与死亡率相关:COVID-19 急性呼吸窘迫综合征患者前瞻性队列的结果。
目的评估由 COVID-19 引起的急性呼吸窘迫综合征患者队列中基于预测体重的驱动压力和潮气量与死亡率之间的关系:这是一项前瞻性观察研究,研究对象包括两个重症监护病房收治的 COVID-19 急性呼吸窘迫综合征患者。我们进行了多变量分析,以确定机械通气第一天的驱动压力和潮气量/公斤预测体重作为自变量是否与住院死亡率有关:我们纳入了 231 名患者。平均年龄为 64(53 - 74)岁,平均简化急性生理学评分 3 为 45(39 - 54)分。住院死亡率为 51.9%。颅内压与住院死亡率密切相关(颅内压每增加 1 cm H2O,几率比为 1.21,95%CI 为 1.04 - 1.41,p = 0.01)。基于双重分层分析,我们发现在潮气量/公斤预测体重相同的情况下,住院死亡风险随着驱动压力的增加而增加。然而,如果潮气量/公斤预测体重的变化没有导致驱动压力增加,则潮气量/公斤预测体重的变化与死亡率无关:结论:在 COVID-19 引起的急性呼吸窘迫综合征患者中,较高的驱动压力与较高的潮气量/公斤预测体重相比,与较高的死亡率相关。这些结果表明,在这些患者中,驱动压力可能是肺保护性机械通气的主要目标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Analyzing how the components of the SOFA score change over time in their contribution to mortality. To: Clinical outcomes of intensive care unit-acquired weakness in critically ill COVID-19 patients. A prospective cohort study. Challenges in using the dynamic components of the SOFA score in health care databases. Impact of intensive care unit admission on cancer patients: enhancing long-term survival through better understanding. Rate of non-metastatic solid tumor progression following critical illness: a prospective cohort study of UK Biobank participants.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1