Radiation dose reduction and image quality improvement with ultra-high resolution temporal bone CT using deep learning-based reconstruction: An anatomical study

IF 4.9 2区 医学 Q1 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING Diagnostic and Interventional Imaging Pub Date : 2024-05-13 DOI:10.1016/j.diii.2024.05.001
{"title":"Radiation dose reduction and image quality improvement with ultra-high resolution temporal bone CT using deep learning-based reconstruction: An anatomical study","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.diii.2024.05.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>The purpose of this study was to evaluate the achievable radiation dose reduction of an ultra-high resolution computed tomography (UHR-CT) scanner using deep learning reconstruction (DLR) while maintaining temporal bone image quality equal to or better than high-resolution CT (HR-CT).</div></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><div>UHR-CT acquisitions were performed with variable tube voltages and currents at eight different dose levels (volumic CT dose index [CTDIvol] range: 4.6–79 mGy), 1024<sup>2</sup> matrix, and 0.25 mm slice thickness and reconstructed using DLR and hybrid iterative reconstruction (HIR) algorithms. HR-CT images were acquired using a standard protocol (120 kV/220 mAs; CTDI vol, 54.2 mGy, 512<sup>2</sup> matrix, and 0.5 mm slice thickness). Two radiologists rated the image quality of seven structures using a five point confidence scale on six cadaveric temporal bone CTs. A global image quality score was obtained for each CT protocol by summing the image quality scores of all structures.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>With DLR, UHR-CT at 120 kV/220 mAs (CTDIvol, 50.9 mGy) and 140 kV/220 mAs (CTDIvol, 79 mGy) received the highest global image quality scores (4.88 ± 0.32 [standard deviation (SD)] [range: 4–5] and 4.85 ± 0.35 [range: 4–5], respectively; <em>P</em> = 0.31), while HR-CT at 120 kV/220 mAs and UHR-CT at 120 kV/20 mAs received the lowest (<em>i.e</em>., 3.14 ± 0.75 [SD] [range: 2–5] and 2.97 ± 0.86 [SD] [range: 1–5], respectively; <em>P</em> = 0.14). All the DLR protocols had better image quality scores than HR-CT with HIR.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>UHR-CT with DLR can be performed with up to a tenfold reduction in radiation dose compared to HR-CT with HIR while maintaining or improving image quality.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48656,"journal":{"name":"Diagnostic and Interventional Imaging","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diagnostic and Interventional Imaging","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2211568424001190","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the achievable radiation dose reduction of an ultra-high resolution computed tomography (UHR-CT) scanner using deep learning reconstruction (DLR) while maintaining temporal bone image quality equal to or better than high-resolution CT (HR-CT).

Materials and methods

UHR-CT acquisitions were performed with variable tube voltages and currents at eight different dose levels (volumic CT dose index [CTDIvol] range: 4.6–79 mGy), 10242 matrix, and 0.25 mm slice thickness and reconstructed using DLR and hybrid iterative reconstruction (HIR) algorithms. HR-CT images were acquired using a standard protocol (120 kV/220 mAs; CTDI vol, 54.2 mGy, 5122 matrix, and 0.5 mm slice thickness). Two radiologists rated the image quality of seven structures using a five point confidence scale on six cadaveric temporal bone CTs. A global image quality score was obtained for each CT protocol by summing the image quality scores of all structures.

Results

With DLR, UHR-CT at 120 kV/220 mAs (CTDIvol, 50.9 mGy) and 140 kV/220 mAs (CTDIvol, 79 mGy) received the highest global image quality scores (4.88 ± 0.32 [standard deviation (SD)] [range: 4–5] and 4.85 ± 0.35 [range: 4–5], respectively; P = 0.31), while HR-CT at 120 kV/220 mAs and UHR-CT at 120 kV/20 mAs received the lowest (i.e., 3.14 ± 0.75 [SD] [range: 2–5] and 2.97 ± 0.86 [SD] [range: 1–5], respectively; P = 0.14). All the DLR protocols had better image quality scores than HR-CT with HIR.

Conclusion

UHR-CT with DLR can be performed with up to a tenfold reduction in radiation dose compared to HR-CT with HIR while maintaining or improving image quality.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
利用基于深度学习的重建技术,通过超高分辨率颞骨 CT 降低辐射剂量并提高图像质量:解剖学研究。
目的:本研究旨在评估使用深度学习重建(DLR)的超高分辨率计算机断层扫描(UHR-CT)可实现的辐射剂量降低,同时保持颞骨图像质量等于或优于高分辨率 CT(HR-CT):在八种不同剂量水平(容积 CT 剂量指数 [CTDIvol] 范围:4.6-79 mGy)、10242 矩阵和 0.25 毫米切片厚度下,使用可变管电压和电流进行 UHR-CT 采集,并使用 DLR 和混合迭代重建 (HIR) 算法进行重建。HR-CT 图像采用标准方案(120 kV/220 mAs;CTDI vol,54.2 mGy,5122 矩阵,0.5 毫米切片厚度)采集。两名放射科医生对六张尸体颞骨 CT 图像的七个结构的图像质量进行了五点置信度评分。将所有结构的图像质量得分相加,得出每个 CT 方案的总体图像质量得分:在 DLR 下,120 kV/220 mAs(CTDIvol, 50.9 mGy)和 140 kV/220 mAs(CTDIvol, 79 mGy)下的 UHR-CT 获得了最高的总体图像质量分数(4.88 ± 0.32[标准差(SD)] [范围:4-5] 和 4.85 ± 0.35 [范围:4-5];P = 0.31),而 120 kV/220 mAs 的 HR-CT 和 120 kV/20 mAs 的 UHR-CT 的图像质量得分最低(即:3.14 ± 0.75 [标准差(SD)] [范围:4-5])、分别为 3.14 ± 0.75 [SD] [范围:2-5] 和 2.97 ± 0.86 [SD] [范围:1-5];P = 0.14)。所有 DLR 方案的图像质量评分均优于使用 HIR 的 HR-CT 方案:结论:与使用 HIR 的 HR-CT 相比,使用 DLR 进行 UHR-CT 可将辐射剂量减少多达十倍,同时保持或改善图像质量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Diagnostic and Interventional Imaging
Diagnostic and Interventional Imaging Medicine-Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging
CiteScore
8.50
自引率
29.10%
发文量
126
审稿时长
11 days
期刊介绍: Diagnostic and Interventional Imaging accepts publications originating from any part of the world based only on their scientific merit. The Journal focuses on illustrated articles with great iconographic topics and aims at aiding sharpening clinical decision-making skills as well as following high research topics. All articles are published in English. Diagnostic and Interventional Imaging publishes editorials, technical notes, letters, original and review articles on abdominal, breast, cancer, cardiac, emergency, forensic medicine, head and neck, musculoskeletal, gastrointestinal, genitourinary, interventional, obstetric, pediatric, thoracic and vascular imaging, neuroradiology, nuclear medicine, as well as contrast material, computer developments, health policies and practice, and medical physics relevant to imaging.
期刊最新文献
CT features of tension neck subcutaneous emphysema (tension pneumocollum). Diagnostic and prognostic value of MRI-based Node-RADS for the assessment of regional lymph node metastasis in renal cell carcinoma. Evaluation of a deep learning-based software to automatically detect and quantify breast arterial calcifications on digital mammogram. Artificial intelligence for bone fracture detection: A promising tool but no substitute for human expertise. CT, MRI and contrast-enhanced ultrasound features of mucinous cystic neoplasm of the liver.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1