Feasibility and Analgesic Efficacy of Thoracolumbar Dorsal Ramus Nerve Block Using Multiorifice Pain Catheters for Scoliosis Surgery: A Prospective Cohort Study.

IF 1.7 Q2 SURGERY International Journal of Spine Surgery Pub Date : 2024-07-04 DOI:10.14444/8601
Tara M Doherty, Ailan Zhang, Alla Spivak, Ellen Kiley, Damon DelBello, Apolonia E Abramowicz, Jeff L Xu
{"title":"Feasibility and Analgesic Efficacy of Thoracolumbar Dorsal Ramus Nerve Block Using Multiorifice Pain Catheters for Scoliosis Surgery: A Prospective Cohort Study.","authors":"Tara M Doherty, Ailan Zhang, Alla Spivak, Ellen Kiley, Damon DelBello, Apolonia E Abramowicz, Jeff L Xu","doi":"10.14444/8601","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Approximately 38,000 scoliosis surgery correction operations are performed annually in the United States; these operations are associated with considerable postoperative pain which can be difficult to manage. This is largely attributed to an incision spanning multiple vertebral segments with paraspinal muscle dissection and retraction to facilitate the implantation of segmental hardware and rods. Frequently utilized analgesic modalities include intravenous patient-controlled analgesia and epidural analgesia, often in combination. We sought to ascertain the feasibility and analgesic efficacy of continuous thoracolumbar dorsal ramus nerve (TDRN) block using surgically placed multiorifice catheters.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Forty-two patients diagnosed with idiopathic scoliosis who underwent a posterior spinal fusion (PSF) were enrolled after consent was obtained. Patients were managed utilizing a standardized Enhanced Recovery After Surgery) protocol including a perioperative opioid-sparing regimen. Data were collected at specified time intervals during the recovery period. These data points included pain scores using the Numeric Rating Scale. Parenteral or both oral and parenteral opioid consumption doses were also collected every 4 hours. Any significant postoperative adverse events were recorded as well.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 42 patients had surgically placed TDRN catheters, and 40 patients were included in this study. The patients all reported low to moderate pain scores with low opioid consumption postoperatively, while the TDRN catheter delivery of local anesthetic analgesics did not result in significant complications.</p><p><strong>Clinical relevance: </strong>A regional technique utilizing TDRN catheters could be a valuable component of the postoperative pain management protocols for PSF surgery, and additional studies are warranted.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study evaluated the feasibility and analgesic efficacy of TDRN catheters for postoperative pain control following multilevel PSF for idiopathic scoliosis. Continuous local anesthetic delivery through TDRN catheters is a feasible and safe technique for postoperative pain control in these patients. Selective blockade of the dorsal rami might have benefits over epidural analgesia or other regional techniques.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: 3: </strong></p>","PeriodicalId":38486,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Spine Surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Spine Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14444/8601","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Approximately 38,000 scoliosis surgery correction operations are performed annually in the United States; these operations are associated with considerable postoperative pain which can be difficult to manage. This is largely attributed to an incision spanning multiple vertebral segments with paraspinal muscle dissection and retraction to facilitate the implantation of segmental hardware and rods. Frequently utilized analgesic modalities include intravenous patient-controlled analgesia and epidural analgesia, often in combination. We sought to ascertain the feasibility and analgesic efficacy of continuous thoracolumbar dorsal ramus nerve (TDRN) block using surgically placed multiorifice catheters.

Methods: Forty-two patients diagnosed with idiopathic scoliosis who underwent a posterior spinal fusion (PSF) were enrolled after consent was obtained. Patients were managed utilizing a standardized Enhanced Recovery After Surgery) protocol including a perioperative opioid-sparing regimen. Data were collected at specified time intervals during the recovery period. These data points included pain scores using the Numeric Rating Scale. Parenteral or both oral and parenteral opioid consumption doses were also collected every 4 hours. Any significant postoperative adverse events were recorded as well.

Results: A total of 42 patients had surgically placed TDRN catheters, and 40 patients were included in this study. The patients all reported low to moderate pain scores with low opioid consumption postoperatively, while the TDRN catheter delivery of local anesthetic analgesics did not result in significant complications.

Clinical relevance: A regional technique utilizing TDRN catheters could be a valuable component of the postoperative pain management protocols for PSF surgery, and additional studies are warranted.

Conclusion: This study evaluated the feasibility and analgesic efficacy of TDRN catheters for postoperative pain control following multilevel PSF for idiopathic scoliosis. Continuous local anesthetic delivery through TDRN catheters is a feasible and safe technique for postoperative pain control in these patients. Selective blockade of the dorsal rami might have benefits over epidural analgesia or other regional techniques.

Level of evidence: 3:

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
脊柱侧凸手术中使用多孔疼痛导管进行胸腰椎背侧神经阻滞的可行性和镇痛效果:前瞻性队列研究。
背景:在美国,每年约有 38,000 例脊柱侧弯矫正手术;这些手术会带来相当大的术后疼痛,而且难以控制。这主要是由于手术切口横跨多个椎体节段,需要解剖和牵拉脊柱旁肌肉,以便于植入节段性硬件和棒材。常用的镇痛方式包括患者自控的静脉镇痛和硬膜外镇痛,通常是联合使用。我们试图确定使用手术置入的多孔导管进行连续胸腰椎背侧神经(TDRN)阻滞的可行性和镇痛效果:42名被诊断为特发性脊柱侧凸并接受后路脊柱融合术(PSF)的患者在征得同意后被纳入研究。患者采用标准化的 "术后强化恢复"(Enhanced Recovery After Surgery)方案进行治疗,包括围手术期阿片类药物稀释方案。在恢复期间的特定时间间隔收集数据。这些数据包括使用数字评分量表进行的疼痛评分。此外,还每隔 4 小时收集一次肠外或口服和肠外阿片类药物的消耗剂量。任何重大术后不良事件也会被记录在案:共有 42 名患者通过手术置入了 TDRN 导管,其中 40 名患者被纳入本研究。所有患者术后疼痛评分均为低至中度,阿片类药物用量较少,而 TDRN 导管输送局麻药镇痛剂并未导致明显的并发症:利用 TDRN 导管的区域技术可能是 PSF 手术术后疼痛管理方案的重要组成部分,有必要进行更多研究:本研究评估了TDRN导管用于特发性脊柱侧弯多级PSF术后疼痛控制的可行性和镇痛效果。通过 TDRN 导管持续输送局麻药是一种可行且安全的术后疼痛控制技术。与硬膜外镇痛或其他区域性技术相比,选择性阻断背韧带可能更有优势:3:
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
162
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Spine Surgery is the official scientific journal of ISASS, the International Intradiscal Therapy Society, the Pittsburgh Spine Summit, and the Büttner-Janz Spinefoundation, and is an official partner of the Southern Neurosurgical Society. The goal of the International Journal of Spine Surgery is to promote and disseminate online the most up-to-date scientific and clinical research into innovations in motion preservation and new spinal surgery technology, including basic science, biologics, and tissue engineering. The Journal is dedicated to educating spine surgeons worldwide by reporting on the scientific basis, indications, surgical techniques, complications, outcomes, and follow-up data for promising spinal procedures.
期刊最新文献
Beyond the Limits to Become a Leading Force in Global Spine Surgery: Present and Future of Spine Surgery in Asia-Pacific. Comparing ACDF Outcomes by Cervical Spine Level: A Single Center Retrospective Cohort Study. Editorial: Embracing Rasch Analysis for Enhanced Spine Surgery Outcomes-The Outsider's Viewpoint. Editors' Introduction: High-Value Endoscopic Techniques: Integrating Surgeon Skill and Experience in Spine Surgery With Rasch Analysis. Invited Commentary: Rasch Analysis and High-Value Spinal Endoscopy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1